ARMY ADS-44-HDBK-2006 ARMAMENT AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION FOR U S ARMY AIRCRAFT《美国军用飞机的装备适航资格》.pdf

《ARMY ADS-44-HDBK-2006 ARMAMENT AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION FOR U S ARMY AIRCRAFT《美国军用飞机的装备适航资格》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ARMY ADS-44-HDBK-2006 ARMAMENT AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION FOR U S ARMY AIRCRAFT《美国军用飞机的装备适航资格》.pdf（105页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、ADS-44-HDBK 3 February 2006 SUPERSEDING ADS-44 APRIL 1990 CAGE Code 81 996 AERONAUTICAL DESIGN STANDARD HANDBOOK ARMAMENT AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION FOR U.S. ARMY AIRCRAFT This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document as a requirement. AMSC NIA FSC 1OGP DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. App

2、roved for public release, distribution is unlimited. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-FOREWORD 1. This handbook is approved for use by the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command and is available for use by all Departme

3、nts and Agencies of the Department of Defense. 2. This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document as a requirement. If it is, the contractor does not have to comply. 3. This handbook provides guidance for airworthiness qualification of armament on U.S. Army aircraft. Compared to the AD

4、S-44 it supersedes, this handbook provides a more comprehensive discussion of the Armys armament airworthiness qualification process and the related analysis, test, and documentation requirements. It is intended as a reference guide for military and civilian personnel who are preparing program docum

5、ents such as Airworthiness Qualification Plans and statements-of-work. It can be used as a tutorial for persons unfamiliar with the Armys armament aiworthiness qualification process. It is not intended as a design guide. This handbook also includes format changes to comply with MIL-STD-967, Departme

6、nt of Defense Standard Practice for Defense Handbooks Format and Content. 4. This handbook was developed as an Army supplement to tri-service documents on armament and stores compatibility. The reader is encouraged to refer to the tri-service documents listed in the Applicable Documents paragraph, e

7、specially MIL-STD-1289, MIL-HDBK-244, MIL-HDBK-1763 and JSSG-2001B. Any contradictions of this handbook with the tri-service documents should be brought to the attention of the office identified in paragraph 6. Guidelines for the use of international standardization agreements are not provided in th

8、is handbook. 5. Comments or questions should be addressed to Commander, U. S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-SE-TD-ST, 5400 Fowler Road, Huntsville, AL 35898-5000 or emailed to WilliamSmithrdec.re

9、dstone.army.mil. Since contact information can change, you may want to verify the currency of this address information using the ASSIST Online database at htt:l/assist.das.dla.millonlinelsta 6. Technical questions may be addressed to the following office: U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Research, Dev

10、elopment and Engineering Center Redstone Arsenal ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AE-S-W Building 4488, Room C-316 Huntsville, AL 35898-5000 Telephone: Commercial (256) 313-8465 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-AERONAUTICAL DESIGN STANDARD HANDBOOK ARM

11、AMENT AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION FOR U.S. ARMY AIRCRAFT FUNCTIONAL DIVISIOFI: David B. Cripps Chief, Mission Equipment Division Aviation Engineering Directorate Research, Development, and Engineering Command f SUBMITTED BY: Acting Director of Aviation Engineering Research, Development, and Engineer

12、ing Command APPROVED BY: e.g. a UAV. An armament that is fired from an airborne vehicle is normally considered to be a subsystem of the air vehicle. This document provides the requirements to fully qualify armament on a U.S. Army aircraft. See ADS-45-HDBK for the data and tests that are needed to ob

13、tain an Airworthiness Release (AWR) or Contractor Flight Release (CFR) for the testing of armament on U.S. Army aircraft. The Army organization that assesses the airworthiness, when the weapon system is mounted or used on an Army aircraft, is the Aviation Engineering Directorate (AED) in the Aviatio

14、n and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. This is so even when another agency is the proponent or materiel developer for a weapon such as a gun or ammunition. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1. General. The documents listed below are not necessarily

15、all of the documents referenced herein, but are those needed to understand the information provided by this handbook. 2.2. Government documents. 2.2.1. Specifications, standards, and handbooks. The following specifications, standards, and handbooks form a part of this document to the extent specifie

16、d herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those listed in the issue of the Department of Defense Index of Specifications and Standards (DoDISS) and supplement thereto, cited in the solicitation. JSSG-2001 B Air Vehicle JSSG-2010-7 Crew Systems, Crash Protection Handbook

