ASTM E2714-2009 Standard Test Method for Creep-Fatigue Testing《蠕变疲劳试验的标准试验方法》.pdf

《ASTM E2714-2009 Standard Test Method for Creep-Fatigue Testing《蠕变疲劳试验的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E2714-2009 Standard Test Method for Creep-Fatigue Testing《蠕变疲劳试验的标准试验方法》.pdf（14页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E 2714 09Standard Test Method forCreep-Fatigue Testing1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 2714; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indi

2、cates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method covers the determination of mechanicalproperties pertaining to creep-fatigue deformation or crackformation in nominally homogeneous materials, o

3、r both by theuse of test specimens subjected to uniaxial forces underisothermal conditions. It concerns fatigue testing at strain ratesor with cycles involving sufficiently long hold times to beresponsible for the cyclic deformation response and cycles tocrack formation to be affected by creep (and

4、oxidation). It isintended as a test method for fatigue testing performed insupport of such activities as materials research and develop-ment, mechanical design, process and quality control, productperformance, and failure analysis. The cyclic conditions re-sponsible for creep-fatigue deformation and

5、 cracking vary withmaterial and with temperature for a given material.1.2 The use of this test method is limited to specimens anddoes not cover testing of full-scale components, structures, orconsumer products.1.3 This test method is primarily aimed at providing thematerial properties required for a

6、ssessment of defect-freeengineering structures containing features that are subject tocyclic loading at temperatures that are sufficiently high to causecreep deformation.1.4 This test method is applicable to the determination ofdeformation and crack formation or nucleation properties as aconsequence

7、 of either constant-amplitude strain-controlledtests or constant-amplitude force-controlled tests. It is prima-rily concerned with the testing of round bar test specimenssubjected to uniaxial loading in either force or strain control.The focus of the procedure is on tests in which creep andfatigue d

8、eformation and damage is generated simultaneouslywithin a given cycle. It does not cover block cycle testing inwhich creep and fatigue damage is generated sequentially. Datathat may be determined from creep-fatigue tests performedunder conditions in which creep-fatigue deformation anddamage is gener

9、ated simultaneously include (a) cyclic stress-strain deformation response (b) cyclic creep (or relaxation)deformation response (c) cyclic hardening, cyclic softeningresponse (d) cycles to formation of a single crack or multiplecracks in test specimens.NOTE 1A crack is believed to have formed when it

10、 has nucleated andpropagated in a specimen that was initially uncracked to a specific sizethat is detectable by a stated technique. For the purpose of this standard,the formation of a crack is evidenced by a measurable increase incompliance of the specimen or by a size detectable by potential dropte

11、chnique. Specific details of how to measure cycles to crack formationare described in 9.5.1.1.5 This test method is applicable to temperatures and strainrates for which the magnitudes of time-dependent inelasticstrains (creep) are on the same order or larger than time-independent inelasticNOTE 2The

12、term inelastic is used herein to refer to all nonelasticstrains. The term plastic is used herein to refer only to time dependant(that is, non-creep) component of inelastic strain. A useful engineeringestimate of time-independent strain can be obtained when the strain rateexceeds some value. For exam

13、ple, a strain rate of 1310-3sec-1is oftenused for this purpose. This value should increase with increasing testmeasurement.1.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. No other units of measurement are included in thisstandard.1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of

14、thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E4 Practices for Force Ve

15、rification of Testing MachinesE8/E8M Test Methods for Tension Testing of MetallicMaterialsE83 Practice for Verification and Classification of Exten-someter SystemsE111 Test Method for Youngs Modulus, Tangent Modulus,and Chord ModulusE139 Test Methods for Conducting Creep, Creep-Rupture,and Stress-Ru

16、pture Tests of Metallic Materials1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E08 on Fatigueand Fracture and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E08.05 on CyclicDeformation and Fatigue Crack Formation.Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2009. Published December 2009. DOI:10.15

17、20/E271409.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Dri

18、ve, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias inASTM Test MethodsE220 Test Method for Calibration of Thermocouples ByComparison TechniquesE230 Specification and Temperature-Electromotive Force(EMF) Tables for Standardized Therm

19、ocouplesE467 Practice for Verification of Constant Amplitude Dy-namic Forces in an Axial Fatigue Testing SystemE606 Practice for Strain-Controlled Fatigue TestingE647 Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue CrackGrowth RatesE1012 Practice for Verification of Test Frame and SpecimenAlignment Under Ten

