ASTM E2172-2001(2014) Standard Guide for Conducting Laboratory Soil Toxicity Tests with the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans《利用线虫 (Caenorhabditis elegans) 进行实验室土壤毒性试验的标准指南》.pdf

《ASTM E2172-2001(2014) Standard Guide for Conducting Laboratory Soil Toxicity Tests with the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans《利用线虫 (Caenorhabditis elegans) 进行实验室土壤毒性试验的标准指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E2172-2001(2014) Standard Guide for Conducting Laboratory Soil Toxicity Tests with the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans《利用线虫 (Caenorhabditis elegans) 进行实验室土壤毒性试验的标准指南》.pdf（12页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E2172 01 (Reapproved 2014)Standard Guide forConducting Laboratory Soil Toxicity Tests with theNematode Caenorhabditis elegans1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2172; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the cas

2、e of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This guide covers procedures for obtaining laboratorydata to evaluate the adverse effects o

3、f chemicals associatedwith soil to nematodes from soil toxicity tests. This standard isbased on a modification to Guide E1676. The methods aredesigned to assess lethal or sublethal toxic effects on nema-todes in short-term tests in terrestrial systems. Soils to be testedmay be (1) references soils o

4、r potentially toxic soil sites; (2)artificial, reference, or site soils spiked with compounds; (3)site soils diluted with reference soils; or (4) site or referencesoils diluted with artificial soil. Test procedures are describedfor the species Caenorhabditis elegans (see Annex A1).Methods described

5、in this guide may also be useful forconducting soil toxicity tests with other terrestrial species,although modifications may be necessary.1.2 Summary of Previous StudiesInitial soil toxicity test-ing using the free-living, bacterivorous soil nematode Cae-norhabditis elegans was developed by Donkin a

6、nd Dusenbery(1).2Following the development of an effective method ofrecovery of C. elegans from test soils, the organism was usedto identify factors that affect the toxicity of zinc, cadmium,copper, and lead (2). Freeman et al. further refined thenematode bioassay by decreasing the quantity of soil

7、andspiking solution volumes, determining test acceptabilitycriteria, and developing control charts to assess worm healthusing copper as a reference toxicant (3). More recently, thetoxicological effects of nitrate and chloride metallic salts in twonatural soils were compared (4). LC50 values for C. e

8、legansexposed for 24-h to nitrate salts of cadmium, copper, zinc, leadand nickel in an artificial soil (see AnnexA2) were found to besimilar to LC50 values for the earthworm, Eisenia fetida (5).Increasing the exposure time to 48-h resulted in much lowerLC50 values (6). However, longer exposure times

9、 necessitatethe addition of food and lead to lower recovery percentages insoils high in organic matter. A modification of the recoverymethod has also been used with a transgenic strain of C.elegans used as a soil biomonitoring tool to assess sub-lethaleffects of metal exposures in soil (7). A variet

10、y of sub-lethalendpoints have been developed using C. elegans in aquaticmedia and may prove useful for assessing soil exposures (8).1.3 Modification of these procedures might be justified byspecial needs. The results of tests conducted using typicalprocedures may not be comparable to results using t

11、his guide.Comparison of results obtained using modified and unmodifiedversions of these procedures might provide useful informationconcerning new concepts and procedures for conducting soiltoxicity tests with terrestrial worms.1.4 The results from field-collected soils used in toxicitytests to deter

12、mine a spatial or temporal distribution of soiltoxicity may be reported in terms of the biological effects onsurvival or sublethal endpoints. These procedures can be usedwith appropriate modifications to conduct soil toxicity testswhen factors such as temperature, pH, and soil characteristics(for ex

13、ample, particle size, organic matter content, and claycontent) are of interest or when there is a need to test suchmaterials as sewage sludge. These methods might also beuseful for conducting bioaccumulation tests.1.5 The results of toxicity tests with (1) materials (forexample, chemicals or waste m

14、ixtures) added experimentallyto artificial soil, reference soils, or site soils, (2) site soilsdiluted with reference soils, and (3) site or reference soilsdiluted with artificial soil, so as to create a series ofconcentrations, may be reported in terms of an LC50 (medianlethal concentration) and so

15、metimes an EC50 (median effectconcentration).1.6 This guide is arranged as follows:Scope 1Referenced Documents 2Terminology 3Summary of Guide 4Significance and Use 5Interferences 6Apparatus 7Safety Precautions 8Soil 9Test Organism 10Procedure 111This guide is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee

16、E50 on EnvironmentalAssessment, Risk Management and Corrective Action and is the direct responsibil-ity of Subcommittee E50.47 on Biological Effects and Environmental Fate.Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2014. Published December 2014. Originallyapproved in 2002. Last previous edition approved in 20

17、08 as E217202(2008). DOI:10.1520/E2172-01R14.2The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end ofthis standard.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States1Analytical Methodology 12Acceptability of Tes

18、t 13Calculation of Results 14Report 15Annexes A1. CaenorhabditiselegansA2. Artificial SoilCompositionReferences1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as thestandard.1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is therespon

19、sibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory requirements prior to use. While somesafety considerations are included in this guide, it is beyond thescope of this standard to encompass all safety requirement

20、snecessary to conduct soil toxicity tests. Specific precautionarystatements are given in Section 8.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3D4447 Guide for Disposal of Laboratory Chemicals andSamplesE943 Terminology Relating to Biological Effects and Envi-ronmental FateE1295 Guide for Conducting T

21、hree-Brood, Renewal Toxic-ity Tests with Ceriodaphnia dubiaE1676 Guide for Conducting Laboratory Soil Toxicity orBioaccumulation Tests with the Lumbricid EarthwormEisenia Fetida and the Enchytraeid Potworm EnchytraeusalbidusE1706 Test Method for Measuring the Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Contamin

22、ants with Freshwater Invertebrates3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 The words “must,” “should,” “may,” “can,” and“might” have very specific meanings in this guide. “Must” isused to express an absolute requirement, that is, to state that thetest must be designed to satisfy the specified condition,

23、unlessthe purpose of the test requires a different design. “Must” isused only in connection with the factors that relate directly tothe acceptability of the test (see Section 13). “Should” is usedto state that the specified condition is recommended and oughtto be met if possible. Although a violatio

24、n of one “should” israrely a serious matter, the violation of several will often renderthe results questionable. Terms such as “is desirable,” “is oftendesirable,” and “might be desirable” are used in connectionwith less important factors. “May” is used to mean “is (are)allowed to,” “can” is used to

25、 mean “is (are) able to,” and“might” is used to mean “could possibly.” Thus, the classicdistinction between “may” and “can” is preserved, and “might”is never used as a synonym for either “may” or “can.”3.1.2 For definitions of terms used in this guide, refer toTerminology E943.3.2 Definitions of Ter

26、ms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 artificial soila synthetic soil, prepared with a spe-cific formulation, designed to simulate a natural soil (seeAnnex A2). Artificial soil may be used as a diluent medium toprepare concentrations of site or reference soil and may be usedas a negative control medium

27、.3.2.2 batchthe total amount of test soil prepared for eachconcentration in a test. A batch is any hydrated test soil readyfor separation into replicates.3.2.3 concentrationthe ratio of the weight of test materialsto the weight of soil (artificial, reference, or site), usuallyexpressed on a dry weig

28、ht basis as percent or milligram/kilogram.3.2.4 diluent soilthe artificial or reference soil used todilute site soils.3.2.5 hydration waterwater used to hydrate test soils tocreate an environment with a moisture level suitable for thespecies being tested. The water used for hydration is often testwa

29、ter (see 3.2.18); however, depending on the nature of the testbeing implemented, site surface water or ground water mayalso be utilized for hydration.3.2.6 negative control soilartificial or field collected soilto be used for evaluating the acceptability of a test.3.2.7 reference soila field-collect

30、ed soil that has physico-chemical and biological properties as similar as possible to thesite soil but does not contain the potentially toxic compoundsof the site soil. It is used to describe matrix effects on the testin question. It may be used as a diluent medium to prepareconcentrations of site s

31、oil and may be used as a negativecontrol medium.3.2.8 sampling stationa specific location, within a site orsampling unit, depending on the field study design, at whichsoil is collected for chemical, physical, and biological evalua-tion.3.2.9 sampling unitan area of land within a site distin-guished

32、by habitat and topography.3.2.10 sedimentparticulate materials that usually lie be-low water. Formulated particulate material that is intended tolie below water in a test.3.2.11 sitea delineated tract of land that is being consid-ered as a study area, usually from the standpoint of its beingpotentia

33、lly affected by contaminants.3.2.12 site soila soil collected from the field to be evalu-ated for potential toxicity. A site soil may be a naturallyoccurring soil or one that has been influenced by contaminants.3.2.13 soilsolid particles produced by the physical andchemical disintegration of rocks,

