ISO TR 17119-2005 Health informatics - Health informatics profiling framework《健康信息学 健康信息学轮廓描述框架》.pdf

《ISO TR 17119-2005 Health informatics - Health informatics profiling framework《健康信息学 健康信息学轮廓描述框架》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ISO TR 17119-2005 Health informatics - Health informatics profiling framework《健康信息学 健康信息学轮廓描述框架》.pdf（36页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 Reference number ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) ISO 2005TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 17119 First edition 2005-01-15 Health informatics Health informatics profiling framework Informatique de sant Cadre de profil dinformatique de sant ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) PDF disclaimer This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces.

2、 In accordance with Adobes licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing

3、Adobes licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this area. Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were optimized

4、for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below. ISO 2005 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part

5、of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISOs member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office Case postale 56

6、CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 749 09 47 E-mail copyrightiso.org Web www.iso.org Published in Switzerland ii ISO 2005 All rights reservedISO/TR 17119:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reserved iiiContents Page Foreword iv Introduction v 1 Scope 1 1.1 General. 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 Bene

7、fits 1 1.4 Target users. 2 2 Terms and definitions. 2 3 Health informatics profiling framework Overview 3 3.1 General. 3 3.2 What is the health informatics profiling framework? 4 3.3 How to use the health informatics profiling framework 4 4 Health informatics profiling framework approach. 6 4.1 Over

8、view of approach. 6 4.2 Artefact profiling . 6 4.3 Framework evolution 10 5 Reference and comparisons of health informatics profiling framework to other initiatives 11 Annex A (informative) Background 12 Annex B (informative) Health informatics profiling framework example meta-model 14 Annex C (info

9、rmative) Framework cell examples 17 Annex D (informative) Comparisons to other frameworks and models . 21 Annex E (informative) Health informatics profiling framework prototype tool and further exploration opportunities. 23 Bibliography . 28 ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) iv ISO 2005 All rights reservedForewo

10、rd ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technic

11、al committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of el

12、ectrotechnical standardization. International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to t

13、he member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote. In exceptional circumstances, when a technical committee has collected data of a different kind from that which is normally published as an International Stan

14、dard (“state of the art”, for example), it may decide by a simple majority vote of its participating members to publish a Technical Report. A Technical Report is entirely informative in nature and does not have to be reviewed until the data it provides are considered to be no longer valid or useful.

15、 Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. ISO/TR 17119 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 215, Health informatics. ISO/TR 17119:2005(E

16、) ISO 2005 All rights reserved vIntroduction The health informatics profiling framework (HIPF) is designed to bring order to the description of health informatics standards artefacts. A common means of description is necessary to facilitate the coordination, communication and comparability of health

17、 informatics standards across and between disciplines and jurisdictions. The HIPF is an approach and tool to describe the variety of artefacts within the domain of health informatics standards. It builds upon other key information frameworks. This Technical Report does not constrain or drive conform

18、ance across informatics standards or their development, but it provides a useful descriptive tool to describe existing and developing health informatics standards. TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reserved 1Health informatics Health informatics profiling framework 1 Scope 1.

19、1 General This Technical Report provides a common description framework for health informatics standards artefacts. The aim of the health informatics profiling framework (HIPF) is to provide a consistent method for describing and classifying artefacts within the domain of health informatics standard

20、s. The HIPF establishes common concepts and a vocabulary for describing the complex domain of various health informatics standards initiatives and their supporting artefacts. The use of the HIPF should promote the reuse of health informatics knowledge and improve the identification of opportunities

21、for health informatics standards alignment, collaboration and coordination. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of the HIPF is to facilitate shared descriptions and comparisons of health informatics standards. In particular, it is the aim of the HIPF to: provide the capability to comprehensively define and clas

22、sify health informatics standards artefacts, facilitate the coordination, communication and comparability of health informatics standards through a common understanding of intended uses and content, help identify and coordinate health informatics standards development, provide a potential foundation

23、 for the development of a global health informatics standards knowledge base, promote health informatics standards integration and alignment within and between standards from different jurisdictions, and provide a framework to assist with the coordination of ISO/TC 215 work items both within the tec

24、hnical committee and with related initiatives from other sources. 1.3 Benefits The potential benefits of the HIPF include: introduction of classification concepts and terminology for health informatics standards artefacts, enhancement of health informatics standards development coordination through

25、the identification of potential duplication between standards initiatives, and enhancement of global understanding of health informatics standards in support of their knowledge management. ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) 2 ISO 2005 All rights reserved1.4 Target users The target users of the HIPF include: healt

26、h informatics standards developers, and users of health informatics standards. 2 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this Technical Report, the following terms and definitions apply. 2.1 artefact any model, document, or work product 2.2 compatibility capability of a functional unit to meet the

27、 requirements of a specified interface without appreciable modification ENV 12443:1996 2.3 concept units of thought constituted through abstraction on the basis of properties common to a set of objects ENV 12443:1996 2.4 context related conditions and situations that provide a useful understanding a

