ASTM E1588-2016 Standard Guide for Gunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry《采用扫描电子显微术 能量散射X射线光谱法进行射击残留物分析的标准指南》.pdf

《ASTM E1588-2016 Standard Guide for Gunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry《采用扫描电子显微术 能量散射X射线光谱法进行射击残留物分析的标准指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E1588-2016 Standard Guide for Gunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry《采用扫描电子显微术 能量散射X射线光谱法进行射击残留物分析的标准指南》.pdf（5页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E1588 16Standard Guide forGunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning ElectronMicroscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1588; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of re

2、vision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This guide covers the analysis of gunshot residue (GSR)by scanning electron microscopy/energy-disp

3、ersive X-rayspectrometry (SEM/EDS) by manual and automated methods.The analysis may be performed manually, with the operatormanipulating the microscope controls and the EDS systemsoftware, or in an automated fashion, where some amount ofthe analysis is controlled by pre-set software functions.1.2 Si

4、nce software and hardware formats vary among com-mercial systems, guidelines will be offered in the most generalterms possible. For proper terminology and operation, consultthe SEM/EDS system manuals for each system.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. No other units of m

5、easurement are included in thisstandard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory

6、limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E1492 Practice for Receiving, Documenting, Storing, andRetrieving Evidence in a Forensic Science Laboratory3. Terminology3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 major, adjelement whose main peak height isgreater tha

7、n13 of the peak height of the strongest peak in thespectrum. Wallace 1984 (15)33.1.2 minor, adjelement whose main peak height is be-tween110 and13 of the peak height of the strongest peak in thespectrum. Wallace 1984 (15)3.1.3 trace, adjelement whose main peak height is lessthan110 of the peak heigh

8、t of the strongest peak in thespectrum. Wallace 1984 (15)4. Summary of Practice4.1 From the total population of particles collected, thosethat are detected by SEM to be within the limits of certainparameters (for example, atomic number, size, or shape) areanalyzed by EDS (1-3). Typically, particles

9、composed of highmean atomic number elements are detected by their SEMbackscattered electron signals and an EDS spectrum is ob-tained from each. The EDS spectrum is evaluated for constitu-ent elements that may identify the particle as being consistentwith or characteristic of GSR, or both.5. Signific

10、ance and Use5.1 This document will be of use to forensic laboratorypersonnel who are involved in the analysis of GSR samples bySEM/EDS (4).5.2 SEM/EDS analysis of GSR is a non-destructive methodthat provides (5, 6) both morphological information and theelemental profiles of individual particles.5.3

11、Particle analysis contrasts with bulk sample methods,such as atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) (7), neu-tron activation analysis (NAA) (8), inductively coupled plasmaatomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), and inductivelycoupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), where thesampled material is

12、 dissolved or extracted prior to the deter-mination of total element concentrations, thereby sacrificingmorphological information and individual particle identifica-tion.5.4 X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) is a techniquethat has been used to map the placement and distribution ofGSR particles s

13、urrounding bullet holes in order to establishshooting distances (9). Unlike the solution-based bulk methodsof analysis, XRF is non-destructive; however, XRF still doesnot provide morphological information and is incapable ofindividual GSR particle identification.1This guide is under the jurisdiction

14、 of ASTM Committee E30 on ForensicSciences and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E30.01 on Criminalistics.Current edition approved March 1, 2016. Published March 20116. Originallyapproved in 1994. Last previous version approved in 2010 as E1588 101. DOI:10.1520/E1588-16.2For referenced AS

15、TM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end o

16、fthis standard.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States16. Sample Preparation6.1 Once the evidence seal is broken, care should be takenso that no object touches the surface of the adhesive SEM/EDSsample collection stub and that

17、 the stub is not left uncoveredany longer than is reasonable for transfer, mounting, orlabeling.6.2 Label the sample collection stub in such a manner that itis distinguishable from other sample collection stubs withoutcompromising the sample; for example, label the bottom orside of the stub.6.3 If a

18、 non-conductive adhesive was used in the samplecollection stub, the sample will need to be coated to increase itselectrical conductivity, unless an environmental SEM orvariable-pressure/low-vacuum SEM is used for the analysis.Carbon is a common choice of coating material, since it willnot interfere