20、sile and Compressive Axial ForceApplicationE1823 Terminology Relating to Fatigue and Fracture Test-ingE2368 Practice for Strain Controlled ThermomechanicalFatigue Testing2.2 BSI Standards:3BS 7270: 2000 Method for Constant Amplitude StrainControlled Fatigue TestingBS 1041-4:1992 Temperature measurem

21、ent Part 4: Guideto the selection and use of thermocouples2.3 CEN Standards:4EN 60584-11996 Thermocouples Reference tables (IEC584-1)EN 60584 -2 1993 Thermocouples Tolerances (IEC584-2)PrEN 38741998 Test methods for metallic materials constant amplitude force-controlled low cycle fatiguetestingPrEN

22、39881998 Test methods for metallic materials constant amplitude strain-controlled low cycle fatiguetesting2.4 ISO Standards:5ISO 121062003 Metallic materials Fatigue testing -Axial strain-controlled methodISO 121112005 (Draft) Strain-controlled thermo-mechanical fatigue testing methodISO 7500-12004

23、Metallic materials Verification of staticuniaxial testing machines Part 1. Tension/compressiontesting machines Verification and calibration of the forcemeasuring systemISO 95131999 Metallic materials Calibration of exten-someters used in axial testingISO 57251994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of

24、 mea-surement methods2.5 JIS Standard:6JIS Z 22791992 Method of high temperature low cyclefatigue testing for metallic materials3. Terminology3.1 The definitions in this test method that are also includedin Terminology E1823 are in accordance with TerminologyE1823.3.2 Symbols, standard definitions,

25、and definitions specific tothis standard are in 3.2.1, 3.3, and 3.4, respectively.3.2.1 Symbols:Symbol Termd L Diameter of gage sectionof cylindrical test specimenDg, L Diameter of grip endsN, E, Eo,EN, FL-2 Elastic modulus, initial modulusof elasticity, modulus of elasticity at cycleET,ECFL-2 Tensi

26、le modulus,compressive modulusP F Forcel, loL Extensometer gage length,original extensometergage lengthL, Lo, L Length of parallel sectionof gage length, original lengthof parallel section of gage lengthN, NfCycle number, cycle numberto crack formationr,L Transition radius(from parallel section to g

27、rip end)min/ max,RStrain ratiosmin/ smax,RsStress ratiot TimeTu Specimen temperatureTiu Indicated specimentemperatureN versus smaxCrack formation or end-of-life criterion isexpressed as a percentage reduction inmaximum stress from the cycles,N versus smaxcurve when the stressfalls sharply (see Fig.

28、1), or a specific percentagedecrease in the modulus of elasticity ratiosin the tensile and compressive portionsof the hysteresis diagrams, or as aspecific increase in crack size asindicated by an electricpotential drop monitoring instrumentation., max, minStrain, maximum strain in the cycle,minimum

29、strain in the cycleea, pa, taElastic strain amplitude,plastic strain amplitude,total strain amplitudeDe, Dp, DtElastic strain range, plastic strain range,total strain range (see Fig. 2)DinInelastic strain range, (see Fig. 2) is the sum of theplastic strain range and the creep strainsduring the cycle

30、; it is the distance on thestrain axis between points of intersectionsof the strain axis and the extrapolated linearregions of the hysteresis loops duringtensile and compressive unloadingss, smax, sminStress, maximum stress in the cycle,minimum stress in the cycleDs Stress range3.3 Definitions:3.3.1

31、 cycleIn fatigue, one complete sequence of values offorce (strain) that is repeated under constant amplitude loading(straining)3.3.2 hold-time, thTIn fatigue testing, the amount oftime in the cycle where the controlled test variable (force,strain, displacement) remains constant with time (Fig. 3).3A

32、vailable from British Standards Institute (BSI), 389 Chiswick High Rd.,London W4 4AL, U.K., http:/www.bsi-.4Available from European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 36 rue deStassart, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium, http:/www.cenorm.be.5Available from International Organization for Standardization (I

33、SO), 1, ch. dela Voie-Creuse, Case postale 56, CH-1211, Geneva 20, Switzerland, http:/www.iso.ch.6Available from Japanese Standards Organization (JSA), 4-1-24 AkasakaMinato-Ku, Tokyo, 107-8440, Japan, http:/www.jsa.or.jpE27140923.3.2.1 DiscussionHold- time(s) are typically placed atpeak stress or st

