ASTM D6990-2005 Standard Practice for Evaluating Biofouling Resistance and Physical Performance of Marine Coating Systems《评估船体涂覆系统的耐生物附着性和物理特性的标准规程》.pdf

《ASTM D6990-2005 Standard Practice for Evaluating Biofouling Resistance and Physical Performance of Marine Coating Systems《评估船体涂覆系统的耐生物附着性和物理特性的标准规程》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D6990-2005 Standard Practice for Evaluating Biofouling Resistance and Physical Performance of Marine Coating Systems《评估船体涂覆系统的耐生物附着性和物理特性的标准规程》.pdf（12页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D 6990 05Standard Practice forEvaluating Biofouling Resistance and Physical Performanceof Marine Coating Systems1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 6990; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revisio

2、n, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This practice establishes a practice for evaluating degreeof biofouling settlement on and physical per

3、formance ofmarine coating systems when panels coated with such coatingsystems are subjected to immersion conditions in a marineenvironment. Guidance for preparation or exposure and han-dling of test specimens can be found in related ASTMstandards as noted below (see Section 2).1.2 This practice and

4、related exposure methodologies aredesigned as tools for the relative assessment of coatingperformance, and in no way are to be used as an absoluteindicator of long-term performance under all conditions and inall environments. There can be high variability among andwithin exposure sites with respect

5、to water quality and popu-lation or species of fouling organisms, and coating perfor-mance may vary with these and other properties.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as thestandard. The values given in parentheses are for informationonly.1.4 This standard does not purport to addre

6、ss all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. A specific hazardstatement is given in Section 6.2. Refer

7、enced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2Recommended ASTM Methods and Practices for evaluationof antifouling coatings via panel exposure under a variety ofexposure conditions:D 3623 Test Method for Testing Antifouling Panels inShallow SubmergenceD 4938 Test Method for Erosion Testing of AntifoulingPaints

8、Using High Velocity WaterD 4939 Test Method for Subjecting Marine AntifoulingCoatings to Biofouling and Fluid Shear Forces in NaturalSeawaterD 5479 Practice for Testing Biofouling Resistance of Ma-rine Coatings Partially ImmersedD 5618 Test Method for Measurement of Barnacle Adhe-sion Strength in Sh

9、earG 141 Guide forAddressing Variability in Exposure Testingof Nonmetallic Materials3. Terminology3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 biofilm, nmatrix-enclosed populations of microor-ganisms adherent to each other or to surfaces, or both, orinterfaces.3.1.2 biofouling adhesion,

10、nqualitative or quantitativeforce required for the successful and complete removal ofmarine fouling attached to the antifouling coating surface (forexample, reference Test Method D 5618 for barnacles).3.1.3 corrosion eruptions, nbuild up of oxides, exitingthrough protective paint film.3.1.4 damage,

11、nlimited destruction of portions of paintfilm due to impact with a foreign article.3.1.5 digging, na term used to describe hard foulingmacroorganisms that are growing “into” the coating. That is,where its calcareous shell penetrates/breaks through the coat-ing surface causing physical damage to the

12、coating.3.1.6 macroorganism, norganisms large enough to beseen with the naked eye and thus would be noted whengrowing on submerged surfaces.3.1.7 microorganism, norganisms too small to be seenwith the naked eye, which generally include bacteria, protozoa,fungi and microalgae (sometimes collectively

13、called “slime”).3.1.8 peeling, nthe phenomenon manifested in paint filmswhere a portion of a film, when pulled, can be removed instrips or relatively large intact pieces, or both.3.1.9 silt, nsedimentary material consisting especially ofmineral particles intermediate in size between those of sandand

14、 clay.1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint andRelated Coatings, Materials, and Applications and is the direct responsibility ofSubcommittee D01.45 on Marine Coatings.Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2005. Published February 2005. Originallyapproved in 2003. Last pr

15、evious edition approved in 2003 as D 6990 03.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM

16、International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.10 softness, advthe phenomenon manifested by paintsin transferring some of its pigmentation to a foreign item orsubstance, upon encountering friction on its surface.3.1.11 wearing, ngradual loss of

17、 the paint film caused byuse or exposure to the environment.4. Summary of Practice4.1 Test specimens or panels are coated with marine coatingsystems and exposed to marine immersion conditions for aspecified amount of time and under specific sets of conditionsas agreed upon by the producer and user.

