ITU-R M 1090-1994 Frequency Plans for Satellite Transmission of Single Channel per Carrier (SCPC) Carriers Using Non-Linear Transponders in the Mobile-Satellite Service《移动卫星业务中使用非线.pdf

《ITU-R M 1090-1994 Frequency Plans for Satellite Transmission of Single Channel per Carrier (SCPC) Carriers Using Non-Linear Transponders in the Mobile-Satellite Service《移动卫星业务中使用非线.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R M 1090-1994 Frequency Plans for Satellite Transmission of Single Channel per Carrier (SCPC) Carriers Using Non-Linear Transponders in the Mobile-Satellite Service《移动卫星业务中使用非线.pdf（6页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、ITU-R RECMN*H. 3090 94 4855232 0523663 532 58 Rec. ITU-R M.1090 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M. 1090 FREQUENCY PLANS FOR SATELLITE TRANSMISSION OF SINGLE CHANNEL PER CARRIER (SCPC) CARRIERS USING NON-LINEAR TRANSPONDERS IN THE MOBILE-SATELLITE SERVICE (Question ITU-R 87/8) (1 994) The ITU Radiocommunication

2、 Assembly, considering a) transponder in satellite communication systems; a) that a number of SCPC (Single Channel Per Carrier) carriers are transmitted via a single satellite b) which case intermodulation noise affects signal quality; that, for efficient use of satellite power, the transponder woul

3、d be operated in the near saturation region, in cl by suitably positioning the channels within the available bandwidth; d) e) that the intermodulation products falling into the frequency slots of occupied signai channels could be reduced that bandwidth-efficient frequency plans need to be developed;

4、 the analysis of intermodulation-minimum frequency assignment as described in Annex 1, recommends 1. that the procedure described in the annex, for minimizing the intermodulation products by appropriately selecting carrier frequency assignments, should be used as a design tool for use in the control

5、 system of a mobile satellite system to determine the preferred carrier allocation for minimizing the intermodulation noise. Note I - Further studies are needed in the following areas when considering practical systems: - dynamic assignment of channels; - - - dynamic power control. restricted bandwi

6、dth which may mean that possible channel selection is limited; the carriers will normally be voice activated; ANNEX 1 Design of frequency plans for satellite transmission of SCPC carriers using non-linear transponders 1. Introduction In satellite communication systems, a number of SCPC carriers are

7、transmitted via a single satellite transponder. For efficient use of satellite power, the transponder would be operated in the non-linear region, in which case intermodulation noise affects signal quality. The intermodulation products falling into the frequency slots of occupied channels could be re

8、duced by suitably positioning the channels within the available bandwidth. Babcock spacing is a typical example of this approach where the channels are completely free from third-order intermodulation noise. However, such an intermodulation-free frequency plan would not necessarily be desirable beca

9、use of its inefficient use of available bandwidth, especially where a large number of channels have to be accommodated. For example, in order to accommodate 20 channels, it would be COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling ServicesITU-R

10、 RECMN*N* 1090 94 4855232 0523662 459 Rec. ITU-R M.1090 59 necessary to utilize a bandwidth more than ten times the width of a plan using adjacent frequency slots. Hence, bandwidth-efficient frequency plans need to be developed, and one approach is to allow some intermodulation products to fall into

11、 the channels, but only to the extent that the degradation of signai quality can be acceptable. This annex discusses the assignment of frequencies based on this approach, which is referred to hereafter as intermodulation-minimum frequency assignment. 2. Equal level SCPC carriers 2. I Relationship be

12、tween assigned bandwidth and intermodulation products It is difficult to determine theoretically intermodulation-minimum frequency plans. However, the attainable minimum number of intermodulation products falling into the worst affected traffic channel can be estimated by a theoretically derived low

13、er bound. Figure 1 shows the theoretically derived lower bounds of the number of the (fi + f2 - f3) type third-order intermodulation products falling into the worst traffic channel as a function of the assigned bandwidth, with the number of traffic channels to be accommodated as a parameter. In this

14、 figure, the number of intermodulation products, which is proportional to the intermodulation noise power, is normalized against the number produced in the worst channel in a plan using adjacent frequency slots. The result is then expressed in decibels. For convenience, the latter plan is referred t

15、o hereafter as minimum equal-spacing. The assigned bandwidth is also normalized by that required for the minimum equal-spacing plan. 2.2 Intermodulation-minimum frequency plan Intermodulation-minimum frequency plans have been obtained for practical application by computer calculation. For a small nu