19、with X-ray lines of interest. For high-vacuumSEM, coat the sample sufficiently to eliminate charging of thesample.6.4 Observe the appropriate procedures for handling anddocumentation of all submitted samples as described in Prac-tice E1492.7. Sample Area7.1 Sample collection stubs for SEMs typically

20、 come in oneof two diameters: 12.7 mm or 25.4 mm, which yield surfaceareas of 126.7 mm2and 506.7 mm2respectively.7.2 Manual analysis of the total surface area of the stub isprohibitively time-consuming. Because the particles are col-lected onto an adhesive surface in a random manner and theparticles

21、 do not tend to cluster, it is reasonable to analyze aportion of the stub surface by employing an appropriatesampling and analytical protocol (6, 10).7.3 Automated SEM/EDS analysis can enable data collec-tion from nearly the entire surface area of the sample collectionstub. Due to the disparity betw

22、een the shape of the samplecollection stub (round) and the SEM field of view search area(square or rectangular), analysis of 100 % of the samplecollection area may not be possible in some systems.7.3.1 Analysis of the maximum allowable surface area ofthe sample is recommended, however, many automate

23、d sys-tems can be programmed to terminate the analysis of a stub orseries of stubs once a pre-established number of particles withspecified classification(s) have been detected. The decision asto how many particles satisfy the requirements of a particularcase is a matter for the analyst to decide bu

24、t should be subjectto guidelines set out in the laboratorys standard operatingprocedures.8. Instrument Requirements and Operation8.1 General:8.1.1 Most commercial-grade SEM/EDS systems should beadequate for GSR analysis.8.1.2 Automated data collection of GSR involves someportion of the data collecti

25、on being controlled by pre-setsoftware functions. The extent to which the SEM and EDSsystems communicate and are integrated varies according tothe manufacturers involved and the capabilities of thehardware/software architecture.8.2 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM):8.2.1 The SEM, operating in the b

26、ackscattered electronimaging mode, must be capable of detecting particles down toat least 0.5 m in diameter.8.2.2 The SEM must be capable of an accelerating voltageof at least 20 kV.8.2.3 Automated SEM/EDS systems include: communica-tion and control between the SEM and EDS system, and amotorized sta

27、ge with automated stage control. The systemshould have the ability to recall stage locations of particles forverification and software for particle recognition.8.3 Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS):8.3.1 The detectors resolution should be better (less) than150 eV, measured as the full width at ha

28、lf the maximum heightof the Mn Ka peak.8.3.2 At a minimum, the EDS spectrum should be acquiredat 20 eV per channel.8.3.3 Display of the EDS output must encompass the X-raylines of analytical utility, with a minimum range of 015 keV.8.3.4 Automated systems will also include software capableof acquiri

29、ng X-ray spectra for a specified collection time ortotal X-ray counts.8.3.5 It is desirable that the spectrum obtained from theanalysis of each particle of interest be stored.At a minimum, anautomated system must be capable of storing all of the particlelocation coordinates.8.4 Sample Placement:8.4.

30、1 Record the positions of the stubs (sample andstandard/reference stubs) on the SEM stage when the samplesare inserted.8.4.2 If it is anticipated or required that additional analyseswill be needed, it is desirable that the stub can be returned tothe same orientation as before its removal. This may c

31、onsist ofmarking the side of each stub and aligning it with marks on themicroscope stage or by having stubs that fit into the stage inonly one position (for example, stubs with a pin that is ahalf-circle in cross section).8.5 Detection and Calibration:8.5.1 Particles of GSR are detected by their bac

32、kscatteredelectron signal intensity. The absolute signal intensity that aparticle produces is related to the electron beam current, meanatomic number, and size of the particle (for particle sizes on theorder of the beam diameter). Particles whose mean atomicnumbers are high will appear brighter than

33、 those of lower meanatomic number composition.As the beam current increases, theamount of signal each particle produces also increases (11).8.5.2 The brightness and contrast settings (low and highthresholds) of the backscattered electron detector system de-termine the limits of detection and discrim

34、ination of particleswhose mean atomic number exceed the minimum thresholdsetting but fall below the maximum threshold setting. Thresh-old settings for the backscattered electron signal should bedone with a suitable reference sample of known origin (oftensupplied by the EDS manufacturer) or pure elem

