REG NASA-LLIS-0706--2000 Lessons Learned Monitoring Spacecraft Exposure to Magnetic Fields.pdf

《REG NASA-LLIS-0706--2000 Lessons Learned Monitoring Spacecraft Exposure to Magnetic Fields.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《REG NASA-LLIS-0706--2000 Lessons Learned Monitoring Spacecraft Exposure to Magnetic Fields.pdf（5页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-03-16a71 Center Point of Contact: JPLa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Monitoring Spacecraft Exposure to Magnetic Fields Practice: This reliability practice provides a read out of magnetic field exposures which could adve

2、rsely affect the magnetic cleanliness of the spacecraft. When transporting a spacecraft or flight instrument to a launch site or other facility, monitor the D.C. magnetic field peak exposure with a “tell tale“ sensor. This practice is also applicable to flight hardware placed in storage for extended

3、 periods.Abstract: Preferred Practice for Design from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:The “tell tale“ device will provide an indication of the peak D.C. magnetic field intensity to which the transported (or stored) system has been exp

4、osed. High residual fields are sometimes caused by nearby lightning strikes, power system faults or exposure to strong permanent magnets. Compliance with the peak magnetic field exposure, as defined in the Magnetic Control Plan document, assures that the flight hardware is in its lowest magnetic sta

5、te, thereby minimizing any adverse effects on the integrity of science data.Implementation Method:JPL uses a version of the “tell tale“ sensor devised by the Ames Research Center to verify compliance with the magnetic control imposed on the Apollo program and by the science requirements for the Pion

6、eer spacecraft. This 3 cm cubic sensor is comprised of 3 orthogonal Dumet wires (20 AWG, approximately 5 cm long) embedded in a plastic block (provided with a ground strap to avoid electrostatic discharge). The block is demagnetized in a near zero field environment and the net magnetic moment is mea

7、sured in the earths field (0.05 mT) Typical value at mid-latitudes (0.5 Gauss), Gauss = 10-4Tesla, mT = milliTesla and at several intermediate points up to a maximum exposure of 2.5 mT (25 Gauss). After a demagnetization, the device is ready for use. For practical considerations, the device characte

8、ristics are expressed in terms of the observed effect of field exposure, i.e. magnetic field in nanoTeslas (nT) produced at a distance of 0.3 meter (12 inches) from the tell tale. Figure 1 shows a sample calibration.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license

9、 from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Given the measured field exposure characteristics for peak exposure of the device, subsequent measurements are indicative of the maximum field exposure since the last demagnetization. Sample results are indicated in Table 1, where the maximum field exposure was

10、less than 0.3 mT (3 Gauss).Table 1: Magnetic Exposure Recorder, Sample Results Serial Number Measured Magnetic Field 0.3m (12“)*X-Axis Y-Axis Z-Axis SN 003 1 1 1 SN 002 1 1.5 1 SN 001 1 1 1 SN 009 2 1 1 *(nT, peak to peak)Typically, 4 to 6 sensors are mounted around the perimeter of the system being

11、 monitored. At significant points in the processing of the flight hardware, the sensors are removed for measurement, demagnetized, and returned to their initial locations. In the event that excessive field exposure is detected, cognizant hardware personnel can determine if the flight hardware being

12、monitored Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-requires demagnetization. Knowledge of the locations of the sensors, their relative field exposure, and the hardware processing performed since the last measurement can aid in the identificati

13、on of the source of the magnetization and in determining if the spacecraft needs localized demagnetization.An example of the use of this device is the transport container for the Galileo spacecraft. Four sensors were located on the inside of the truck container wall around the spacecraft. Two sensor

14、s were mounted ahead of the spacecraft on the right and left side wall and two more were mounted behind the spacecraft. Thus, the sensors would be more exposed than the spacecraft to any external magnetic field that might pass by the transport truck. At the end of the cross country trip, none of the

15、 twelve magnetizable rods showed any evidence of exposure to an excessive magnetic field.Technical Rationale:Because it is impractical to completely eliminate the use of ferromagnetic materials on spacecraft and flight hardware, it is important to control the maximum magnetic field exposure for hard

16、ware used on those missions for which a magnetic control plan has been implemented. In most cases, a magnetic control plan is required for missions which have a science magnetometer or a plasma wave experiment as part of the payload.Verification of compliance with the specified maximum field exposur

17、e is difficult because not all sources of strong magnetic fields are obvious, and there is no sensual perception of magnetic fields in the range of interest for spacecraft concerns, 0.1 to 2.5 mT (1 to 25 Gauss). In addition, the time interval over which monitoring may be required can be very long-

18、particularly if the flight hardware has to be shipped over long distances or placed in storage. Hence, a passive sensing device is needed.Dumet, a ferromagnetic alloy, has mechanical properties which make it suitable for applications such as component leads requiring a hermetic seal to glass. An anc

19、illary characteristic of this material is a high magnetic permeability. This property, coupled with the fact that the material is available in the form of small diameter wire, makes it suitable for use in the fabrication of the “tell tale“ sensors. Alternate materials include Kovar and ferrites.Refe

20、rences:1. “Assessment and Control of Spacecraft Magnetic Fields“, NASA SP-8037, September 1970.2. Magnetic Design Control for Science Instruments, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PD-ED-12073. Demagnetization of Ferromagnetic Parts, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PD-ED-12204. Magnetic Field Re

21、straints for Spacecraft Systems and Subsystems, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PD-ED-1222Impact of Non-Practice: Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-If there is no process in place to monitor the magnetic field exposure of flight hard

22、ware between integration and launch, there is no assurance that high permeability materials are in their lowest magnetic state. Magnetized components could result in erroneous magnetometer experiment data or other adverse effects.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-03-16a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-