ASTM F1577-2005(2012) Standard Test Methods for Detention Locks for Swinging Doors 《双开式弹簧门安全锁的标准试验方法》.pdf

《ASTM F1577-2005(2012) Standard Test Methods for Detention Locks for Swinging Doors 《双开式弹簧门安全锁的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM F1577-2005(2012) Standard Test Methods for Detention Locks for Swinging Doors 《双开式弹簧门安全锁的标准试验方法》.pdf（26页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: F1577 05 (Reapproved 2012)Standard Test Methods forDetention Locks for Swinging Doors1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1577; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision

2、. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods cover the apparatus, procedures, andacceptance conditions for evaluating the normal operationalperformance and t

3、he performance characteristics under assaultconditions of locks used in swinging door assemblies indetention and correctional institutions. Thus, they give only anindication of the performance characteristics of locks in actualservice. Such variables as installation and maintenance condi-tions are n

4、ot considered.1.2 It is the intent of these test methods to help ensure thatdetention locks perform at or above minimum acceptable levelsto control passage to unauthorized or secure areas, to confineinmates, and to delay and frustrate escape attempts and resistvandalism. It is recognized that in ord

5、er to meet the intent ofthese test methods, door and frame assemblies must becompatible with the level of performance required by TestMethods F1450.1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the standard. The values in parentheses are for informationonly.1.4 This standard does no

6、t purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standard

7、s:2E152 Methods for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies3F1450 Test Methods for Hollow Metal Swinging DoorAssemblies for Detention and Correctional FacilitiesF1592 Test Methods for Detention Hollow Metal VisionSystemsF1643 Test Methods for Detention Sliding Door LockingDevice AssemblyF1758 Test Methods for

8、 Detention Hinges Used onDetention-Grade Swinging DoorsF1915 Test Methods for Glazing for Detention Facilities2.2 ANSI Standard:4ANSI A156.5 Auxiliary Locks and Associated Products2.3 UL Standards:5UL-437 Standard for Key LocksUL-1034 Standard for Burglary Resistant Electric LockingMechanisms3. Term

9、inology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 Bolts:3.1.1.1 bolt projections, ndistance the lock bolt extendsfrom the lock case measured with the lock bolt in an extendedposition.3.1.1.2 dead bolt, nlock component having an end thatprotrudes from or is withdrawn into the lock front by action ofthe lock mechanism by

10、rotating the key or thumb turn. Whenthe door is closed and the dead bolt is thrown, it extends intoa hole provided in the strike, locking the door, and will notreturn with end pressure.3.1.1.3 deadlocking latch bolt, adjcomponent that, whenactuated, automatically locks the projected latch bolt again

11、streturn by end pressure. Also referred to as an auxiliary latchbolt or roller bolt.3.1.1.4 latch bolt, nlock component having a beveled endthat projects from the lock front in its extended position butmay be forced back into the lock case by end pressure ordrawing back by action of the lock mechani

12、sm. When the dooris closed, the latch bolt projects into a hole provided in thestrike, holding the door in a closed position. Sometimesreferred to as a snapbolt.3.1.2 bolt throw, ndistance the lock bolt travels from aretracted to a fully extended position.3.1.3 cylinder, nsubassembly of a lock conta

13、ining a plugwith a key slot and tumbler mechanism.1These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F33 onDetention and Correctional Facilities and are the direct responsibility of Subcom-mittee F33.04 on Detention Hardware.Current edition approved June 1, 2012. Published August 2012.

14、 Originallyapproved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as F1577 05. DOI:10.1520/F1577-05R12.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standar

15、ds Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Withdrawn.4Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.5Available from Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Corporate Progress, 333Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062.1Copyright ASTM International,

16、100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.3.1 builders hardware cylinder, adjkey cylinder ofsimilar design to the mogul cylinder except smaller (1532 in.(40 mm) in diameter), with keys and internal parts at least halfthe size of mogul cylinders. Also kno

17、wn as commercialcylinders and mortise cylinders. See ANSI A156.5, 6.9.3.1.3.2 mogul cylinder, adjpin tumbler cylinder approxi-mately 2 in. (51 mm) in diameter, 2 in. long.3.1.3.3 mogul key, adjoversized key designed to fit themogul cylinder, which is approximately 112 in. (38 mm) by 358in. (92 mm).3