16、mber of traffic channels, the optimum solution can be obtained by examining all possible combinations. For a large number of traffic channels, the quasi-optimum solution, which may not be optimum but would be considered very close to optimum, can be obtained by an iterative approach. Comparing them

17、with their lower bounds, it is observed that the number of intermodulation products falling into the worst traffic channel in the intermoduiation-minimum frequency pians can be estimated effectively by using the lower bound curve for K = - shown in Fig. 1. 3. Multi-level SCPC carriers In future sate

18、llite systems it may be desirable to operate with several standards of mobile earth stations having different G/T values. One possibility would be to transmit signals destined to the various mobile earth station standards with different satellite e.i.r.p. levels. Even within systems that operate wit

19、h a single mobile earth station standard, different satellite carrier power levels may be used for different services. However, accommodation of large numbers of carriers of mixed power levels in a single non-linear satellite transponder by placing the carriers in arbitrarily-selected channel assign

20、ments could easily lead to situations where intermodulation noise from certain relatively higher-power channels would render several relatively lower-power channels unusable. 3. I Mixed-level frequency plan alternatives One type of frequency pian capable of easily accommodating mixed level carriers

21、assigns carriers to channels selected from a set of equally spaced channels using a Babcock spacing. Resultant assignment channels are totally free of third-order intermodulation noise and could consequently be used for carriers of any power level. However, Babcock plans are generally impractical, u

22、nless the number of required carrier assignments is small, due to the inefficient use such pians make of the available bandwidth. COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling Services ITU-R RECMNxM. LO90 94 485.5212 0523663 395 Rec. ITU-R M

23、.1090 FIGURE 1 Retationship between the number ofinennodulation products failing into the mrst raffr channel and the assigned bandwidth O -1 -2 a, -3 o a E -4 5 C O .a d -5 E; 9 -6 8 -7 = -8 C O o c( rci 5 3 -9 z - 10 - 11 - 12 K = 50 $ 1 2 3 4 5 Normalized bandwidth Obtained results: 0: K=20 o: K=3

24、0 A: K=a A: K=50 0: K=lO A : lower bounds K: number of trafic channels :* Improved efficiency at the expense of third-order intermodulation products falling in assigned channels can be achieved with “multiple Babcock” plans. For example, in the case of a two-level system, such plans are formed by pl

25、acing two identical Babcock plans side by side in frequency, but separated by an amount approximately equal to the bandwidth of one of the identical plans. This is referred to hereafter as a “double Babcock” plan. Since such a plan still provides a substantial reduction in the number of third-order

26、products within each assigned channel over that which could be obtained with uniform or random channel spacings, intermodulation performance may be sufficiently good to operate with mixed level carriers. COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information

27、Handling ServicesITU-R RECMN*M. LO90 94 I 4855232 0523bb4 223 Rec. ITU-R M.1090 61 If required, performance of the “double Babcock” plan can be improved for any selected assigned channel by deleting its “twin” assigned channel in the opposite half of the plan. When this is done, the selected channel

28、 becomes totally free of third-order intermodulation products. Consequently these improved channels may be used for carriers either lower or higher in power than other channels of the plan. Although the bandwidth efficiency of this plan is better than that of a Babcock plan, it still utilizes bandwi

29、dth inefficiently and is useful only when small numbers of assignable channels are required. More bandwidth-efficient plans can be achieved at the expense of higher levels of intermodulation noise falling into carrier channels. Two methods, “dedicated zone method” and “interleaving method”, which ac

30、hieve a significant improvement in bandwidth utilization efficiency while at the same time providing low intermodulation noise power in carrier channels, have been suggested. In the “dedicated zone method”, a dedicated frequency band is provided within the available bandwidth for carriers of each po

31、wer levei, and the carriers are placed within the dedicated frequency band exclusively usable by them. If the dedicated frequency bands are properly placed within the whole bandwidth, the band for lower level carriers could be free from the intermodulation products caused by higher level carriers. I

32、f it is possible to separate the two dedicated bands by an unassigned band, the possibility of intermodulation products caused by higher level carriers falling into the dedicated frequency band for lower level carriers could be further reduced. In the “interleaving method”, the carrier of ith level

33、is placed only on the (Mj+i) numbered frequency slots, where: M : number of carrier levels i: integer between 1 and M j : integer between O and (BIM - 1) B : number of the whole assignable frequency slots. In this method, the intermodulation products caused by three carriers of a certain power level

