ITU-T X 740 CORR 1-1995 Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management Security Audit Trail Function - Technical Corrigendum 1 Data Networks and Open Sy.pdf

《ITU-T X 740 CORR 1-1995 Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management Security Audit Trail Function - Technical Corrigendum 1 Data Networks and Open Sy.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-T X 740 CORR 1-1995 Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management Security Audit Trail Function - Technical Corrigendum 1 Data Networks and Open Sy.pdf（42页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU Corrigendum I X.740 (04195) DATA NETVVORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS OS1 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION - SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT: SECURITY AUDIT TRAIL FUNCTION TECHNICAL COR

2、RIGENDUM I Corrigendum 1 to ITU-T Recommendation X.740 (Previously “CCITT Recommendation”) ITU-T Rec. X.740 (1992)/Cor.l(1995 E) i IPN= 4862591 0690730 654 FOREWORD ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The 1727 Telec

3、ommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. Some 179 member countries, 84 telecom operating entities, 145 scientific and industrial organizations and 38 international organizations participate in ITU-T which is the body which sets world telecommunications standards (

4、Recommendations). The approval of Recommendations by the Members of ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, 1993). In addition, the World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, approves Recommendations submitted to i

5、t and establishes the study programme for the following period. In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-Ts purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with IS0 and IEC. The text of ITU-T Recommendation X.740, Corrigendum 1, was approved on 10th of Apr

6、il 1995. The identical text is also published as ISOhEC International Standard 10164-8. NOTE In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized private operating agency. O ITU 1995 Ail rights reserved.

7、No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. i IPN= 4862591 0690731 590 ITU-T X-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS (F

8、ebruary 1994) ORGANIZATION OF X-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS Subject area PUBLIC DATA NETWORKS Recommendation Series I Services and Facilities I X. l-X.19 I Interfaces Transmission, Signalling and Switching X.20-X.49 X.50-X.89 I Network Aspects I X.90-X.149 I Maintenance Administrative Arrangements X. 150

9、-X.179 X.180-X.199 I OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION I I Model and Notation Service Definitions X.200-X.209 X.2 10-X.2 19 I Connection-mode Protocol Specifications I X.220-X.229 I Connectionless-mode Protocol Specifications PICS Proformas X.230-X.239 X.240-X.259 I Protocol Identification I X.260-X.269

10、I Layer Managed Objects Conformance Testing I Security Protocols I X.270-X.279 I X.280-X.289 X.290-X.299 General Mobile Data Transmission Systems Management I INTERWORKTNG BETWEEN NETWORKS I I X.300-X.349 X.350-X.369 X.370-X.399 DIRECTORY OS1 NETWORKJNG AND SYSTEM ASPECTS I MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS

11、I X.400-X.499 I X.500-X.599 Networking Naming, Addressing and Registration X.600-X.649 X.650-X.679 - - - I 1 Abstract Svntax Notation One ASN.1) I X.680-X.699 SECURITY OS1 APPLICATIONS I OS1 MANAGEMENT I X.700-X.799 I X.800-X.849 Commitment, Concurrency and Recovery Transaction Processing X.850-X.85

12、9 X.860-X.879 Remote Operations OPEN DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING IPN= 4862591 0690732 427 X.880-X.899 X.900-X.999 IT-T Rec. X.740 (1992)lCor.l (1995 E) iii Summary This technical corrigendum corrects the conformance statement in clause 13 and the implementation Conformance Statement proformas (ICs). Thes

13、e changes will ensure this Recommendation aligns with the Amendment 1 applied to each of Recommendations X.730 to X.736 inclusive for conformance. IPN= 4862591 0690733 363 1W-T RECOMMENDATION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION - SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT: SECURITY AUDIT TRAIL FUNCTION TE

14、CHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 (to Rec. X.740 I ISOKEC 10164-8) 1) Add the following footnote to the first list item in 2.1: l) as amended by ITU-T Rec. X.701/Cor.2 I ISO/IEC lOMO/Cor.2” 2) Apply the following change to 2.1: Remove footnote 1 and replace the fourth lut item with the following: “- ITU-T Recom

15、mendation X.724 (1993) I ISOIIEC 10165-6:1994, Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Structure of management information: Requirements and guidelines fir implementation conformance statement proformas associated with OSI management.” 3) Add the following reference to 3.3: CL- ITU-T

