ATIS 0700021-2015 Canadian Wireless Public Alerting Service (WPAS) LTE Mobile Device Behavior Specification.pdf

《ATIS 0700021-2015 Canadian Wireless Public Alerting Service (WPAS) LTE Mobile Device Behavior Specification.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ATIS 0700021-2015 Canadian Wireless Public Alerting Service (WPAS) LTE Mobile Device Behavior Specification.pdf（14页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 ATIS-0700021 ATIS Standard on - CANADIAN WIRELESS PUBLIC ALERTING SERVICE (WPAS) LTE MOBILE DEVICE BEHAVIOR As a leading technology and solutions development organization, the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) brings together the top global ICT companies to advance the indus

2、trys most pressing business priorities. ATIS nearly 200 member companies are currently working to address the All-IP transition, network functions virtualization, big data analytics, cloud services, device solutions, emergency services, M2M, cyber security, network evolution, quality of service, bil

3、ling support, operations, and much more. These priorities follow a fast-track development lifecycle from design and innovation through standards, specifications, requirements, business use cases, software toolkits, open source solutions, and interoperability testing. ATIS is accredited by the Americ

4、an National Standards Institute (ANSI). The organization is the North American Organizational Partner for the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), a founding Partner of the oneM2M global initiative, a member of and major U.S. contributor to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), as w

5、ell as a member of the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL). For more information, visit www.atis.org. Notice of Disclaimer 2. WPAS requires mandatory bilingual (English and French) language support; 3. WPAS will only employ the highest level non-opt out emergency messages Ref 10 (kno

6、wn as Presidential Alerts in WEA) and; 4. WPAS requires the use of a Canadian specific cadence, alert tone and alert banner to notify wireless users of alerts. It is intended that this Standard shall be used in conjunction with J-STD-100 Ref 1 and J-STD-100.a Ref 2 as a Normative Reference. 2 Normat

7、ive References The following standards contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this Standard are encourag

8、ed to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below. Ref 1 J-STD-100, Joint ATIS/TIA CMAS Mobile Device Behavior Specification; January 30, 2009.11This document is available from the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), 1200 G

9、 Street N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005 . ATIS-0700021 5 Ref 2 J-STD-100.a, Supplement A to J-STD-100, Joint ATIS/TIA CMAS Mobile Device Behavior Specification; December, 2012.2 Ref 3 SOREM Public Alerting Working Group, FPT REQUIREMENTS for WIRELESS PUBLIC ALERTING v. 1.0; May 2013. 3Ref 4 SO

10、REM Public Alerting Working Group, NATIONAL PUBLIC ALERTING SYSTEM COMMON LOOK AND FEELGUIDANCE 1.0, October 2013. 4Ref 5 WPAS Steering Committee. WPAS Requirements Definition - Deliverable 1.9; May 2105. 5Ref 6 Public Safety Canada, Request to CISC to develop technical specifications for a wireless

11、 public alerting service, July 2014.6Ref 7 CRTC Decision, Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2014-444-Section 101, August 2014. 7Ref 8 3GPP TS 23.041 3RDGeneration Partnership Project; Technical Specifications Group Core Network and Terminals; Technical Realization of Cell Broadcast Service (CBS).8

12、Ref 9 3GPP TS 22.268 3RDGeneration Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Public Warning System (PWS) requirements).9Ref 10 Senior Officials Responsible for Emergency Management (SOREM) Broadcast Immediate (BI) Alert List 10Ref 11 Canadian Official Languages

13、Act 11Ref 12 CRTC Broadcasting and Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-430 “Accessibility of telecommunications and broadcasting services”, July 200912Ref 13 Peter Menzies speech to the National Public Alerting Summit13Ref 14 CRTC Three Year Plan 2015-2018, April 201514Ref 15 CRTC Interconnection St

14、eering Committee (CISC) Network Technology Working Group (NTWG), Canadian Wireless Public Alerting Service (WPAS) LTE Mobile Device Requirements, 2014/01/06152This document is available from the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC

15、20005 . 3This document is available from Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission . 4This document is available from Defence Research You will note that I emphasized the word “safeguard.” And you will note that it is not our role to do any safeguarding per se but it is very much o

16、ur role indeed an obligation placed upon us by Parliament to ensure the “orderly development” of a system that safeguards Canadians.” Mr. Menzies then went on to say “We have a keen interest in developing a set of national standards, especially as it relates to the Network Working Group on wireless