17、 MIL-A-8591 Airborne Stores, Suspension Equipment and Aircraft-Store Interface (Carriage Phase); General Design Criteria 1 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Electrical Load and Power Source Capacity, Aircraft, Analysis of Environmental

18、and Performance Tests for Fuze and Fuze Components Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems Aircraft Electric Power Characteristics Test Method Standard for Environmental En

19、gineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests Standard Practice for System Safety Airborne Stores, Ground Fit and Compatibility Requirements Safety Criteria for Fuze Design Safety Design Requirements for Military Lasers and Associated Support Equipment Safety Criteria and Qualification Requirements

20、for Pyrotechnic Initiated Explosive (PIE) Ammunition Human Engineering Electric Equipment, Aircraft, Selection and Installation Hazards to Electromagnetic Radiation Ordnance (HERO) Test Guide Guide to AircraWStores Compatibility System Safety Engineering Design Guide for Army Materiel Fire Control S

21、ystems, General Electroexplosive Subsystems, Electrically Initiated, Design Requirements and Test Methods AircraWStores Compatibility: Systems Engineering Data Requirements and Test Procedures Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-HDBK-

22、2069 Aircraft Survivability Copies of the above specifications, standards, and handbooks are available from the Standardization Document Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 191 11-5094 or online at the following web site: http:/assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/) 2.2.2. Other Gover

23、nment documents, drawinqs, and publications. The following other Government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this document to the extent specified herein. AR 70-62 Airworthiness Qualification of U.S. Army Aircraft Systems AR 385-16 System Safety Engineering and Management AR 385-

24、63 Range Safety ADS-1 B-PRF Rotorcraft Propulsion System Airworthiness Qualification Requirements Ground and Flight Test Surveys and Demonstrations ADS-20-HDBK Armament and Fire Control System Survey for Army Aircraft ADS-33E-PRF Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft ADS-37A-PRF El

25、ectromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Performance and Verification Requirements ADS-45-HDBK Data and Test Requirements for Airworthiness Release for U.S. Army Helicopter Armament Testing (Guns, Missiles, Rockets) ADS-50-PRF Rotorcraft Propulsion Performance and Qualification Requirements and Guid

26、elines ADS-51-HDBK Rotorcraft upon which the design or operational limits of the aircraft, stores, or portions thereof are based. 3.1 .I 9. Degrade: Any decomposition to a system that prevents or causes it to not perform in its intended manner. 3.1.20. Dispense. The intentional separation from an ai

27、rborne dispenser of devices, weapons, submunitions, liquids, gases, or other matter, for purposes of employment of the items being dispensed. 3.1.21. Dispersion. A scattered pattern of hits around the mean point of impact (MPI) of bombs and projectiles dropped or fired under identical conditions. 3.

28、1.21 .I. Dispersion, aircraft. Refers to the errors that contribute to the overall ballistic error budget such as sensor errors, on-board avionics errors, timing delays, rotor downwash, fire control, or variation in rack ejection forces. 3.1.21.2. Dispersion. ballistic. Weapon-to-weapon variation in

29、 the free-stream ballistic flight path which is attributed to manufacturing tolerances such as mass and physical properties, and accidental misalignments occurring during assembly and handling of the weapon. 3.1.21.3. Dispersion, system. The total dispersion due to the weapon, aircraft and weather e

30、ffects such as wind. 3.1.22. Electromaqnetic compatibility IEMC). The capability of electrical and electronic systems, equipment, and devices to operate in their intended electromagnetic environment within a defined margin of safety, and at design levels of performance, without suffering or causing

31、unacceptable degradation as a result of electromagnetic interference. 3.1.23. Ejection. Separation of a store with the assistance of a force imparted from a device, either external or internal to the store. 3.1.24. Electromaqnetic environment effects (E3). The impact of the electromagnetic environme

32、nt upon the operational capability of military forces, equipmen systems and platforms. It encompasses all electromagnetic disciplines, including electromagnetic compatibility; electromagnetic interference; electromagnetic vulnerability; electromagnetic pulse; hazards of electromagnetic radiation to

33、personnel, ordnance and volatile materials; and natural phenomena effects of lightning and precipitation static (p-static). Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-3.1.25. Electromaqnetic interference (EMI). Any electromagnetic disturbance, w

