REG NASA-LLIS-0736--2000 Lessons Learned Arcjet Thruster Design Considerations for Satellites.pdf

《REG NASA-LLIS-0736--2000 Lessons Learned Arcjet Thruster Design Considerations for Satellites.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《REG NASA-LLIS-0736--2000 Lessons Learned Arcjet Thruster Design Considerations for Satellites.pdf（6页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-04-03a71 Center Point of Contact: GRCa71 Submitted by: Wilson HarkinsSubject: Arcjet Thruster Design Considerations for Satellites Practice: Use flight proven arcjet thrusters in the design of satellites and as a lightweight

2、reliable propulsion maneuvering system to lower propellant mass, increase orbital lifetime, and use smaller less costly launch vehicles.Programs that Certify Usage: This practice has been used on ELITE, STS 5 from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and T

3、est.Long-term spacecraft and propulsion system compatibility in near earth orbital environment has been demonstrated by several experimental test flights. This thruster system is currently being incorporated into the new series of Martin Marietta satellites as well as a new series of military reconn

4、aissance satellites. The benefits are a decrease in propulsion system weight, a potential reduction in mission cost, and an increase in orbital lifetime and satellite reliability.Implementation Method:Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-E

5、lectrothermal (arcjet) engines and thrusters have been around for the past thirty years. It has only been in the last ten years that these devices have gained popularity due to the decrease in weight of the power conditioning systems and improved performance of the thrusters. Lewis Research Center a

6、nd Olin Aerospace Corporation are jointly working on several varieties of low power arcjet thrusters for use as North-South stationkeeping thrusters for satellites.The mechanics of electrothermal propulsion is shown in the schematic of Figure 1. Propellant is pumped into a chamber where it is passed

7、 through an arc and electrically heated. This hot gas is then thermodynamically expanded through a nozzle and accelerated to supersonic speeds. Exhaust velocities of 1000 to 5000 m/sec have been produced with thrust ranges of 0.01 N to 0.5 N.1refer to D descriptionD Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo r

8、eproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Several areas of development at Lewis Research Center in cooperation with outside vendors, have focused on the advancement of electrothermal propulsion and integration of this into commercial and military satell

9、ites as a reliable maneuvering propulsion system. These areas include investigations into new propellants, low power capabilities, and advanced power processing.Propellant considerationsCurrent propellant considerations for north-south stationkeeping have been ammonia, hydrogen, and hydrazine. The i

10、deal propellant for arcjet engines is one which can be stored easily, has a low atomic mass, and favorable thermodynamic conditions during heating and expansion. The chart below shows the advantages and disadvantages for the various arcjet thruster propellants.Table 1. Electrothermal Propellant Cons

11、iderations2Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Electrothermal Propellants Advantages DisadvantagesHydrogen (H2) High specific heat and thermal conductivity.Difficulty in storage. Suffers from frozen flow losses in the nozzle expansion.Amm

12、onia (NH3) Liquid phase does not require refrigeration.Heavy molecule which dissociates into low-molecular-mass constituents which introduces frozen flow loses.Hydrazine (N2H4) Can be dual used for a combination propulsion system on satellites. Can be easily stored.Chemical erosion problems are inte

13、nsified at higher specific impulses. Heat transfer problems at the nozzle and chamber.Power Processing DevelopmentThe current research and testing of arcjet thrusters is the low power (1-2kW) range. NASA LeRC and Olin Aerospace are investigating the use of a low power arcjet thrusters on the new gen

14、eration of satellites. Early work on low power arcjet thrusters used a ballasted DC power supply hich transitioned the arc to steady-state operating conditions4. This caused significant electrode erosion and nonuniform arcs. These problems were overcome through changing the geometry of the electrode

15、, providing vortex flow stabilization, and development of a pulse-width modulated power processor with limiting current circuit for startups.5These improvements have lead to a 1000h/500 cycle lifetest which demonstrated long-term, reliable, non-damaging arcjet operation. Also demonstrated was an 891

