BS IEC IEEE 60780-323-2016 Nuclear facilities Electrical equipment important to safety Qualification《核设施 具有安全重要性的电气设备 鉴定》.pdf

《BS IEC IEEE 60780-323-2016 Nuclear facilities Electrical equipment important to safety Qualification《核设施 具有安全重要性的电气设备 鉴定》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《BS IEC IEEE 60780-323-2016 Nuclear facilities Electrical equipment important to safety Qualification《核设施 具有安全重要性的电气设备 鉴定》.pdf（36页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、BSI Standards PublicationNuclear facilities Electrical equipment important to safety QualificationBS IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016National forewordThis British Standard is the UK implementation of IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016.It supersedes BS IEC 60780:1998 which is withdrawn.The UK participation in its prepar

2、ation was entrusted to TechnicalCommittee NCE/8, Instrumentation, Control any IEC National Committee interested in the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparatio

3、n. IEEE Standards documents are developed within IEEE Societies and Standards Coordinating Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. IEEE develops its standards through a consensus development process, approved by the American National Standards Institute, which brings

4、together volunteers representing varied viewpoints and interests to achieve the final product. Volunteers are not necessarily members of IEEE and serve without compensation. While IEEE administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the consensus development process, IEEE does n

5、ot independently evaluate, test, or verify the accuracy of any of the information contained in its standards. Use of IEEE Standards documents is wholly voluntary. IEEE documents are made available for use subject to important notices and legal disclaimers (see http:/standards.ieee.org/IPR/disclaimer

6、s.html for more information). IEC collaborates closely with IEEE in accordance with conditions determined by agreement between the two organizations. This Dual Logo International Standard was jointly developed by the IEC and IEEE under the terms of that agreement. 2) The formal decisions of IEC on t

7、echnical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all interested IEC National Committees. The formal decisions of IEEE on technical matters, once consensus within IEEE Societies and S

8、tandards Coordinating Committees has been reached, is determined by a balanced ballot of materially interested parties who indicate interest in reviewing the proposed standard. Final approval of the IEEE standards document is given by the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. 3) IEC/

9、IEEE Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National Committees/IEEE Societies in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC/IEEE Publications is accurate, IEC or IEEE cannot be held responsible f

10、or the way in which they are used or for any misinterpretation by any end user. 4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications (including IEC/IEEE Publications) transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional p

11、ublications. Any divergence between any IEC/IEEE Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in the latter. 5) IEC and IEEE do not provide any attestation of conformity. Independent certification bodies provide conformity assessment services and, in

12、some areas, access to IEC marks of conformity. IEC and IEEE are not responsible for any services carried out by independent certification bodies. 6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication. 7) No liability shall attach to IEC or IEEE or their directors, employee

13、s, servants or agents including individual experts and members of technical committees and IEC National Committees, or volunteers of IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinating Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board, for any personal injury, property damage or other

14、 damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC/IEEE Publication or any other IEC or IEEE Publications. 8) Attention is drawn to the normative references cited in this pu

15、blication. Use of the referenced publications is indispensable for the correct application of this publication. 9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that implementation of this IEC/IEEE Publication may require use of material covered by patent rights. By publication of this standard, no position

16、 is taken with respect to the existence or validity of any patent rights in connection therewith. IEC or IEEE shall not be held responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of Patent Claims or deter

17、mining whether any licensing terms or conditions provided in connection with submission of a Letter of Assurance, if any, or in any licensing agreements are reasonable or non-discriminatory. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any patent rights, and the

18、 risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility. International Standard IEC/IEEE 60780-323 has been prepared by subcommittee 45A: Instrumentation, control and electrical systems of nuclear facilities, of IEC technical committee 45: Nuclear instrumentation, in cooperation w

19、ith the Nuclear Power Engineering Committee of the Power those features that are provided to mitigate the consequences of malfunction or failure of structures, systems and components. A) For usage consistent with IEC 61226, equipment important to safety are as follows: all I for equipment important

20、to safety, qualification is essential to the following: electric equipment and systems that are essential to emergency reactor shutdown, containment isolation, reactor core cooling, and containment and reactor heat removal, or electric equipment that are otherwise essential in preventing significant

21、 release of radioactive material to the environment. Note 1 to entry: Users of this standard are advised that Class 1E is a functional term. Equipment and systems are to be classified Class 1E only if they fulfill the functions listed in the definition. Identification of systems or equipment as Clas

22、s 1E based on anything other than their function is an improper use of the term and should be avoided. 3.13 equipment qualification generation and maintenance of evidence to ensure that equipment will operate on demand to meet system performance requirements during normal and abnormal service condit

23、ions and postulated design basis events SOURCE: IAEA Safety Glossary, 2007 3.14 equipment similarity demonstration of physical, operational and dynamic equivalency between equipment being qualified and equipment previously qualified BS IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016 11 IEC/IEEE 2016

24、3.15 harsh environment environment that significantly changes as a result of a design basis event, e.g., loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), high-energy line break (HELB), and main steam line break (MSLB) SOURCE: IEEE Standards Dictionary Online 3.16 interfaces shared boundary between structures, syste

25、ms and components that includes physical attachments, mounting, auxiliary components, and connectors (electrical and mechanical) to the equipment 3.17 margin difference between service conditions and the conditions used for equipment qualification SOURCE: IEEE Standards Dictionary Online 3.18 mild e

26、nvironment environment that would at no time be significantly more severe than the environment that would occur during normal plant operation, including anticipated operational occurrences 3.19 qualified condition condition of equipment, prior to the start of a design basis event, for which the equi