17、public alerting. This forum, which operates under the umbrella of the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee, is working on developing standards that would enable emergency ATIS-0700021 8 management officials to relay information to Canadians on their cellphones. The standards that the working grou

18、p is validating emerged from SOREM and a live demonstration will hopefully take place later this year. We will be following this trial with great interest, in the hopes that it paves the way for its adoption by all jurisdictions. We will act, within the confines of our mandate, to ensure that the ap

19、propriate policies are in place in as timely a manner as possible.” 4.2 Key Government of Canada Provisions Canada is subject to the Official Languages Act which is a Canadian law that came into force on September 9, 1969 and was substantially amended in 1988. The official languages of Canada are En

20、glish and French, which “have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and Government of Canada,“ according to Canadas constitution. Official bilingualism is the term used in Canada to collectively describe the policies, constitutional

21、provisions, and laws that ensure legal equality of English and French in the Parliament and courts of Canada, protect the linguistic rights of English and French-speaking minorities in different provinces, and ensure a level of government services in both languages across Canada . In addition to the

22、 symbolic designation of English and French as official languages, official bilingualism is generally understood to include any law or other measure that: Mandates that the federal government conduct its business in both official languages and provide government services in both languages; Encourage

23、s or mandates lower tiers of government (most notably the provinces and territories, but also some municipalities) to conduct themselves in both official languages and to provide services in both English and French rather than in just one or the other; Places obligations on private actors in Canadia

24、n society to provide access to goods or services in both official languages (such as the requirement that food products be labeled in both English and French); Provides support to non-government actors to encourage or promote the use or the status of one or the other of the two official languages. T

25、his includes grants and contributions to groups representing the English-speaking minority in Quebec and the French-speaking minorities in the other provinces to assist with the establishment of an infrastructure of cultural supports and services. At the provincial level, New Brunswick and Manitoba

26、officially recognize the equal status of French and English. While French has equal legal status in Manitoba restored due to a court ruling that struck down seventy-year-old English-only laws in 1985, in practice, French language services are only provided in some regions of the province Ref 3. Queb

27、ec has declared itself officially unilingual (French only). Alberta and Saskatchewan are also considered unilingual (English only) Ref 4. In practice, all provinces, including Quebec, offer some services in both English and French and some publicly funded education in both official languages up to t

28、he high school level (English language postsecondary education institutions are also present in Quebec, as are French language postsecondary institutions in other provinces, in particular in Ontario and New Brunswick). English and French are official languages in all three territories. As such, the

29、WPAS platform including the C-Interface and Mobile Devices shall be architected to deliver bilingual alerts. Furthermore, it shall be architected to leave the choice of language and the sequence of language to be the responsibility of the government alerting authorities. These could include English

30、unilingual, French unilingual, English plus French bilingual or French plus English bilingual alerts depending upon the region being geo-targeted for an emergency alert. 4.3 Canadian WPAS Reference Design The following figure is the Canadian WPAS Reference Design as specified in Ref 15. ATIS-0700021

31、 9 Figure 4.1 Supplement: Canadian WPAS Reference Architecture 5 Assumptions The following assumptions apply to the support of WPAS services on mobile devices: 1. The Canadian WPAS is intended to be largely based on and compatible with the United States WEA. Both services are based on 3GPP PWS stand

32、ards. The key purpose of this document is to describe the differences in mobile device behaviors between WPAS and WEA. In those areas where this document is silent, the reader should assume that the WPAS mobile device behavior is as described in J-STD-100 “Joint ATIS/TIA CMAS Mobile Device Behavior

33、Specification” Ref 1 and its Supplement A Ref 2. 2. WSPs are not required to support WPAS on legacy or non-WPAS compliant devices. Thus, the behavior of such mobile devices with respect to WPAS alerts is outside the scope of this specification. 3. WSPs are not required to support WPAS on non-LTE dev

34、ices. Thus, the behavior of such mobile devices with respect to WPAS alerts is outside the scope of this specification. 4. This specification only covers WPAS functionality of the mobile device. All other mobile device functions such as registration, authentication, etc., are outside the scope of th

35、is specification 5. Since the over-the-air WPAS delivery mechanism is subject to expected system delays due to factors such as processing and propagation, the delivery of any WPAS message at a certain time and place is not guaranteed. 6 Mandated Mobile Device Requirements 6.1 Alert Vibration Cadence

