SAE J 1267-1988 Leakage Testing《泄漏检测的信息报告》.pdf

《SAE J 1267-1988 Leakage Testing《泄漏检测的信息报告》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《SAE J 1267-1988 Leakage Testing《泄漏检测的信息报告》.pdf（8页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirelyvoluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefro

2、m, is the sole responsibility of the user.”SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions.QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS DOCUMENT: (724) 772-8512 FAX: (724) 776-0243TO PLACE A DOCUMENT

3、 ORDER; (724) 776-4970 FAX: (724) 776-0790SAE WEB ADDRESS http:/www.sae.orgCopyright 1988 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.SURFACEVEHICLE400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001INFORMATIONREPORTJ1267REAF.DEC88Issued 1979-05Reaffirmed 1988-12Supersed

4、ing J1257JUN84LEAKAGE TESTINGForewordThis Reaffirmed Document has not changed other than to put it into the new SAE Technical StandardsBoard Format.1. ScopeThis information report provides basic information on leakage testing, as applied to nondestructivetesting, and affords the user sufficient info

5、rmation so that he may decide whether leakage testing methodsapply to his particular need. Detailed references are listed in Section 2.2. References2.1 Applicable PublicationsThe following publications form a part of the specification to the extent specifiedherein. Unless otherwise indicated the las

6、test revision of SAE publications shall apply.2.1.1 SAE PUBLICATIONAvailable from SAE, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001.SAEJ426Liquid Penetrant Test Methods2.2 Related PublicationsThe following publications are provided for information purposes only and are not arequired part of thi

7、s document.2.2.1 ASTM PUBLICATIONSAvailable from ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.ASTM E 425Standard Definitions of Terms Relating to Leak TestingASTME427Recommended Practice for Testing for Leaks Using the Halogen Leak Detector (Alkali-IonDiode)ASTM E 432Standard Recomm

8、ended Guide for the Selection of a Leak Testing MethodASTM E 479Standard Recommended Guide for Preparation of a Leak Test SpecificationASTME493Standard Test Methods for Leaks Using the Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector in theInside-Out Testing ModeASTME498Standard Methods of Testing for Leaks Using th

9、e Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector orResidual Gas Analyzer in Tracer Probe ModeASTME499Standard Methods of Testing for Leaks Using the Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector in theDetector Probe ModeASTM E 515Standard Methods of Testing for Leaks Using Bubble Emission TechniquesASTM E 908Standard Practice f

10、or Calibrating Gaseous Reference LeaksCOPYRIGHT Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Licensed by Information Handling ServicesSAE J1267 Reaffirmed DEC88-2-2.3 Other PublicationsNondestructive Testing Handbook, Volume 1, “Leak Testing,“ 1982, American Society for NondestructiveTesting, Columbus, OH 4

11、3228.J. W. Marr, Leakage Testing Handbook, 1968, NASA Cr-952, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NationalAeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC.N. I. Sax, Dangerous Properties of Industrial Methods, 2nd Edition, 1963, Reinhold Publishing Corp., NewYork, NY.J. W. Perry, Chemical Engineering Han

12、dbook, 3rd Edition, 1950, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY.Metals Handbook, 8th Edition, Volume 11, 1976, pp. 260-270, American Society for Metals, Metals Park,OH 44073.ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, latest addenda, American Society for Mechanical Engineers,New York, NY.Qualification and Ce

13、rtification of Personnel, Recommended Practice SNT-TC-1A, Supplement G (LeakTesting), American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH 43228.R. J. Roehrs, Leak Testing of Welded Vessels, 2nd Annual Symposium on Nondestructive Testing ofWelds, sponsored by IITRI, Chicago, IL, 1967.3. General

14、Leakage testing is a form of nondestructive testing capable of determining the existence of leaksites and, under proper conditions, measuring the quantity of material passing through these sites. The wordleak means the hole through which fluid (liquid or gas) passes in either a pressurized or evacua

15、ted system,while leakage is the term used to connote the mass flow of fluid regardless of the size of the leak. Leakagerate is the quantity of fluid per unit time that flows through the leak at a given temperature as a result of aspecified pressure difference across the leak. The ASTM accepted unit

16、of leakage rate is standard cubiccentimeters per second (std. cm3/s), frequently referred to as atmosphere cubic centimeters per second (atm.cm3/s). The SI terminology is Pascal cubic meters per second (Pa m3/s). (1 Pa M3/s = 10 atm. cm3/s,approximately.)There is no container in which a differential

