ASTM D3939 D3939M-2010 Standard Test Method for Snagging Resistance of Fabrics (Mace)《织物防钩丝性的标准试验方法(钉锤法)》.pdf

《ASTM D3939 D3939M-2010 Standard Test Method for Snagging Resistance of Fabrics (Mace)《织物防钩丝性的标准试验方法(钉锤法)》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D3939 D3939M-2010 Standard Test Method for Snagging Resistance of Fabrics (Mace)《织物防钩丝性的标准试验方法(钉锤法)》.pdf（8页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D3939/D3939M 10Standard Test Method forSnagging Resistance of Fabrics (Mace)1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D3939/D3939M; the number immediately following the designation indicates theyear of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.

2、A number in parentheses indicates the year of lastreapproval. A superscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method determines the snagging resistance of afabric.1.2 Studies of fabric snagging have shown that this testmethod is suit

3、able for a range of woven and knitted fabricsmade from textured or untextured filament yarns or spun yarnsor combinations of these yarns.2,3This test method is notsuitable for (1) open construction fabrics (such as a net)because the points on the mace will snag the felt pad ratherthan the specimen,

4、(2) very heavy or very stiff fabrics thatcannot be made to fit tightly on the drum and felt pad, and (3)tufted or nonwoven fabrics because the apparatus is designedfor woven and knitted fabrics.1.3 If after using this test method it is found to be too severefor your fabrics, an alternative method ca

5、n be used, such as BS8479 Textiles: Method for Determination of the Propensity ofFabrics to Snagging and Related Surface Defects - RotatingChamber Method.1.4 The values stated in either acceptable metric units or inother units shall be regarded separately as the standard. Thevalues stated in each sy

6、stem may not be exact equivalents;therefore, each system must be used independently of the other,without combining values in any way. In case of refereedecisions, the metric units will prevail.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. I

7、t is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precau-tionary statements are given in Section 7.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:4D123 Terminology Rel

8、ating to TextilesD1335 Test Method for Tuft Bind of Pile Yarn FloorCoveringsD1776 Practice for Conditioning and Testing TextilesD2724 Test Methods for Bonded, Fused, and LaminatedApparel FabricsD3136 Terminology Relating to Care Labeling for Apparel,Textile, Home Furnishing, and Leather ProductsD446

9、7 Practice for Interlaboratory Testing of a Textile TestMethod That Produces Non-Normally Distributed Data5D4850 Terminology Relating to Fabrics and Fabric TestMethodsD5362 Test Method for Snagging Resistance of Fabrics(Bean Bag)2.2 AATCC Standards:665 Test Method for Snag Resistance of Womens Nylon

10、Hosiery (see Note 1)135 Test Method for Dimensional Changes in AutomaticHome Laundering of Woven and Knit FabricsNOTE 1In 1988, the AATCC voted to withdraw this test method fromits technical manual; however, the ASTM task group on fabric snaggingdecided it should be listed as an alternative for test

11、ing open constructionfabrics.3. Terminology3.1 For definitions of textile terms used in this test method:(color contrast, in textiles; distortion, in fabrics; protrusion, infabrics; snag, in fabrics; snagging resistance, in fabrics), referto Terminology D4850.1This test method is under the jurisdict

12、ion of ASTM Committee D13 on Textilesand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.59 on Fabric Test Methods,General.Current edition approved June 15, 2010. Published August 2010. Originallyapproved in 1980. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as D3939 09. DOI:10.1520/D3939-10.2Finnigan,J.

13、A., “Laboratory Prediction of the Tendency of a Fabric to SnagDuring Wear,” Textile Institute and Industry, Vol 10 , No. 6, 1972, pp. 164167.3Leung, P., and Hershkowitz, R., “Snag- and Fuzz-Resistant Double Knits viaFabric Construction,” Textile Research Journal, Vol 45, No. 2, 1975, pp. 93102.4For

14、referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.5Withdrawn. The last approved version of this historical standard

15、is referencedon www.astm.org.6Available from American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists(AATCC), P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, http:/www.aatcc.org1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.2 For

16、definitions of other textile terms used in this testmethod, refer to Terminology D123.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 A tubular specimen is placed on a cylindrical drum.Then a mace (spiked ball) bounces randomly against therotating specimen. Snags are produced to a degree affected bya variety of factor

17、s. The degree of fabric snagging is thenevaluated by comparison of the tested specimens with visualstandards that may be either fabrics or photographs of fabrics.The observed resistance to snagging is reported on a scaleranging from 5 (no or insignificant snagging) to 1 (very severesnagging).5. Sign