34、hether intentional or not, that interrupts, obstructs, or otherwise degrades or limits the effective performance of electronic or electrical equipment. 3.1.26. Ernplovment. The use of a store for the purpose and in the manner for which it was designed, such as releasing a bomb, launching a missile,

35、firing a gun, or dispensing a submunition. 3.1.27. or between a store and suspension equipment. 3.1.55. Separation effects. A model of the weapon motion from the moment it is released until oscillations caused by the aircraft flow field are dampened. They are currently modeled as a function of relea

36、se variables such as velocitylMach number, normal acceleration, angle of attack, and dynamic pressure. These coefficients may be incorporated into the ballistic tables andlor into a separation effects algorithm in the Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without licen

37、se from IHS-,-,-aircraft ballistic operational flight program (OFP). The coefficients used in the separation effect algorithm may result in aircraft velocity adjustments used in the air-to- surface trajectory calculations or may incorporate changes in the mode of trajectory calculation. 3.1.56. Stat

38、ement of Airworthiness Qualification (SAQ). A final document establishing full qualification status and airworthiness release that is issued in conjunctionwith the AQSR normally completing an airworthiness qualification program. The SAQ contains a description of the configuration of the air vehicle,

39、 operating instructions and procedures, limitations and restrictions, and requirements for sustaining airworthiness. An SAQ may be issued temporarily as an interim SAQ (ISAQ). See ISAQ. 3.1.57. Store. See aircraft-store above 3.1.58. Submunition. Any munition that, to perform its task, separates fro

40、m a parent munition. 3.1.59. Suspension eauipment. All aircraft devices such as racks, adapters, missile launchers, and pylons used for carriage, employment and jettison of aircraft stores. 3.1.60. Technical manuals. Manuals that contain the approved data required for the loading, carriage and emplo

41、yment of a store. Pertinent manual types include the following: 3.1.60.1. Army Technical Manuals (TMs). a. TM 55-1 520-XXX-XXX - Aircraft Technical Manuals b. TM 55-1520-XXX-10 - Operators Manual c. TM 55-1520-XXX-23 - Maintenance Manual d. TM 55-1520-XXX-23P - Parts Manual e. TM 9-XXXX-XXX-XX - Arm

42、ament Technical Manuals 3.1.60.2. Air Force Technical Orders (TOs). a. Aircraft - 1 TO - Flight Manual b. Aircraft - 2 TO - Aircraft Maintenance Manual c. Aircraft - 5 TO - Basic Weight Checklist and Loading Data d. Aircraft - 16 TO - Nuclear Weapons Loading Procedures e. Aircraft - 25 TO - Nuclear

43、Bombs Delivery Manual f. Aircraft - 30 TO - Nuclear Missile Delivery Manual g. Aircraft - 33 TO - Non-nuclear Munitions Loading Procedures h. Aircraft - 34 TO - Non-nuclear Munitions Delivery Manual i. Aircraft - 35 TO - Non-munitions Stores Installation and Removal Procedures j. Aircraft - 100 TO -

44、 Aircraft Modifications Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-3.1.60.3. Navv Technical Manuals. a. NAVAIR 01-XXXXX-1 Flight Manuals b. NAVAIR 01-XXXXX-IT Tactical Manuals 3.1.61. Warninqs, Cautions, and Advisories NVCA). A term that describ

45、es the operating limitations, restrictions and advisory “Notes“, “Cautions“ and “Warnings“ established through the System Safety Program. They are used in flight releases, technical manuals and aircraft software to warn or inform the crew. 3.1.61.1. Note. An operating procedure, practice, or conditi

46、on that must be highlighted. 3.1.61.2. Caution. An operating procedure, practice, or condition which, if not strictly observed, could result in damage to or destruction of equipment, or minor injury 3.1.61.3. Warninq. An operating procedure, practice, or condition which, if not correctly followed, c

47、ould result in severe injury to personnel or loss of life, or loss of a major system. 3.2Acronvms and abbreviations. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license

48、from IHS-,-,-Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,- -.- - - - SRS I Software Requirements Speclflcaton SIL SOF SOW Software Integration Laboratory Safety-of-Flight Statement of Work SSHA SSMP SSPP SSRA SSS STANAG STD STP System Safety Hazard Analysis System Safety Management Plan System Safety Program Plan System Safety Risk Assessment SystemlSubsystem Specification Standardization Agreement Software Test Description Software Test Plan STR SVD TNDS TC TEMP TEPP TP 4. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - . .-. . . Software Test Report Software Vers