16、 hr qualification lifetest of a 1.8 kW hydrazine arcjet with 918 restarts and a specific impulse of 520s.6The 1.8 kW hydrazine has been developed and approved for use on Lockheed Martin Series 7000 geosynchronous telecommunications satellites to provide a highly efficient means of north/south statio

17、nkeeping. AT&Ts Telstar 401 spacecraft was the first application of Lockheed Martins Series 7000.Technical RationaleDue to the gravitational perturbations caused by a combination of forces from the sun/moon/earth system, most geosynchronous satellites require north/south (N/S) stationkeeping. For a

18、satellite to maintain a positional accuracy of between 0.05 and 0.1 degrees, a delta velocity of approximately 49 m/s/year must be added in the north or south direction, perpendicular to the orbital plane.7The propellant requirements for N/S stationkeeping can represent up to 80% of the mass of tota

19、l propellant and up to 20% of the on-board “wet“ mass of the satellite. Therefore to improve the efficiency of stationkeeping class thrusters various designs and improvements have been developed. The latest and most efficient thruster design developed thus far is the hydrazine arcjet system.Provided

20、 by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Table 2 compares the use of hydrazine in various thruster configurations. The high specific impulse and the decrease in propellant weight add to the arcjets competitive edge over other propulsion thruster syste

21、ms.Table 2. N/S stationkeeping propellant mass comparison for a 12 Year, 1700 kg dry mass satellite.7Thruster SystemsTypical Thrust Level (N)Specific Impulse (lbf-s/lbm)N/S Stationkeeping Propellant (kg)Hydrazine (N2H4) 0.4-20 220 532Bipropellant (MMH/N2H4)20-40 302 373Resistojet (N2H4) 0.2-0.4 302

22、373Arcjet (N2H4) 0.15-0.3 520 207*Does not include dry mass penalty of approximately 20 kg.The hydrazine arcjet not only outperforms existing propulsion options, it also has several key advantages over other electric propulsion options. The performance and economic edge is derived from three major a

23、reas. The first is that arcjets have a relatively higher thrust than other electric propulsion devices which reduces duty cycles and battery demands. Second, the arcjets use of hydrazine propellant allows commonality and simplicity in the feed system. Third, the arcjet system is relatively compact i

24、n size and has a very high thermal efficiency which provides relatively simple structural and thermal spacecraft integration.While trade studies for different satellite masses and lifetimes will show a greater or lesser advantage for the arcjet, the conclusion reached is the same: arcjet thrusters w

25、ill have a major impact on reducing propellant mass and increasing the economic return on investment for many commercial satellite systems.References1. Sutton, George P. , Rocket Propulsion Elements: Introduction to the Engineering of Rockets, John Wiley & Sons, 19922. Jahn, Robert, Physics of Elect

26、ric Propulsion., McGraw-Hill Series in Missile and Space Technology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1968Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-3. Smith, W.W., Smith, R.D.,Yano, S.E., “Low Power Hydrazine Arcjet Flight Qualification“, IEPC-91-148,

27、 October 1991.4. Smith, R.D., Roberts, C.R., Davies, K. and Vaz, J., “Development and Demonstration of a 1.8 kW Hydrazine Arcjet Thruster“, AIAA-90-2547, July 1990.5. Curran, Francis M., Sovey, James S.,and Myers, Roger M.,“Electric Propulsion: An Evolutionary Technology“, Acta Astronautica Vol. 29,

28、 No. 9 pp. 651-665, 1993.6. Sovey, James S., Curran, Francis M., Haag, Thomas W., Patterson, Micheal J., Pencil, Eric J., Rawlin, Vincent K., “Development of Arcjet and Ion Propulsion For Spacecraft Stationkeeping“, NASA TM-106102.7. Sovey, James S., Pidgeon, David J., “Advance Propulsion For LEO an

29、d GEO Platforms“, AIAA 90-2551, July 1990.Impact of Non-Practice: Failure to use the design concepts presented in this guideline could result in more complex thruster designs, lower reliability, and higher launch vehicle costs.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-04-03a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-