ASTM C1521-2009e1 Standard Practice for Evaluating Adhesion of Installed Weatherproofing Sealant Joints《评价已安装上的防风雨的密封接头粘结性的标准实施规程》.pdf

《ASTM C1521-2009e1 Standard Practice for Evaluating Adhesion of Installed Weatherproofing Sealant Joints《评价已安装上的防风雨的密封接头粘结性的标准实施规程》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM C1521-2009e1 Standard Practice for Evaluating Adhesion of Installed Weatherproofing Sealant Joints《评价已安装上的防风雨的密封接头粘结性的标准实施规程》.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: C1521 091Standard Practice forEvaluating Adhesion of Installed Weatherproofing SealantJoints1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C1521; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last r

2、evision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1NOTEEditorial changes were made in Section 7 in December 2009.1. Scope1.1 This practice describes destructive and nondestructiveprocedu

3、res.1.2 The destructive procedure stresses the sealant in such away as to cause either cohesive or adhesive failure of thesealant or cohesive failure of the substrate where deficientsubstrate conditions exist. The objective is to characterize theadhesive/cohesive performance of the sealant on the sp

4、ecificsubstrate by applying whatever strain is necessary to effectfailure of the sealant bead. It is possible that the strain appliedto the sealant bead may result in the failure of a deficientsubstrate before effecting a failure in the sealant.NOTE 1The destructive procedure requires immediate repa

5、ir of thesealant bead. Appropriate materials and equipment should be available forthis purpose.NOTE 2Sealant formulations may fail in cohesion or adhesion whenproperly installed, and tested by this method. The sealant manufacturershould be consulted to determine the appropriate guidelines for using

6、thismethod.1.3 The nondestructive procedure places strain on the seal-ant and a stress on the adhesive bond. Though termed nonde-structive, this procedure may result in an adhesive failure of adeficient sealant bead, but should not cause a cohesive failurein the sealant. The results of this procedur

7、e should be eitheradhesive failure or no failure.NOTE 3The nondestructive procedure may require immediate repairof the sealant bead, if failure is experienced. Appropriate materials andequipment should be available for this purpose.1.4 The non-destructive procedure can be used for continu-ous inspec

8、tion of 100 % of the joint(s) or for any areas wheredeficient conditions, which are inconsistent with the practicesof Guide C1193, are suspected.1.5 The committee with jurisdiction over this practice is notaware of any comparable practices published by other organi-zations or committees.1.6 The valu

9、es stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematicalconversions to SI units that are provided for information onlyand are not considered standard.1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with

10、its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C717 Terminology of Building Seals and SealantsC1193 Guide for Use of

11、 Joint Sealants3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsFor definitions of terms used in this rec-ommended procedure, see Terminology C717.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 flap, nthe term “flap” as used in this specificationrefers to a portion of an installed sealant bead that has beenpu

12、rposely cut along one substrate bond line and across the beadat two locations resulting in a portion of bead adhered alongone substrate bond line.3.2.2 tail, nthe term “tail” as used in this specificationrefers to a portion of an installed sealant bead that has beenpurposely cut along both substrate

13、 bond lines and across the1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C24 on BuildingSeals and Sealants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C24.30 onAdhesion.Current edition approved June 1, 2009. Published July 2009. Originally approvedin 2002. Last previous edition appr

14、oved in 2008 as C1521 08a. DOI: 10.1520/C1521-09.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright A

15、STM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.bead at one location resulting in a portion of bead unadhered tothe substrates but adhered to the remainder of the sealant bead.4. Significance and Use4.1 Many parameters contribute to the overall

16、performanceof a sealant application. Some of the most significant param-eters are sealant bead size and configuration, joint movement,quality of workmanship, the quality of the adhesive bond, andthe quality of the sealant material.4.2 A sealant usually fails to perform as a weatherseal whenit experi

17、ences cohesive or adhesive failure.4.3 If a sealant bead fails, an evaluation of the total jointmovement may be needed to determine if the joint sealant wasstrained beyond design or if the sealant failed within designparameters.4.4 If a sealant bead fails adhesively, there is no straight-forward pro

18、cedure for determining the cause. The adhesivefailure may be due to workmanship, the specific surfacepreparation used, the specific sealant used, poor “installed”joint design, poor bond chemistry and other causes.4.5 Because of the complex nature of the performance of asealant bead, an understanding

