FORD ESR-M2C179-A-2009 OIL ENGINE - HIGH PERFORMANCE RACING TO BE USED WITH FORD WSS-M99P1111-A 《高性能 空转发动机油 与标准FORD WSS-M99P1111-A一起使用 》.pdf

《FORD ESR-M2C179-A-2009 OIL ENGINE - HIGH PERFORMANCE RACING TO BE USED WITH FORD WSS-M99P1111-A 《高性能 空转发动机油 与标准FORD WSS-M99P1111-A一起使用 》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《FORD ESR-M2C179-A-2009 OIL ENGINE - HIGH PERFORMANCE RACING TO BE USED WITH FORD WSS-M99P1111-A 《高性能 空转发动机油 与标准FORD WSS-M99P1111-A一起使用 》.pdf（5页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 ENGINEERING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONDate Action Revisions 2009 10 27 N-STATUS No known use. No Replacement Named D. DiGregorio, NA 2004 05 20 Revised Para 3.0 inserted; para 3.6.2, 3.13 & 4 deleted 1983 12 12 Released R022-266 G.S. Balint / D. G. Groh Printed copies are uncontrolled Copyright 2009, F

2、ord Global Technologies, LLC Page 1 of 5 OIL, ENGINE - HIGH PERFORMANCE/RACING ESR-M2C179-A NOT TO BE USED FOR NEW DESIGN 1. SCOPE This specification establishes the performance and product requirements for a high performance automotive engine oil. 2. APPLICATION This specification was released orig

3、inally for service fill engine oils marketed under the Motorcraft trademark. The material is intended for lubrication of automotive spark ignition and certain compression ignition internal combustion engines powered by conventional fuels or nitromethane, consistent with the original equipment manufa

4、cturers lubrication recommendations. Material meeting this specification is primarily intended for high performance engines modified for competition racing, including turbocharged or supercharged configurations. 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.0 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTION MATERIALS Material suppliers an

5、d part producers must conform to the Companys Standard Requirements For Production Materials (WSS-M99P1111-A). 3.1 GENERAL Shall meet all of the requirements described in this specification to assure: (a) material approved to this specification satisfies all appropriate user and original equipment m

6、anufacturers requirements, (b) reliable test documentation is available to substantiate labeling and advertising claims, and (c) the packaged material is maintained at a uniform quality level which is equivalent to the originally approved formulation. 3.2 PERFORMANCE 3.2.1 Shall meet all the require

7、ments of Ford Engineering Material Specification ESE-M2C153 (latest revision). 3.2.2 Shall satisfy all the requirements of the American Petroleum Institute (API) service categories “SF“ and “CC“ as defined in SAE Recommended Practice J 183 (latest revision). 3.2.3 Shall meet the SAE 20W-50 engine oi

8、l viscosity requirements as defined by SAE Recommended Practice J300 (latest revision). Timing shall be consistent with the SAE guidelines for implementation of the revision. ENGINEERING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONESR-M2C179-A Printed copies are uncontrolled Copyright 2009, Ford Global Technologies, LLC

9、Page 2 of 5 3.2.4 Anti-Foaming Properties (In addition to those required in 3.2.1) (ASTM D 892) 3.2.4.1 Foaming Tendency Foam At end of 5 minute Collapse Blowing Period Time Sequence 4, max 30 mL 5 sec (Sequence 4 to consist of: 150 +/- 3 C, 200 mL/minute air) 3.2.4.2 Must be capable of reproducing

10、requirements listed above following 6 week undisturbed storage using option “A“ under ASTM D 892. 3.2.5 High Temperature Viscosity (ASTM D 3945, Procedure “B“) Prior to the Fuel Injector Shear Stability Test, must provide: Viscosity, min at 150 C and 1,000,000 5.00 mPas reciprocal seconds shear rate

11、 (Tapered bearing simulator or equivalent method) Following 20 passes in Fuel Injector Shear Stability Test, must provide: Viscosity, min at 150 C and 1,000,000 4.50 mPas reciprocal seconds shear rate (Tapered bearing simulator or equivalent method) 3.2.6 Additional Boundary Wear Requirement (ASTM D

