ASTM D8104-2017 8577 Standard Guide for Determining Coating Qualification Test Data Applicability《测定涂层合格测试数据适用性的标准指南》.pdf

《ASTM D8104-2017 8577 Standard Guide for Determining Coating Qualification Test Data Applicability《测定涂层合格测试数据适用性的标准指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D8104-2017 8577 Standard Guide for Determining Coating Qualification Test Data Applicability《测定涂层合格测试数据适用性的标准指南》.pdf（6页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D8104 17Standard Guide forDetermining Coating Qualification Test Data Applicability1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D8104; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.

2、A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 The purpose of this guide is to identify evaluationvariables that can be used to determine whether existingcoating qualification test

3、 data (for example, design basisaccident or DBA, chemical resistance, fire resistance, thermalconductivity, etc.) meet the respective nuclear power plantqualification requirements or whether requalification is re-quired. Guidance on developing a coating qualification testplan/procedure to qualify a

4、new coating is beyond the scope ofthis standard.1.2 This guide is intended for use in new construction andfor refurbishing existing coating systems applied to concreteand metal substrates within containment.1.3 This guide is intended for the use by, or under thesupervision of, a person knowledgeable

5、 in coating technologyand coatings used in CSL I applications, such as a personmeeting the requirements of Guide D7108 or equivalent.1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematicalconversions to SI units that are provided for

6、information onlyand are not considered standard.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of reg

7、ulatory limitations prior to use.1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-ization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards, Guides and Recom-mendations issued by the World Trade

8、Organization TechnicalBarriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2D3911 Test Method for Evaluating Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants at Simulated Design BasisAccident (DBA) ConditionsD4060 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of OrganicCoatings by the

9、Taber AbraserD4082 Test Method for Effects of Gamma Radiation onCoatings for Use in Nuclear Power PlantsD4258 Practice for Surface Cleaning Concrete for CoatingD4259 Practice for Abrading ConcreteD4260 Practice for Liquid and Gelled Acid Etching ofConcreteD4538 Terminology Relating to Protective Coa

10、ting andLining Work for Power Generation FacilitiesD4541 Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings UsingPortable Adhesion TestersD5139 Specification for Sample Preparation for Qualifica-tion Testing of Coatings to be Used in Nuclear PowerPlantsD5144 Guide for Use of Protective Coating Standards

11、inNuclear Power PlantsD7108 Guide for Establishing Qualifications for a NuclearCoatings SpecialistE84 Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics ofBuilding MaterialsE1269 Test Method for Determining Specific Heat Capacityby Differential Scanning CalorimetryE1530 Test Method for Evaluating the R

12、esistance to Ther-mal Transmission of Materials by the Guarded Heat FlowMeter TechniqueG14 Test Method for Impact Resistance of Pipeline Coatings(Falling Weight Test)1This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D33 on ProtectiveCoating and Lining Work for Power Generation Facilities and i

13、s the directresponsibility of Subcommittee D33.02 on Service and Material Parameters.Current edition approved March 1, 2017. Published April 2017. DOI: 10.1520/D8104-17.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annua

14、l Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United StatesThis international standard was developed in accordance with internationally re

15、cognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.12.2 Federal Standards:310CFR50 Ultimate design basisAppendix

16、ACriterion 4 Environmental and Dynamic Ef-fectsAppendix BPart III Design ControlAppendix BPart XI Test Control2.3 U.S.NRC Standards:4USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.54 Service Level I, II, and IIIProtective Coatings Applied to Nuclear Power PlantsUSNRC APCSB 9.5-1, Branch Technical Position APCSB9.5-1 Guid

17、elines for Fire Protection for Nuclear PowerPlants2.4 ANSI Standards:5ANSI N101.2 Protective Coatings (Paints) for Light WaterNuclear Reactor Containment Facilities2.5 SSPC Standards:6SSPC-SP 5 White Metal Blast CleaningSSPC-SP 6 Commercial Blast CleaningSSPC-SP 7 Brush-Off Blast CleaningSSPC-SP 8 P

18、icklingSSPC-SP 10 Near White Blast CleaningSSPC-SP 11 Power Tool Cleaning to Bare MetalSSPC-SP WJ-1 Waterjet Cleaning of MetalsCleanSSPC-SP WJ-2 Waterjet Cleaning of MetalsVery Thor-ough CleaningSSPC-SP WJ-3 Waterjet Cleaning of MetalsThoroughCleaningSSPC-SP WJ-4 Waterjet Cleaning of MetalsLight Cle

19、an-ing3. Terminology3.1 Definitions for use with this standard are shown inTerminology D4538 or other applicable standards.4. Significance and Use4.1 For conformance with the intent of the criteria listed in2.2 and 2.3, coating qualification tests are founded on plant-specific test parameters that r

