ASTM D2719-2013 Standard Test Methods for Structural Panels in Shear Through-the-Thickness《胶合板纵向剪切的标准试验方法》.pdf
《ASTM D2719-2013 Standard Test Methods for Structural Panels in Shear Through-the-Thickness《胶合板纵向剪切的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASTM D2719-2013 Standard Test Methods for Structural Panels in Shear Through-the-Thickness《胶合板纵向剪切的标准试验方法》.pdf(12页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Designation: D2719 89 (Reapproved 2007)D2719 13Standard Test Methods forStructural Panels in Shear Through-the-Thickness1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D2719; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the
2、 year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods determine the shear through-the-thickness properties of structural panels associated with
3、shear distortionof the major axis. Structural panels in use include plywood, wafer board, oriented strand board, and composites of veneer and ofwood based layers. Three test methods are included which differ somewhat in their application:Test Method SectionA. Small Panel Shear Test 5B. Large Panel S
4、hear Test 6C. Two Rail Shear Test 7The choice of test method will be determined in part by the purpose of the tests, characteristics of test material, and equipmentavailability. In general, Test Method B or C for large specimens is preferred when equipment, amount of test material, andexperimental p
5、lan permit.1.1.1 Test Method A: Small Panel Shear TestThis test method is suitable for testing small samples of uniform materialincluding investigations of the effects of grain direction or orientation and of many raw materials and manufacturing processvariables which influence shear properties unif
6、ormly throughout the specimen. The test method is unsuited for determining effectsof grade and manufacturing features such as density variations, knots, and core gaps within the specimen.1.1.2 Test Method B: Large Panel Shear TestThis test method is regarded as giving the most accurate modulus of ri
7、gidity andis therefore recommended for elastic tests of materials to be used in stress analysis studies of test structures. This test method alsoyields excellent shear strength values for clear material. However, in spite of the large size of the specimen, failures generally occuronly in narrow zone
8、s at the perimeter of the test area. This characteristic, a result of the heavy perimeter framing, causes this testmethod to be generally unsuited for determining grade and manufacturing effects such as density variations, core gaps, and knotsthat are not uniformly distributed throughout the panel.
9、Generally, only in cases where effects of these factors under conditions ofheavy perimeter framing are desired, should the test method be applied.1.1.3 Test Method C: Two-Rail Shear Test This test method is applicable to a wide variety of materials and problems. Thespecimen fabrication and test proc
10、edures are somewhat simpler than in Test Methods A and B. The specimen is free to shearparallel to its 24-in.(610-mm) length dimension anywhere within the 8-in. (203-mm) width between rails. Thus, the test methodis well suited for determining grade and manufacturing effects such as core gaps and kno
11、ts occupying and affecting small areas.The test method is not so ideally suited for determination of modulus of rigidity, but when adjusted for strain distribution effects,values approximating those obtained by Test Method B result. The test method simulates effects of heavy framing when expectedpla
12、nes of weakness are oriented perpendicular to rails and no framing at all when parallel to rails.NOTE 1Asmaller scale version based on the principles of this two rail shear method is contained in Test Methods D1037 section 27. The results fromTest Methods D1037 section 27 may not be equivalent to th
13、e results from Test Methods D2719 Method C.1.2 Significant differences, moderate to small in magnitude, among the three test methods have been found to exist when thesetest methods are applied to plywood of clear straight-grained veneers. Therefore, when comparisons are made among test results,it is
14、 recommended that the same test method be used throughout.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibilityof the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicabili
15、ty of regulatorylimitations prior to use.1 These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D07 on Wood and are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D07.03 on Panel Products.Current edition approved April 1, 2007Oct. 1, 2013. Published April 2007October 2013. Originally approved
16、in 1969. Last previous edition approved in 20012007 asD2719 89 (2001).(2007). DOI: 10.1520/D2719-89R07.10.1520/D2719-13.This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Becauseit m
17、ay not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current versionof the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Har
18、bor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States12. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2D1037 Test Methods for Evaluating Properties of Wood-Base Fiber and Particle Panel MaterialsD2395 Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Wood and Wood-Based MaterialsD4442 Test Methods fo
19、r Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Wood-Base Materials3. Significance and Use3.1 The strength and modulus of rigidity of structural panels in shear through-the-thickness obtained by these test methods arerequired for the rigorous design of many lumber-panel structural components such
20、as trusses with panel gussets, box beams, foldedplate roofs, and space plane structures, as well as floor and roof diaphragms, and shear walls. These properties are of secondaryimportance in typical roof deck and sheathing applications, and in crates and shipping containers.3.2 Veneer produced by sl
21、icing or rotary peeling may contain fine checks or separations parallel to the grain on the knife sideof the veneer that are produced as the knife is forced through the wood. These checks are termed “knife checks” to distinguishthem from occasional checks that may be formed on the opposite side of t
22、he veneer by forces at the compression bar, and fromchecks caused by drying. Average depth of knife checks has been found to strongly influence shear properties in plywood panelsand may be of significance in veneer incorporated in composite panels. Measurement of depth of knife checks is recommended
23、in these test methods.3.3 To control or define other variables influencing shear properties, these test methods require determination of moisturecontent and elapsed time to failure. The conditioning of test material in controlled atmosphere and determination of specific gravityare recommended.4. Con
24、trol of Moisture Content4.1 Structural panel samples to be tested at a specific temperature/relative humidity shall be conditioned to approximate constantweight in controlled atmospheric conditions before gluing wood rails. Conditioning of fabricated specimens at the sametemperature and relative hum
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASTMD27192013STANDARDTESTMETHODSFORSTRUCTURALPANELSINSHEARTHROUGHTHETHICKNESS 胶合板 纵向 剪切 标准 试验 方法 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-513411.html