35、ent standardsat the same parameters that will be used for the sampleE1588 162analysis. This calibration sample should, if possible, be in themicroscope chamber at the same time as the samples to beanalyzed.8.5.3 The backscattered electron detectors brightness andcontrast should be set to include the

36、 high atomic numberparticles of interest and exclude low atomic number particlesthat are not of interest. Typically, high contrast and lowbrightness settings provide an adequate range between thresh-old limits for ease of detection. If the beam current is changedor drifts, the brightness and contras

37、t threshold limits, whichwere based on the previous beam current, may no longer becompatible with the new conditions and should be readjusted.The beam current may be measured with a Faraday cup, aspecimen current meter, or monitored by comparing the inte-grated counts within the same peak in sequent

38、ially collectedspectra from a known standard.8.6 Quality Control:8.6.1 When conducting automated analysis of GSR, specialmeasures have to be chosen in order to meet common qualitymanagement demands. Therefore, as minimum conditions:8.6.1.1 Establish a protocol to confirm optimum instrumentoperation

39、parameters on a routine basis.8.6.1.2 Monitor the EDS X-ray energy calibration and SEMbeam current stability regularly. This may be facilitated by theuse of appropriate standards or reference samples, or both.8.6.1.3 Analyze a reference sample (positive control) withparticles of known size, range, a

40、nd composition at regularintervals in order to test the accuracy of particle detection andidentification, whether by automated or manual analysis. It isrecommended that a reference sample has been prepared andmounted in a manner comparable to the collection method inuse by the submitting agency. The

41、 reference sample may be asample of GSR from a known source (caliber of weapon,ammunition manufacturer, number of rounds fired, collectedarea from shooter, or a synthetic GSR standard). Additionalenvironmental particles may be added to ensure the inclusionor exclusion of particular classes of partic

42、les. Alternatively, asynthetic, simulated-GSR reference sample may be used forthis purpose. The frequency of analysis of this sample is amatter for the analyst to decide and is subject to guidelines setout in the laboratorys standard operating procedures.8.6.1.4 The incorporation of environmental or

43、 controlsamples into the analytical protocol is recommended in order tomonitor the cleanliness of the sampling or analytical system, orboth. An environmental sample may be prepared in a numberof ways: for example, it may be an unused stub that has beenprepared contemporaneously with the questioned s

44、amples or asample taken from the sampling or analytical environment(exposed to the air or as a direct sampling of clean workspace),or both.9. Data Analysis9.1 Definition and Classification:9.1.1 Morphology:9.1.1.1 Particles identified as characteristic or consistentwith GSR using this method are oft

45、en spheroidal, noncrystal-line particles between 0.5 m and 5.0 m in diameter; theremainder are irregular in shape or vary from 1 to 100+ m insize, or both (5, 12, 13). In general, it is not consistent with themechanisms of GSR formation to find particles with crystallinemorphology. However, such par

46、ticles have occasionally beenobserved in known primer GSR residues. Since morphologycan vary greatly, it should never be considered as the onlycriterion for identification of GSR.9.1.2 Elemental Composition:9.1.2.1 The elemental composition is the most diagnosticproperty to determine if a particle m

47、ay be GSR (14). Whenappropriate, the elemental composition of the recovered par-ticulate can be compared with case-specific known sourceitems, such as the recovered weapon, cartridge cases, orvictim-related items.9.1.2.2 Occasionally, GSR particles with apparent unusualelemental compositions may be

48、encountered in case work. Inthis circumstance, the elemental compositions of these par-ticles should be compared to case-specific sources, such ascartridges or ammunition/weapon test fire deposits.9.1.3 Particles characteristic of GSR (that is, most likelyassociated with the discharge of a gun) will

49、 have the followingelemental composition:9.1.3.1 Lead, antimony, barium.9.1.3.2 It is common for additional elements to becomeincorporated into particles containing these elements. Suchparticles may contain but not be limited to one or more of theelements: aluminum, silicon, phosphorus, sulfur (trace),chlorine, potassium, calcium, iron (trace), nickel, copper, zinc,zirconium, and tin.9.1.4 Particles consistent with GSR (that is, may be associ-ated with the discharge of a gun but could also originate fromother sources unrelated to a gun discharge) will have one of th