ASTM D2837-2013e1 Standard Test Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials or Pressure Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Products《获得热塑性塑料管材液体静.pdf

《ASTM D2837-2013e1 Standard Test Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials or Pressure Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Products《获得热塑性塑料管材液体静.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D2837-2013e1 Standard Test Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials or Pressure Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Products《获得热塑性塑料管材液体静.pdf（16页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D2837 131An American National StandardStandard Test Method forObtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic PipeMaterials or Pressure Design Basis for Thermoplastic PipeProducts1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D2837; the number immediately following the design

2、ation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1NOTETable 8 was editorially corrected in Ap

3、ril 2014.1. Scope*1.1 This test method describes two essentially equivalentprocedures: one for obtaining a long-term hydrostatic strengthcategory based on stress, referred to herein as the hydrostaticdesign basis (HDB); and the other for obtaining a long-termhydrostatic strength category based on pr

4、essure, referred toherein as the pressure design basis (PDB). The HDB is basedon the materials long-term hydrostatic strength (LTHS),andthe PDB is based on the products long-term hydrostaticpressure-strength (LTHSP). The HDB is a material propertyand is obtained by evaluating stress rupture data der

5、ived fromtesting pipe made from the subject material. The PDB is aproduct specific property that reflects not only the properties ofthe material(s) from which the product is made, but also theinfluence on product strength by product design, geometry, anddimensions and by the specific method of manuf

6、acture. ThePDB is obtained by evaluating pressure rupture data. TheLTHS is determined by analyzing stress versus time-to-rupture(that is, stress-rupture) test data that cover a testing period ofnot less than 10 000 h and that are derived from sustainedpressure testing of pipe made from the subject m

7、aterial. Thedata are analyzed by linear regression to yield a best-fitlog-stress versus log time-to-fail straight-line equation. Usingthis equation, the materials mean strength at the 100 000-hintercept (LTHS) is determined by extrapolation. The resultantvalue of the LTHS determines the HDB strength

8、 category towhich the material is assigned. The LTHSPis similarlydetermined except that the determination is based on pressureversus time data that are derived from a particular product. Thecategorized value of the LTHSPis the PDB. An HDB/PDB isone of a series of preferred long-term strength values.

9、 This testmethod is applicable to all known types of thermoplastic pipematerials and thermoplastic piping products. It is also appli-cable for any practical temperature and medium that yieldsstress-rupture data that exhibit an essentially straight-linerelationship when plotted on log stress (pound-f

10、orce per squareinch) or log pressure (pound-force per square in. gage) versuslog time-to-fail (hours) coordinates, and for which this straight-line relationship is expected to continue uninterrupted throughat least 100 000 h.1.2 Unless the experimentally obtained data approximate astraight line, whe

11、n calculated using log-log coordinates, it isnot possible to assign an HDB/PDB to the material. Data thatexhibit high scatter or a “knee” (a downward shift, resulting ina subsequently steeper stress-rupture slope than indicated bythe earlier data) but which meet the requirements of this testmethod t

12、end to give a lower forecast of LTHS/LTHSP.Inthecase of data that exhibit excessive scatter or a pronounced“knee,” the lower confidence limit requirements of this testmethod are not met and the data are classified as unsuitable foranalysis.1.3 A fundamental premise of this test method is that whenth

13、e experimental data define a straight-line relationship inaccordance with this test methods requirements, this straightline may be assumed to continue beyond the experimentalperiod, through at least 100 000 h (the time intercept at whichthe materials LTHS/LTHSPis determined). In the case ofpolyethyl

14、ene piping materials, this test method includes asupplemental requirement for the “validating” of this assump-tion. No such validation requirements are included for othermaterials (see Note 1). Therefore, in all these other cases, it isup to the user of this test method to determine based on outside

15、information whether this test method is satisfactory for theforecasting of a materials LTHS/LTHSPfor each particularcombination of internal/external environments and tempera-ture.NOTE 1Extensive long-term data that have been obtained on com-mercial pressure pipe grades of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), p

16、olybutlene(PB), and cross linked polyethlene (PEX) materials have shown that thisassumption is appropriate for the establishing of HDBs for thesematerials for water and for ambient temperatures. Refer to Note 2 andAppendix X1 for additional information.1This test method is under the jurisdiction of

