ASHRAE LV-11-C073-2011 Role of Radiant Panel Heating and Cooling in Net Zero Energy Buildings.pdf
《ASHRAE LV-11-C073-2011 Role of Radiant Panel Heating and Cooling in Net Zero Energy Buildings.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASHRAE LV-11-C073-2011 Role of Radiant Panel Heating and Cooling in Net Zero Energy Buildings.pdf(8页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、 oabRTppbbttUccCO u KKK12Role of Radiant Panel Heating and Cooling in Net Zero Energy Buildings Birol Kilkis, Ph.D. Fellow ASHRAE ABSTRACT For a successful and sustainable net-zero energy building, a careful match and balance between the supply exergy and demand exergy is essential. Especially in lo
2、w-exergy buildings, radiant panels offer unique advantages primarily due to their moderate temperature and particularly low-exergy demands. A parametric study is included in the presentation in order to better quantify the benefits of radiant panel systems in view of energy and exergy benefits. A ne
3、w solar tri-generation system is presented, which acts like a solar PV on the outside and acts as panel cooling in the inside. This system replaces non-load bearing external wall elements and offer substantial energy and carbon emission efficiencies. INTRODUCTION The overall success of radiant panel
4、 heating and cooling depends on exergy of the type of energy source used in the building. For example, if fossil fuel is the energy source, the exergy efficiency of a radiant panel heating system in a “low-exergy building” may prove to have lower rational exergy management efficiency than other hydr
5、onic or even forced-air systems. In order to correct this apparent issue, a radiant panel system, which is a low-exergy demanding system must be coupled with low-exergy energy resources like low-intensity renewables or waste heat or cold. When the objective is to reduce carbon emissions especially f
6、or net-zero energy buildings, usually solar and wind energy resources are prioritized. For example, solar collectors are used for space heating in several countries in conjunction with radiant panel systems. In fact both make a good coupling due to the fact that moderate temperatures that may be del
7、ivered with solar collectors make a good match with moderate water temperature requirement of radiant panel systems. This match also reduces carbon emissions, because such a good temperature match also replicates itself in exergy match. According to the Rational Exergy Management Model (REMM), the c
8、ompound carbon emission per hour is given in Equation 1. Here, cbis the carbon equivalency of the energy source and is the first-law efficiency of the system. The subscript “ p” stands for the power plant that the building is attached via the grid, with an overall power delivery efficiency of T. The
9、 term Ubstands for the overall heat transfer coefficient of the building envelope (W/K). (1) The term Ris the REMM efficiency (Kilkis, S. 2009). The second term represents avoidable carbon emissions due to exergy imbalances. Equation 3 is the demand exergy for unit load and Equation 4 is the supply
10、exergy based on the supply temperature Tfof the energy source in kelvin. Trefis the environment reference temperature. supHHdemR (2) Birol Kilkis is a professor at Bakent University and Head of Energy Engineering Graduate Program, Ankara LV-11-C073602 ASHRAE Transactions2011. American Society of Hea
11、ting, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (www.ashrae.org). Published in ASHRAE Transactions, Volume 117, Part 1. For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAES prior written permission.(11
12、.7%) 0.11735.017.085.055.01111 CHPErefCHPECHPHrefCHPHPESPVTKK arefdemTT1H(3) frefTT1supH(4) DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW RATING PARAMETER Radiant panel heating technology is recently coupled in many countries with PVT (Solar photovoltaic and heat). Radiant panel cooling is also possible now by PVTC (Solar P
13、hotovoltaic, thermal, and cooling) systems. Speaking about PVT, a new rating parameter, which is not available yet, was developed in this study in order to accurately quantify benefits of coupling PVT and PVTC technology with radiant panel heating and cooling concept. This new rating parameter combi
14、nes environmental benefits and fuel savings benefits. To begin with the development of the new parameter, PES equation of the EU Directive 1 on co-generation, aka Combined Heat and Power (CHP), may be adopted to form a trial form of PESPVTsolution: (5) The reference values CHPEref and CHPHref are gi
15、ven in the same Directive. Because the solar PVT is on-site, the reference efficiency values must be selected accordingly (on-site availability of energy and power). The overall electric power generation, distribution, and transmission efficiency is about 0.35. In a typical PVT system, solar- therma
16、l efficiency is about 0.55 and solar-power efficiency is typically 0.17. The condensing-boiler reference efficiency is about 85% on average load. Yet, the result obtained by the above trial form of PESPVTequation and the moderate fuel savings percentage does not represent actual benefits of a PVT sy
17、stem. This is primarily because it does not factor in the rational exergy management efficiency, namely R, which is a strong metric about environmental benefits of alternative energy systems. A recent study has modified Equation 5 in terms of R. The result is PESRPVT2: (6) Here, RPVTfor PVT is appro
18、ximately equal to 0.34. The reference value, namely Rref is 0.2024 3. The result is not successful again and in fact, meaningless, because what it tells us is that one may save only 18% of fossil fuel “used.” In a solar PV or PVT system, no fossil fuel use is involved unless a fossil fuel-hybrid sys
19、tem is employed. Above two tries to factor in benefits of radiant panel systems to PVT and PVTC systems are not successful. This condition justifies the need for a new rating parameter for alternative energy-combined heat and power systems. The new parameter is a simple modification of Equation 6. T
20、hen actual fuel savings of a solar PVT system, which supplies all power and heat demand (QA/Q =1) is: (7) Here, QAis the sum of all heat (and or cold) supplied by a solar and or any other alternative energy resource. Q is the total heat and power demand of the building. If for example, in a hybrid (
21、Boiler and grid power integrated solar PVT) system QA/Q is 0.45, then Equation 7 gives a fuel savings ratio of 0.4775 (47.75%) for the same example. In a further refinement of Equation 7 exergy difference between heat and power is recognized: (18%) 0.1834.022024.0235.017.085.055.0112211 u u RPVTRref
22、RPVTCHPErefCHPECHPHrefCHPHPESKK (100%) 11 RPVTARPVTRAPESQQPESPES 2011 ASHRAE 603(8) In Equation 8, Q terms are broken down into heat and power components and into their respective exergy values, namely 0AH, 0AE, 0HH, 0EE. Exergy of electric power, namely 0AEand 0EEwere taken unity. Compare a PVT sys
23、tem with a condensing-type “wall-mounted combi” heater used on-site (in the building) in summer for domestic hot water supply, where the electric power is supplied from the national grid. PESRcombivalue in this case is negative even the condensing boiler may have a peak on-site thermal efficiency of
24、 0.95. This is primarily because; it does not generate power at all. Actually a “high-efficiency” boiler wastes fuel rather than saving it 4, 5. Therefore, the overall energy savings of a PVT system compared to natural-gas condensing boiler is 108%. PVTCI CONCEPT In spite of their environmental bene
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASHRAELV11C0732011ROLEOFRADIANTPANELHEATINGANDCOOLINGINNETZEROENERGYBUILDINGSPDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-455476.html