18、See 2.1 for publishedASTM standard methods and practices that provide guidancefor exposure of coating systems.4.2 Coating systems are evaluated in terms of fouling rating(percent of coverage of the coating system by biofoulingorganisms), and physical deterioration rating (percent area ofthe coating

19、system affected by physical coating failure(s).These data are useful in assessing and comparing effectivenessof antifouling coating systems.5. Significance and Use5.1 This practice is designed to provide guidance to a panelinspector for quantitative and consistent evaluation of coatingperformance fr

20、om test panels coated with marine antifoulingcoating systems. The practice assesses performance of coatingsystems based on both antifouling and physical properties.5.2 The user is cautioned that the results are representativefor the specific region and time of year in which the specimensare immersed

21、. It shall be noted that interpretation of results willdepend on the geographical location where the test is con-ducted, whether the coated specimens are exposed eithertotally or partially immersed, under static or dynamic condi-tions, and position and orientation.5.3 Simultaneous testing of a prove

22、n standard antifoulingcoating system (known to minimize fouling accumulation, forexample, containing biocide or active agent(s) to preventfouling settlement/growth) in the specific marine environmentshall be included as a reference to assist in interpretation ofresults. In addition, a negative contr

23、ol (inert surface susceptibleto heavy fouling) shall be included on a regular basis. For theexposure to be valid, the surface of the negative control shouldshow heavy fouling relative to the standard system(s).5.4 Marine coating systems that produce positive resultsrelevant to the standard system(s)

24、 show potential for use inprotecting underwater marine structures.5.5 The format can be utilized independent of exposureprotocol and coating type, and provides the end user with aconsistent practice and format for reporting of performancerating.6. Safety Precautions6.1 WarningCertain marine coating

25、systems containtoxic materials (biocides) that may cause skin and eye irritationon contact as well as adverse physiological effects if ingestedor inhaled. In the preparation, application, and general han-dling of panels coated with various types of marine paints, theuse of appropriate protective clo

26、thing and equipment is re-quired consistent with local, state, federal government regula-tions and recognized industrial and technical standards.7. ProcedureEvaluation of Fouling Present on TestSurface7.1 Controls should be exposed and assessed at the sametime as the test materials. More information

27、 about the use ofcontrol materials in weathering tests can be found in GuideG 141. (See also 5.3.)7.2 Retrieve test panels and any negative controls andreference coatings from immersion site. Note and record thevisual percentage coverage by biofilm or silt, or both, or lackthereof in accordance with

28、 the guidelines provided below.7.3 Prior to inspection, it is recommended that panels berinsed (see below and 7.3.2 for more information) in order toremove silt (may interfere with observation of attached forms)and unattached forms. Alternatives to rinsing such as eithergentle agitation of the panel

29、s or not rinsing the panels at allmay be done but must be specified in the final reports.Whichever preparation is chosen, it must be documented andperformed on all panels equally and at each inspection. Ifrinsed, the test panel surface is to be wetted using low-pressurewater. For example,use househo

30、ld water pressures from gardenhose sized-nozzles measuring 9.5 to 13 mm (38 to12 in.) in theform of a gentle shower spray or non-forceful flow to allow fora reliable inspection of what is attached to the coating/panel.Nozzles that cause water to be forcefully applied to the panelshall not be used. W

31、arningRisk in rinsing panels is thatsubsequent biofouling attachment may be affected. Alterna-tively, panels may be gently agitated in water to removeloose/unattached bacterial biofilm or silt deposits, or both.WarningRisk in not rinsing panels is that silt or slime, orboth, may interfere with asses

32、sment of biofouling attachmenton complete panel surface.7.3.1 Test panels shall not be allowed to dry during theentire inspection period. A holding tank is useful for accom-plishing this.7.3.2 Rinse water and holding tank water, shall be takenfrom the immersion site.7.3.3 Efforts shall be made to mi

33、nimize the length of timepanels remain removed from the normal immersion site, and tonot touch the coated surfaces.7.4 Populations and types of organisms will vary by testsite. Some examples of biofouling microorganisms includebarnacles, oysters, mussels, bryozoans (arborescent and en-crusting), hyd

34、roids, tubeworms, tunicates, sponges, and vari-ous types of algae. Each type of fouling organism directlyattached to the test surface shall be reported by (1) theestimated percentage of the panel area covered by all of thesame type of biofouling (for example, colonial forms), (2) thefrequency (numbe

