API PUBL 4657-1997 Effects of Sampling and Analytical Procedures on the Measurement of Geochemical Indicators of Intrinsic Bioremediation Laboratory and Field Studies《影响采样和分析程序 对测量.pdf

《API PUBL 4657-1997 Effects of Sampling and Analytical Procedures on the Measurement of Geochemical Indicators of Intrinsic Bioremediation Laboratory and Field Studies《影响采样和分析程序 对测量.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《API PUBL 4657-1997 Effects of Sampling and Analytical Procedures on the Measurement of Geochemical Indicators of Intrinsic Bioremediation Laboratory and Field Studies《影响采样和分析程序 对测量.pdf（78页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、American Petroleum Institute EFFECTS OF SAMPLING AND ON THE MEASUREMENT OF OF INTRINSIC BIOREMEDIATION: LABORATORY AND FIELD STUDIES ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES GEOCHEMICAL INDICATORS Health and Environmentai Sciences Department Publication Number 4657 November 1997 American Petroleum P Institute American

2、 Petroleum Institute Environmental, Health, and Safety Mission and Guiding Principles MISSION The members ofthe American Petmleum Institute am dedicated to continuous e$orts to improve the compatibility of our operations with the envimnment while economically deveioping energy msouxes and supplying

3、high quality pmducts and services to consumers. We recognize our responsibility to work with the public, the government, and others to develop and to use natural resources in an envimnmentally sound manner while protecting the health and sa$ety of our employees and the public. To meet these riespnsi

4、bilties, API members pledge to manage our businesses according to the forrowng principles using sound science to prioritize risks and to implement cost-wive management pmctices: o To recognize and to respond to community concerns about our raw materials, products and operations. PRINCIPLES 0 To oper

5、ate our plants and facilities, and to handle our raw materiais and products in a manner that protects the environment, and the safety and health of our employees and the public. e To make safety, heaith and environmental considerations a priority in our planning, and our development of new products

6、and processes. o To advise promptly, appropriate officiais, employees, customers and the public of information on significant industry-related safety, health and environmental hazards, and to recommend protective measures. o To counsel customers, transporters and others in the safe use, transportati

7、on and disposal of our raw materials, products and waste materials. o To economically develop and produce natural resources and to conserve those resources by using energy efficiently. o To extend knowledge by conducting or supporting research on the safety, health and environmental effects of our r

8、aw materiais, products, processes and waste materiais. o To commit to reduce overall emission and waste generation. o To work with others to resolve problems created by handling and disposai of hazardous substances from our operations. o To participate with government and others in creating responsi

9、ble laws, regulations and standards to safeguard the community, workplace and environment. o To promote these principles and practices by sharing experiences and offering assistance to others who produce, handle, use, transport or dispose of similar raw materials, petroleum products and wastes. STD.

10、API/PETRO PUBL 4b57-ENGL 1997 0732290 Ob04524 02T = Effects of Sampling and Analytical Procedures on the Measurement of Geochemical Indicators of Intrinsic Bioremediation: Laboratory and Field Studies Health and Environmental Sciences Department API PUBLICATION NUMBER 4657 PREPARED UNDER CONTRACT BY

11、: CH2M-H ILL ST. LOUIS, MO 63102 10 SOUTH BROADWAY NOVEMBER 1997 American Petroleum I Institute - STD.API/PETRO PUBL 4b57-ENGL I1997 = 0732290 ObO?l525 Tbb FOREWORD API PUBLICATIONS NECESSARILY ADDRESS PROBLEMS OF A GENERAL NATURE. WITH RESPECT TO PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL

12、LAWS AND REGULATIONS SHOULD BE REVIEWED. API IS NOT UNDERTAKING To MEET THE DUTIES OF EMPLOYERS, WAC- TURERS, OR SUPPLIERS TO WARN AND PROPERLY TRAIN AND EQUIP THEIR EMPLOYEES, AND OTHERS EXPOSED, CONCERNING HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS AND PRECAUTIONS, NOR UNDERTAKING THEIR OBLIGATIONS UNDER LOCAL, STAT

13、E, OR FEDERAL LAWS. NOTHING CONTAINED IN ANY API PUBLICATION IS TO BE CONSTRUED AS GRANTING ANY RIGHT, BY IMPLICATION OR OTHERWISE, FOR THE MANU- FACTURE, SALE, OR USE OF ANY METHOD, APPARATUS, OR PRODUCT COV- ERED BY LETTERS PATENT. NEITHER SHOULD ANYTHING CONTAINED IN ITY FOR INFRINGEMENT OF LE?IT