17、ASTM Committee F17 on PlasticPiping Systems and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F17.40 on TestMethods.Current edition approved Nov. 15, 2013. Published December 2013. Originallyapproved in 1969. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as D2837 11. DOI:10.1520/D2837-13.*A Summary of Chang

18、es section appears at the end of this standardCopyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States11.4 The experimental procedure to obtain individual datapoints shall be as described in Test Method D1598, whichforms a part of this test me

19、thod. When any part of this testmethod is not in agreement with Test Method D1598, theprovisions of this test method shall prevail.1.5 General references are included at the end of this testmethod.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its us

20、e. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the standard. The values given in parentheses are forin

21、formation only and are not considered the standard.NOTE 2Over 3000 sets of data, obtained with thermoplastic pipe andpiping assemblies tested with water, natural gas, and compressed air, havebeen analyzed by the Plastic Pipe Institutes (PPI) Hydrostatic StressBoard2. None of the currently commercial

22、ly offered compounds includedin PPI TR-4, “PPI Listing of Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB), Hydro-static Design Stress (HDS), Strength Design Basis (SDB), PressureDesign Basis (PDB) and Minimum Required Strength (MRS) Ratings forThermoplastic Piping Materials or Pipe” exhibit knee-type plots at thelis

23、ted temperature, that is, deviate from a straight line in such a mannerthat a marked drop occurs in stress at some time when plotted onequiscalar log-log coordinates. Ambient temperature stress-rupture datathat have been obtained on a number of the listed materials and that extendfor test periods ov

24、er 120 000 h give no indication of “knees.” However,stress-rupture data which have been obtained on some thermoplasticcompounds that are not suitable or recommended for piping compoundshave been found to exhibit a downward trend at 23C (73F) in which thedeparture from linearity appears prior to this

25、 test methods minimumtesting period of 10 000 h. In these cases, very low results are obtained orthe data are found unsuitable for extrapolation when they are analyzed bythis test method.Extensive evaluation of stress-rupture data by PPI and others has alsoindicated that in the case of some material

26、s and under certain testconditions, generally at higher test temperatures, a departure fromlinearity, or “down-turn”, may occur beyond this test methods minimumrequired data collection period of 10 000 h.APPI study has shown that inthe case of polyethylene piping materials that are projected to exhi

27、bit a“down-turn” prior to 100 000 h at 73F, the long-term field performanceof these materials is prone to more problems than in the case of materialswhich have a projected “down-turn” that lies beyond the 100 000-hintercept. In response to these observations, a supplemental “validation”requirement f

28、or PE materials has been added to this test method in 1988.This requirement is designed to reject the use of this test method for theestimating of the long-term strength of any PE material for whichsupplemental elevated temperature testing fails to validate this testmethods inherent assumption of co

29、ntinuing straight-line stress-rupturebehavior through at least 100 000 h at 23C (73F).When applying this test method to other materials, appropriate consid-eration should be given to the possibility that for the particular grade ofmaterial under evaluation and for the specific conditions of testing,

30、particularly, when higher test temperatures and aggressive environmentsare involved, there may occur a substantial “down-turn” at some pointbeyond the data collection period. The ignoring of this possibility maylead to an overstatement by this test method of a materials actualLTHS/LTHSP. To obtain s

31、ufficient assurance that this test methodsinherent assumption of continuing linearity through at least 100 000 h isappropriate, the user should consult and consider information outside thistest method, including very long-term testing or extensive field experiencewith similar materials. In cases for

32、 which there is insufficient assurance ofthe continuance of the straight-line behavior that is defined by theexperimental data, the use of other test methods for the forecasting oflong-term strength should be considered (see Appendix X1).2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3D1243 Test Method f

33、or Dilute Solution Viscosity of VinylChloride PolymersD1598 Test Method for Time-to-Failure of Plastic PipeUnder Constant Internal PressureE29 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data toDetermine Conformance with Specifications2.2 ISO Standard:ISO 9080 Plastic Piping and Ducting Systems, D

34、etermina-tion of Long-Term Hydrostatic Strength ofThermoplasticsMaterials in Pipe Form by Extrapolation42.3 Plastics Pipe Institute:2PPI TR-3 Policies and Procedures for Developing Hydro-static Design Basis (HDB), Hydrostatic Design Stresses(HDS), Pressure Design Basis (PDB), Strength DesignBasis (S