18、ificance and Use5.1 This test method is not considered satisfactory foracceptance testing of commercial shipments of fabrics becausethe between-laboratory precision of the test method is poor (see15.1).5.1.1 If there are differences of practical significance be-tween reported test results for two la

19、boratories (or more),comparative test should be performed to determine if there is astatistical significant difference between them, using competentstatistical assistance. As a minimum, use the samples for sucha comparative test that are as homogeneous as possible, drawnfrom the same lot of material

20、 as the samples that resulted indisparate results during initial testing and randomly assigned inequal numbers to each laboratory. The test results from thelaboratories involved should be compared using a statisticaltest for unpaired data, at a probability level chosen prior to thetesting series. If

21、 bias is found, either its cause must be foundand corrected or future testing for that material must beadjusted in consideration of the statistically significant differ-ences.5.2 This test method may be used for quality control testingof fabrics during manufacturing and product comparisons ofdiffere

22、nt fabrics by manufacturers, retailers, and users. This testmethod may also be used by researchers to examine the effectof new fibers, yarns, fabric constructions, and finishes on thesnagging resistance of fabrics.5.3 This test method may be used to test the snaggingresistance of most apparel and ho

23、me furnishings fabrics.However, a different test method may be needed for differenttypes of fabrics and different end-uses (such as towels, pants,and upholstery) (see 5.3.1).5.3.1 Some fabrics that may not be suitable for this testmethod are described in 1.2. Many open construction fabricscan be tes

24、ted for snagging resistance using AATCC TestMethod 65. The snagging resistance of many pile floorcoverings can be tested by Test Method D1335. Test MethodD5362 (Bean Bag) may also be considered as an alternative fortesting the snagging resistance of fabrics. This test methoddoes not apply to the ABC

25、 Snag Tester.5.4 Since fabric snagging can be affected by laundering ordrycleaning, it may be advisable to test the snagging resistanceof a fabric before and after laundering or drycleaning.5.5 The snagging resistance of a specific fabric varies withindividual wearers and general conditions of use.

26、Therefore, itcan be expected that garments of the same fabric will show afairly wide snagging resistance spectrum after wear and muchgreater variation in wear than in replicate fabric specimenssubjected to controlled laboratory tests. This factor should beconsidered when adopting levels of acceptabi

27、lity for anyspecification that includes snagging resistance.5.6 Snags observed in worn garments vary appreciably innumber and appearance. The appearance of a snag dependsparticularly on (1) the degree of color contrast between thesnag and the surrounding area of the fabric or (2) the presenceof long

28、 distortions or long protrusions. These conditions arenot evaluated when snagging is rated solely on the number ofsnags. See Section 13 for a description of color contrast,distortion, and protrusion as used in this test method; and seeFigs. 1 through 3 in Test Method D5362 for pictures of fabricdefe

29、cts due to snagging. Because the overall acceptability of aspecific fabric is dependent on both the characteristics of thesnags and other factors affecting fabric appearance, it isrecommended that fabrics tested in the laboratory be evaluatedwith regard to the defects that may be observed visually a

30、ndnot rated solely on the number of snags developed. A series ofvisual rating standards (see 6.2.4) may be set up to provide abasis for the ratings. The visual rating standards are mostadvantageous when the tested laboratory specimens correlateclosely in appearance with fabrics from a wear test, for

31、example, when tested laboratory specimens and fabrics from awear test show similar color contrasts. In the precedingexample, a series of fabrics from the wear test would be a goodchoice for the fabric standards described in 6.2.4.2.6. Apparatus and Materials6.1 ICI Mace Snag Tester (see Fig. 1):6.1.

32、1 Specimen Templates, 205 by 330 mm or 8 by 13 in. forweft knit fabrics and 205 by 320 mm or 8 by 12.5 in. for wovenfabrics and warp knit fabrics.6.1.2 Felt Sleeves, wool or chief weight wool syntheticblend with thickness of 3.5 6 0.5 mm and weight of 1400 6200 g/m2.6.1.3 Gage, for setting position

33、of mace (calibration block).6.1.4 Rubber O-rings.6.2 Sewing Machine, with a sewing needle that is appropri-ate for the fabric being tested for snagging resistance, or6.2.1 Sharps Hand Sewing Needle.6.2.2 Sewing Thread, cotton, Tex ticket 35 to 50, or equiva-lent polyester and cotton.6.2.3 Standard C

34、alibration Fabric, having an establishedsnagging resistance rating that has been agreed upon by thepurchaser and the supplier. (No standard calibration fabric hasbeen specified by Subcommittee D13.59.)6.2.4 Visual Rating Standards:6.2.4.1 Photographic StandardsA series of photographsof tested specim