14、ERS PATENT. THE PUBLICATION BE CONSTRUED AS INSURING ANYONE AGAINST LIABIL- A11 rights reserved. No parr of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by my means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise. without prior written permission from the

15、publisher Contact the publisher; API Publishing Services, 1220 L Street, N. W, Wmhington, D.C. 20005. Copyright Q 1997 American Petroleum Institute . 111 STD-APIIPETRO PUBL 4b57-ENGL 1997 m 0732290 Ob0452b 9T2 m ACKNOWLEDGMENTS THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE ARE RECOGNIZED FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS OF TIME AND

16、EXPERTISE DURING THIS STUDY AND IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT - Bruce Bauman, Health and Environmental Sciences Department Roger Cl 2) elevated levels of bicarbonate, methane, and ferrous iron; and 3) geochemical conditions that are in dramatic disequilibrium with the atmosphere. Based on theore

17、tical considerations, one would anticipate that the geochemistry of a groundwater sample from a geochemically reduced zone would be altered by sampling techniques that involve contact between the groundwater and the atmosphere. Such alterations in concentrations of dissolved oxygen, ferrous iron, an

18、d methane were confirmed in the project through both the laboratory and field studies. COWARTSON OF SAMPLING METHODS In the laboratory study, samples of known geochemical composition were collected from a sealed tank by three sampling methods: 1) a micropurging sampling method with a low flow submer

19、sible pump, 2) a variation of the micropurging sampling techniques with a peristaltic pump, and 3) a bailer. All sampling techniques resulted in some introduction of DO, and some loss of methane and ferrous iron. The micropurging method with the submersible pump consistently introduced the least bia

20、s. The most bias was introduced with the bailer. To further compare the effects of sampling methods, groundwater samples were collected from multiple wells at two different field sites. Wells were sampled using the micropurging method ES- 1 STDmAPIIPETRO PUBL Yb57-ENGL 1997 m 0732290 ObOY533 032 m w

21、ith a low flow submersible pump, and were then sampled with bailers. Results generally were consistent with the laboratory studies, particularly with respect to the greater loss of ferrous iron and methane with the bailer method. A limited amount of field work was done to evaluate data collection me

22、thods involving no purging of monitoring wells. For wells in zones geochemically affected by hydrocarbon releases, downhole DO probe measurements on unpurged monitoring wells often yield DO readings that are higher than the DO of formation groundwater. Of the sampling methods examined, the no purgin

23、g method resulted in the greatest loss of iron and methane from groundwater in geochemically reduced zones. COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL METHODS During the field studies, a comparison of field and commercial laboratory analytical methods for nitrate, sulfate, iron, and alkalinity was made. Field methods

24、 are of interest because the rapid sample analyses reduce the potential for changes in composition during shipment and storage, and allow for “real time” data evaluation in the field. Generally, there was fairly good correlation among data produced using the two methods, suggesting that field method

25、s are generally viable alternatives to use of a commercial laboratory. CONCLUSIONS While certain groundwater sampling techniques can alter the samples geochemistry, these changes may or may not significantly affect data interpretation. Groundwater in hydrocarbon bearing zones often has a geochemistr

26、y radically different than background groundwater as a result of naturally occurring hydrocarbon biodegradation. These general shifts in geochemistry can be readily detected using conventional groundwater monitoring and sampling techniques. If the objective is simply to provide geochemical evidence

27、of hydrocarbon biodegradation activity, then any of the groundwater monitoring and sampling techniques examined in this study generally will suffice, as long as they are consistently applied across a particular site. It is typically the differences among multiple measurements at a site that are impo

28、rtant. If, on the other hand, the geochemical data are used in quantitative projections of plume migration (e.g., input parameters in BIOPLUME IIi modeling), the potential biases in geochemical data ES-2 STD*API/PETRO PUBL 4657-ENGL 1997 W 0732290 Ob04534 T79 W introduced through sample collection s

29、hould be considered in scoping data collection activities. The potential for sampling methodology to significantly affect a quantitative intrinsic bioremediation evaluation will be highest on sites where the dominant biodegradation mechanisms are aerobic respiration, iron reduction, and/or methanoge

30、nesis. in summary, there are several groundwater sampling and analytical methods that may be appropriate for measuring geochemical indicators of intrinsic bioremediation. The methods vary in accuracy, level of effort, and cost. The choice of the best method for a given application should be based on

31、 project-specific and site-specific considerations, particularly the specific manner in which the data are to be used. A companion document (CH2M HILL, 1997) provides guidance on the selection and use of field sampling and analytical methods for measuring geochemical indicators of intrinsic bioremed