35、DB), and Minimum Required Strength (MRS)Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping Materials or PipePPI TR-4 PPI Listing of Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB),Hydrostatic Design Stress (HDS), Strength Design Basis(SDB), Pressure Design Basis (PDB) and Minimum Re-quired Strength (MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Pip

36、ingMaterials or Pipe3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 failurebursting, cracking, splitting, or weeping(seepage of liquid) of the pipe during test.3.1.2 hoop stressthe tensile stress in the wall of the pipe inthe circumferential orientation due to internal hydrostaticpressure.3.1.3 hydrostatic desi

37、gn basis (HDB)one of a series ofestablished stress values for a compound. It is obtained bycategorizing the LTHS in accordance with Table 1.3.1.4 hydrostatic design stress (HDS)the estimated maxi-mum tensile stress the material is capable of withstandingcontinuously with a high degree of certainty t

38、hat failure of thepipe will not occur. This stress is circumferential when internalhydrostatic water pressure is applied.3.1.5 long-term hydrostatic strength (LTHS)the estimatedtensile stress in the wall of the pipe in the circumferentialorientation that when applied continuously will cause failure

39、ofthe pipe at 100 000 h. This is the intercept of the stressregression line with the 100 000-h coordinate.2Available from Plastics Pipe Institute (PPI), 105 Decker Court, Suite 825,Irving, TX 75062, http:/www.plasticpipe.org.3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcon

40、tact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.4Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http:/www.ansi.orgD2837 1312

41、3.1.6 long-term hydrostatic pressure-strength (LTHSP)the estimated internal pressure that when applied continu-ously will cause failure of the pipe at 100 000 h. This is theintercept of the pressure regression line with the 100 000-hinterce3.1.7 pressurethe force per unit area exerted by themedium i

42、n the pipe.3.1.8 pressure rating (PR)the estimated maximum waterpressure the pipe is capable of withstanding continuously witha high degree of certainty that failure of the pipe will not occur.3.1.8.1 The PR and HDS/HDB are related by the followingequation.PR 5 2 HDB!DF!/SDR 2 1! 5 2 HDS!/SDR 2 1! (

43、1)3.1.8.2 The PR and PDB are related by the followingequation:PR 5 PDB!DF! (2)3.1.9 pressure design basis (PDB)one of a series ofestablished pressure values for plastic piping components(multilayer pipe, fitting, valve, etc.) obtained by categorizingthe LTHSPin accordance with Table 2.3.1.10 service

44、 (design) factor (DF)a number less than1.00 (which takes into consideration all the variables anddegree of safety involved in a thermoplastic pressure pipinginstallation) which is multiplied by the HDB to give the HDS,or multiplied by the PDB to give the pressure rating.3.1.11 The following equation

45、s shall be used for the relationbetween stress and pressure:S 5 PD 2 t!/2t for outside diameter controlled pipe (3)orS 5 Pd1t!/2t for inside diameter controlled pipe (4)where:S = stress,P = pressure,D = average outside diameter,d = average inside diameter, andt = minimum wall thickness.4. Significan

46、ce and Use4.1 The procedure for estimating long-term hydrostaticstrength or pressure-strength is essentially an extrapolationwith respect to time of a stress-time or pressure-time regressionline based on data obtained in accordance with Test MethodD1598. Stress or pressure-failure time plots are obt

47、ained forthe selected temperature and environment: the extrapolation ismade in such a manner that the long-term hydrostatic strengthor pressure strengthis estimated for these conditions.NOTE 3Test temperatures should preferably be selected from thefollowing: 40C; 50C; 60C; 80C; 100C. It is strongly

48、recommendedthat data also be generated at 23C for comparative purposes.4.2 The hydrostatic or pressure design basis is determinedby considering the following items and evaluating them inaccordance with 5.4.4.2.1 Long-term hydrostatic strength or hydrostaticpressure-strength at 100 000 h,4.2.2 Long-t

49、erm hydrostatic strength or hydrostaticpressure-strength at 50 years, and4.2.3 Stress that will give 5 % expansion at 100 000 h.4.2.4 The intent is to make allowance for the basic stress-strain characteristics of the material, as they relate to time.4.3 Results obtained at one temperature cannot, with anycertainty, be used to estimate values for other temperatures.Therefore, it is essential that hydrostatic or pressure designbases be determined for each specific kind and type of plasticcompound and each temperature. Estimates of lo