36、 & Tones for WPAS The mobile device shall only use the described Cadence and Alert tones for WPAS alerts, when the mobile device receives a CB message with a Message Identifier value in the range 4370 4399 (TS 23.041 Ref 8). Mobile Devices shall use the following WPAS Cadence and Alert tones: TcfoHT

37、sAIfuTSe0T6TEWWTm6ItasSLEadlaThe Canadianombination oformed by thez. he duration econds. Thettention Signthe WPAS apdated WPAhe Canadianignal. This isntire duration.5 second ONhe duration o.2 WPAhe mobile deMERGENCYhen the moPAS alerts. he mobile dessage with.3 Bilinghas been ms WPAS (Wient in the t

38、woince the cuanguage andmergency authorities. Remographicsnguage accehe WPAS mAlerting Attf three frequcombinationof the audio following figal: Figure 6lert messageS alert messAlert Vibraa “fast” 0.5 of the Alertand 0.5 secf the CanadiS Alert Bvice shall disALERT / ALbile device ievice shall oa Mess

39、age Iual Alerandated by Creless Publicofficial langrrently used UCS-2 doeslerts in Canegional alertof their respnts. obile device sention Signalencies: 932.3of the threeattention sigure is an in.1 Temporis updated, age. tion Cadencesecond vibrating Attentionond OFF shaan Alert Vibraanner play a WPAS

40、ERTE DURGs in Canadanly use the dentifier valut Messaganadian govAlerting Seruages of CanGSM 7-bit , it is a requiada will be issuers mayective regionhall support ATis comprised3 Hz, 1046.frequenciesnal is 8 secoformative illual Pattern othe Canadianemploys a ion during ToSignal. If noll apply. tion

41、 CadencAlert banneENCE , this bannerdescribed We in the rangees ernment agevice), all emeada (Englishcharacter serement that hissued by Celect to isss. In any evGSM 7 and UTIS-070002110 of two alter5 Hz, and 31: 440Hz, 659nds and altestration for f the CanadiAlerting Atttemporal pane 1 and a 0t poss

42、ible one is 8 secondr with the follis generatedPAS Alert b4370 - 4399ncies, that inrgency alertsand French)t does not sandsets usedanadian fedue a unilingent, UCS-2 sCS-2 messanating comp35.96 Hz, m.26 Hz, and rnates betwthe temporaan Alerting Atention Signalttern that ma.5 second “scertain mobs. ow

43、ing text: by the mobanner when (TS 23.041 the Canadiaissued in C. upport all ain Canada seral authoritual alert (inupport is reqge encodinglex tones. Toodulated at 73135.96 Hz, een Tone 1 l pattern of ttention Sigshall also betches Canadlow” vibrationile devices, ile device athe mobile Ref 8). n imp

44、lementanada will haccented chaupport the Uies or by PFrench or uired to corre. ne 1 is form271.96 Hz. modulated aand Tone 2 the Canadiannal used to introian Alerting during Tonea vibration cand is the sadevice receivation of CMAve the capabracters in thCS-2 characrovincial or English) to rctly displ

45、ay aed by the Tone 2 is t 1099.26 every 0.5 n Alerting duce the Attention 2 for the dence of me for all es a CB S, known ility to be e French ter set. Municipal eflect the ll French ATIS-0700021 11 7 Considerations for Individuals with Special Needs The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunicatio

46、ns Commission addresses the requirements for individuals with special needs in Broadcasting and Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-430 Ref 12. Clause 44 of that policy states, “Accordingly, the Commission requests that, by 21 October 2009, all WSPs Wireless Service Providers offer and maintain in t

47、heir inventories at least one type of wireless mobile handset that will provide access to wireless service by persons who are blind and/or have moderate-to-severe mobility or cognitive disabilities.” Device manufacturers are encouraged to provide mobile devices with capabilities that will allow such

48、 persons to receive and understand WPAS messages. Such devices might employ text-to-speech conversion or screen reading capability, as described in J-STD-100 Section 11 Ref 1. ATIS-0700021 12 Annex A: Use Cases (informative) This informative annex provides example use cases on the behavior of the mo

49、bile devices for WPAS alerts. These use cases are written from the end user point of view and provide insight into the WPAS user experience which is used in the development of the mobile device requirements of this specification. The example use cases included in this section are as follows: Unilingual message use case. Bilingual message use case. A.1 Use Case #1 Unilingual Message Use Case Michel purchased a mobile phone that supports WPAS alerts. Michel is a French speaking person who lives in Quebec