32、iation. ES -3 STDaAPIlPETRO PUBL 4b57-ENGL L997 W 0732290 Ob04535 905 Section 1 INTRODUCTION This report, sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute (MI), presents the results of laboratory and field studies on field methods for the measurement of geochemical indicators of intrinsic bioremediatio

33、n. Intrinsic bioremediation is a risk management strategy that relies on naturally occumng biodegradation for mitigation of the potential risks posed by subsurface contaminants. Various technical articles and protocols offer guidance on the groundwater parameters and properties that should be measur

34、ed to characterize intrinsic bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. These include dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrate, sulfate, ferrous iron, methane, carbon dioxide, alkalinity, oxidationheduction potential (OW), pH, conductivity, and temperature. Measurement of these parameters is being performed at

35、 an increasing number of petroleum hydrocarbon sites. However, there is a lack of guidance on appropriate sampling and analytical procedures to ensure that these measurements generate quality data. This lack of guidance is cause for concern because the extent to which intrinsic bioremediation is ult

36、imately embraced will depend, to a large degree, on the valid characterization of site conditions. The project consisted of a laboratory study, which allowed comparison of sampling methods under controlled conditions, as well as field studies, which allowed verification of laboratory results on samp

37、ling methods under actual.field conditions. The field studies also incorporated a comparison of commercial laboratory and field analytical methods. Field analytical methods are of interest because their use makes possible rapid sample analyses, thus reducing the potential for changes in the composit

38、ion of the sample during sample shipment and storage, and allowing for “real time” data evaluation in the field. Based on these studies, a companion document (CH2M HILL, 1997) was prepared to provide guidance on the selection and use of field sampling and analytical methods for measuring geochemical

39、 indicators of intrinsic bioremediation. 1-1 STD.API/PETRO PUBL 4657-ENGL 1997 0732290 O604536 841 The primary objective of this report is to document and discuss the findings of the laboratory and field studies. This report should not be interpreted as providing endorsement of a particular sampling

40、 or analytical method. Guidance on the selection and use of sampling and analytical methods used to support intrinsic bioremediation site characterizations is presented in the companion document (CH2M HILL, 1997). Site data on indicators of intrinsic bioremediation can be used in a variety of ways,

41、ranging from very qualitative uses (e.g., comparison to background data) to very quantitative uses (e.g., input parameters to numerical fate and transport models). The ultimate data use dictates the data quality objectives. The data quality obtained through the various sampling and analytical method

42、s, and effects on data use, are discussed in this report. This report should not be interpreted as providing endorsement of any particular data use. The field studies described in this report were conducted at petroleum hydrocarbon sites, and the report focuses on applications of intrinsic bioremedi

43、ation at petroleum hydrocarbon sites. However, the observations and findings presented will generally be applicable to any site where biodegradable organic constituents exist. 1-2 Section 2 BACKGROUND Microbial metabolism of petroleum hydrocarbons has predictable geochemical consequences (Wilson et

44、al., 1994). For example, respiration of hydrocarbons may result in the loss of oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate, and the production of ferrous iron. Petroleum hydrocarbons may also be biodegraded through an anaerobic process that results in the production of methane (i.e., methanogenesis). Measuring the

45、 trends in the distribution and concentration of these and other parameters can be used qualitatively to establish hydrocarbon biodegradation activity. Data on the spatial distribution of these parameters, together with hydrogeologic and stoichiometric data, are also sometimes used to support quanti

46、tative estimation of contaminant biodegradation rates and projection of plume migration. These uses of geochemical data will be valid only to the extent that these parameters are representative of geochemical conditions in the groundwater system sampled. Key considerations in the collection of repre

47、sentative geochemical data are outlined below. GEOCHEMICAL CONSIDERATIONS In recent years, it has become widely recognized that microorganisms can have profound effects on groundwater quality (Chapelle, 1993). This is particularly true where large masses of biodegradable organic compounds (e.g., pet

48、roleum hydrocarbons) are present in the vadose and groundwater zones. Hydrocarbon biodegradation involves microbiologically mediated oxidation coupled with reduction of an electron acceptor through the biological process of respiration. The reduction of highly oxidized electron acceptors (e.g., DO)

49、results in an overall decrease in the oxidizing potential of the groundwater. Once species with the highest oxidizing potential are exhausted, the next most highly oxidized electron acceptor is reduced. This process continues and the oxidizing potential of the groundwater system is progressively reduced. A general sequence of electron acceptor utilization and lowering of the oxidizing potential of the groundwater is as follows: 2- 1 - STD.API/PETRO PUBL 4657-ENGL 1997 m 0732290 Ob04538 bL4 m 1. Consumption of D