CEPT T S 22-09 E-1988 Stage 2 Description of the Three Party Service《第二阶段第三方业务描述》.pdf
《CEPT T S 22-09 E-1988 Stage 2 Description of the Three Party Service《第二阶段第三方业务描述》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《CEPT T S 22-09 E-1988 Stage 2 Description of the Three Party Service《第二阶段第三方业务描述》.pdf(55页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、2326434 0007908 9 m, Page 1 TS22-09 E Recommendation T/S 22-09 (Edidburgh 1988) STAGE 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE THREE PARTY SERVICE Recommendation proposed by Working Group T/WG 11 “Signalling, Protocols and Switching” (SPS) Text of the Recornmendation adopted by the “Telecommimications” Commission: “The
2、 European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations, considering - that in accordance with the principles outlined in Recommendation T/SPS the exchange and network features - that in several CEPT member countries the Three Party Service is considered to be offered to the customers,
3、 - that it is desirable to handle the Three Party Service in a standardized way especially when calls related to the which are required for the implementation of services and facilities should be identified and specified, Three Party Service are crossing borders, recommends that the members recogniz
4、e and use the following definitions, arrangements and specifications for the Three Party Service.” 1. INTRODUCTION This stage 2 description of the Three Pary Service is based on the stage 1 description of the Three Party Service. This stage 2 description provides a signalling system independent info
5、rmation flow between nodal functions of interest to the Three Party Service, SDL diagrams of some interesting nodal functions, and recommends a scenarium for allocating the nodal functions to physical locations in the network. 2. DEFINITION OF THE THREE PARTY SERVICE The Three Party Service enables
6、a user who is active on a call to hold that call, make an additional call to a third party, switch from one call to the other as required (privacy being provided between the two calls), and/or release one call and return to the other or to join the two calls together into a three-way conversation. 3
7、. 3.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE FUNCTIONAL MODEL Functional Model for the Three Party Service The functional model selected for the Three Party Service is shown in Figure 1 (T/S 22-09). It uses six functional entities as follows: FE 1 : Three Party Service agent of the served user (A) FE 2: Three Party Se
8、rvice control of the served user (A) FE 3: Three Party Service control of the 1st remote user (B) FE 4: Three Party Service agent of the 1st remote user (B) FE 5: Three Party Service control of the 2nd remote user (C) FE 6: Three Party Service agent of the 2nd remote user (C) O I ISE 5 FE 6 Figure 1
9、 (T/S 22-09). Functional entity model. Note. This functional model may need revision with regard of FE 2 in case that the functionality of FE 2 is distributed across a PABX and a local exchange. Edition of October 31, 1989 iL-? 2326434 0007909 O M TIS 22-09 E Page 2 - 4 This functional model applies
10、 to the Three Party Service for one served user. It must be recognized that the remote users may have the capability to become served users if they support and also invoke the Three Party Service. In this case a symmetrical model can be assumed with regard to all functional entities. In the case whe
11、re a dependent user does not invoke the Three Party Service FE 1 and FE 2 on his side are assumed to be in the idle state. In the case where a dependent user does not have the capability to support the Three Party Service FE 1 on his side can be assumed to be non-existent. However it is assumed that
12、 FE 2 on his side will provide interaction (multiparty compatibility) checking for this service. 3,2. Relationship to the Basic Services The functional entities for the Three Party Service are represented as modular extensions to the functional model of the basic services. This approach provides the
13、 flexibility to allow FE 1, the Three Party Service agent, to be colocated either with the call control or the call control agent of the served user. The former represents the stimulus invocation of the Three Party Service together with a functional basic call control, the latter represents the func
14、tional invocation. See Figure 2 (TB 22-09). served I I Ist remote 1 I I I r2 / r4 2nd remote 1 I Figure 2 (T/S 22-09). Relationship between the Three Party Service and the basic services. Key: FE 1 . FE 6: see definitions in section 5 cc : CCA: call control as required for a basic call call control
15、agent as required for a basic call 4. INFORMATION FLOW The information flow between the functional entities illustrating the successful provision of the Three Party Service is shown in Figure 3 (T/S 22-09) on the following pages. 4,l. Diagrams See Figure 3 (T/S 22-09). 4.2. Definitions The definitio
16、ns provided in this section are specific for the Three Party Service. Information flows depicted in the diagrams but not defined here in section 4.2., e.g. SETUP, DISCONNECT, are not specific to the Three Party Servcie and their definitions may be found elsewhere. The call Id contained in an acknowl
17、edging or rejecting information flow is always the same as was used in the request associated with that acknowledging or rejecting information flow. Edition of October 31, 4.2.1. = 2326414 0007910 7 i! TIS 22-09 E Page 3 ALTERNATE (REQ) req.ind Meaning: The ALTERNATE (REQ) req.ind is used by FE 1 to
18、 interrupt the established communication and to request the re-establishment of the held communications. This is a confirmed information flow and appears within relationship rl of the call being active when requesting the alternate. Information Content: - Call Id of the active call when requesting t
19、he alternate - alternate request ALTERNATE (ACK) respxonf Meaning: This is sent by FE 2 to FE 1 to indicate completion of the alternate request. Information Content: - Call Id - alternate request acknowledgement ALTERNATE (REJ) resp.conf Meaning : This is sent by FE 2 to FE 1 to indicate failure to
20、a request to alternate. Information Content: - Call Id - alternate request reject 3PS-HOLD (REQ) req.ind Meaning: The 3PS-HOLD (REQ) req.ind is sent toward the served users equipment. The 3PS-HOLD (REQ) req.ind is the information sent from FE 2 to FE 1 causing the user equipment to detach the design
21、ated call from the B-channel. This is a confirmed information flow and appears within relationship rl of the call to be held. Information Content: - Call Id of the call to be held - hold request 3PS-HOLD (ACK) resp.conf Meaning: 3PS-HOLD (ACK) resp.conf is the information sent from FE 1 to FE 2 to i
22、ndicate completion of the hold actions. The user equipment has disconnected from the B-Channel, if there is no other call within theuser equipment the B-Channel is assigned to. Information Content: - Call Id - hold request acknowledgement 3PS-HOLD (REJ) respxonf Meaning: The application of a 3PS-HOL
23、D (REJ) resp-conf sent by FE 1 to FE 2 within the context of this service is for further study. CONNECTED req.ind Meaning: CONNECTED req.ind is used to acknowledge that a previously sent SETUP resp.conf has been received and accepted. This is an unconfirmed information flow within the rl relationshi
24、p and is sent from the CC to the CCA. Information Content: - as Basic Service - in particular Call Id of the awarded call - in particular Assignment indication Meaning of the Assignment indication: This is an indication that a specified B-Channel exclusively has-to be used for this call. 4.2.2. 4.2.
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- CEPTTS2209E1988STAGE2DESCRIPTIONOFTHETHREEPARTYSERVICE 第二阶段 第三 业务 描述 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-593272.html