CALMAC MEETING.ppt

《CALMAC MEETING.ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《CALMAC MEETING.ppt（16页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、CALMAC MEETING,July 18, 2007 Pacific Energy Center,Shel Feldman,Memorial ServiceMemorial services will be held this Thursday morning, July 19, in Madison at 9:00 am at the Cress Funeral Home on Speedway. Directly following the service the family, and anyone who wishes to come, will travel to Chicago

2、 for interment at the Shalom Memorial Park in Arlington Heights. Following will be a reception at Shels sisters home in Chicago. Anyone living in the Chicago area is invited to attend. If you would like to participate, please contact Cara Lee Mahany Braithwait (sambCAE; 608-231-2552) for additional

3、details.Shel & Eve Feldman FundIEPEC has changed the name of the recently established Eve Feldman Scholarship Fund to the Shel & Eve Feldman Fund. You can contribute to the fund by donating money to IEPEC earmarked for this fund. Send the check to Jane Peters, P.O. Box 12312, Portland, Oregon 97212.

4、 Write it out to IEPEC and make a note on the check that it is for the Shel & Eve Feldman Fund. The first scholarships from this fund will be awarded at IEPEC next month. At least one person from Shels family will be at IEPEC to present the scholarships to the students who will be benefiting from th

5、is fund.Letters of CondolenceLetters of condolence can be sent to: Nikki Boyle (Shels daughter)5201 Timber Cove Baton Rouge. LA 70808,Attribution & Net-To-Gross in the New Millenium,Rafael Friedmann CALMAC Meeting July 18, 2007 Pacific Energy Center,Objectives for CALMAC 2007,Present key results of

6、recent EM&V studies of Californias Energy Efficiency Programs Identify results that apply to 2006-08 programsShowcase the variety of evaluation projects undertakenProvide a forum for evaluators and implementers to exchange informationIdentify key researchable issues going forward,Evaluation in the C

7、ontext of the Big & Bold World,Context is changing to much more EE-friendly! Private & Public engaged/interested/taking action 30 years of efforts: InfrastructureHarvest Time! Big-Bold Efforts Being Considered Seek multi-partner involvement Focus on much longer-term results Issues for Evaluation: At

8、tribution of savings? NTG? Need to focus on data collection & methods in this new world!,Agenda July 18, 2007,9:30 - 9:45 Introduction Rafael Friedmann CALMAC Chair 20079:45 11: 00 Evaluators Panel presents recent efforts & views on Attribution and NTGTami Rasmussen “NTG for California IOUs 2004-200

9、5 Upstream Lighting Program”Donald R. Dohrmann “Methods for Estimating Net Savings for Statewide Residential Appliance Recycling Program“Dan Violette “Select Issues in Attribution and Net-to-Gross Practical Examples for Discussion”Clark Bernier “NTG in the New Construction arena”Mike Rufo “NTG in Lo

10、ng Lead Time Situations”Doug Mahone “Codes & Standards: New Evaluation Findings & Updated Ex-Ante Estimates”11:00 -12:00 Discussion on Attribution and Role of NTG13:00-14:00 Discussion on Alternative Methods for Attribution14:00-15:00 Action Plan What Next?15:00 Concludes,Net-To-Gross for California

11、 IOUs 2004-2005 Upstream Lighting Program,Tami Rasmussen,Methods for Estimating Net Savings for Statewide Residential Appliance Recycling Program,Donald R. Dohrmann,Select Issues in Attribution and Net-to-Gross Practical Examples for Discussion,Dan Violette,Net-To-Gross in the New Construction Arena

12、,Clark Bernier,Net-To-Gross in Long Lead Time Situations,Mike Rufo,Codes & Standards: New Evaluation Findings & Updated Ex-Ante Estimates,Doug Mahone,Discussion on Attribution and Role of NTG,If our purpose is to maximize cost-effective energy savings to society, Can evaluation still provide credibl

13、e attribution findings for Portfolio & Program optimization?Can NTG (free riders &/or spillover) be accurately estimated in todays context?What key conditions are needed for accurate estimation of NTG and/or attribution?Where do these key conditions still exist? Where dont they?,Discussion on Altern

14、ative Methods for Attribution,For situations where NTG no longer is deemed credible,Can alternative evaluation methods still provide credible attribution findings for Portfolio & Program optimization?Do these alternate methods need to be specific by customer segment, market situation, programs and/o

15、r measures? What key data are needed for accurate estimation of attribution?Do we collect this data already? What data is still needed?,Action Plan What Next?,For situations where NTG no longer is deemed credible for attribution of savings,How can the evaluation community determine the best course to follow?What are the roles of key players within California and Nationwide?What are key action items and who will be responsible for them?What key deadlines need results of this work?,Thanks!,Please submit issues for future CALMAC Meetings to: 415 972 5799,