16、 Recommendation X.2963), OSI conformance testing methodology and framework fir protocol Recommendations for ITU-T applications - Implementation conformance statements. ISOAEC 9646J3), Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Confirmance testing methodology and framework - Part 7: Impl

17、ementation Conformance Statements. And then add the following footnote: Presently at the stage of draft. 3, 4) Apply the following changes to 3.4: Replace “dependent conformance” with “managed object conformance statement (MOCS)”. Replace “general conformance” with “management information conformanc

18、e statement (MICS)”. Relabel items$ and g) as h) and i) and insert the following new items: Q MICS proforma; g) MOCS proforma;” 5) Insert the following new subclause: “3.9 This Recommendation I International Standard makes use of the following terms defined in ITU-T Rec.X.724 1 Implementation confor

19、mance statement proforma definitions ISO/IEC 10165-6: a) b) Management Conformance Summary (MCS); c) d) MCS proforma; e) MRCS proforma.” Managed Relationship Conformance Statement (MRCS); Management Information Definition Statement (MIDS) proforma; 6) Add the following abbreviation to clause 4: “ICs

20、 Implementation Conformance Statement MICS Management Information Conformance Statement MRCS Managed Relationship Conformance Statement” Replace clause 13 with the following: 7) IT-T Rec. X.740 (1992)/Cor.l(1995 E) IPN= 4862591 0690734 2TT I -13 umiurIIiaIict: Implementations claiming to conform to

21、this Recommendation I International Standard shall comply with the conformance requirements as defined in the following subclauses. 13.3 Any MCS proforma, MICS proforma, and MOCS proforma which conforms to this Recommendation 1 International Standard shall be technically identical to the proformas s

22、pecified in Annexes B, C and D preserving table numbering and the index numbers of items, and differing only in pagination and page headers. The supplier of an implementation which is claimed to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall complete a copy of the Management Conforman

23、ce Summary (MCS) provided in Annex B as part of the conformance requirements together with any other ICs proformas referenced as applicable from that MCS. An ICs which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard shall: Management implementation conformance statement requirements - - des

24、cribe an implementation which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard; have been completed in accordance with the instructions for completion given in lTU-T Rec. X.724 I include the information necessary to uniquely identifj both the supplier and the implementation. ISO/IEC 1 O1 65-

25、6; - Claims of conformance to the management information defined in this Recommendation 1 International Standard in managed object classes defhed elsewhere shall include the requirements of the MIDS proforma in the MOCS for the managed object class. 8) Apply the following change to A.5: Replace the

26、production for “SecurityAuditInfo” with the following: ” SecuntyAuditInfo := SEQUENCE serviceReportCause I ServiceReportCause OPTIONAL, notificationIdentifier Notificatioddentifier OPTIONAL, correlateNotifications i IMPLICIT CorrelatedNotifications OPTIONAL, additionalText AdditionalText OPTIONAL, a

27、dditionalInformation 12) IMPLICIT AdditionalInformation OPTIONAL It* 9) Replace Annexes B, C, D and E with the following: 2 ITU-T Rec. X.740 (1992)/Cor.l(1995 E) IPN= 4862591 0690735 136 13.1 Static conformance The implementation shall conform to the requirements of this Recommendation I Intemationa

28、l Standard in the manager role, the agent role, or both roles. A claim of conformance to at least one role shall be made in Table B.i . If a claim of conformance is made for support in the manager role, the implementation shall support at least one of the notifications or at least one of the managem

29、ent operations specified in this Recommendation I International Standard. The conformance requirements in the manager role for those management operations and notifications are identified in Table B.3 and further tables referenced by Annex B. If a claim of conformance is made for support in the agen

30、t role, the implementation shall support at least one of the notifications specified in this Recommendation I International Standard. The conformance requirements in the agent role are identified in Table B.4 and further tables referenced by Annex B. The implementation shall support the transfer syn

31、tax derived from the encoding rules specified in CCITT Rec. X.209 1 ISO/IEC 8825 named cjoint-iso-ccitt asnl(1) basicEncoding(l) for the abstract data types referenced by the definitions for which support is claimed. NOTE - Prior to the publication of this amendment, this Recommendation I Internatio

32、nal Standard identified general and dependent conformance classes. A claim of conformance similar to general conformance class can be made by stating support in the manager role, the agent role, or both roles, for the security audit trail reporting functional unit in Table B.2. A claim of conformanc

