SAE J 1750-2010 Describing and Evaluating the Truck Drivers Viewing Environment《卡车驾驶员视野描述和评估》.pdf
《SAE J 1750-2010 Describing and Evaluating the Truck Drivers Viewing Environment《卡车驾驶员视野描述和评估》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《SAE J 1750-2010 Describing and Evaluating the Truck Drivers Viewing Environment《卡车驾驶员视野描述和评估》.pdf(29页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、_SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising theref
2、rom, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright 2010 SAE International All rights reserved. No part of this publication ma
3、y be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) Tel: +1 724-776-4970 (outside US
4、A) Fax: 724-776-0790 Email: CustomerServicesae.org SAE WEB ADDRESS: http:/www.sae.orgSAE values your input. To provide feedback on this Technical Report, please visit http:/www.sae.org/technical/standards/J1750_201010SURFACEVEHICLERECOMMENDEDPRACTICEJ1750 OCT2010 Issued 1995-03Revised 2010-10Superse
5、ding J1750 MAR1995 (R) Describing and Evaluating the Truck Drivers Viewing Environment RATIONALEThe 1995 version of this SAE Recommended Practice presented only two methods of evaluation: the Polar Plot and the Horizontal Planar Projection. Each of these methods is insufficient to adequately describ
6、e both direct and indirect fields of view around the entirety of the vehicle. However, the document referenced additional “experimental and graphical methods” that were defined at the time as beyond the scope of the document. This release is intended not to replace methods originally presented, and
7、rather adds the preferred Target Evaluation, which allows for utilization of available tools that complete the original purpose of this Recommended Practice. The Target Evaluation Method may be utilized for alternative vision systems as well (i.e., cameras and monitors), but additional work is neces
8、sary to specify system requirements that appropriately consider valid image representation (clarity, acuity, distortion, size, etc.). A minimum mirror radius of 300 mm for a spherical convex mirror is recommended based on a consensus of the committee. Appendix D describes the rational for this limit
9、 which is derived from considerations of visual acuity and typical vehicle layout. In establishing a Target Evaluation Procedure, care was taken to ensure that the evaluation could be conducted in a simulated environment with appropriate CAD utilization, or equivalently with manual methods. This pro
10、cedure details target cylinders and spacing, which were selected to be similar to the concept established in the Federal Regulation FMVSS 111, as required for school buses, with notable improvements. Within the Target Evaluation Method, it is acknowledged that the extrapolation of the solid angles t
11、o form a vision cone, are not fully detailed in this Procedure with consideration of ergonomic limitations (i.e., head and eye movement). These limitations should be considered, but as with the previous 1995 version, are beyond the scope of this document. It is recognized that the Target Evaluation
12、Procedure counts the cylinder targets on the boundary between zones twice but it was judged by the Task Force to be preferable over a more complicated procedure that attempted to resolve the double count. This resolution of boundary target cylinders also allows each zone to be assessed independently
13、, as well as in summary, to achieve a field of view volume evaluation. The Target Evaluation Procedure requires a setup with the mirrors in the nominal adjustment position. The Task Force intended to require that both the top and bottom corners of the extremities of the vehicle would be visible, but
14、 it was determined that in most situations these extremities could not be viewed simultaneously without adjusting the mirror surface from nominal. Therefore, the bottom extremities of the vehicle were chosen as required view points. Copyright SAE International Provided by IHS under license with SAEN
15、ot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-SAE J1750 Revised OCT2010 Page 2 of 291. SCOPE & PURPOSE This SAE Recommended Practice establishes three alternate methods for describing and evaluating the truck drivers viewing environment: the Target Evaluation, the
16、 Polar Plot and the Horizontal Planar Projection. The Target Evaluation describes the field of view volume around a vehicle, allowing for ray projections, or other geometrically accurate simulations, that demonstrate areas visible or non-visible to the driver. The Target Evaluation method may also b
17、e conducted manually, with appropriate physical layouts, in lieu of CAD methods. The Polar Plot presents the entire available field of view in an angular format, onto which items of interest may be plotted, whereas the Horizontal Planar Projection presents the field of view at a given elevation chos
18、en for evaluation. These methods are based on the Three Dimensional Reference System described in SAE J182a. This document relates to the drivers exterior visibility environment and was developed for the heavy truck industry (Class B vehicles, class 6, 7, 8 vehicles) although the projection principl
19、es presented in this document can be applied to any class of motor vehicles. This document is intended to complement SAE J1050a and provides a visual format that can describe the drivers entire viewing environment. This environment can then be analyzed to determine what the driver is capable of seei
20、ng. It should be noted that one of the most important factors affecting the drivers field of view and the ability to make valid vehicle/design comparisons is the location of the drivers eyepoint. SAE J941 defines the Eyellipse which forms the basis for eyepoints chosen as the origin for Polar Plots
21、and Horizontal Planar Projections. The Target Evaluation, Horizontal Planar Projection and Polar Plot create monocular evaluations. Projections/plots of multiple eyepoints must be overlaid to create binocular or ambinocular evaluations. Analytical methods for creating Target Evaluations, Polar Plots
22、 and Horizontal Planar Projections for direct and indirect vision (planar and spherical convex mirrors) are presented. Note that it is possible to create plots and projections for other mirror surfaces and vision devices if the equations for determining reflection points are provided.2. REFERENCES 2
23、.1 Applicable Publications The following publications form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, the latest issue of SAE publications shall apply. 2.2 SAE Publications Available from SAE, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel: 877-6
24、06-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA), www.sae.org.SAE J182a Motor Vehicle Fiducial Marks and Three-dimensional Reference System SAE J264 Vision Glossary SAE J941 Motor Vehicle Drivers Eye Locations SAE J1050a Describing and Measuring the Drivers Field of View SAE J1100 Motor
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- SAEJ17502010DESCRIBINGANDEVALUATINGTHETRUCKDRIVERSVIEWINGENVIRONMENT 卡车 驾驶员 视野 描述 评估 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-1026510.html