12、 2670) Substitute a break-in load of 113 kg force for 5 minute interval. Increase load to 238 kg force and hold for 20 minutes or incipient seizure. Initial temperature is set but not controlled. Wear, Microns, max At 65 C 30 At 150 C 40 3.2.7 Turbocharger Evaluation Supplier shall provide documenta

13、tion of material evaluation demonstrating satisfactory performance in an engine configured with exhaust turbocharging. The determination of test adequacy and satisfactory performance shall be at the discretion of the affected product engineering office. The preferred test evaluation shall be a cycli

14、c procedure emphasizing the thermal stress caused by heat soaking. An example of such a test procedure is documented in SAE Technical Paper 811227. ENGINEERING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONESR-M2C179-A Printed copies are uncontrolled Copyright 2009, Ford Global Technologies, LLC Page 3 of 5 3.3 RACE EVALUA

15、TION The formulation shall have been successfully evaluated in a variety of race conditions judged suitable by the affected product engineering office. If requested by the affected product engineering office, affidavits from reputable vehicle owners, crew chiefs or drivers would be satisfactory evid

16、ence of acceptable performance and product use. Documentation of off-road and track testing, including endurance and drag racing using nitromethane or other fuels may be required at the discretion of the affected product engineering office. 3.4 DOCUMENTATION Supplier must furnish to the affected pro

17、duct engineering complete test results for permanent retention. These results must be certified by a qualified and authorized representative of the supplying company and must demonstrate full compliance with all the physical and engine test requirements of this specification. All tests must be condu

18、cted in accordance with the most recently approved procedures and test conditions as supplemented by information letters. All tests, currently under surveillance by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), must be performed on test stands monitored by the ASTM Test Monitoring Center. A

19、ll tests must be certified by a qualified and authorized representative of the test facility. The test reports must include results on both the candidate oil and the appropriate reference oils (supplied by the ASTM Test Monitoring Center, where applicable). The standard photographs of the test compo

20、nents are considered an essential part of the required test documentation. Any test variations must be duly noted and explained. The oil sample code used for identification in each test document must be consistent for all the submitted engine qualification tests. If the oil sample codes are not unif

21、orm, a detailed letter of explanation must be provided. The affected product engineering office shall decide if the explanation is adequate and the form of the data acceptable. The definition of engine oil for purposes of this specification shall be a finished base stock plus a specific additive pac

22、kage. The supplier must provide specific base stock information, in addition to engine test data, indicating crude source, refining process and percentage of blend components. If the supplier changes either the base stock source, refining processes or any individual additive, the previous data provi

23、ded will not be considered adequate to maintain approval. It shall be the responsibility of the supplier to provide sufficient additional test data to satisfy the responsible product engineering office that the reformulated product meets all pertinent specifications. The magnitude of the change will

24、 determine the extent of the test data required. If the affected product engineering office determines that the change is too large, all new certified test data showing compliance with this specification will be required. 3.5 VERIFICATION The practice of verification testing is intended to discourag

25、e marginal product formulations. The supplier must provide such quantities of material for testing as required by the affected product engineering office. It is the suppliers responsibility to submit samples of the quality and composition which the supplier intends to produce on a continuing basis.

26、The affected product engineering office reserves the right to conduct verification testing at its own expense on the samples provided by the supplier at any time. ENGINEERING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONESR-M2C179-A Printed copies are uncontrolled Copyright 2009, Ford Global Technologies, LLC Page 4 of 5

27、If the material fails to validate existing test data to the satisfaction of the affected product engineering office, the supplier must coordinate through the affected product engineering office, a re-test to support product claims. This supplier-purchased test must be certified and conducted by an i

28、ndependent laboratory (monitored by the ASTM, where applicable) on a test stand which is not sponsored by any of the parties involved. This re-test must be completed in a timely manner (typically within six months) after supplier notification. Failure to satisfy this requirement shall be considered

29、grounds for rejection of the material in question. If the material under test verifies the submitted test data, then samples of this material will be analyzed for physical properties and elemental composition and the results of this analysis shall be used as the basis for the Quality Control Supplem