33、e similar to dependent conformance class can be made by stating support for at least one of the items in Tables B.3 or B.4. 13.2 Dynamic conformance Implementations claiming to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall support the elements of procedure and definitions of semantic

34、s corresponding to the definitions for which support is claimed. MCS proformas) (This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation I International Standard) B.l Introduction B.l.l Purpose and structure The Management Conformance Summary (MCS) is a statement by a supplier that identifies an im

35、plementation and provides information on whether the implementation claims conformance to any of the listed set of documents that specify conformance requirements to OS1 management. The MCS proforma is a document in the form of a questionnaire that when completed by the supplier of an implementation

36、 becomes the MCS. B.1.2 The supplier of the implementation shall enter an explicit statement in each of the boxes provided. Specific instmction is provided in the text which precedes each table. B.13 Symbols, abbreviations and terms For ail annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, th

37、e following common notations, defined in CCITT Rec. X.291 I ISOIEC 9646-2 and IT-T Rec. X.296 I ISOAEC 9646-7, are used for the Status column: Instructions for completing the MCS proforma to produce a MCS m Mandatory; o Optional; C Conditional; X Prohibited; - NOTES 1 2 Not applicable or out of scop

38、e. c, m, and o are prefxed by “c:” when nested under a conditional or optional item of the same table; o may be suffixed by “.N” (where N is a unique number) for selectable options among a set of status values. Support of at least one of the choices (from the items with the same value of N) is requi

39、red. For ail annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT Y Implemented; N Not implemented; - No answer required; Ig The item is ignored (Le. processed syntactically but not semantically). B.1.4 Table format Some of the tables in this Reco

40、mmendation I International Standard have been split b Rec. X.291 I ISOIEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used-for the Support column: cause the idormation i 30 wide to fit on the page. Where this occurs, the kdex number of the first block of columns are the index numbers of the co

41、rresponding rows of the remaining blocks of columns. A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the following layout: I Index I First block of columns I Second block of columns I Etc. I 5) Users of this Recommendation I Intemational Standard may freely reproduce the MCS pr

42、oforma in this annex so that it can be used for its intended purpose, and may further publish the completed MCS. Instnictions for the MCS proforma are specified in IT-TRec. X.724 I ISO/IEC 10165-6. ITU-T Rec. X.740 (1992)/Cor.l(1995 E) 3 IPN= 4862591 0690736 072 rust bioc or coiumns. Index A B C D 1

43、 ab- 2 ab- When a table with sub-rows is too wide to fit on a page, the continuation table(s) have been constructed with index numbers identical to the index numbers in the corresponding rows of the first table, and with sub-index numbers corresponding to the sub-rows within each indexed row. For ex

44、ample, if Table X. 1 has 2 rows and the continuation of Table X. 1 has 2 sub-rows for each row, the tables are presented as follows: %PO* E F G Table X.l - Title Table X.l (continued) - Title A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the following layout: References made

45、to cells within tables shall be interpreted as references within reconstructed tables. In the example, above, the reference X.l/ld corresponds to the blank cell in column G for row with Index 1, and X.1/1.2b corresponds to the blank cell io column L for row with Sub-index 1.2. B.2 Identification of

46、the implementation B.2.1 Date of statement The supplier of the implementation shall enter the date of this statement in t-2 box below. Use the format DD-MM- m. Date of statement 4 ITU-T Rec. X.740 (1992)/Cor.l(1995 E) IPN= 4862591 0690737 TO9 The supplier of the implementation shall enter informatio

47、n necessary to uniquely identi the implementation and the system(s) in which it may reside, in the box below. B.2.3 Contact The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on whom to contact if there are any queries concerning the content of the MCS or any referenced conformance stateme

48、nt, in the box below. B.3 Identification of the Recommendations I International Standards in which the management information is defined The supplier of the implementation shall enter the title, reference number and date of the publication of the Recommendations I International Standards which speci

49、 the management information to which conformance is claimed, in the box below. Recommendations I Intemational Standards to which conformance is claimed BA1 Technical corrigenda implemented The supplier of the implementation shall enter the reference numbers of implemented technical corrigenda which modi the identified Recommendations 1 International Standards, in the box below. BA2 Amendments implemented The supplier of the implementation shall state the titles and reference numbers of implemented amendments to the identified Recommendations I Internat