17、 pressure exists (either pressurized or vacuum) that does not leak tosome extent. Absolute leak tightness is an absolute impossibility. Any container must, therefore, have amaximum leakage rate specified. In considering the leakage rate that can be tolerated, one must decidewhether the rate represen

18、ts the total leakage from the system or the maximum leakage from a single leak.Additional factors to be considered include shelf life, product contained, toxicity, legal requirements,consequences of excessive leakage, cost of product, cost of testing, and customer requirements. Once aleakage rate ha

19、s been specified then a leak test procedure describing the operating and test conditions needsto be detailed. Since leakage rate relates pressure, volume, and time, more than one set of procedural valuescan yield the same leakage rate. In general, the pressure used should reflect pressures that the

20、item wouldsee in service, however, this is not a requirement. In some isolated cases, using markedly different pressurescan cause leaks to pass grossly different rates of fluid due to elastic deformation of the item being tested.Regardless of the type of leakage testing being done, safety considerat

21、ions for the personnel performing thesetests must be a paramount consideration.COPYRIGHT Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Licensed by Information Handling ServicesSAE J1267 Reaffirmed DEC88-3-4. Principles There are eight or more primary methods which may be employed to detect, locate, and/ormea

22、sure leakage. The following paragraphs identify these methods and describe their principles, as well astheir capabilities and limitations.4.1 Mass Loss and Pressure ChangeThese are two related methods. Traditionally, these are used for sizableleakage rates, and provide no information as to the leak

23、site. Mass loss is calculated on the basis of change inmass at two times; accordingly, extremely accurate weighing is a requirement of this method. Pressurechange methods operate in a similar fashion, except that a change in pressure is the signaling mechanism.Pressure change systems usually measure

24、 change of the gaseous systems. Since pressure is temperaturedependent, the temperature of the system must either remain constant or be compensated for by use of idealgas laws. Mass loss and pressure change methods, using most techniques, are time consuming and thus arelimited in leakage testing app

25、lications.Theoretically, these methods are very accurate if one has sufficient time to conduct the test.4.2 Ultrasonic Leak TestingThis is a method valuable for detecting leakage great enough to produce turbulentflow. Turbulent flow in a gas occurs when the velocity approaches the speed of sound in

26、that gas; this isapproximately 101 to 102 std. cm3/s. This method takes advantage of the fact that turbulent flow generatessound frequencies from audible upward to 60 kHz. In using only the ultrasonic component generated, fewerfalse signals are detected because there are fewer other sources of ambie

27、nt ultrasound. Because of the highlydirectional nature of ultrasound, the leak can usually be accurately located. Output of ultrasonic leak detectorsis an audible signal or a meter deflection, the strength of which is a function of the leak rate. Advantages of theultrasonic method are that the equip

28、ment is simple to operate, it can be done with the probe removed from theleak, and it does not require any material which could clog a leak and require cleaning. Its primarydisadvantage lies in its lack of sensitivity to small leakage rates (less than 102 std. cm3/s).4.3 Chemical Penetrant Leak Test

29、sThese are incapable of providing leakage rate information, but do clearlypoint out sites for repair. Sensitivities are generally conceded to be in the range of 103 std. cm3/s, althoughgreater sensitivities have been achieved. Two basic forms of chemical penetrants are available, liquid tracers(quit

30、e similar to liquid penetrants, see SAE Information Report J426) and gaseous tracers. Hydrostatic testingwith water alone is not a substitute for leakage testing.4.3.1 LIQUID TRACERSLiquid tracers are usually a solution of a tracer dye and a liquid in which it is soluble. It isessential to determine

31、 the coloring power of the tracer solution in the concentration being used as this relatesto the sensitivity, as does the wettability of the tracer solution. As a general rule in white light systems, basicdyes work best in a water solution and solvent dyes are better suited to an oil based system. W

32、hite lightliquid tracer systems are generally inferior to fluorescent liquid tracer systems. This sensitivity inferiority isdue, in part, to the increased visibility of fluorescent dyes, and the inherent contrast of the dyes to the nearblack background used in testing. By dissolving a fluorescent tr

33、acer in a volatile liquid, very small leaks canbe found, because the liquid which evaporates leaves behind a concentrated dye which is more visible.Advantages of liquid tracers lie in their cost, sensitivity, and ease of use. Foremost among theirdisadvantages is that they use material which could te

