ASTM F1037-2010 Standard Test Method for Visual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-Service Exposure to Foot Traffic《多人踩过后弹性地板外观评定的标准试验方法》.pdf

《ASTM F1037-2010 Standard Test Method for Visual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-Service Exposure to Foot Traffic《多人踩过后弹性地板外观评定的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM F1037-2010 Standard Test Method for Visual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-Service Exposure to Foot Traffic《多人踩过后弹性地板外观评定的标准试验方法》.pdf（6页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: F1037 10Standard Test Method forVisual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-Service Exposure to Foot Traffic1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1037; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of

2、 revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method is intended to provide a numericalrating system for classification of resilien

3、t floors during thevarious stages of their wear life in relation to their condition, asperceived by a knowledgeable user.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-p

4、riate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematicalconversions to SI units that are provided for information onlyand are not

5、 considered standard.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2D1436 Test Methods for Application of Emulsion FloorPolishes to Substrates for Testing PurposesF141 Terminology Relating to Resilient Floor Coverings3. Terminology3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 surface textures

6、urface imperfections such as deepscratches, indents, or changes in embossing texture.4. Significance and Use4.1 Ratings are developed by subjective, comparative,evaluation of exposed samples to original unexposed speci-mens of those parameters experience has shown to be the mostimportant in the cons

7、umers minds in evaluating the perfor-mance of a walking surface. These parameters are a change ingloss, color, surface texture, alterations to pattern and re-storability of appearance with normal maintenance procedures,including the use of waxes, finishes, or buffing. Rating is doneby a panel of qua

8、lified observers under specified lightingconditions in accordance with prescribed procedures.5. Apparatus5.1 Buffng Machine, residential, equipped with single ordouble brush (pad), soft fiber polishing brushes, and lambswool pads. When equipped with polishing brushes, the unitshould deliver a nomina

9、l lineal velocity (loaded) of 1100 to1400 ft/min (each brush) and a Dwell ratio of 190 to 210 ft2(17to 19 m2) per min at a pressure of 0.40 to 0.50 psi. Whenequipped with buffing pads, the unit shall deliver a nominallineal velocity (loaded) of 1100 to 1400 lineal fpm (each pad)and a Dwell ratio of

10、500 to 550 ft2(45 to 50 m2) per min at apressure of 0.15 to 0.20 psi (see note).5.2 Scrub Brush, approximately 2 by 7 in. (63 by 178mm) with nylon bristles approximately 114 in. (32 mm) long.5.3 Cellulose Sponge, approximate dry dimension 8 by 414by 1 in. (203 by 108 mm).6. Reagent6.1 Cleaning Solut

11、ion, shall be as recommended by theflooring manufacturer and shall be prepared in sufficientquantity in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.NOTE 1For flooring test specimens maintained with polish, thecleaning solution shall be capable of removing the polish.1This test method is under the

12、 jurisdiction ofASTM Committee F06 on ResilientFloor Coverings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F06.30 on TestMethods - Performance.Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2010. Published January 2011. Originallyapproved in 1987. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as F103705. DOI:10.152

13、0/F1037-10.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Dri

14、ve, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.7. Sampling, Test Specimens, and Test Units7.1 Specimen size can vary as desired. A typical size panelwould be 24 by 24 in. (610 by 610 mm) and contain four12 by 12 in. (305 by 305 mm) similar or different panels to betested. In additi

15、on, a companion specimen must be retained andstored in a location where its appearance will not be altered.This specimen will be used for comparison purposes through-out the test cycle. Each sample is to be cleaned in accordancewith the washing procedure in 8.1. The waxing procedure shallbe followed

16、 on all resilient flooring samples designed to bemaintained with wax before each rating session. The originalunexposed samples of these products shall be waxed also.Those no-wax floors whose appearance, through exposure totraffic, has deteriorated to an overall rating of “3” or more shallbe restored

17、 with either the waxing procedure (no samplesreceive double-waxing) (see 8.2) or the buffing procedure (see8.3). The choice of restorative maintenance is determined bythe manufacturers recommended procedure. All cleaning andrestorative maintenance procedures shall be performed on theentire sample.7.

