大学英语六级真题2011年12月及答案解析.doc
《大学英语六级真题2011年12月及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学英语六级真题2011年12月及答案解析.doc(30页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级真题 2011年 12月及答案解析(总分:710.00,做题时间:120 分钟)一、Part Writing(总题数:1,分数:142.00)1.Directions:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled The Way to Success by commenting on Abraham Lincolns famous remark ,“ Give me six hours to chop down a tree, and I will spend the first
2、four sharpening the axe.“ You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words. The Way to Success _ _ _ (分数:142.00)_二、Part Reading Compr(总题数:1,分数:71.00)Googles Plan for Worlds Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy? In recent years, teams of workers dispatched by Google hav
3、e been working hard to make digital copies of books. So far,Google has scanned more than 10 million titles from libraries in America and Europeincluding half a million volumes held by the Bodleian in Oxford. The exact method it uses is unclear: the company does not allow outsiders to observe the pro
4、cess. Why is Google undertaking such a venture? Why is it even interested in all those out-of-print library books, most of which have been gathering dust on forgotten shelves for decades? The company claims its motives are essentially public-spirited. Its overall mission, after all, is to “organise
5、the worlds information“, so it would be odd if that information did not include books. The company likes to present itself as having lofty aspirations. “This really isnt about making money. We are doing this for the good of society.“ As Santiago de la Mora, head of Google Books for Europe, puts it:
6、“By making it possible to search the millions of books that exist today,we hope to expand the frontiers of human knowledge.“ Dan Clancy,the chief architect of Google Books, does seem genuine in his conviction that this is primarily a philanthropic(慈善的)exercise. “Googles core business is search and f
7、ind,so obviously what helps improve Googles search engine is good for Google,“ he says, “But we have never built a spreadsheet (电子数据表)outlining the financial benefits of this,and I have never had to justify the amount l am spending to the companys founders.“ It is easy,talking to Clancy and his coll
8、eagues, to be swept along by their missionary passion. But Googles book-scanning project is proving controversial. Several opponents have recently emerged, ranging from rival tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon to small bodies representing authors and publishers across the world. In broad terms
9、, these opponents have levelled two sets of criticisms at Google. First, they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving the worlds books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company. In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books, Robert Darnton, the head of
10、Harvard Universitys library, argued that because such books are a common resourcethe possession of us allonly public, not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them. The second related criticism is that Googles scanning of books is actually illegal. This allegation has led to Google
11、 becoming mired in (陷入)a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Charles Dickens Bleak House look straightforward. At its centre,however, is one simple issue: that of copyright. The inconvenient fact about most books, to which Google has arguably paid insuffic
12、ient attention,is that they are protected by copyright. Copyright laws differ from country to country,but in general protection extends for the duration of an authors life and for a substantial period afterwards,thus allowing the authors heirs to benefit. (In Britain and America, this post-death per
13、iod is 70 years.) This means,of course, that almost all of the books published in the 20th century are still under copyrightand last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined. Of the roughly 40 million books in US libraries,for example,an estimated 32 million are in co
14、pyright. Of these,some 27 million are out of print. Outside the us, Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the “public domain“ (works such as the Bodleians first edition of Middlemarch, which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search). But,within the US,
15、the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works. In its defence, Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are in copyrightarguing that such displays are “fair use“. But critics allege that by making electronic copies of these books without first seeki
16、ng the permission of copyright holders,Google has committed piracy. “The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied only once authors have expressly given their permission,“ says Piers Blofeld,of the Sheil Land literary agency in London. “Google has reversed this-it has
17、simply copied all these works without bothering to ask,“ In 2005, the Authors Guild of America, together with a group of US publishers,launched a class action suit (集团诉讼 )against Google that,after more than two years of negotiation,ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimant
18、s had reached an out-of-court settlement. The full details are complicated the text alone runs to 385 pagesand trying to summarise it is no easy task. “Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible,“ says Blofeld,one of the settlements most vocal British critics. Broadly,the deal prov
19、ides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached (including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works). In exchange for this, the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future. This settlement hands Google the powerbut onl
20、y with the agreement of individual rights holdersto exploit its database of out-of-print books. It can include them in subscription deals sold to libraries or sell them individually under a consumer licence. It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlements most controversial aspect
21、. Critics point out that, by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database, the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the companys role from provider of information to seller. “Googles business model has always been to provide information for free, and sell advertising on the
22、 basis of the traffic this generates,“ points out James Grimmelmann, associate professor at New York Law School. Now, he says, because of the settlements provisions,Google could become a significant force in bookselling. Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on “orphan“ works, where
23、there is no known copyright holderthese make up an estimated 5-10% of the books Google has scanned. Under the settlement, when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work, commercial control automatically reverts to Google. Google will be able to display up to 20% of orphan
24、works for free,include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer licence. It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted (执行)it is the subject of a fairness hearing in the US courts. But if it is enacted, Google will in effect be
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 英语六级 2011 12 答案 解析 DOC
