[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷693及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷693及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷693及答案与解析.doc(25页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级模拟试卷 693及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled Diligence Helps to Achieve Success by commenting on the famous saying, “ Genius is 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. “ You should write at least 120 words but no more th
2、an 180 words. Diligence Helps to Achieve Success 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-7, mark: Y (for YES) if the state
3、ment agrees with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 The Gulf Between College Students and Librarians Students rarely ask librarians for help, even whe
4、n they need it. This is one of the sobering truths the librarians have learned over the course of a two-year, five-campus ethnographic (人种学的 ) study examining how students view and use their campus libraries. The idea of a librarian as an academic expert who is available to talk about assignments an
5、d hold their hands through the research process is, in fact, foreign to most students. Those who even have the word “librarian“ in their vocabularies often think library staff are only good for pointing to different sections of the stacks. The ERIAL (Ethnographic Research in Illinois Academic librar
6、ies) project contains a series of studies conducted at Illinois Wesleyan, DePaul University, and Northeastern Illinois University, and the University of Illinoiss Chicago and Springfield campuses. Instead of relying on surveys, the libraries included two anthropologists (人类学者 ), along with their own
7、 staff members, to collect data using open-ended interviews and direct observation, among other methods. The goal was to generate data that, rather than being statistically significant yet shallow, would provide deep, subjective accounts of what students, librarians and professors think of the libra
8、ry and each other at those five institutions. Exploding the “Myth of the Digital Native“ The most alarming finding in the ERIAL studies was perhaps the most predictable: when it comes to finding and evaluating sources in the Internet age, students are extremely Internet-dependent. Only 7 out of 30 s
9、tudents whom anthropologists observed at Illinois Wesleyan “ conducted what a librarian might consider a reasonably well-executed search,“ wrote Duke and Andrew Asher, an anthropology professor at Bucknell University, who led the project. Throughout the interviews, students mentioned Google 115 time
10、smore than twice as many times as any other database. The prevalence of Google in student research is well-documented, but the Illinois researchers found something they did not expect: students were not very good at using Google. They were basically clueless about the logic underlying how the search
11、 engine organizes and displays its results. Consequently, the students did not know how to build a search that would return good sources. “I think it really exploded this myth of the digital native, “ Asher said. “Just because youve grown up searching things in Google doesnt mean you know how to use
12、 Google as a good research tool. “ Even when students turned to more scholarly resources, it did not necessarily solve the problem. Many seemed confused about where in the constellation (云集 ) of library databases they should turn to locate sources for their particular research topic: Half wound up m
13、isusing databases a librarian “ would most likely never recommend for their topic.“ For example, “Students regularly used JSTOR, the second-most frequently mentioned database in student interviews, to try to find current research on a topic, not realizing that JSTOR does not provide access to the mo
14、st recently published articles. “ Unsurprisingly, students using this method got either too many search results or too few. Frequently, students would be so discouraged they would change their research topic to something that requires a simple search. “Many students described experiences of anxiety
15、and confusion when looking for resourcesan observation that seems to be widespread among students at the five institutions involved in this study,“ Duke and Asher wrote. There was just one problem, Duke and Asher noted: “ Students showed an almost complete lack of interest in seeking assistance from
16、 librarians during the search process. “ Of all the students they observedmany of whom struggled to find good sources, to the point of despairnot one asked a librarian for help. In a separate study of students at DePaul, Illinois-Chicago, and Northeastern Illinois, other ERIAL researchers deduced se
17、veral possible reasons for this. The most basic was that students were just as unaware of the extent of their own information illiteracy as everyone else. Some others overestimated their ability or knowledge. Another possible reason was that students seek help from sources they know and trust, and t
18、hey do not know librarians. Many do not even know what the librarians are there for. Other students imagined librarians to have more research-oriented knowledge of the library but still thought of them as glorified ushers. Influence of Professors and Librarians However, the researchers did not place
19、 the blame solely on students. Librarians and professors are also partially to blame for the gulf that has opened between students and the library employees who are supposed to help them, the ERIAL researchers say. Instead of librarians, whose relationship to any given student is typically ill-defin
20、ed, students seeking help often turn to a more logical source: the person who gave them the assignmentand who, ultimately, will be grading their work. Because librarians hold little sway with students, they can do only so much to reshape students habits. They need professors help. Unfortunately, fac
21、ulty may have low expectations for librarians, and consequently students may not be connected to librarians or see why working with librarians may be helpful. On the other hand, librarians tend to overestimate the research skills of some of their students, which can result in interactions that leave
22、 students feeling intimidated and alienated (疏远的 ). Some professors make similar assumptions, and fail to require that their students visit with a librarian before carrying on research projects. And both professors and librarians are liable to project an idealistic view of the research process onto
23、students who often are not willing or able to fulfill it. By financial necessity, many of todays students have limited time to devote to their research. Showing students the pool and then shoving them into the deep end is more likely to foster despair than self-reliance. Now more than ever, academic
24、 librarians should seek to “save time for the reader“. Before they can do that, of course, they will have to actually get students to ask for help. “That means understanding why students are not asking for help and knowing what kind of help they need,“ say the librarians. “This study has changed, pr
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语四 模拟 693 答案 解析 DOC
