公共英语((五级)7及答案解析.doc
《公共英语((五级)7及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《公共英语((五级)7及答案解析.doc(19页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、公共英语(五级)7 及答案解析(总分:7.00,做题时间:120 分钟)一、Section II Use of E(总题数:1,分数:1.00)The worry about salt is that it may 【B1】 high blood pressure. Chemically, salt 【B2】 of sodium and chloride ions, both of 【B3】 are common in the human 【B4】 and are important for many physiological and biochemical 【B5】 We not only
2、 need salt, we are salt; but too 【B6】 may still be bad for us. Although the idea of a 【B7】 between salt and high blood pressure 【B8】 back to 2000 BC, there is still no scientific 【B9】 as to whether this is so or not. One reason for this 【B10】 to agree is that individual salt intake 【B11】 enormously
3、from day to day, and so reliable measures of intake are hard to come 【B12】 . Those who believe that salt does 【B13】 to high blood pressure point to the high 【B14】 of high blood pressure in countries that eat a very 【B15】 diet. In Japan, for instance, where salted fish is an important part of the die
4、t, high blood pressure and 【B16】 complications are common, 【B17】 among some Amazonian and African tribes, which have a low intake of salt, they are almost 【B18】 . But 【B19】 there is this neat relation between salt intake and the incidence of high blood pressure between countries, it doesnt seem to a
5、pply 【B20】 those countries themselves. Studies, for instance, of couples who have a similar salt intake dont show any consistency in how often they develop high blood pressure. (分数:1.00)填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空
6、项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_二、Section III Reading(总题数:3,分数:3.00)Why does the Western movie especially have such a hold on our imagination? Chiefly, I think, because it offers serious insights into the problem of violence such as can be found almost nowhere in our culture. One of the well-known peculia
7、rities of modern civilized opinion is its refusal to acknowledge the value of violence. This refusal is virtue, but like many virtues it involves a certain willful blindness and it encourages hypocrisy. We train ourselves to be shocked or bored by cultural images of violence, and our very concept of
8、 heroism tends to be a passive one: we are less drawn to the brave young men who kill large numbers of our enemies than to the heroic prisoners who endure torture without capitulating. And in the criticism of popular culture, the presence of images of violence is often assumed to be in itself a suff
9、icient ground for condemnation. These attitudes, however, have not reduced the element of violence in our culture but have helped to free it from moral control by letting it take on the aura of “ emancipation“. The celebration of acts of violence is left more and more to the irresponsible. The gangs
10、ter movie, with its numerous variations, belongs to a cultural “underground“ which glamorizes violence and sets it against all our higher social attitudes. It is more “modern“ genre than the Western movie, perhaps even more profound, because it confronts industrial society on its own ground the city
11、 and because, like much of our advanced art, it gains its effects by a gross insistence on its own narrow logic. But it is anti-social, resting on fantasies of irresponsible freedom. If we are brought finally to acquiesce in the denial of these fantasies, it is only because they have been shown to b
12、e dangerous, not because they have given way to higher values of behaviour. In war movies, to be sure, it is possible to present violence within a framework of responsibility. But there is the disadvantage that modern war is a co-operative enterprise in which violence is largely impersonal and heroi
13、sm belongs to the group more than to the individual. The hero of a war movie is most often simply a leader, and his superiority is likely to be expressed in a denial of the heroic: you are not supposed to be brave, you are supposed to get the job done and stay alive (this too, of course, is a kind o
14、f heroic posture, but a new and “practical“ one). At its best, the war movie may represent a more civilized point of view than the Western, and if it, were not continually marred by ideological sentimentality we might hope to find it developing into a higher form of drama. But it cannot supply value
15、s we seek in the Western movies. These values are in the image of a single man who wears a gun on his thigh. The gun tells us that he lives in a world of violence, and even that he “believes in violence“. But the drama is one of self-restraint: the moment of violence must come in its own time and ac
16、cording to its special laws, or else it is valueless. He is there to remind us of the possibility of style in an age which has put on itself the burden of pretending that style has no meaning, and, in the midst of our anxieties over the problem of violence, to suggest that even in killing or being k
17、illed we are not freed from the necessity of establishing satisfactory models of behaviour. (分数:1.00)(1).The reason given for our acceptance of a gangsters downfall is our being convinced that_.(分数:0.20)A.his behavior is wrongB.he is a threat to societyC.his aspirations are unrealisticD.he represent
18、s a denial of freedom(2).Violence in modern societies is seen, it is claimed in paragraph 2, as_.(分数:0.20)A.a symbol of freedomB.something sacredC.morally controlledD.basic to our culture(3).The word “acquiesce“ in the second paragraph is closest in meaning to_.(分数:0.20)A.acceptanceB.refusalC.devoti
19、onD.giving up(4).War films present the hero as_.(分数:0.20)A.pragmaticB.impersonalC.unheroicD.posturing(5).The image of the Western hero is intended to show us that_.(分数:0.20)A.violence need not cause us concernB.killing and death are not importantC.our modern age is lacking in styleD.there is always
20、a need for standardsConventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive
21、 way. Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizati
22、ons and other for not-for-profit organizations. Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizati
23、ons and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict. Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision-making in their organizations. Schwenk
24、interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 公共英语 答案 解析 DOC