19、 of the quality of the adhesivebond is instrumental in any evaluation of sealant performance.It is critical that the test procedures used truly evaluate thequality of the adhesive bond and do not simply take advantageof the tear resistance of the sealant.4.6 This method does not evaluate the perform

20、ance of asealant joint as a weatherseal. It only evaluates the character-istics of the adhesive bond relative to the cohesive strength ofthe sealant in a particular installation. Since any failures thatresult from use of this test method are intentionally induced,they do not necessarily mean that th

21、e sealant joint will notperform as a weatherseal.4.7 The results of these methods are most useful in identi-fying sealant joints with poor adhesion. The continuous inspec-tion procedure is also useful in the identification of places ofpoor joint configuration. Obvious cohesive failures are alsoident

22、ified. The results of these methods can be used to assessthe likely performance of the sealant joint and to compareperformance against other sealant joints.4.8 The nondestructive methods are most effective while thesealant is in a state of extension due to mild or low tempera-tures. They are least e

23、ffective during high temperature whenthe sealant is in a compressed condition.5. Testing Equipment5.1 Field EquipmentThe following equipment is requiredto perform this practice: rule with132 in. divisions (mm),probing tool, razor knife, knife or other cutting instrument witha pointed 2 in. (50 mm) m

24、inimum length blade, sealablesample bags, repair sealant compatible with existing sealant,tools for installing sealant, butyl tape, water.5.2 Field Equipment, Nondestructive ContinuousMethodA wheel roller such as a screen roller or a backer rodinsertion roller or a pressure controlled roller.5.3 Pro

25、vide materials for recording data. These may includemasking tape, marking pen, note books, shop or architecturaldrawings, a camera or video recorder, or both.6. Summary of Methods6.1 Nondestructive Spot MethodThis method makes useof a blunt dowel shaped tool to impart pressure against thesurface of

26、the sealant bead. Firm pressure is applied to thesurface of the sealant in the center of the bead and near thebond line. This method evaluates a discrete area of the sealantbead and is repeated numerous times to provide an evaluationof a given length of sealant joint.6.2 Nondestructive Continuous Me

27、thodThis methodmakes use of a wheel to impart pressure against the surface ofthe sealant bead. The wheel is rolled continuously along thecenter of the sealant bead to provide 100 % inspection of agiven length of sealant joint.6.3 All MethodsData is collected continuously for allmethods. Precise desc

28、ription of location and type of allanomalies is recorded by a method appropriate for the givenevaluation. See Appendix X1.6.4 Destructive MethodThis method is performed bycutting through the sealant bead to provide either a “tail” or a“flap” of sealant that can be pulled by hand, to stress the bondl

29、ine of the sealant. The width and location of the sealant beadwill determine how and to what degree the hand pull methodcan be performed. This method uses described techniques tocause an adhesive failure from the substrate.NOTE 4Narrow joints (less than516 in. or 8 mm wide) do not lendthemselves to

30、destructive field adhesion tests. Usually, some kind of “tail”can be provided to perform an adhesion pull. However, these tests tend toevaluate the cohesive property of the sealant more than the adhesiveproperty.NOTE 5Joints that are less than58 in. or 16 mm wide or that are morethan12 in. (13 mm) d

31、eep do not lend themselves to a “flap” style adhesionpull. The “tail” style adhesion pull should be performed on these joints.7. Procedures7.1 Nondestructive Procedure:7.1.1 Select a probing tool that is at least18 in. (3 mm)narrower than the width of the sealant joint to be evaluated.Fig. 1 provide

32、s example dimensions for a probing tool.NOTE 6The probing tool should be blunt without sharp edges andFIG. 1 Probing ToolC1521 0912shaped in such a way that it will not puncture the sealant bead.7.1.2 Technique 1Using the probing tool, depress thecenter of the sealant bead to create an elongation st

33、rain on thesealant joint. Record the depth of the depression as a percent-age of the width of the bead. A common percentage used tocreate reasonable strain and reveal poor adhesion is 50 %. Theappropriate percentage varies with each sealant joint and isapproximately proportional to the expected join

34、t movement.The percentage can be correlated with destructive proceduretest results.7.1.3 Technique 2Locating the probing tool adjacent tothe sealant/substrate bond line, depress the sealant bead to theextent that (visually) it appears the sealant is about to failcohesively. The sealant bead should b

35、e depressed in such a waythat the probing tool does not contact or scrape against thesubstrate, nor slide toward the center of the joint. Thistechnique will effect a peel-type strain on the sealant joint. Thistechnique will produce shear forces close to the bond line andtherefore the results should