35、ens that show the degrees of snagging, such asthe Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) photographs;7or7The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this timeis SDL Atlas LLC, 1813AAssociates Lane, Charlotte, NC 28217. If you are awareof alternative suppliers, please provide thi

36、s information to ASTM InternationalHeadquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of theresponsible technical committee,1which you may attend.D3939/D3939M 1026.2.4.2 Fabric StandardsA series of tested specimens orfabrics from a wear test that show the degrees of snagging

37、 (see5.6 and Note 2).NOTE 2Fabric standards should be stored and handled under condi-tions that will preserve their original form and appearance. Mount thefabric standards using white poster board or plastic or metal framing.6.2.5 Apparatus for Fabric Evaluation, for illumination andsimultaneous vie

38、wing of specimens and visual rating stan-dards:6.2.5.1 Apparatus for Fabric Evaluation, (see Fig. 2),7having a single cool white fluorescent (CWF) tube with acorrelated color temperature of 4100 to 4500 K, or6.2.5.2 ICI Viewing Cabinet, (see Fig. 3),7having a singlecool white fluorescent (CWF) tube

39、with a correlated colortemperature of 4100 to 4500 K.6.3 Optional Equipment:6.3.1 Steam Iron, weighted to 2.3 kg or 5 lb and an ironingboard.6.3.2 Tumble Dryer, as described in AATCC TestMethod 135.6.3.3 Washing Machine, as described in AATCC TestMethod 135.6.3.4 Detergent, Heavy Duty Granule, the 1

40、993 AATCCStandard Reference Detergent as described in AATCC TestMethod 135. When agreed upon by the purchaser and thesupplier, a substitute detergent that does not include fabricsoftener or bleach may be used.6.3.5 Equipment for Drycleaning Specimens, as described inTest Methods D2724.7. Hazards7.1

41、Locate the mace snag tester in a low-traffic area becauseof the danger from the exposed mace and rotating drum.7.2 Check that all parts of the mace snag tester are secureand are in good working condition.7.3 Wear protective gloves when examining the points onthe mace snag tester or removing fibers a

42、nd yarns from themace points.7.4 Observe the following safety precautions when operat-ing the tester: (1) do not wear loose or dangling clothing thatcan get caught in the mace points or moving parts; (2)donotattempt to change a specimen while the drum is rotating; and(3) do not injure your hands on

43、the sharp mace points whenplacing a specimen on the drum.8. Sampling8.1 Lot SampleAs a lot sample for acceptance testing,take at random the number of rolls of fabric directed in anapplicable material specification or other agreement betweenthe purchaser and the supplier. Consider rolls of fabric to

44、be theprimary sampling unit.8.2 Laboratory Sampling UnitAs a laboratory samplingunit for acceptance testing, take a full width swatch 1-m or1-yd long from the end of each roll of fabric in the lot sample,after first discarding the outermost layer of fabric. Whendrycleaning and laundering are to be p

45、erformed, take addi-tional swatches for the laundering and drycleaning tests.8.3 SpecimensTest four specimens from each swatch inthe laboratory sampling unit. When drycleaning and launderingtests are to be performed, test four additional specimens fordrycleaning and four additional specimens for lau

46、ndering.9. Preparation of the Specimens9.1 When snagging resistance after laundering or dryclean-ing is to be evaluated, launder or dryclean the swatches asdirected in 9.1.1 or 9.1.2 before cutting the specimens.9.1.1 LaunderingLoad the washer with a 3.5-kg or 8-lbtotal load of swatches that compris

47、e a homogeneous load (forexample, same manufacturer, same line, same finishing, andsame previous care) or a homogeneous group of swatches fortesting and a desized unsoftened group of ballast fabrics. Selectnormal cycle, warm water temperature, and the 1993 AATCCStandard Reference Detergent (see Term

48、inology D3136 andAATCC Test Method 135). Run one machine cycle and do notuse softener. Load the dryer with the washed fabrics. Selectnormal cycle, medium temperature, and run the dryer for 20min or until the fabrics are dry to the touch. Do not use softenerin the dryer. Do not overdry the fabrics (s

49、ee Note 3).NOTE 3When agreed upon by the purchaser and the supplier, otherlaundering and drycleaning procedures may be used.FIG. 1 ICI Mace TesterD3939/D3939M 1039.1.2 DrycleaningFollow the procedure given in TestMethods D2724 (see Note 3).9.2 Using the template (see 6.1.2 ), cut the followingspecimens: (1) for determination of the snagging resistance ofthe fabric in the lengthwise (machine) direction, cut twospecimens, with the shorter dimension parallel to the length-wise direction of the fabric; and (2) for determination ofsnagging resistance of the fabric in the