34、which may or may notcontain organic material.3.2.14 spikingthe experimental addition of a test materialto an artificial, site, or reference soil, such that the toxicity ofthe material added can be determined.After the test material is3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.o

35、rg, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.E2172 01 (2014)2added, which may involve a solvent carder, the soil is mixedthoroughly to distribute the test material evenly t

36、hroughout thesoil.3.2.15 test chamberan enclosed space or compartment inwhich environmental parameters such as temperature andlighting are controlled (for example, incubator or modifiedroom). Test containers are placed in the test chamber forbiological evaluation.3.2.16 test containerthe experimenta

37、l unit; the smallestphysical entity to which treatments can be assigned indepen-dently.3.2.17 test soila soil prepared to receive a test organism.Site or reference soil mixed with artificial soil or reference soilmixed with site soil in known concentrations for evaluation aretest soils. Artificial,

38、site, or reference soils spiked with testmaterials such as chemicals, oils, or manufacturing productsare test soils. Once a site, reference, or artificial soil ishydrated, even though it is not mixed with artificial orreference soil or spiked with a material, it may be called a testsoil.3.2.18 test

39、waterwater used to prepare stock solutions,rinse test organisms, rinse glassware, and apparatus or for anyother purpose associated with the test procedures or culture ofthe test organism. Test water should be deionized water orbetter, such as reagent-grade water produced by a system ofreverse osmosi

40、s, carbon, and ion-exchange cartridges.4. Summary of Guide4.1 Toxicity of Test Soils is Assessed During the ContinuousExposure of Terrestrial OrganismsSoils tested may be thefollowing: (1) soils collected from potentially contaminatedsites, (2) soils collected from reference sites, (3) artificial so

41、il(see Annex A2) spiked with compounds, (4) site soil spikedwith compounds, (5) reference soil spiked with compounds, (6)site soil diluted with artificial soil, (7) site soil diluted withreference soil, or (8) reference soil diluted with artificial soil.Anegative control of artificial or reference s

42、oil is used for thefollowing: (1) to yield a measure of the acceptability of the test;(2) to provide evidence of the health and relative quality of thetest organisms; (3) to determine the suitability of testconditions, food, and handling procedures; and (4) to providea basis for interpreting data ob

43、tained from the test soils.Specified data are obtained to determine the toxic effects onsurvival for 24 h exposures to the terrestrial nematodes C.elegans.5. Significance and Use5.1 Soil toxicity tests provide information concerning thetoxicity and bioavailability of chemicals associated with soilst

44、o terrestrial organisms. As important members of the soilfauna, nematodes have a number of characteristics that makethem appropriate organisms for use in the assessment ofpotentially hazardous soils. Bacterial-feeding nematodes suchas C. elegans feed on soil microbes and contribute to thebreakdown o

45、f organic matter. They are also of extremeimportance in the cycling and degradation of key nutrients insoil ecosystems (9). Soil nematodes also serve as a source ofprey and nutrients for fauna and microflora such as soilnematophagous fungi (10).Amajor change in the abundance ofsoil invertebrates suc

46、h as nematodes, either as a food source oras organisms functioning properly in trophic energy transferand nutrient cycling, could have serious adverse ecologicaleffects on the entire terrestrial system.5.2 Results from soil tests might be an important consider-ation when assessing the hazards of mat

47、erials to terrestrialorganisms.5.3 The soil test might be used to determine the temporal orspatial distribution of soil toxicity. Test methods can be used todetect horizontal and vertical gradients in toxicity.5.4 Results of soil tests could be used to compare thesensitivities of different species.5

48、.5 An understanding of the effect of these parameters ontoxicity may be gained by varying soil characteristics such aspH, clay content, and organic material.5.6 Results of soil tests may be useful in helping to predictthe effects likely to occur with terrestrial organisms in fieldsituations.5.6.1 Fi

49、eld surveys can be designed to provide either aqualitative or quantitative evaluation of biological effectswithin a site or among sites.5.6.2 Soil surveys evaluating biological effects are usuallypart of more comprehensive analyses of biological, chemical,geological, and hydrographic conditions. Statistical correlationcan be improved and costs reduced if subsamples of soil forlaboratory tests, geochemical analyses, and community struc-ture are taken simultaneously from the same grab of the samesite.5.7 Soil toxicity tests can be an important tool for makingdecisio