35、r of individuals for the larger and solitaryorganisms; for example, barnacles, mussels, oysters, tubeworms, and some tunicates), and (3) the range of size for theindividual organisms (for larger, solitary organisms). SeeAppendix X1 for guidance on estimating percent cover andFig. X2.1 for a suggeste

36、d sample antifouling inspection reportform.7.4.1 Make a note of any fouling organisms found to begrowing into the paint film, also referred to as “digging.”7.4.2 Note that percentage cover of algae and arborescentbryozoans shall be based on the area covered by the “hold fast”D6990052and not the area

37、 covered by the “strands” or colony. The typeof algae (for example, brown, red, green) shall also be recordedif known.7.4.3 Only attachment of primary biofouling settlement(that is, biofouling attached directly to the coating system)shall be recorded. Notes on secondary fouling (biofoulingattached t

38、o other fouling organisms) can be made if desired, butshall not factor into the generation of a “fouling rating.”7.4.4 Percent cover by mud tube-building amphipods shallbe reported as a footnote in Fig. X2.1, but shall NOT factor intothe generation of a “fouling rating.”7.4.5 Partial Immersion Test

39、Panels OnlyPanels exposedin accordance with Practice D 5479 are partially immersed.The non-immersed area will be subject to splash and may showsome fouling attachment, but the area is not included in thedetermination of a fouling rating. Therefore, the fouling ratingis calculated based on the fully

40、immersed surface area, count-ing the immersed surface area as 100 %.7.4.6 In addition, antifouling performance of coating sys-tems is often different in the immediate waterline vicinity.Therefore, an estimate of coverage along the first 50 mm (2 in.)of the test panel shall also be made and can then

41、be contrastedwith the overall coverage. Fouling occurring in the “above thewaterline” area, if any, is not considered when generating a“fouling rating.”7.5 Discount biofouling attachment within 13 mm (12 in.)from all edges of the test panel.8. ProcedureEvaluation of Physical Deterioration/Performanc

42、e of Test Surface8.1 Prior to the original exposure, inspect all test panels forpossible physical deterioration. Record findings. Continueobservation of predetermined damage during future inspec-tions. See Fig. X2.2 for a suggested sample physical perfor-mance inspection report form.8.2 Evaluate ind

43、ividual physical performance failure, quali-tatively and quantitatively, for each test specimen. Observa-tions of erosion, wearing, blistering, alligatoring, checking,cracking, chipping, peeling, flaking, and damage shall bemade. For additional information and guidance for evaluatingany of the previ

44、ous physical deteriorations, refer to Sections 2and 3. Record the percent surface area affected by eachphysical parameter.8.2.1 Observations of physical deterioration shall be per-formed for each coat visible to the inspector (for example,topcoat, intermediate, primer). The percent surface area af-f

45、ected by each physical parameter shall be estimated based onthe visible area of each coat.8.3 Discount any physical failures within 13 mm (12 in.)from all edges of the test panel.8.4 Observations of physical deterioration cannot be per-formed on panel surface areas covered by hard fouling. At thetim

46、e of inspection do not count this area in the generation ofthe physical deterioration rating (PDR); see also 11.2. At theend of the panel test period, a final evaluation of physicaldeterioration rating can be performed after removal of hardfouling in order to determine whether physical deterioration

47、has occurred under areas that had been covered by hardfouling.9. ProcedureEvaluation of “Softness” of MarineCoating System9.1 Evaluation of “softness” is intended for marine coatingsystems (excluding silicone coating systems), and is an indi-cator of a coatings pigment erosion characteristics. It is

48、measured on a subjective scale of 10 to 0 (see 9.2.1), dependenton the amount of pigment transferred from the coating to acotton swab.9.2 After rinsing the test panels (see 7.2), rub a wet cottonswab, exactly 10 strokes in a back and forth motion, over thewet test surface. The cotton swab is held at

49、 one of its ends withthe thumb and index finger. The cotton swab is positioned at45 to the coating surface and sufficient pressure is applied sothat the cotton swab stem just starts to bend. The strokes shallbe made continuously in a back and forth motion, in the samelinear pattern, approximately 50 mm ( 2 in.) in length. Use ofproper protective equipment, such as gloves, is recommended.9.2.1 Softness shall be evaluated on the following subjec-tive scale, where:10 = no pigment transferred to a cotton swab,8 = trace amount of pigment transferred to a cotton swa