18、2 Before evaluation, each sample shall be prepared usingthe procedure given in Section 8. This procedure is intended toremove all dirt and wax (if present).8. Procedure8.1 Mix the cleaning solution and stir thoroughly.8.1.1 Soak brush in solution for 1 min.38.1.2 Apply enough solution so that the pa

19、nel is coveredwith a thin coat of solution. Allow the solution to remainundisturbed for 3 min.8.1.3 Dip brush in solution, then scrub the panel 30 times ineach direction with enough pressure to slightly bend thebristles. Localized, abnormal stains such as chewing gum,ground-out cigarettes, tar, or o

20、ther spots considered abnormalin residential environment may be given special attention.Overall stains, discoloration, or soil that lodges in deepembossments should not be given special treatment.8.1.4 With the cellulose sponge wrung out in clear, luke-warm water, remove the cleaning solution. Rinse

21、 sponge inclear, lukewarm water, wring sponge out lightly, then go overthe panel to rewet the surface. Rinse out sponge again in clearwater. Wring out tightly and remove as much rinse water aspossible.8.1.5 Allow surface to air dry for 1 h.8.2 Finish ProcedureAfter washing, apply to each indi-vidual

22、 sample to receive finish, a wax or finish in the followingmanner. Use a fresh supply of an acrylic floor finish or anequivalent material appropriate for the specific type of floor.Apply the wax in accordance with Method B of Test MethodsD1436.48.3 Buffng ProcedureFollowing the washing procedureoutl

23、ined in 8.2, samples of resilient floor coverings whosemanufacturers recommend buffing as the restorative mainte-nance should be treated according to the following buffingprocedure.58.3.1 Buff each sample with the polishing brushes, using aleft to right to left motion covering the entire sample from

24、 topto bottom to top again, using overlapping strokes, in 1 min. Noexcess pressure or weight should be used on the buffer.8.3.2 Repeat 8.3.1, using an overlapping top to bottom totop motion, covering the entire sample fully from left to rightto left in 1 min.8.3.3 Repeat the bidirectional buffing te

25、chnique above, us-ing lambs wool pads on the buffer.8.3.4 Washing Lambs Wool PadsFor purposes of thistest, the lambs wool pads will be washed every time theequivalent of 2016 in.2(13 104 cm2) samples are buffedaccording to this procedure.8.3.4.1 Pads are to be washed in a mild detergent6and coldwate

26、r (2 heaping teaspoons (10.0 g) per gallon (3.8 L) ofwater), rinsed in cold water and air dried (do not “wring out”pads).9. Observer Panel9.1 The panel of observers shall consist of at least threepeople. One-third of the panel shall consist of a person(s)technically trained in the composition and us

27、e of householdcleaning products, such as a home economist or chemist.One-third of the panel shall consist of a person(s) trained in thetechnical characteristics and testing procedures used on resil-ient flooring, such as an engineer or chemist. One-third of thepanel shall be a non-technically traine

28、d person(s) who regu-larly maintains resilient floors in a home. No panel membershall be color blind. The maintenance person shall not beincluded in the observer panel. Members shall be carefullyinstructed on the scoring procedure and shall have had priorexperience of at least a complete rating of o

29、ne sample beforeestablishing a valid scored rating.9.2 Individual panel observers are provided with separatedata sheets and are to separately rate gloss, color, surfacetexture, pattern change and restorative effects of maintenance.They may do their rating simultaneously, but should notdiscuss or com

30、pare ratings. If any sample requires restorativemaintenance, all panels are returned to the exposure site onlyafter restorative maintenance is complete and ratings forrestorative maintenance are made. Scoring is in accordancewith 11.1.10. Sample Arrangements and Lighting Conditions10.1 Samples are t

31、o be washed, waxed where appropriate(See Section 8 and Fig. 1) and assembled with the viewingtemplate as outlined in this section.10.1.1 Place the flooring panels to be rated horizontally ona freestanding 30 in. (762 mm) high table, the top of which is3Asponge with scrubbing capabilities may be subs

32、tituted for the scrub brush andcellulose sponge.4Future floor polish, a trademark of S.C. Johnson, or its equivalent, has beenfound suitable for this purpose.5The following machine meets the specifications: Sears 149 Twin Brush RugShampooer/Floor Polisher Model No. 100.85602 weighing 15 pounds; brus

33、h/padspeed is 1150 rpm unloaded (850 rpm loaded); polishing brush(es) No. 905318;Lambs Wool pad(s) No. 905317.6Woolite, a trademark of Boyle-Midway Inc., or its equivalent, has been foundsuitable for this purpose.F1037 102smaller than the sample panels. This arrangement will enableobservers to walk