34、mporarily clog a leak. Also, liquid tracers requirecleaning of the parts after use and care in their application so as not to create false signals. In addition, onemay experience occasional difficulty in tracing large leakages to their source due to liquid spread.4.3.2 GASEOUS TRACERSGaseous tracers

35、 are gases which color indicating media, thereby denoting the locationof a leak. The most widely used gas for this application is ammonia. Indicating media for ammonia gas are:1. Phenolphthalein which turns from clear to pink.2. Bromocresol purple which turns from a yellow-green to purple.3. Bromoth

36、ymol blue, which turns from yellow to blue.Carbon dioxide gas can be used for leak testing with an indicating medium of sodium carbonate andphenolphthalein in an agar-agar solution. This bright red indicator will turn white at a leak site.COPYRIGHT Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Licensed by In

37、formation Handling ServicesSAE J1267 Reaffirmed DEC88-4-There is another medium, which is much less widely used, due to the inherent danger of its chemicals.Pressurizing a component with ammonia and then allowing hydrogen chloride to be brought near, willproduce a white cloud of ammonium chloride va

38、por which is clearly visible. These gases are highly corrosiveand dangerous to human tissue. Extreme care and a high level of ventilation are needed, as well asconsideration for the safety of the personnel performing the test.There is little difference in the level of sensitivity for gaseous tracers

39、 when compared to liquid tracers; bothare typically at 103 std. cm3/s. Rates as low as 106 std. cm3/s have been reported for gaseous tracers.Primary among their advantages is their low cost of operation since no instrumentation is needed.Disadvantages are that some gases could corrode the test objec

40、t, be hazardous to personnel, requirecleanup, and clog leaks.4.4 Bubble Leak TestThese methods are widely used. They possess sensitivities to a commercial range assmall as 104 std. cm3/s (102 is a practical value for an unskilled operator). In the laboratory, under idealconditions with special combi

41、nations of liquid and gas, rates as low as 107 std. cm3/s have been detected.The method operates on the basis of a differential pressure at a leak creating a flow of gas. This gas, uponescaping, will produce one or more bubbles in the test liquid. These bubbles mark the location of the leak andthe f

42、requency and size can be used to estimate the leakage rate.Procedurally, the test object is fixtured and pressurized, and then the indicating liquid (not a soap or detergentsolution) is brought into contact with the component. This precludes the liquid from temporarily blocking asmall leak which cou

43、ld cause the acceptance of a leaking component. Precleaning of the test object isnecessary because surface contaminants also may cause a temporary blockage of a leak. From a practicalstandpoint, any gas may be used to pressurize the object. Should air be used, it must be very clean, again topreclude

44、 temporary blockage of a leak. Shop air is generally too dirty, wet, and oily to use for leak testing.Ample illumination must be provided to permit the inspector to be able to see a stream of bubbles; 1000 1m/m2(100 fc) is recommended as a minimum level.Indication of leakage may be accomplished by t

45、he use of:1. A liquid in which the test object is immersed.2. A liquid film which produces bubbles when a leakage passes. (A vacuum box which surrounds the testarea may be used to create the pressure differential.)Liquids used in bubble testing must not corrode the object being tested. Frequently, i

46、t is desired to enhancethe sensitivity of a bubble test. Enhancement can be done by increasing the time for testing or increasing thepressure. In some instances, neither of these approaches is practical. Changing the gas to one of a lowermolecular weight and/or lowering the surface tension of the li

47、quid will also enhance the sensitivity. Visualinspection should be conducted at distances less than 0.6 m (2 ft) for best results.A vacuum box places an area to be tested under a sub-atmospheric pressure. A clear window through whichobservations are made and a liquid in which leakage appears are nec

48、essary for the vacuum box technique.When used (usually for welds in large vessels) adjacent testing locations must be overlapped to assure fullcoverage.The advantages of bubble testing lie in its simplicity, cost, and relative sensitivity. Disadvantages include theneed for cleanup, the fact that fin

49、e leaks may not be detected due to a lack of time, the possibility of clogging,and finally that bubble testing is a visual inspection, and as such, bubble testing is limited by the performanceof an operator.COPYRIGHT Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Licensed by Information Handling ServicesSAE J1267 Reaffirmed DEC88-5-4.5 Thermal Conductivity Leak Testing These methods have a minimum leakage rate detectability of 105 std.cm3/s. They are based on the principle that certain gases have a markedly different thermal conductivity whencompared to air. Equipment