36、be prudently interpreted.7.2 Nondestructive Continuous Inspection Procedure:7.2.1 Place masking tape on the exposed surface of thesubstrate adjacent to the sealant to be inspected. Using a rollerof such thickness as to be equal to or less than half of the widthof the joint, apply pressure to the sea

37、lant through the roller todevelop a depression in the sealant joint that representsapproximately 50 % deflection of the sealant. Advance theroller along the centerline of the length of the joint, usinguniform pressure. Observe the condition of the sealant forconditions, such as deflection of the sea

38、lant that is greater thanor less than expected, adhesive failure, cohesive failure ormechanical damage to the sealant, and mark the location ofthese conditions on the masking tape. It is helpful to usecharacteristic marks such as “A” for adhesion loss, “H” wherethe sealant appears hard, “S” where th

39、e sealant appears soft,“C” where a cohesive failure exists, for example, whenmarking the masking tape. Where extended length of adhesivefailure occurs, the masking tape can be marked to indicate theends of the adhesive failures. The tape can also containmarkings that identify the location and side o

40、f the joint atwhich it is located. Upon completion of depressing the sealantwith the roller, documentation of the locations and types ofconditions can be performed.7.2.2 Determining the Causes of the AnomaliesEachanomaly can be inspected for obvious causes. However, it isgenerally helpful to remove

41、a portion of the sealant and backermaterial for inspection. Sometimes, a more thorough examina-tion of the anomaly location will be required. The destructiveprocedure described in 7.3 can be used.7.3 Destructive Procedure:7.3.1 The “Tail” Procedure consists of cutting through thesealant, 6 in. (150

42、mm) along the bond line at both substrates.Cut across the sealant bead to release one end of the “tail” thatis formed (see Fig. 2). Insure that the sealant is cut at thesubstrate and that the sealant bead is free of nicks or jaggededges.7.3.2 Method A:7.3.2.1 Mark the cut portion of the sealant 1 in

43、. (25 mm)from the adhesive bond.7.3.2.2 Grasp the sealant “tail” at the mark 1 in. (25 mm)from the adhesive bond.7.3.2.3 Pull tail at an angle of 90 to the substrate toeffectively extend the 1-in. mark to two times the statedmovement capability of the sealant.7.3.2.4 Record the type of failure that

44、occurred and thedistance of the mark from the adhesive bond when failureoccurred, or the distance recommended by manufacturer with-out causing failure.7.3.3 Method B:7.3.3.1 Mark the cut portion of the sealant 1 in. (25 mm)from the adhesive bond.7.3.3.2 Grasp the sealant tail at the mark 1 in. (25 m

45、m) fromthe adhesive bond.7.3.3.3 Various tests can be performed pulling the tailslowly at an angle of 30, 90 or 150 to the substrate, keepingthe tail in line with the sealant bead as nearly as possible.Monitor the extension to determine the elongation resulting infailure.NOTE 7Techniques using the “

46、tail procedure” that allow evaluationsFIG. 2 Tail ProcedureC1521 0913of sealant adhesion to one substrate at a time are acceptable.7.3.3.4 If the sealant begins to tear cohesively, stop pullingand readjust the grasp on the tail and begin pulling again. Pullon the tail in whatever direction or manner

47、 that best avoidscohesive tearing and encourages adhesive failure.7.3.3.5 Repeat procedure as necessary to evaluate adhesionto both substrates forming the joint.7.3.4 Flap Procedure:7.3.4.1 The “Flap” Procedure consists of cutting through thesealant, 3 in. (75 mm) along the bondline on the substrate

48、opposite to the substrate to be evaluated. Make two cuts acrossthe sealant bead, one at each end of the 3 in. (75 mm) cut. Pryup the flap that is formed by the three cuts through the sealantbead (see Fig. 3).7.3.4.2 Grasp the flap near the edge opposite the bond lineto be evaluated.7.3.4.3 Pull the

49、flap in the tensile mode until adhesive orcohesive failure.7.3.4.4 Stop pulling and grasp the flap near the other end.7.3.4.5 Pull the flap in a shear mode until the onset ofadhesive or cohesive failure.7.3.4.6 Trim away the portions of the flap that have failed.7.3.4.7 Bend, twist and/or rotate the flap until adhesive orcohesive failure occurs.7.3.4.8 The Flap Procedure should be performed to evaluatethe bond at each substrate, particularly if the substrates oneither side of the joint vary.7.4 Number of Tests:7.4.1 The frequency of the testing depen