28、nd meaning of a subject 2.5 data “raw” alphanumeric text, objects, and symbols defined without any context in such a way that by itself one cannot tell its correct meaning 2.6 framework a structure for supporting or enclosing something else, often acting to partition something complex into simple co

29、mponents 2.7 granularity the boundary where an object functions as a self-contained, stand-alone unit to support a common vision or goal 2.8 health informatics profiling framework HIPF an approach and tool to describe the variety of artefacts within the domain of health informatics standards 2.9 HIP

30、F cell the intersection of an HIPF perspective and an HIPF level of specificity that is defined within the context of the HIPF classification matrix ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reserved 32.10 HIPF classification matrix a structure that includes dimensions for health informatics standard

31、s artefacts, levels of specificity, and perspectives 2.11 HIPF perspective a classification dimension for differentiating health informatics standards artefacts based on their viewpoints, intended purpose or focus NOTE This dimension includes the perspectives of what, how, where, who, when and why,

32、which are further described in 4.2.1.2. 2.12 HIPF specificity a classification dimension for differentiating health informatics standards artefacts based on their level of abstraction with respect to implementation specifications NOTE This dimension includes the conceptual, logical and physical leve

33、ls, which are further described in 4.2.1.1. 2.13 information data in context that enable interpretation with meaning and relevance 2.14 interface the shared boundary between two functional units defined by various characteristics pertaining to the functions, physical interconnections, signal exchang

34、es and other characteristics as appropriate ENV 12443:1996 2.15 profile a brief description, outline or overview 2.16 top-down method or procedure that starts at the highest level of abstraction and proceeds towards the lowest level ENV 12443:1996 3 Health informatics profiling framework Overview 3.

35、1 General The HIPF provides the basis for a management tool to support the coordination of health informatics standards initiatives. It does this by providing an approach for the classification of health informatics standards artefacts. This approach is supported by an extensible architecture. The H

36、IPF is a descriptive tool. It includes a simple two-dimensional HIPF classification matrix that articulates the dimensions of specificity and perspective. Although a simple structure, the matrix is capable of reflecting complexity through multiple relationships between a standard artefact and the HI

37、PF matrix components. These relationships may be used to provide a comprehensive and comparable description of health informatics standards. Artefact profiles may be further enhanced through the use of optional HIPF attributes, in addition to the classification matrix. ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) 4 ISO 200

38、5 All rights reservedThis Technical Report describes a methodological approach for using the HIPF matrix to “profile” health informatics standards, and it also describes how these classifications may contribute to the evolution of a health informatics standards knowledge base. This approach includes

39、 the following processes: health informatics standards profiling, and framework evolution. These processes are intended to support the goal of sharing knowledge about and supporting the comparison of health informatics standards artefacts. 3.2 What is the health informatics profiling framework? The

40、first component to be addressed is the concept of a “framework”. A framework is a structure for supporting or enclosing something else. The HIPF is such a structure. One of the essential features of both frameworks and models is that they allow highly complex systems to become conceptually manageabl

41、e. The difference between them is primarily in terms of comprehensiveness and approach. Models are mostly concerned with describing what is wanted or what is available, often in a visual manner. Frameworks are more commonly used to describe and structure enterprise architectures or other comprehensi

42、ve domains. In developing the classification matrix portion of the HIPF, Zachmans widely known Enterprise Architecture Framework was used as a starting point. The “domain” of the framework or, in Zachmans terms, the “Enterprise”, which this architectural framework is to support, is the domain of “he

43、alth informatics”. Frameworks have the following properties. They partition the universe of interest into manageable chunks. They are comprehensive yet simple. They are composed of two or more dimensions. Most frameworks have two core dimensions though multidimensional (e.g. cube) frameworks may als

44、o be used. One dimension is often contextual (e.g. concerned with a specific perspective). Often this is related to the user of the information (e.g. designer, database builder) or domain (e.g. party, recipient). One can create ones own framework or use an existing one if an appropriate structure is

45、 available for the domain of interest. The HIPF classification matrix partitions this domain in terms of the level of specificity and the perspective (or focus area) as a consistent and generic method for describing health informatics standards artefacts. The profile of an artefact may be further en

46、hanced by additional attributers, such as approval status and other optional detail. In the HIPF, a “profile” is a brief description (including a classification) of a health informatics standards artefact. 3.3 How to use the health informatics profiling framework The HIPF provides classification gui

47、delines so that a model or other standards artefact can be placed in one or more of the cells defined in the matrix. The matrix partitions the domain of health informatics into 18 separate sub-domains. The classification matrix can help avoid unnecessary problems or confusion as the cell placement i

48、ndicates which artefacts are unlikely or likely candidates for comparison or integration. Those that are placed in or mapped to the same cell have at least the characteristics of the cells to provide some basis for comparison or collaboration. ISO/TR 17119:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reserved 5The c

49、lassification of a model or other standards artefact requires analysis of the model or standard against the rows and columns of the matrix. The matrix allows for the co-location of artefacts that have like characteristics. It does not ensure that these artefacts can or should be compared or aligned. Decisions regarding alignment would be a subsequent exercise. The framework subdivides the health informatics universe into more manageable conceptual “chunks”. Most likely, transformations will