ASTM D1044-2008e1 Standard Test Method for Resistance of Transparent Plastics to Surface Abrasion《透明塑料软片表面耐摩擦性的标准试验方法》.pdf
《ASTM D1044-2008e1 Standard Test Method for Resistance of Transparent Plastics to Surface Abrasion《透明塑料软片表面耐摩擦性的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASTM D1044-2008e1 Standard Test Method for Resistance of Transparent Plastics to Surface Abrasion《透明塑料软片表面耐摩擦性的标准试验方法》.pdf(7页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Designation: D1044 081Standard Test Method forResistance of Transparent Plastics to Surface Abrasion1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D1044; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revisi
2、on. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.1NOTEEditorially corrected Note 9 in February 2012.1. Scope*
3、1.1 This test method describes a procedure for estimatingthe resistance of transparent plastics to one kind of surfaceabrasion by measuring the change in optical properties.1.2 Abrasive damage is visually judged and numericallyquantified by the difference in haze percentage in accordancewith Test Me
4、thod D1003 between an abraded and unabradedspecimen.1.3 CS-10F wheels manufactured between October 2002and September 2004 have been found to give different resultsthan historical values. Comparisons of data using these wheelsshould be made with caution. Results using wheels made afterSeptember 2004
5、have agreed with those obtained beforeOctober 2002.1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. The values given in parentheses are for informationonly.NOTE 1This test method is equivalent to ISO 3537 in the measure-ment of resistance to abrasion in Section 7, but is not equivale
6、nt toISO 3537 in any other measurement or section. This test method is notequivalent to ISO 9352, and results cannot be directly compared betweenthe two methods.NOTE 2This test method is similar to ANSI/SAE Z26.1, Test 17.NOTE 3Prior attempts to employ the Taber Abraser for volume lossdeterminations
7、 of various plastics2have been unsuccessful because ofexcessively large coefficients of variation attributed to the data. Insuffi-cient agreement among the participating laboratories has rendered the useof volume loss procedure inadvisable as an ASTM test method.NOTE 4For determining the resistance
8、to abrasion of organic coatingsby weight loss, reference is made to Test Method D4060, which uses moreaggressive CS-10 or CS-17 abrasive wheels. It suffers from poor repro-ducibility between laboratories when numerical abrasion resistance valuesare used. Interlaboratory agreement improves significan
9、tly when rankinga series of coatings for their abrasion resistance.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the ap
10、plica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for TestingD1003 Test Method for Haze and Luminous Transmittanceof Transparent PlasticsD4000 Classification System for Specifying Plastic Materi-alsD4060 Test Method
11、 for Abrasion Resistance of OrganicCoatings by the Taber AbraserE691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study toDetermine the Precision of a Test Method2.2 ISO Standards:4ISO 3537 Road VehiclesSafety Glazing MaterialsMechanical TestsISO 9352 PlasticsDetermination of Resistance to Wear byAbra
12、sive Wheels2.3 ANSI Standards:4ANSI/SAE Z26.1 Safety Glazing Materials for GlazingMotor Vehicle and Motor Vehicle Equipment Operatingon Land HighwaysAbrasion Resistance, Test 17 (Plas-tics)3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 abrasionabrasive wear caused by displacement orrearrangement of a softer ma
13、terial due to rubbing or scuffingagainst hard sharp particles.3.1.2 hazeIn accordance with Test Method D1003, thatpercentage of transmitted light which in passing through thespecimen deviates from the incident beam by forward scatter-ing. For the purpose of this test method, only light flux1This tes
14、t method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D20 on Plasticsand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D20.10 on Mechanical Properties.Current edition approved March 1, 2008. Published March 2008. Originallyapproved in 1949. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as D1044 - 05. DOI:10.
15、1520/D1044-08E01.2Supporting data are available from ASTM Headquarters. Request RR:D20-48and RR:D20-1090.3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standar
16、ds Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.4Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http:/www.ansi.org.1*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C7
17、00, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.deviating more than 0.044 rad (2.5) on the average isconsidered to be haze.3.1.3 refacepreparation of an abrasive wheel on a condi-tioning stone prior to use in testing.3.1.4 wheelan abrasive wheel consisting of hard particles(aluminum oxide) embed
18、ded in resilient binder.4. Significance and Use4.1 Transparent plastic materials, when used as windows orenclosures, are subject to wiping and cleaning; hence themaintenance of optical quality of a material after abrasion isimportant. It is the purpose of this test method to provide ameans of estima
19、ting the resistance of such materials to this typeand degree of abrasion.4.2 Although this test method does not provide fundamentaldata, it is suitable for grading materials relative to this type ofabrasion in a manner which correlates with service.4.3 Comparison of interlaboratory data or the speci
20、ficationof a “haze” value has no significance if the hazemeterrequirements given in 5.4 are not used. This is because lightdiffused from the surface of a Taber track is scattered at anarrow angle (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) while light diffused internallyby a specimen is scattered at a wide angle. In many h
21、azemeters,when a diaphragm is inserted to limit the light beam to thewidth of the abraded track, the specular beam at the exit portbecomes smaller. The dark annulus will then be greater than the0.023 6 0.002 rad (1.3 6 0.1) requirements of Test MethodD1003. Since a large percentage of the narrow-ang
22、le forward-scattered light will not impinge on the sphere wall, “haze”readings become smaller. For hazemeters that have not beenproperly adjusted, the magnitude of this reduction is dependentboth on the integrating sphere diameter and the reduction of theentrance beam.4.4 For many materials, there m
23、ay be a specification thatrequires the use of this test method, but with some proceduralmodifications that take precedence when adhering to thespecification. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to that materialspecification before using this test method. Table 1 of Classi-fication System D4000 lists
24、 the ASTM materials standards thatcurrently exist.4.5 For some materials, abrasion tests utilizing the Taberabraser may be subject to variation due to changes in theabrasive characteristics of the wheel during testing.4.5.1 Depending on abradant type and test specimen, thewheel surface may change (t
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASTMD10442008E1STANDARDTESTMETHODFORRESISTANCEOFTRANSPARENTPLASTICSTOSURFACEABRASION 透明 塑料 软片 表面 摩擦 标准

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-509157.html