20、ealistically reflect or bound thematerial and process variables that can reasonably be expectedto influence qualification testing performance.4.2 This guide provides guidance for evaluating existingcoating system qualification data for applicability to thenuclear plant desiring to use a coating syst

21、em not previouslyused in the plant or to qualify an existing coating system.4.3 It is recognized that new-build plants, as well as smallmodular reactors currently under development, may havedesign features that differ from those of the operating plantsthat formed the basis for the existing test data

22、. Therefore,careful review is required to assure that coating performancerequirements critical to the new design are adequately ad-dressed in the existing data or the need for additional coatingtesting is identified.5. Variables and Their Use5.1 Variables that can be used to evaluate existing test d

23、ataare provided in Table 8. Also provided in Table 8 are criteria toassess the test values for each variable and a brief explanationof the significance of the variable relative to qualification of thecoating system. Each variable should be used to compare theexisting qualification test data to the r

24、espective nuclear plantslicense basis and coating qualification requirements. If com-parison of the existing test data for a given variable to theplants qualification requirements shows that the test data doesnot satisfy the criteria described in Table 8, the existing testdata is not applicable.5.1.

25、1 Example: The existing test data shows that the test wasconducted at a peak temperature of 207F, but the plants DBApeak temperature is 238F. The DBA test data are not appli-cable to the plant because the DBAtest peak temperature is lessthan the postulated peak temperature for the plants DBA.5.2 An

26、example approach to evaluating existing qualifica-tion test data for applicability: A plant wants to use a singleproduct coating system to repair the existing coating systeminside reactor containment. The coating has not previouslybeen applied in the plant. The following describes one possibleapproa

27、ch to evaluating the existing qualification test data forapplicability to the plant using the variables in Table 8. Otherapproaches may be used. The specific variables to be used mayvary with the particular scope of the search; not all variablesmay be applicable or necessary.5.2.1 Step 1: Search the

28、 existing DBAtest reports and selectthose applicable to the coating system.5.2.2 Step 2: Review the reports selected in Step 1 andusing the variable assessment criteria for DBA testing, selectthe reports that satisfy the criteria applicable to the plant.5.2.3 Step 3: Review the reports selected in S

29、tep 2 and usingthe variable assessment criteria for Irradiation, select thereports that satisfy the criteria applicable to the plant.5.2.4 Step 4: Review the reports selected in Step 3 and usingthe variable assessment criteria for Coupon Preparation, selectthe reports that satisfy the criteria appli

30、cable to the plant.5.2.5 Step 5: Review the reports selected in Step 4 and usingthe variable assessment criteria for Coating Application, selectthe reports that satisfy the criteria applicable to the plant.5.2.6 If, at the completion of Step 5, there are no acceptableDBA test reports, then satisfact

31、ory DBA testing of the coatingto the plants qualification requirements is required before thecoating can be applied in the plant as a qualified coating.5.2.7 If one or more DBA test reports are found to satisfythe criteria used in Steps 1 through 5, additional evaluationmay be required prior to full

32、 approval of the coating for use asrequired by the plants license basis and qualification require-ments using the variable assessment criteria for Other CoatingProperties.5.2.8 Step 6: As required to satisfy the plants qualificationrequirements, review the reports selected in Step 5 and usingthe var

33、iable assessment criteria for Other Coating Properties,3Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent ofDocuments, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001, http:/www.access.gpo.gov.4Available from U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 11555 RockvillePk., Rockville, MD

34、 20852, http:/www.nrc.gov.5Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http:/www.ansi.org.6Available from Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC), 800 Trumbull Dr.,Pittsburgh, PA 15205, http:/www.sspc.org.D8104 172TABLE8CoatingQualificati

35、onTestReportAssessmentVariablesVariableAssessmentCriteriaSignificanceofVariable/BasisofAssessmentCriteriaCouponPreparationSubstratea.Carbonsteelcouponcanbeusedtorepresentcarbonsteel,caststeel,andcastiron. b.Austeniticstainlesssteelcouponcanbeusedtorepresentausteniticstainlesssteel.c.Galvanizedcarbon

36、steelcanbeusedtorepresentgalvanizedcarbonsteel(SpecificationD5139).d.Aweldedcouponcanbeusedtorepresentinstalledwelds.e.Copper,brass,andbronzesubstratesarealloy-specific.a.Duetothelowalloycontent,carbonsteel,caststeel,andcastironpresentacarbonsteelsubstrateforcoating.Testdataforanothermetalisnotappli

37、cabletocarbonsteel.b.Testdataforanothermetalisnotapplicabletoausteniticstainlesssteel.c.Thesurfaceandreactivityofzincisuniqueandtestdataforanon-galvanizedsurfaceisnotapplicabletogalvanizedsteel.Forthepurposesofthisdocument,galvanizingisconsideredtobeasubstrate.d.Thepreparationperformedonweldedcoupon

