剑桥商务英语中级-68及答案解析.doc
《剑桥商务英语中级-68及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《剑桥商务英语中级-68及答案解析.doc(34页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、剑桥商务英语中级-68 及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、BREADING/B(总题数:1,分数:7.00)BPART ONE/BLook at the statements below and the comments on change management on the opposite page. Which section(A,B,C or D)does each statement 1-7 refer to? For each statement 1-7,mark one letter(A,B,C or D) You will need to use som
2、e of these letters more than once AFor over three decades,academics,managers,and consultants,realizing that transforming organizations is difficult,have analyzed the subjectTheyve sung the praises of leaders who communicate vision and walk the talk in order to make change efforts succeedTheyve sanct
3、ified the importance of changing organizational culture and employeesattitudesTheyve teased out the tensions between top-down transformation efforts and participatory approaches to changeStill,studies show that in most organizations,two out of three transformation initiatives fail BEach manager look
4、s at an initiative from his or her viewpoint and,based on personal experience,focuses on different success factorsThe experts,too,offer different perspectivesA recent search for books on change and management turned up 6,153 titles,each with a distinct take on the topic. Those ideas have a lot to of
5、fer,but take together,they force companies to tackle many priorities simultaneously,which spreads resource sand skills thin. CSomeofthehardfactorsthataffectatransformationinitiativearethetimenecessarytocompleteit,the number of people required to execute it,and the financial results that intended act
6、ions are expected to achieve. The research shows that change projects fail to get off the ground when companies neglect the hard factors. That doesnt mean that executives can ignore the soft elements;that would be a grave mistake. However. If companies dont pay attention to the hard issues first,tra
7、nsformation programs will break down before the soft elements come into play. DCompanies assume that the longer an initiative carries on. The more likely it is to failthe early impetus will peter out,windows of opportunity will close,objectives will be forgotten,key supporters will leave or lose the
8、ir enthusiasm,and problems will accumulate. However,contrary to popular perception, along project that is reviewed frequently is more likely to succeed than a short project that isnt reviewed frequently. Thus,the time between reviews is more critical for success than a projects life span.(分数:7.00)(1
9、).the importance of taking into consideration the economic effects brought by the change(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.(2).the diversity in observing the initiative of change in companies(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.(3).the belief that good communication between managers and staff will benefit the change(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.(4).
10、the relationship between the duration of a project and the chances of winning the change(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.(5).the need to consider all the elements involved in a change(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.(6).the possibility to make a successful change by considering the plan more than once(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.(7).the negat
11、ive view of asking companies to solve many problems at the same time(分数:1.00)A.B.C.D.二、BPART TWO/B(总题数:1,分数:5.00)Read the article below about management teams in making decisions. Choose the best sentence from the opposite page to fill each of the gaps. For each gap 8-12,mark one letter(A-G). Do not
12、 use any letter more than once. How Management Teams Can Have a Good Fight Top managers often find it very difficult to manage conflict. They know that conflict over issues is natural and even necessary. Reasonable people,making decisions under conditions of uncertainty,are likely to have honest dis
13、agreements over the best path for their companys future. Management teams whose members challenge one anothers thinking develop a more complete understanding of the choices, cerate a richer range of options. Ultimately they are able to make the kinds of effective decisions necessary in todays compet
14、itive environments. But, unfortunately, healthy conflict can quickly turn unproductive. A comment meant as a substantive remark can be interpreted as a personal attack. U(8) /UPersonalities frequently become closely connected with issues. Because most executives are proud of their ability to make ra
15、tional decisions,they find it difficult even to acknowledgelet alone managethis emotional,irrational dimension of their behavior.The challenge is familiar to anyone who has ever been part of a management team. U(9) /UThe managers should be encouraged to argue without destroying their ability to work
16、 as a team.In a study,in 4 of the 12 companies,there was little or no substantive disagreement over major issues and therefore little conflict to observe. But the other 8 companies experienced considerable conflict. In 4 of them,the top-management teams handled conflict in a way that avoided interpe
17、rsonal hostility or discord. U(10) /UThey described the way they work as a team asopen,fun,and productive. The executives vigorously debated the issues,but they wasted little time on carefully considering and posturing. As one put it, I really dont have time. Another said, We dont gloss over the iss
18、ues:we hit them straight on. But were not political, Still another observed of her companys management team, We scream a lot,then laugh,and then resolve the issue. The other four companies in which issues were contested were less successful at avoiding interpersonal conflict. Their top teams were pl
19、agued by intense hostility. U(11) /UWhen executives described their colleagues to us,they used words such asmanipulative, secretive.burned out,andpolitical. The teams with minimal interpersonal conflict were able to separate substantive issues from those based on personalities. U(12) /UHow did they
20、do that? After analyzing the observations of the teams behavior, the experts found that their companies used the same tactics for managing interpersonal conflict. For instance,team members worked with more, rather than less, information and debated on the basis of facts.A. They must try to keep cons
21、tructive conflict over issues from turning into nonfunctional interpersonal conflict.B. Executives Often failed to cooperate. rarely talking with one another, tending to fragment into cliques, and openly displaying their frustration and anger.C. Anxiety and frustration over difficult choices can evo
22、lve into anger directed at colleagues.D. Executives in those companies referred to their colleagues as smart, team player, and best In the business.E. All the teams had to make high-stakes decisions in the face of considerable uncertainty and under pressure to move quickly.F. They managed to disagre
23、e over questions of strategic significance and still get along with one another.(分数:5.00)(1).(分数:1.00)填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_三、BPART THREE/B(总题数:1,分数:6.00)Read the article below about customer loyalty on the opposite page. For each question 13-18, mark one letter(A, B, C or D)for the ans
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 剑桥商务英语 中级 68 答案 解析 DOC
