[外语类试卷]专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷149及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷149及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷149及答案与解析.doc(14页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷 149及答案与解析 SECTION A In this section there are several passages followed by ten multiple-choice questions. For each question, there are four suggested answers marked A, B, C and D. Choose the one that you think is the best answer. 0 The government has launched its consultation on bette
2、r measures of child poverty, but it really has to be asked, better for whom? This is a government that looks set to preside over a truly dramatic increase in child poverty. The Institute for Fiscal Studies projects that after a decade of steady reductions in child poverty rates, 300, 000 more childr
3、en will be living in poverty in the U. K. by 2015. Big cuts to tax credits, a three-year freeze in child benefit, uprating out-of-work benefits using CPI rather than the more generous RPI all will make vulnerable families poor over the course of this parliament, So what does the government do about
4、it? Rather than review its policies and ask how it can seek to fulfill its legal commitments under the Child Poverty Act 2010, it launches a consultation on the way that child poverty is measured. Poverty is a complex phenomenon and no single indicator can fully capture the condition. The CPA 2010 r
5、ecognizes this, urging governments to make progress against four specific measures; relative poverty, absolute poverty, material deprivation and persistent poverty. Alongside this, we also track numerous other indicators of child well-being in the U. K. such as educational achievement, health outcom
6、es and subjective experience. Both lain Duncan Smith and David Laws sought to convince the audience at the launch of the consultation that the government was not in retreat from the income measures contained in the CPA 2010. But in truth, the consultation document is peppered with digs at the relati
7、ve measure, suggesting that changes to this indicator do not tell us anything meaningful about “real“ poverty. The consultation also seeks to dilute the relevance of income by developing a “multidimensional indicator“ of child poverty. This indicator will blend together measures of worklessness, unm
8、anageable debt and family stability among others to produce a single headline number that can be tracked over time. At best, the government is combining poverty with its many consequences. At worst, it is simply changing the yardstick against which they will be measured. Consider, for example, the p
9、roposal that parental worklessness be a key defining feature of the new child poverty measure. Using current definitions, 60% of children living in poverty today have at least one parent in work. Any measure that insists poverty is about worklessness will simply airbrush these 1.4 million children o
10、ut of the picture altogether. Equally worryingly, the consultation insists that any new poverty measure must resonate with the public. The latest British Social Attitudes survey shows just how widespread negative views of vulnerable groups in society are, but also makes clear that much of this shift
11、 in public opinion has been caused by current and previous government policies. So, should we expect better measures of child poverty as a result of the consultation? Not better for the children growing up in low-income families for sure. And given the broader costs to society of child poverty, not
12、better for anyone else except, perhaps, a government that we suspect may be trying to avoid being held to account. 1 What will NOT lead vulnerable families to poverty according to the first paragraph? ( A) Sharp decline in tax credits. ( B) A three-year freeze in child benefit. ( C) Increasing unemp
13、loyment benefits. ( D) The adoption of RPI instead of CPI. 2 The multidimensional indicator adopts the following measures EXCEPT_. ( A) educational accomplishment ( B) unemployment ( C) unpayable debt ( D) family stability 3 It can be inferred from the last paragraph that_. ( A) we can get better me
14、asures of child poverty from this consultation ( B) changing the child poverty measures cant help poor children ( C) the government cant benefit from better measures of child poverty ( D) the government avoids taking the responsibility 3 Comedys legendary Monty Python members you know, “Im a lumberj
15、ack(伐木工 )and Im okay, “ the Killer Rabbit, the Dead Parrot were tired of seeing their legendary sketches pirated and fuzzily posted on YouTube, free to whoever wanted a quick laugh. So they posted their own, higher-quality versions on YouTube also freebut let fans know that complete DVD versions wer
16、e available for purchase. Sales rose 23, 000 percent. “Free worked, and worked brilliantly. People are making lots of money charging nothing. Not nothing for everything, but nothing for enough that we have essentially created a country-sized economy around the price of $0.00.“ Anderson, 48, the edit
17、or of Wired magazine, discussed the allure of zero with Jesse Kornbluth. In the 20th century, “free“ meant giving away one thing to create demand for another. Get a free cell phone, for example, by buying a monthly plan. What is “free“ now? Yes, 20th-century “free“ was about real objects made of ato
18、ms. Real costs were involved, so the consumer paid one way or another. In the 21st century, “free“ is digital bit with marginal costs. For all practical purposes, they really are free. In the digital economy, someone pays, but increasingly its not you. Google and Wikipedia, for example, dont show up
19、 on your credit card. So how do you pay? Not with money, but with your time and attention. Some resources, of course, are scarce and getting scarcer; you pay for those. Digital goods and services, because they can be reproduced and distributed at almost no cost, are abundant. Once youve given conten
20、t away on the Web, can you get people to pay? Absolutely. Use “free“ to get an audience, then segment your user base so you have a free version and a premium one. The Wall Street Journal created a clever hybrid some free articles, some available only to paid subscribers. I get the sense that when it
21、 comes to news, anyway well soon have two classes of Internet users: 1)people who have money and will pay for quality reporting and analysis, and 2)people who are less well-off or care less about quality and will accept any information thats free. So the elite will be better informed, and others may
22、 get trashier media. Im simply observing what happens in economics when marginal costs fall. In economic terms, “free“ is the law of gravity. I dont tell the apple to fall; it just falls. I dont tell water to flow downhill; it just does. In that way, its simple: As costs approach zero, “free“ prevai
23、ls. 4 We can infer from the second and third paragraphs that in the 21st century_. ( A) all information is free ( B) digital economy has been the most important ( C) the real “free“ commodity finally shows up ( D) a free cell phone does not exist any more 5 It can be inferred from the sentence “ / d
24、ont tell the apple to fall; it just falls.“ in the last paragraph that_. ( A) free has been the trend ( B) apple will fall when ripens ( C) the fall of apple is a natural phenomenon ( D) all people will have free lunch 6 According to the passage, which one is CORRECT? ( A) Complete DVD versions were
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 专业 英语四 阅读 模拟 149 答案 解析 DOC
