CEPT ERC REPORT 51-1997 Principles for Sharing between Military and Civil Radio Services (Bucharest)《军事和民用无线电业务之间共享原则 布加勒斯特》.pdf

《CEPT ERC REPORT 51-1997 Principles for Sharing between Military and Civil Radio Services (Bucharest)《军事和民用无线电业务之间共享原则 布加勒斯特》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《CEPT ERC REPORT 51-1997 Principles for Sharing between Military and Civil Radio Services (Bucharest)《军事和民用无线电业务之间共享原则 布加勒斯特》.pdf（4页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、STDaCEPT ERC REPORT 51-ENG1 1997 D 232b4L4 0033304 O22 ERC REPORT 51 PRINCIPLES FOR SHARING BETWEEN MILITARY AND CIVIL RADIO SERVICES Bucharest, 2 - 5 December 1997 STD-CEPT ERC REPORT 53-ENGL 1777 2326434 0033305 Tb9 W Copyright 1998 the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administ

2、rations (CEFT) STD.CEPT ERC REPORT 51-ENGL 1797 232b414 00L330b 9T5 M ERC REPORT 51 Page I PRINCIPLES FOR SHARING BETWEEN MILITARY AND CIVIL RADIO SERVICES 1 INTRODUCTION The need for sharing between military and Civil use of the radio spectrum is becoming an important issue as the pressure on civil

3、 radio spectrum increases to meet the requirements of the new services. Pressure on the radio spectrum is influenced by the emphasis adopted in provisioning telephony services, which in some countries is concentrated on cable, and also by liberalisation and competing operators. However the need for

4、additional spectrum is important and various sharing principles are identified below. The need for temporary/short term access to military spectrum at a limited location for applications such as ENG/OB is probably easier to accommodate by a geographical separationhime sharing combination. For longer

5、 term access there is a need to guarantee use of the spectrum on a non- interference basis and possible methods are given in section 2 below. 2 SHARING PRINCIPLES Sharing can be achieved between two or more radio services occupying the same portion of the frequency spectrum in one of the following w

6、ays: a. b. C. d. 3 a. Use of the same frequency by different services at different times - time sharing. Simultaneous use of different parts of a shared frequency band by different radio services - frequency separation. Simultaneous use of the same parts of a shared frequency band but in separated g

7、eographical areas - geographical separation. Simultaneous use of the same parts of a shared frequency band at the same time in the same place but on a non-interference basis - NIB operation. PROTECTION OF MILITARY SERVICES Time-sharing. It seems simple to suggest that civil services should use milit

8、ary spectrum in peacetime and the spectrum should revert to military use only in emergency or war. However, some defence systems are operational in peacetime, e.g. strategic missile detection systems, air traffic control and air defence radars. Also military training and exercises continue in peacet

9、ime in order to prepare for war roles. Finally, many civil radio services would be very reluctant to give up their use of radio in exercises or in a period of transition-to-war. Transition-to-war procedures may mange for civil frequency bands to be taken over by the military but these arrangements c

10、onstitute overt preparation for war and are unlikely to be agreed except at a late stage of the transition process. The transition-to-war procedures are not appropriate for circumstances of major national or NATO exercises when more spectrum might be needed. Nevertheless, time-sharing is feasible in

11、 suitable circumstances, particularly at HF. STD=CEPT ERC REPORT 51-ENGL 3997 = 2326414 0013307 831 ERC REPORT 51 Page 2 b. Frequency Separation. Civil use of military frequency bands has been agreed in many cases where the military band is not completely occupied in frequency channel terms. This wo

12、rks well in that the civil service operates on dedicated channels independently of the military usage although the military normally insists on a “non-interference no protection“ condition to avoid the need for detailed Co-ordination and band-edge protection by guard bands. Difficulties can occur if

13、 military usage subsequently increases, particularly if the civil user is not aware of the conditions of occupancy and the prior rights of the military. Frequency separation is the most widely practised method of sharing spectrum. Where it is possible to use the same equipment operating in the same

14、frequency band with the same channel plans this will further facilitate sharing. c. Geographical Separation. In some cases use of military bands is confined to limited parts of the country, e.g., military training areas, and sharing can be agreed with civil services if those services can be restrict

15、ed to other locations. Geographical separation may be possible with licensed radio services because they are subject to a radio site clearance procedure which enables military to object to individual sites if interference is likely. Sharing would not be agreed for unlicensed civil services unless th

16、ere were power limitations applied which would make interference to military systems negligible; this depends upon the sensitivity of the military radio or radar receivers in the band concerned and the type of civil operation. For instance, sharing by low power devices operating in aircraft communic

17、ation bands has been opposed by NATO on the basis that an aircraft receiver would be subject to a dangerous noise level from the number of devices it could receive fi-om, even if only a small proportion of the devices were in use simultaneously. Geographical separation sharing has been agreed in a l

18、imited number of cases. d. NIB Operation. Different radio services can share the same frequency channels if the sharing services undertakes not to cause interference to the host service. This is the basis of sharing between primary allocations and secondary allocations in the same band. There is a p

19、ossibility of severe penalties to the service sharing if the primary service operates in a safety-of-life context because extensive, lengthy and costly testing may be necessary to demonstrate that interference will not occur; this has happened with the military Joint Tactical Information Distributio

20、n System which operates in the radio navigation band of 960-1215 MHz. Sharing on a NIB basis has been agreed particularly with radars. 4 CONCLUSIONS There are already specific instances where it has proved practicable for shared civil and military use of the frequency spectrum by using one or more of the sharing principles detailed previously. The opportunities for sharing are dependent on the precise civil application such as whether the civil fixed links are for short time periods, permanent use, or for high or low performance availabilitys and the type of military services.