30、ent (para 3.6). 3.6 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 3.6.1 Specific chemical and physical properties are not specified herein, but an Engineering Quality Control Supplement will be issued to cover each approved material. The selected engineering approved source shall furnish appropriate chemical and

31、 physical properties along with the production tolerance limits that apply to the material(s) upon which approval was given. The agreed upon values and limits will be issued to Quality Control by the affected product engineering office. These values will then be used by Quality Control for ongoing q

32、uality verifications. The Quality Control Supplement is an integral requirement of this specification. If more than one source supplies material to this specification, a Quality Control Supplement will be issued for each specific approved material. 3.7 COMPATIBILITY Shall be capable of tolerating sm

33、all amounts of moisture and/or coolant without adverse effects such as: (1) precipitation of dispersant/detergent additive package, (2) loss of dispersive characteristics and (3) reaction to form gel structure. This tolerance must be demonstrated in both “fresh“ and “used“ oil conditions. The specif

34、ic test requirement for filterability and moisture compatibility remains to be determined. 3.8 STORAGE Shall not settle or separate to the extent that would require remixing before use and must be capable of storage without any detrimental effect for a minimum of 2 years. Supplier shall furnish all

35、necessary information on types of material required for packaging and on the storage life of the material in each of the product packages supplied. For any particular size package or container for the product, the supplier shall furnish information on safe storage practice and recommendations as to

36、maximum and minimum ambient temperatures and direct sun load conditions at which the product may be stored without any adverse effect. If the package is considered unsafe for storage in an automotive vehicle, the package shall be labeled accordingly and the safe storage conditions specified. 3.9 SAF

37、ETY Shall be safe to use and must be formulated to minimize employe health hazards due to toxic or otherwise injurious ingredients. It must meet all applicable federal, state and local regulations. 3.10 ODOR Shall not be formulated or blended in a manner which produces an objectionable odor either i

38、nitially or upon storage. The definition or determination of objectionable odor shall be at the discretion of the affected product engineering office. ENGINEERING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONESR-M2C179-A Printed copies are uncontrolled Copyright 2009, Ford Global Technologies, LLC Page 5 of 5 3.11 LABELIN

39、G 3.11.1 Provisions of this specification are applicable when material is used according to labeling directions. Any precautions involved in the use of the material must be clearly stated on the product label. 3.11.2 The label(s) for the material(s) must comply to the Federal Hazardous Substances Ac

40、t and all other provisions under the Consumer Product Safety Commission and all other applicable federal, state and local regulations. Supplier shall furnish the affected product engineering office with the label(s). 3.11.3 Supplier shall furnish certification that the composition of his product has

41、 been examined and that the label recommended is in compliance with the Federal Hazardous Substances Act and all other provisions under the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Completed Material Health and Safety Data Sheets and Hazardous Substances Data Sheets must be submitted by the supplier to t

42、he Ford Motor Company toxicologist. 3.11.4 If applicable, supplier shall furnish a copy of the laboratory report wherein the product was evaluated under the procedures required by the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. A Ford Mandatory Reporting of Critical Materials form must be submitted for each p

43、roduct to the affected product engineering office to comply with the Federal Toxic Substances Control Act. 3.11.5 If the label submitted by the supplier contains any advertising claims, suitable corroborative testing data must also be furnished. Such claims and data are encouraged. 3.11.6 Marking Co

44、ntainers and cartons must be marked with a code indicating source and compounding date of the material. Supplier must furnish this code to the affected product engineering office. Container marking may be waived if approved in writing by the affected product engineering office. 3.12 GENERAL REQUIREM

45、ENTS 3.12.1 The test report data furnished by the supplier showing compliance with this specification shall give the specific test methods followed and shall give specific answers to generalized requirements. 3.12.2 If not specified above, generally accepted test methods (American Society for Testin

46、g and Materials, SAE, and Ford Laboratory Test Methods are preferred) and procedures should be followed where such methods are known, otherwise the methods of evaluation should be explained in detail. 3.12.3 Comparative performance data ratings utilizing the requirements outlined above, comparing the proposed material(s) to presently marketed Ford Motor Company products, are encouraged.