34、rain in tension and/or compression, but can alsobe placed at other positions within the cycle.3.3.3 total cycle period, ttT,The time for completion ofone cycle. The parameter tt can be separated into hold andnon-hold components (tnh), where the total cycle time is thesum of the hold time and the non

35、-hold time.3.3.4 hysteresis diagramThe stress-strain path during onecycle (see Fig. 2).3.3.5 initial modulus of elasticity, Eo, FL-2 The modulusof elasticity determined during the loading portion of the firstcycle.3.3.6 modulus of elasticity at cycle N, (EN, FL-2Theaverage of the modulus of elastici

36、ty determined during increas-ing load portion (see Ecin Fig. 2) and the decreasing loadportion (ETin Fig. 2) of the hysteresis diagram for the Nthcycle.3.4 Definitions: Defintions of Terms Specific to This Stan-dard:3.5 stress range, Ds , FL-2The difference between themaximum and minimum stresses.3.

37、5.1 DiscussionFor creep-fatigue tests, the differencebetween the maximum and minimum stresses is called the“peak stress range” and for tests conducted under straincontrol, the difference between the stresses at the points ofreversal of the control parameter is called the “relaxed stressrange” (see F

38、ig. 2b).3.6 DCPD and ACPDDirect current and alternating cur-rent electrical potential drop crack monitoring instrumentation.3.7 homologous temperatureThe specimen temperaturein K divided by the melting point of the material also in K.3.8 crack formationA crack is believed to have formedwhen it has n

39、ucleated and propagated in a specimen that wasinitially un-cracked to a size that is detectable by a statedtechnique.4. Significance and Use4.1 Creep-fatigue testing is typically performed at elevatedtemperatures and involves the sequential or simultaneousapplication of the loading conditions necess

40、ary to generatecyclic deformation/damage enhanced by creep deformation/damage or vice versa. Unless such tests are performed invacuum or an inert environment, oxidation can also be respon-sible for important interaction effects relating to damageaccumulation. The purpose of creep-fatigue tests can b

41、e todetermine material property data for (a) assessment input datafor the deformation and damage condition analysis of engi-neering structures operating at elevated temperatures (b) theverification of constitutive deformation and damage modeleffectiveness (c) material characterization, or (d) develo

42、pmentand verification of rules for new construction and life assess-ment of high-temperature components subject to cyclic servicewith low frequencies or with periods of steady operation, orboth.4.2 In every case, it is advisable to have complementarycontinuous cycling fatigue data (gathered at the s

43、ame strain/loading rate) and creep data determined from test conducted asper Practice E139 for the same material and test tempera-ture(s). The procedure is primarily concerned with the testingof round bar test specimens subjected (at least remotely) touniaxial loading in either force or strain contr

44、ol. The focus ofFIG. 1 Crack Formation and End-of-Test Criterion based on Reduction of Peak Stress for (a) Hardening and (b) Softening MaterialsE2714093the procedure is on tests in which creep and fatigue deforma-tion and damage is generated simultaneously within a givencycle. Data which may be dete

45、rmined from creep-fatigue testsperformed under such conditions may characterize (a) cyclicstress-strain deformation response (b) cyclic creep (or relax-ation) deformation response (c) cyclic hardening, cyclic soft-ening response or (d) cycles to crack formation, or both.4.3 While there are a number

46、of testing Standards andCodes of Practice that cover the determination of low cyclefatigue deformation and cycles to crack initiation properties(See Practice E606, BS 7270: 2000, JIS Z 22791992, PrEN3874, 1998, PrEN 39881998, ISO 121062003,ISO 121112005, and Practice E2368-04 and (1, 2, 3)7, someof

47、which provide guidance for testing at high temperature (forexample, Practice E606, ISO 121062003, and PracticeE2368-04, there is no single standard which specificallyprescribes a procedure for creep-fatigue testing.5. Functional Relationships5.1 Empirical relationships that have been commonly usedfo

48、r description of creep-fatigue data are given inAppendix X1.These relationships typically have limitations with respect tomaterial types such as high temperature ferritic and austeniticsteels versus nickel base alloys. Therefore, original data shouldbe reported to the greatest extent possible. Data

49、reductionmethods should be detailed along with assumptions. Sufficientinformation should be recorded and reported to permit analy-sis, interpretation, and comparison with results for othermaterials analyzed using currently popular methods.6. Apparatus6.1 Test machines:6.1.1 Tests shall be conducted using a servo-controlledtension-compression fatigue machine that has been verified inaccordance with ISO 7500-12004 or Practices E4-03 andE467-04. Hydraulic and electromechanical mac