[外语类试卷]雅思（写作）模拟试卷95及答案与解析.doc

《[外语类试卷]雅思（写作）模拟试卷95及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《[外语类试卷]雅思（写作）模拟试卷95及答案与解析.doc（3页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、雅思（写作）模拟试卷 95及答案与解析 1 Some people think that the university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to give practical training. Do you agree or disagree? Use your own experience and knowledge to support your idea. 2 Some people think the students should take the subjects which are decided by t

2、he government in the university. Others think that students can apply for the subjects they prefer. What is your opinion? 雅思（写作）模拟试卷 95答案与解析 1 【正确答案】 Whether theory and practice are contradictory to each other has long since been a controversial issue and is still unresolved. Some people claim that

3、university should not provide theoretical knowledge but to give practical training, which sounds unreasonable and even ridiculous to me. What my viewpoint towards this issue is that university should function as a comprehensive academic institution which can provide both theoretical knowledge and pr

4、actical training. At first, I would like to point out that university is an intermediate stage where the graduates from high school prepare themselves for their future in society. As we all know, high schools focus relatively more emphasis on elementary education, which means the teaching in high sc

5、hools is based on theoretical knowledge instead of practical training. Provided the university only attaches importance to the practical training, how can the college students adjust themselves to society and make contributions later without iearning about applying theory into practice? Secondly, th

6、eoretical knowledge has settled foundation for practical training which serves as essentially as a cornerstone. The latter will not even be able to exist without the former ones guiding and directing. Take my own experience for example. When I was a freshman in university, I was offered a part-time

7、job as a proofreader in a press. I accepted it without any hesitation considering it to be an extremely rare and valuable opportunity for practical training. Less than two weeks later I was dismissed by the chief editor who was mainly in charge of proofreading. The reason is simply that I was not qu

8、alified for the job due to lack of some correspondent theoretical knowledge. Thirdly, theoretical knowledge itself derives from practice via a demanding and sophisticated course of refining and abstracting. To provide proper amount of theoretical knowledge can consequently save money as well as time

9、 which are supposed to be devoted to practical training. In general, I stand my position that university ought not to replace theoretical knowledge teaching with practical training. Instead, we should attach the same importance to both aspects. 2 【正确答案】 Some people hold that college students are sup

10、posed to study imperative courses assigned by the government while others argue that they should be endowed with the right to select whatever subjects appealing to their own interest. As far as Im concerned, I side with the latter viewpoint and will demonstrate it in the following aspects. First and

11、 foremost, it is the basic human right to make personal choices, including what to study on campus, as schools are mere places for receiving education rather than military camps forcing people to accept everything imposed on them. Students, despite the fact that they just step into adulthood and may

12、 thus be inexperienced, actually dont need the government to confine them to a tiny little framework of knowledge. As an independent university student, one is both supposed to and able to apply for any subject hes keen on and shoulders all responsibilities for the decision. In the second place, eac

13、h individual is distinctive, meaning that one doubtlessly has his own aptitudes as well as weaknesses. As is known to all, one mans meat could be anothers poison. Therefore, the government should be sensible enough to entitle every single student to design or at least decide on his own curriculum ac

14、cording to his specific learning style and preference. It would have been a total catastrophe to have forced Beethoven to major in math and Einstein to work on opera. Every coin has two sides. Admittedly, there are still a few merits for students to take subjects determined by the government. For in

15、stance, students can better comprehend and pursue the latest trend of the countrys cultural orientations, if they want to. Whats more, they can lead a relatively easier academic life simply by following what is already prepared for them by the government. However, as we can clearly notify that these incentives are just for the sake of convenience. To sum up, to select subjects on ones own will contributes more to students all-round development and it conforms more closely to human nature as well.