18、.1.3.4 paracentric cylinder, commonly referred to as alever tumbler cylinder, adjkey cylinder consisting of acylinder that is an integral part of the lock.3.1.3.5 paracentric key, commonly referred to as a levertumbler key, adjparacentric keys are between 4 in. (102 mm)and 5 in. (153 mm) long, with

19、large ends or bows, which maybe as large as 212 in. (63 mm) wide.3.1.4 detention security, adjassurance of the restriction ofmobility of inmates to designated areas within a correctional ordetention facility.3.1.5 hand tools, nitems permitted for use in disengaginga lock when it fails to disengage,

20、either remotely or manually;such items are tools commonly carried in a correctional facilitymaintenance tool kit: hand screwdrivers (various sizes and tipconfigurations including tips for coverplate security screws),claw hammer, ball peen hammer, chisel, pliers (any commonsize), and vise grips.3.1.6

21、 hinged door, adjdoor equipped with hinges thatpermit it to swing about the hinge axis.3.1.7 hollow metal, nterm used in reference to such itemsas doors, frames, partitions, enclosures, and other items that arefabricated from sheet metal. These products are internallyreinforced but hollow, hence the

22、 term hollow metal.3.1.8 locks, nfastening device that secures a door orwindow assembly against unauthorized use. A lock generallyincludes the cylinder, bolt, strike, knobs, or levers.3.1.9 manufacturer, nparty responsible for the fabricationof the lock.3.1.10 performance characteristics, nresponse

23、attributesof the lock in any one of the tests described.3.1.11 strike or strike plate, nmetal plate attached to ormortised into the door or frame to receive and hold a projectedlatch bolt or dead bolt, or both, in order to secure the door tothe jamb.3.1.12 strike box, nhousing used in the back of th

24、e striketo enclose the bolt or bolt opening.3.1.13 testing laboratory, nindependent testing laboratorynot associated with the manufacturer.3.1.14 trim, ntrim shall include knobs or lever handlesused to retract the latch bolt or to act as a pull when the latchbolt is inoperative.4. Significance and U

25、se4.1 A major concern for detention and correctional admin-istrative officials is the reliable operation of locks used in theirfacilities. These test methods aid in assigning a level ofphysical security and performance to locks for swinging doorassemblies.4.2 These test methods evaluate the resistan

26、ce of a lock toattacks using battering devices, prying devices, and fire. Thesetest methods also evaluate the performance of a lock undersimulated operating conditions. These test methods do notprovide a measure of the resistance or performance of a locksubjected to attack by chemical agents, ballis

27、tics, explosives,or other extreme methods of attack. These test methods do notmeasure the resistance or performance of the device whensubjected to environmental elements such as rain, snow, orwind-carried dust or sand. Where such elements may be afactor, the manufacturer should be consulted for prop

28、er appli-cation.4.3 The primary purpose of these test methods is to approxi-mate the levels of abuse and operating conditions to whichlocks are subjected in detention and correctional institutions.The desired result of these test methods will provide a measureof assurance of protection to the correc

29、tional personnel, public,and inmates.4.4 It is recommended that the detention/correctional facil-ity administration provide adequate training, supervision, andpreventative maintenance programs to enable door assembliesto function as intended throughout the expected service life.5. Sample Selection,

30、Construction, and Size5.1 Sample locks shall be randomly selected and shall berepresentative of the types and styles intended for use in theapplication of these test methods.5.2 The manufacturer shall permanently mark the testsample and retain them at the manufacturing facility for futurereference.

31、Instead of test samples, the manufacturer shallprovide a certified procedure for the construction of testedassemblies.5.3 The test assembly shall be certified by an independent,third-party testing and certification agency; any change ofcomponents or assembly methods or processes shall be certi-fied

32、in writing by the testing certification agency. The agencyshall have the sole authority to decide the extent and scope ofretesting required.5.4 Test reports shall include complete details and photo-graphs of the test specimen, the testing apparatus, and instal-lation instructions including templates

33、 for all items of hard-ware.6. Test Methods6.1 A test sample shall consist of a minimum of one lock.The test methods that follow may consist of independent setupsand procedures.6.2 Impact TestLocks shall comply with the following.6.2.1 ScopeThis test method is designed to evaluate thecapability of a

34、 detention lock to resist repeated impact forces.6.2.2 Significance and UseThis test method is intended toclosely simulate a sustained battering ram-style attack andprovide an evaluation of the capability of the lock to prevent,delay, or frustrate escape or access to unauthorized areas, orcombinatio

