ASTM D4796-1988(2004) Standard Test Method for Bond Strength of Thermoplastic Traffic Marking Materials《热塑性交通标志材料粘合强度的试验方法》.pdf
《ASTM D4796-1988(2004) Standard Test Method for Bond Strength of Thermoplastic Traffic Marking Materials《热塑性交通标志材料粘合强度的试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASTM D4796-1988(2004) Standard Test Method for Bond Strength of Thermoplastic Traffic Marking Materials《热塑性交通标志材料粘合强度的试验方法》.pdf(4页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Designation: D 4796 88 (Reapproved 2004)Standard Test Method forBond Strength of Thermoplastic Traffic Marking Materials1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 4796; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, th
2、e year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method provides an instrumental means for thedetermination of thermoplastic traffic marking mater
3、ial bondstrengths using cement bricks and steel cubes.1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as thestandard. The values given in parentheses are for informationonly.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is therespon
4、sibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C 109/C 109M Test Method for Compressive Strength ofHydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or
5、50-mm CubeSpecimens)C 881/C 881M Specification for Epoxy-Resin-Base Bond-ing Systems for ConcreteD 883 Terminology Relating to PlasticsE 284 Terminology of AppearanceF 412 Terminology Relating to Plastic Piping Systems3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsDefinitions are in accordance with Termi-nology D 883
6、, E 284, and F 412 unless otherwise indicated.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 cement brick, na brick formed by mixing cementand fine sand together and allowing to harden.3.2.2 thermoplastic, ntraffic marking (same as 3.2.3).3.2.3 thermoplastic traffc marking, na highly fille
7、d100 % total solids highway marking system that when heatedto a molten state can be extruded or sprayed onto a road surfaceand when cooled forms a solid durable delineator.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 The thermoplastic specimen is prepared for this test byfirst melting a sample to its application te
8、mperature undercontinuous agitation. The specimen is then applied to thespecified cement brick by a hot drawdown blade. Two steelcubes are then immediately placed onto the hot thermoplasticline and the excess thermoplastic trimmed away from aroundthe two steel cubes. After the trimming is complete,
9、the steelcubes are removed. A heated steel cube is bonded with epoxyto the square of thermoplastic and allowed to cure overnightbefore determining the bond strength on a Dillon dynamometeror similar device.5. Significance and Use5.1 The function of this test method is to provide numericalinstrumenta
10、l results indicating the cohesive or adhesive, orboth, bond strength of thermoplastic traffic marking to aspecified cement brick substrate.5.2 The use of this test method allows the user and manu-facturer to control the quality of the product and makeinferences about the performance of the thermopla
11、stic trafficmarking product. Results from these tests also provide infor-mation helpful in researching and developing thermoplastictraffic marking materials.5.3 Strict adherence to the procedures outlined is necessaryfor precision of the test method. Under no conditions shouldthe bond strength be ac
12、cepted unless there is conformance to9.14. Precise results are obtained only when one steel block isepoxied to the thermoplastic traffic marking on the cementbrick.6. Types of Separation in Bond Strength Tests6.1 Thermoplastic to Steel Cube SeparationThis type ofseparation occurs where there is an i
13、nsufficient bond betweenthe thermoplastic and steel cube probably due to insufficientcoverage of the epoxy adhesive.1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paintand Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and is the direct responsibility ofSubcommittee D01.44 on Tr
14、affic Coatings.Current edition approved June 1, 2004. Published June 2004. Originallyapproved in 1988. Last previous edition approved in 1998 as D 4796 88 (1998).2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book
15、of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.6.2 Thermoplastic to Thermoplastic SeparationThis typeof separation is caused by int
16、ernal cohesive failure of thethermoplastic. This separation is acceptable when it exceedsthe specified bond strength.6.3 Thermoplastic to Cement Brick SeparationThis typeof separation is caused by the failure of the bond between thethermoplastic specimen and the cement brick.6.4 Cement Brick to Ceme
17、nt BrickThis type of separationis caused by the internal cohesive failure of the brick. This isdue, in most cases, to a bond between the thermoplastic andcement brick that exceeds the cohesive strength of the cementbrick. This separation is not acceptable when the bond strengthvalues are lower than
18、specified.7. Apparatus7.1 Agitator Blade, 150 mm (6 in.) long with a 10 mm(12-in.) steel shaft and a 45 by 25 by 3 mm (134 by 1 in. by18-in.) straight horizontal steel blade.7.2 Capped Bolts, two, 16 mm (58 in.) in size.7.3 Cement Bricks,9by5by19cm(312 by2by712-in.) insize with a compressive strengt
19、h of 3000 to 5000 psi (Note 1).NOTE 1Concrete bricks conforming to Test Method C 109/C 109Mhave been used but proved more variable due to migration of a thin veneerof cement to the top of the brick making determinations erratic. Thecement bricks may be obtained from local block plants. The term“ceme
20、nt” brick is common for the industry and is used in this test methodextensively.NOTE 2The unit should be fitted with a steel frame to hold the cementbrick for testing.7.4 Dynamometer,3with a capacity of 6000 lbs in 2700 kgin 10 kg (25-lb) divisions having a pull-rate capability of14in./min. (6 mm/mi
21、n) (Note 2) (See Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, andFig. 4).7.5 Draw Down Blade, 5 by 2.5 by 10 cm (2 by 1 by 4 in.)in size capable of laying down a 125 mil (0.125 in.) wetthermoplastic film 2-in. wide.7.6 Drill Press, or other apparatus capable of agitating thethermoplastic during meltdown to the applicati
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASTMD479619882004STANDARDTESTMETHODFORBONDSTRENGTHOFTHERMOPLASTICTRAFFICMARKINGMATERIALS 塑性 交通标志 材料 粘合

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-518002.html