27、pment was demonstrated to meet the design requirements for the specified service conditions. This could include certain post accident cooling and monitoring systems that are expected to remain operational. 3.20 qualified life period for which an equipment has been demonstrated, through testing, anal

28、ysis and/or experience, to be capable of functioning within acceptance criteria during specific operating conditions while retaining the ability to perform its safety functions in accident condition or earthquake Note 1 to entry: This note applies to the French language only. SOURCE: IAEA Safety Glo

29、ssary, 2007 3.21 service conditions actual physical states or influences during the service life of equipment, including normal operating conditions, abnormal operating conditions, design basis event conditions and conditions following a design basis event and design extension conditions Note 1 to e

30、ntry: In 2007-edition of IAEA safety glossary, accident conditions include both design basis accident and beyond design basis accident. This second notion has been replaced within IAEA by the notion of design extension conditions (AIEA, SSR-2/1). It explains the need of changing the definition. SOUR

31、CE: IAEA Safety Glossary, 2007, modified 3.22 service life period from initial operation to final withdrawal from service of a structure, system or component BS IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016 12 IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016 IEC/IEEE 2016 SOURCE: IAEA Safety Glossary, 2007 3.23 severe accident accident condition

32、s more severe than a design basis event and involving significant core degradation SOURCE: IAEA Safety Glossary, 2007 3.24 significant ageing mechanism ageing mechanism that, under normal and abnormal service conditions, causes degradation of equipment that progressively and appreciably renders the

33、equipment vulnerable to failure to perform its safety function(s) during the design basis event conditions SOURCE: IEEE Standards Dictionary Online 4 Symbols and abbreviations DBE Design Basis Event EM Electromagnetic EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility EMI Electromagnetic Interference HELB High Energ

34、y Line Break I however analysis alone shall not be used to demonstrate qualification. Qualification should comprise a logical assessment, similarity evaluation or a valid mathematical model of the equipment to be qualified. The bases for analysis typically include physical laws, results of test data

35、 (including those collected during type test performed on equipment from the plant see 6.2.3 and condition measurement) and operating experience. 6.1.4 Combined methods Equipment may be qualified by combinations of type test, operating experience, and analysis. For example, where type test of a comp

36、lete assembly is not possible, component testing supplemented by analysis may be used. 6.2 Reassessing qualified life 6.2.1 General Environmental qualification may yield a qualified life that is less than the anticipated service life of the equipment. For example, the qualified life may be limited d

37、ue to the use of moderate ageing acceleration factors to achieve realistic simulation of degradation in service during available testing time. Such moderate ageing acceleration factors may result in the condition of the equipment under test falling short of its required end-of-life condition and hen

38、ce limiting service life. The methods that follow may be used for reassessing and extending equipment qualified life. The method chosen shall be justified and the application shall be sufficiently documented to give confidence in the extended qualified life. BS IEC/IEEE 60780-323:2016IEC/IEEE 60780-

39、323:2016 15 IEC/IEEE 2016 6.2.2 Method 1: Using conservatism Evaluation of conservatisms in original assumptions for environmental conditions, failure criteria, and acceleration factors may identify that actual conditions are less severe, and the qualified life may be adjusted accordingly with due c

40、onsideration of the required margins addressed in 7.3.5. Limitations of use of accelerating factors shall be considered (e.g. time period extrapolation, synergy between effect of temperature and radiation, dose rate effect). Ageing models shall be properly verified. Environmental conditions shall be

41、 properly assessed. 6.2.3 Method 2: Type test on aged samples from the plant Install additional qualified equipment in identical service conditions or use qualified equipment aged in the plant. Remove before the end of the qualified life of equipment in-service and demonstrate its safety function pe

42、rformance during DBE(s) after further age conditioning to establish additional qualified life. 6.2.4 Method 3: Performing type test for longer qualified life A longer qualified life can be achieved by either retain and continue ageing the test sample from the initial program for additional duration

43、or begin ageing a new sample while the qualified equipment is in service. Equipment safety function is then demonstrated by successfully passing accident condition test. 6.2.5 Method 4: Component replacement Identify age-sensitive components and replace them with new, identical components to extend

44、qualification. Consideration shall be given to time required to have the component accessible for the replacement. This method shall not be used if the disassembly of the equipment can alter its performance in service conditions (including accident conditions). 6.3 Condition monitoring Condition mon

45、itoring for equipment qualification purposes monitors one or more condition indicators to determine whether equipment remains in a qualified condition. The trend of the condition indicator shall be determined during age conditioning of the test specimen for qualification testing or on another simila

46、r specimen (same model, same materials, same supplier, same hardware/software, etc.) submitted to the same age conditioning tests. The condition indicator shall be measurable, change monotonically with time, be correlated with the safety function performance under DBE conditions, be linked to the fu

47、nctional degradation of the qualified equipment, and have a consistent trend from unaged through the limit of the qualified pre-accident condition. Condition indicators are dependent on technology. Such condition indicators cannot always be defined in practice, even if such indicators would be benef

48、icial. Condition-based qualification is an adjunct to type testing. To use condition-based qualification, age conditioning shall be performed incrementally and condition indicators shall be measured at each increment to establish data for comparison with observations of the same indicators during se

49、rvice. In particular, it is required to establish the condition of the condition indicator(s) at the conclusion of age conditioning, prior to testing to accident conditions. If the qualification programme has been completed, age conditioning may be replicated on another sample by performing incremental condition indicator measurements. Since measurements for condition indicators may be taken at one temperature, additional data may be required to provide a correlation with time and temperature. Condition indicators shall be leading indicators of ad