35、n thereof. The test results are intended to aid inassigning a level of physical security to various configurationsof detention locks. An impact test of this design performed ona detention lock evaluates the impact strength of the lock andits components as well as the quality of fabrication technique

36、s.F1577 05 (2012)26.2.3 Apparatus:6.2.3.1 ImpactorThe impactor shall consist of a hinged orpivoted system with a mass capable of delivering impacts of200 ftlb (271.2 J) to a hinged panel simulating a door mountedin a frame assembly. The striking surface of the impactor shallbe made from C1010C1020 c

37、arbon steel and have a strikingsurface area of 4.0 6 0.04 in.2(25.8 cm2) (see Fig. 1). (Referto Appendix X1.)6.2.4 ProcedureInstall the lock in a test fixture simulatinga door and frame assembly. The anchoring method for the lockand the strike, where the strike is normally required with thelock, sha

38、ll accurately simulate the manufacturers mountingprocedures. Using the test apparatus in accordance with 6.2.3,deliver the number of impacts of 200 ftlb (271.2 J) as requiredfor the grade level being tested. See Table 1 for the number ofrequired impacts. The point of impact shall be on the doorpanel

39、 along a centerline through the lock bolt space at 6 in.(152 mm) from the strike.6.2.5 Test Termination and Conditions of AcceptanceThelock shall remain engaged and the door panel shall remain inplace throughout the testing. Failure of the lock to remainengaged or the door panel to remain closed sha

40、ll constitutefailure. Upon completion of the impact series, an attempt shallbe made to manually disengage the lock. If the lock will notdisengage by remote or key operation or by use of commonlyavailable hand tools, it shall constitute failure.6.2.6 Precision and BiasNo information is presentedabout

41、 either the precision or bias of the impact test within thesetest methods since the test result is nonquantitative.6.3 Fire TestWhen specified for fire doors, locks shallcomply with the following:6.3.1 The door assembly with the required lock shall besubjected to fire endurance and hose stream tests

42、 in accordancewith Methods E152 or equivalent.6.3.2 Test Termination and Conditions of AcceptanceTheacceptance criteria of fire ratings shall be in accordance withMethods E152, or equivalent. If a manufacturer omits designoptions in the fire test, those options will not be permitted inproduction mod

43、els that are required to carry fire ratings.6.3.3 Precision and BiasThe precision and bias of the firetest method within these test methods are essentially asspecified in the test method utilized (Methods E152 or equiva-lent).6.4 Cylinder TestLocks shall comply with the following.6.4.1 ScopeThe lock

44、 mechanical key cylinder shall betested to evaluate the capabilities of the cylinder and key tocontinuously function independent of the lock mechanismunder normal operating conditions. Cycle tests in accordancewith Table 2 shall be performed. Also test the cylinder forresistance to tool attack, pick

45、 resistance, and forcing tests inaccordance with test standards UL-437 and UL-1034. StandardUL-437 is not applicable to a paracentric cylinder lock.6.4.2 Significance and UseThis test method is intended toclosely simulate continuous or long-term usage of the lockcylinder and key by repeatedly operat

46、ing the key and cylinder.A cycle test of this design, as performed on a cylinder and key,evaluates the wear characteristics and fatigue strength of thecylinder and key independent of the lock as well as the qualityof fabrication techniques. These test methods are intended toestablish the acceptable

47、level of use and resistance of theFIG. 1 Swing Lock ImpactorTABLE 1 Impact Test CriteriaSecurity Grade Number of Impacts Element of TimeA1 600 60 min2 400 40 min3 200 20 min4 100 10 minAElement of time is based on the assumption that sustained manpower candeliver 400 blows of 200 ftlb (271.2 J) each

48、 in 40 min. Since 400 blows is thenumber of impacts a Grade 2 lock must absorb and still be operational, inaccordance with in 6.2.5, it is assumed failure of the Grade 2 lock will occur after40 min. The element of time assigned to the various grades of locks is adjusted toachieve more manageable tim

49、e periods than actual calculations provide. Theelement of time is hypothetical and is offered solely as a design suggestion.TABLE 2 Cylinder and Key Test CyclesAType Number of Cycles Cylinder TorqueMogul 1 000 000 8 in.lb (0.9 NM)Builders hardware 100 000B4 in.lb (0.45 NM)Paracentric 50 000 tested in lock assemblyACylinders and keys must be capable of successfully completing the testmethod in accordance with 6.6.At 83-lbf side-load, the key, and cylinder must exertat least 85 in.lb of torque without breaking.BBuilders hardware cycle req