34、around the sample and view it from variousangles and positions.10.1.2 Although it is desirable that the flooring samples orthe panel containing the flooring samples be portable to permitplacement in ideal lighting conditions, it is acknowledged that,in the case of installed flooring, this may not be

35、 possible. Inthese instances, efforts must be made to simulate the lightingconditions specified in 10.2 and 10.2.1.10.1.3 Prepare a template that allows viewing of the mainportion of the sample area, but masks its edges (usually12 in.(13 mm) is sufficient). Immediately adjacent, and as part of thete

36、mplate, is a second opening of identical dimensions. Thepurpose of the second opening is to serve as a comparisonframe for the original, unexposed sample. See Fig. 2 for asketch of such a template that would be used where four12 by 12 in. (305 by 305 mm) samples are attached to a24 by 24 in. (610 by

37、 610 mm) base.10.2 Principal lighting shall be provided by overhead fluo-rescent lights at 3000K. (warm white). Illumination shall beuniform and not less than 150 ft candles at the sample surface.10.2.1 A secondary source of light shall be established toenable observers to evaluate gloss. The source

38、 may be anuncurtained north facing window, a fluorescent fixture placedfacing the samples, or several incandescent spotlights. Colorvalue is not critical but should not be of extreme departurefrom the primary source. The secondary source should be 5 to10 ft (152 to 305 cm) from the floor.11. Rating1

39、1.1 Rating is established by totaling the scores for eachsample of gloss, color, surface texture, pattern, and restorativemaintenance by each observer. Total scored is then convertedto a final visual rating in accordance with the conversions asfollows:FIG. 1 Suggested Rotation Procedure for Panels U

40、nder ExposureF1037 103Total Score Final Visual Rating0 1Excellent1 to 4 2Good5 to 8 3Acceptable9 to 11 4Poor12 to 16 5UnacceptableNOTE 2Fractional averages will be rounded to the nearest wholenumber.NOTE 3Scoring for each parameter is to be made as a consideration ofthe difference between the expose

41、d sample and the original unexposedsample.11.2 For each sample, the ratings of individual observersare averaged.11.3 The final rating is developed by conversion of totalindividual parameter scores (see 11.1). The following finalratings, from 1 to 5, indicates the general condition of theflooring.1 V

42、irtually unchanged from the original (total score of 0).2 Slight change in gloss, coloration, or surface texture, nochange in pattern. The following is still highly acceptable inappearance. Restorative maintenance will return sample tooriginal appearance (total score of 1 to 4).3 Significant changes

43、 in gloss, coloration, or surface texture,no change in pattern. Appearance might be objectionable to avery “fussy” housekeeper. Restorative maintenance improvesthe appearance but will not return sample to original appear-ance (total score of 5 to 8).NOTE 4There must be no change in pattern for a sam

44、ple to receive afinal rating of 3 or less.4 Significant degradation of surface involving change of gloss,color, surface texture, or alteration of the pattern, or a combi-nation thereof. Many housekeepers would desire replacement.Restorative maintenance does little to improve appearance(total score o

45、f 9 to 11).5 Major damage such as total loss of gloss, objectionablechange of pattern, surface texture, color or a combinationthereof. Most housekeepers would consider the floor no longerserviceable, worn out, and in need of replacement. Restorativemaintenance does not improve appearance (total scor

46、e of 12 to16).11.4 The restorative maintenance scores are shown in Fig. 3.12. Precision and Bias12.1 Round robin testing indicates that even though this is asubjective test method, a satisfactory correlation does existbetween product performance and the ability of the raters todistinguish among the

47、products.13. Keywords13.1 appearance; gloss; maintenance; resilient floors; visualratingFIG. 2 Template, 24 by 24 in. (610 by 610 mm)F1037 104Gloss, Color, Surface Texture and Pattern Scores0Unchanged from original1Slight change from original2Significant change from original3Objectionable changeScor

48、e for Waxing/Buffing0Not needed1Will restore to original appearance2Almost restores original appearance3Does little to restore original appearance4Does nothing to restore original appearanceTotal Score to Final Rating ConversionTotal Score Final Rating011to4 25to8 39to11 412 to 16 5NOTE 1Restorative

49、 maintenance is performed in terms of waxing, refinishing or buffing when the maintenance score reaches 3 or more.FIG. 3 Visual Rating Data SheetF1037 105ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentionedin this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the riskof infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.This standard is subject to revision at any time by the