GPA CHECKLISTS FOR ENERGY-1981 Check Lists for Energy Conservation in Gas Processing Plants 1981《天然气加工厂的节能检验表 1981年》.pdf
《GPA CHECKLISTS FOR ENERGY-1981 Check Lists for Energy Conservation in Gas Processing Plants 1981《天然气加工厂的节能检验表 1981年》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《GPA CHECKLISTS FOR ENERGY-1981 Check Lists for Energy Conservation in Gas Processing Plants 1981《天然气加工厂的节能检验表 1981年》.pdf(45页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、 FORE WORD The need for energy conservation in the gas processing industry was recognized in the middle seventies when the Middle East Oil cartel pushed the cost of energy higher and higher. In 1978 the GPA Board of Directors assigned the subject of energy conservation to the Technical Committee. In
2、 turn Section A was charged to develop an energy conservation check list following a format similar to the plant design check list developed by Section A in the early seventies. The initial work group appointed by Section A Chairman, Allen Tarbutton, Mitchell Energy Corp. and Vice Chairman Joe Zanet
3、ell, El Paso Natural Gas Co., was composed of Messrs. Jack Carnal, Pioneer Natural Gas Co., Chairman; Joe Wheeler, Champiin Petroleum Co.; and Charles Guffey, Purvin and Gertz. In addition the following persons contributed to one or more sections of this work. Ed Asmus Bill French Dean B. Knight Lut
4、her Petty S. D. Swenson Don Bunton John Kline John Krogue Barry Kellogg M. V. Stuewe Don Ballard Bill Cummings Tom Jackson Bill Crawford Bruce McMillan R. G. Auld Jim McDougall Glen Van Burkleo Bob Blackburn Bob McKinley Howard Grekel Frank Campana H. L. Slaton D. D. Splawn Oscar Wantiez John Hunt R
5、eid Robertson Amoco Production Co. Amoco Production Co. Amoco Production Co. Amoco Production Co. Champlin Petroleum Co. Champlin Petroleum Co. Champlin Petroleum Co. Cities Service Co. Cities Service Co, Coastal Chemical Co. Coastal Chemical Co. Dresser Engineering Co. El Paso Natural Gas Co. EI Pa
6、so Natural Gas Co. Esso Resources Canada Ltd. Esso Resources Canada Ltd. Exxon USA R. L. Frailey, Inc. Getty Oil Co. HG Consulting Assoc. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Lone Star Gas Co. LoVaca Gathering Co. Mapco Inc. Mobil Oil Corp. Nalco Chemical Co. Gary Graysner Don Ewan Roland Meissner III Carl Alleman Bo
7、b Bellinger Bill Tuckett Clayton Terry Bill Hockersmith Jim Hamilton Walt Calvert Basil R. James Bill McWilliams Charley Wallace Mike Butler Wick Skinner Bob Holmes J. K. Bartels E. J. Hoffman E. B. Oliver Drue Talley Glenn Campbell Dennie Dixon Leon Simank Leeta Murphy Ralph Cole Terry Klare Oklaho
8、ma Gas they are intended for the use of persons in the gas industry, persons who are assumed to be proficient in their area of concern. These check lists are designed to provide the operators and designers of natural gas procesLing facilities with a “tickler” to insure that energy con- servation is
9、maximized. As such the check lists may be used in the day to day operation of the processing facilities by operators, foremen, and engineers or may be used as an aid in the design of new processing facilities. The check lists are not designed nor are they intended to be used as an instruction manual
10、 on energy conservation. Neither are these lists to be used as an “all inclusive listing nor as a rigid guide for design and operations. Consequently, the lists pro- vide simple action statements with little or no explanation as to either the reason for or the quanti- tative saving which can be real
11、ized from such action. The inclusion of operating and maintenance items in the lists were felt necessary because, ultimately, this is where the saving must be realized. Failure to educate and encourage energy conservation at the operations and maintenance level will result in com- plete failure of a
12、ny energy program, no matter how much time and money was spent in an energy saving design. Lack of training and motivation of operating and maintenance personnel, can dump energy dollars faster out the back door with a bucket than design personnel can bring through the front door with a tank car. Fo
13、llowing this introduction is a brief discussion as to the systematic methods available for conducting energy audits. The energy audit serves to determine the usage and to identify possible areas of conserva- tion. The energy audit can be system wide, by plant, or on individual pieces of equipment. L
14、ogs on energy consumption can be maintained to indicate at a glance the energy per mcf processed and/or energyper gdon of product recovered. Logs can also be maintained to indicate such things as loading of compressors and heaters, and efficiency of exchangers. These logs will serve as a historical
15、energy efficiency record for the equipment involved. NO attempt has been made to differentiate between low-cost high-return projects and the reverse. All such considerations are beyond the scope of this manual. Many conservation measures which seem good investments at the onset, when studied careful
16、ly, may even exhaust additional energy andlor be highly expensive. Payout of all proposed projects must be scrutinized very carefully. Evaluations should include a check for interference between earlier and sub- sequent projects to determine how much, if any, a subsequent project will reduce the sav
17、ing from the earlier conservation project. No person should embark on any course of action until all the conse- quences of the action are known and the consequences carefully evaluated. When properly utilized as intended these check lists represent a tool useful in indicating areas that should be in
18、vestigated and observed when energy economy is being sought. EN ERGY AU DIT General The energy audit should be considered as the first step in an energy conservation program. The purpose of the audit is to identify total consumption, the prime users, and the efficiency of energy utilization. The aud
19、it by itself may not produce results; however, it will help focus attention on the critical areas and form a basis to track results. Three levels of energy audit should be considered. They are the (1) historical audit, (2) technical audit, and (3) follow up audit. An explanation of what is involved
20、in each of these types of audits is given below. As each level is completed, it should become obvious whether to proceed to the next level. In many cases the majority of benefits may be realized through completion of the first two levels. Procedural or maintenance oriented conservation activities ma
21、y warrant consideration of the follow up audit. Historical Audit The first level of audit that should be performed is the historical audit. The objective of this audit is to identify historically the energy efficiency of a plant or process and as many subsystems as possible within these boundaries.
22、An indicator of energy efficiency is the energy consumed per unit of production. In the case of gas processing facilities this could be the amount of fuel gas used per gas volume throughput. This energy efficiency indicator forms a basis for 1 GPA TITLE*LBL f* tracking conservation efforts. In addit
23、ion it may help focus attention on areas where conservation can provide the greatest benefits. Technical Audit The second level in the audit process is the technical audit. This audit is a detailed analysis of a process or subsystems within the process. The objective of this audit is to identify ene
24、rgy conserva- tion opportunities and the incentives for modifications or changes. In most cases it will be necessary to per- form a mass and energy balance for the system being examined. Information that is needed to carry out this level of audit will include operating data and detailed specificatio
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- GPACHECKLISTSFORENERGY1981CHECKLISTSFORENERGYCONSERVATIONINGASPROCESSINGPLANTS1981 天然气 加工厂 节能 检验 1981

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-782306.html