38、sisunique.e.Testdataisspecificforthealloytestedandnotapplicabletootheralloys.SteelsubstratecleanlinessAspecificlevelofcleanlinesscanbeusedtoqualifyacoatingappliedtoasurfacewithamorestringentlevelofcleanliness,butnotalessstringentlevelofcleanliness.a.CleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP11canbeconsideredtobea

39、pproximatelyequivalenttothecleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP10.b.CleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP8canbeconsideredtobeapproximatelyequivalenttothecleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP5.c.CleanlinessproducedbySSPC-WJ-1canbeconsideredtobeapproximatelyequivalenttothecleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP5.d.CleanlinessproducedbySS

40、PC-WJ-2canbeconsideredtobeapproximatelyequivalenttothecleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP10.e.CleanlinessproducedbySSPC-WJ-3canbeconsideredtobeapproximatelyequivalenttothecleanlinessproducedbySSPC-SP6.f.CleanlinessproducedbySSPC-WJ-4canbeconsideredtobeapproximatelyequiva-lenttothecleanlinessproducedbySSPC-

41、SP7.Amorestringentlevelofcleanlinessenhancescoatingadhesionandperformance.Therefore,testingwithalessstringentlevelofcleanlinessismoreconservative.SSPCSPCOMranksSSPCSPstandardsintermsofcleanlinessachieved.a.SSPC-SP10allowsforsomestainingandSSPC-SP11allowsforsmalldiscreteresi-dueofmillscaleandprevious

42、coatingmaterialinthebottomofpitsifthesteelsubstrateispitted.b.Acidcleaning(pickling)toSSPC-SP8removesallrustandmillscalewithnodiscus-sionofstaining.c.ThisequivalencyisdiscussedinSSPC-SPWJ-1.d.ThisequivalencyisdiscussedinSSPC-SPWJ-2.e.ThisequivalencyisdiscussedinSSPC-SPWJ-3.f.Thisequivalencyisdiscuss

43、edinSSPC-SPWJ-4.Steelsubstrateprofileheighta.Aspecificprofileheightrangewasusedtoqualifythecoating.b.Ifqualifyinganexistingcoatingintheplant,theDBATestprofileheightmustbewithinthemanufacturerspublishedrecommendationsfortheexistingappliedcoatingDFT.a.Coatingapplicationtoasubstrateprofileheightoutside

44、thequalifiedprofileheightrangerequiresqualification.b.TheassumptionisthattheexistingcoatingwasappliedtoasurfacewithaprofileheightwithinthemanufacturerspublishedrecommendationsfortheappliedcoatingDFT.Steelsubstrateanchorpatterna.Alessthansharpangularanchorpatterncanbeusedtoqualifycoatingappliedtoasha

45、rpangularpattern.a.Manufacturertestingindicatesthatprofilepatternisnotacriticalattribute.But,appli-catorexperiencesuggestsanchorpatternisasignificantvariable.Concretecuringcompoundsa.Additionofcuringcompoundstothecouponcanbeusedtoqualifycoatingappliedtoconcretewithnoaddedcuringcompounds.a.Insomecase

46、s,curingcompoundscanadverselyaffectcoatingadhesionandperfor-mance.Therefore,theadditionofcuringcompoundsismoreconservative.Concretesubstratesurfaceconditiona.Inclusionofbugholesand/orporositycanbeusedtoqualifycoatingappliedtocon-cretewithnobugholesorporosity(SpecificationD5139).a.Bugholesandporosity

47、increasetheriskofdevelopingairpocketsunderthecoating,reducingadhesionstrengthunderDBAconditions.Therefore,theinclusionofbugholesand/orporosityismoreconservative.Concretesubstrateprofilea.CouponspreparedtoSpecificationD5139canbeusedtoqualifycoatingsappliedtocouponspreparedtoPracticesD4258,D4259,orD42

48、60.a.CouponspreparedtoSpecificationD5139areconservativeinthatformreleaseagentsandcuringcompoundsmaybeusedandsurfacecleaningisbylightwirebrush-ingthebroomfinishsurfaceandcompressedairblowoftheas-castsurfaces.CoatingApplicationSteelcoatingsystemSingle,multiplecoatsystemMustbesamenumberofcoatsandsameco

49、atingmaterialcombination(includesrepaircoatingsorfeatheredinterface)ConcretecoatingsystemSingle,multiplecoatsystemMustbesamenumberofcoatsandsamecoatingmaterialcombination(includesrepaircoatingsorfeatheredinterface)ThinningManufacturerspublishedrecommendationsforsolventusedandamountCurrentmanufacturerspublishedrecommendationsareacceptableColorManufacturerscolororcolornumbertestedChangeincolornumberrequiresverificationfrommanufacturerthatitmeetsthequali-fiedformulationorrequiresqualificationD8104 173TABLE8ContinuedVariableAssessmentCriteriaSignificanceofVariab