34、 necessarily fall into the frequency slots for carriers of the same power level, thus the intermodulation products caused by higher level carriers would not fall into the frequency slots for lower level carriers. In the case of a dual-level system, for example, the “interleaving method” leads to an

35、“odd-even” plan, where high power carriers are placed on even-numbered slots and lower power carriers on odd-numbered slots. In the case of a dual-level system, the third-order products created may be classified into one of eight categories shown in Table 1. The table also shows the approximate rela

36、tive powers of each product type assuming that the ratio of low power to high power carriers is equal to “r”. The advantage gained with plans based on the “dedicated zone method” and the “interleaving method” is that the more powerful intermodulation products of category 1 do not fall in frequency s

37、lots where the lower power carriers are placed. In many cases, the “dedicated zone method” may provide larger reduction in the number of the intermodulation products falling into channels of the lower level carriers than the “interleaving method”. Actual frequency plans can be obtained by the follow

38、ing procedure. First, the positions of the lowest level carriers are determined within the frequency slots for them by using the iterative approach. Then, the positions of the next low level carriers are determined within the frequency slots for them by the iterative method, where the worst carrier-

39、to-intermodulation noise power ratio (C/IM) among all carriers already placed is maximized. This procedure is repeated on a level-to-level basis until the positions of carriers of all levels are determined. 3.2 Typical performance of a dual-level plan In order to compare two assignment methods for t

40、he multi-level systems, the C/lM improvement has been calculated for typical examples of two-level and three-level systems. The CIIM improvement means the amount of improvement in the worst C/IM compared with that for the frequency plan where the lowest-level carriers are equally spaced, and where t

41、he number of carriers are chosen so as to maintain the same output power in the satellite transponder. For the two-level system, it is assumed that ten carriers with a certain level and ten carriers with 10 dB higher level share a transponder. For the three-level system, it is assumed that ten carri

42、ers with a certain level (L), ten carriers with 7 dB higher level, and ten carriers with 10 dB higher level than L share a transponder. Furthermore, a normalized bandwidth of three is assumed for both cases. Table 2 summarizes the performance of the obtained frequency plans. The table implies that t

43、he “dedicated zone method” could provide better C/lM in the lower power carrier channels than the “interleaving method”. COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling ServicesITU-R RECMNxM- 1090 94 = 485521i2 0523665 1b8 Product category 62

44、Channels into which the products may fail Dedicated zone method Interleaving method Product Relative power type Rec. ITU-R M.1090 1 2 3 TABLE 1 fh+fh-fh 1 For H carriers For H carriers fh +fh-ft r For L carriers For L carriers fh + ft - fh fh ft - ft r2 For H and L carriers For H carriers ft +ft-fh

45、Categories and relative powers of the third-order intermodulation products and channels into which the products may fall for a dual-level frequency plan 4 5 ft+ft-ft r3 For H and L carriers For L carriers 2f h - fh 114 For H and L carriers For H carriers 6 2fh-ft rl4 Unused slots For L camers 7 8 2f

46、t-fh r =I4 For H and L carriers For H carriers 2fr-ft r 314 For H and L carriers For L carriers Note I - fh is used to indicate a frequency slot for a high-power carrier and ft to indicate a frequency slot for a low-power carrier. Note 2 - ris the ratio of low-power to high-power carrier powers. Not

47、e 3 - H carrier is used to indicate a high-power carrier and L carrier to indicate a low-power carrier. Number of carrier levels TABLE 2 CIIM improvement Level of carriers dB) dB) Dedicated zone method Interleaving method Comparison of performance of multi-level frequency plans based on the “dedicat

48、ed zone method” and the “interleaving method” 2 O 5.2 3.2 10 5.2 5.3 O 3.2 2.8 3 7 3.4 2.8 10 6.2 5.1 Note I - CIIM improvement means the amount of improvement in the worst CIIM compared with that in the frequency plan where the lowest level carriers are equally spaced, and where the number of carri

49、ers is chosen so as to maintain the same output power in the satellite transponder. COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling ServicesITU-R RECMN*M- LO90 74 4855232 0523bbb OT4 = RS. ITU-R M.1090 63 4. Conclusions it has been shown that the number of third-order intermodulation products falling into a channel slot can be substantially reduced by the use of a carrier assignment plan encompassing an assigned bandwidth greater than that for the minimum equal-spacing plan. It was also shown in Fig. 1 that the normalized n