专业英语四级(阅读)-试卷149及答案解析.doc
《专业英语四级(阅读)-试卷149及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《专业英语四级(阅读)-试卷149及答案解析.doc(11页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、专业英语四级(阅读)-试卷149及答案解析 (总分:30.00,做题时间:90分钟)一、READING COMPREHENSIO(总题数:11,分数:30.00)1.PART V READING COMPREHENSION_2.SECTION AIn this section there are several passages followed by ten multiple-choice questions. For each question, there are four suggested answers marked A, B, C and D. Choose the one th
2、at you think is the best answer._The government has launched its consultation on better measures of child poverty, but it really has to be asked, better for whom? This is a government that looks set to preside over a truly dramatic increase in child poverty. The Institute for Fiscal Studies projects
3、 that after a decade of steady reductions in child poverty rates, 300, 000 more children will be living in poverty in the U. K. by 2015. Big cuts to tax credits, a three-year freeze in child benefit, uprating out-of-work benefits using CPI rather than the more generous RPIall will make vulnerable fa
4、milies poor over the course of this parliament, So what does the government do about it? Rather than review its policies and ask how it can seek to fulfill its legal commitments under the Child Poverty Act 2010, it launches a consultation on the way that child poverty is measured. Poverty is a compl
5、ex phenomenon and no single indicator can fully capture the condition. The CPA 2010 recognizes this, urging governments to make progress against four specific measures; relative poverty, absolute poverty, material deprivation and persistent poverty. Alongside this, we also track numerous other indic
6、ators of child well-being in the U. K. such as educational achievement, health outcomes and subjective experience. Both lain Duncan Smith and David Laws sought to convince the audience at the launch of the consultation that the government was not in retreat from the income measures contained in the
7、CPA 2010. But in truth, the consultation document is peppered with digs at the relative measure, suggesting that changes to this indicator do not tell us anything meaningful about real poverty. The consultation also seeks to dilute the relevance of income by developing a multidimensional indicator o
8、f child poverty. This indicator will blend together measures of worklessness, unmanageable debt and family stability among others to produce a single headline number that can be tracked over time. At best, the government is combining poverty with its many consequences. At worst, it is simply changin
9、g the yardstick against which they will be measured. Consider, for example, the proposal that parental worklessness be a key defining feature of the new child poverty measure. Using current definitions, 60% of children living in poverty today have at least one parent in work. Any measure that insist
10、s poverty is about worklessness will simply airbrush these 1.4 million children out of the picture altogether. Equally worryingly, the consultation insists that any new poverty measure must resonate with the public. The latest British Social Attitudes survey shows just how widespread negative views
11、of vulnerable groups in society are, but also makes clear that much of this shift in public opinion has been caused by current and previous government policies. So, should we expect better measures of child poverty as a result of the consultation? Not better for the children growing up in low-income
12、 families for sure. And given the broader costs to society of child poverty, not better for anyone elseexcept, perhaps, a government that we suspect may be trying to avoid being held to account.(分数:6.00)(1).What will NOT lead vulnerable families to poverty according to the first paragraph?(分数:2.00)A
13、.Sharp decline in tax credits.B.A three-year freeze in child benefit.C.Increasing unemployment benefits.D.The adoption of RPI instead of CPI.(2).The multidimensional indicator adopts the following measures EXCEPT_.(分数:2.00)A.educational accomplishmentB.unemploymentC.unpayable debtD.family stability(
14、3).It can be inferred from the last paragraph that_.(分数:2.00)A.we can get better measures of child poverty from this consultationB.changing the child poverty measures cant help poor childrenC.the government cant benefit from better measures of child povertyD.the government avoids taking the responsi
15、bilityComedys legendary Monty Python membersyou know, Im a lumberjack(伐木工)and Im okay, the Killer Rabbit, the Dead Parrotwere tired of seeing their legendary sketches pirated and fuzzily posted on YouTube, free to whoever wanted a quick laugh. So they posted their own, higher-quality versions on You
16、Tubealso freebut let fans know that complete DVD versions were available for purchase. Sales rose 23, 000 percent. Free worked, and worked brilliantly. People are making lots of money charging nothing. Not nothing for everything, but nothing for enough that we have essentially created a country-size
17、d economy around the price of $0.00. Anderson, 48, the editor of Wired magazine, discussed the allure of zero with Jesse Kornbluth. In the 20th century, free meant giving away one thing to create demand for another. Get a free cell phone, for example, by buying a monthly plan. What is free now? Yes,
18、 20th-century free was about real objects made of atoms. Real costs were involved, so the consumer paid one way or another. In the 21st century, free is digital bit with marginal costs. For all practical purposes, they really are free. In the digital economy, someone pays, but increasingly its not y
19、ou. Google and Wikipedia, for example, dont show up on your credit card. So how do you pay? Not with money, but with your time and attention. Some resources, of course, are scarce and getting scarcer; you pay for those. Digital goods and services, because they can be reproduced and distributed at al
20、most no cost, are abundant. Once youve given content away on the Web, can you get people to pay? Absolutely. Use free to get an audience, then segment your user base so you have a free version and a premium one. The Wall Street Journal created a clever hybridsome free articles, some available only t
21、o paid subscribers. I get the sense thatwhen it comes to news, anywaywell soon have two classes of Internet users: 1)people who have money and will pay for quality reporting and analysis, and 2)people who are less well-off or care less about quality and will accept any information thats free. So the
22、 elite will be better informed, and others may get trashier media. Im simply observing what happens in economics when marginal costs fall. In economic terms, free is the law of gravity. I dont tell the apple to fall; it just falls. I dont tell water to flow downhill; it just does. In that way, its s
23、imple: As costs approach zero, free prevails.(分数:6.00)(1).We can infer from the second and third paragraphs that in the 21st century_.(分数:2.00)A.all information is freeB.digital economy has been the most importantC.the real free commodity finally shows upD.a free cell phone does not exist any more(2
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 专业 英语四 阅读 试卷 149 答案 解析
