[外语类试卷]专业英语八级(阅读)练习试卷29及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]专业英语八级(阅读)练习试卷29及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]专业英语八级(阅读)练习试卷29及答案与解析.doc(10页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、专业英语八级(阅读)练习试卷 29及答案与解析 0 When Tony Blair was elected to Britains House of Commons in 1983, he was just 30, the Labour Partys youngest M.R Labour had just fought and lost a disastrous election campaign on a far-left platform, and Margaret Thatcher, fresh from her victory in the Falklands War, was in
2、 her pomp. The opposition to Thatcher was limited to a few ancient warhorses and a handful of bright young things. Blair, boyish Blair, quickly became one of the best of the breed. Nobody would call Blair, 54 on May 6, boyish today. His face is older and beaten up, his reputation in shreds. Very soo
3、n, he will announce the timetable for his departure from office. In a recent poll for the Observer newspaper, just 6% of Britons said they found Blair trustworthy, compared with 43% who thought the opposite. In Britain as in much of the rest of the world Blair is considered an unpopular failure. Ive
4、 been watching Blair practically since he entered politics at first close up from the House of Commons press gallery, later from thousands of miles away. In nearly a quarter-century, I have never come across a public figure who more consistently asked the important questions about the relationships
5、between individuals, communities and governments or who thought more deeply about how we should conduct ourselves in an interconnected world in which loyalties of nationality, ethnicity and religion continue to run deep. Blairs personal standing in the eyes of the British public may never recover, b
6、ut his ideas, especially in foreign policy, will long outlast him. Britons (who have and expect an intensely personal relationship with their politician) love to grumble about their lot and their leaders, especially if like Blair theyve been around for a decade. So you would never guess from a few h
7、ours down the pub how much better a place Britain is now than it was a decade ago. Its more prosperous, its healthier, its better educated, and with all the inevitable caveats about disaffected young Muslim men it is the European nation most comfortable with the multicultural future that is the fate
8、 of all of them. It would be foolish to give all the credit for the state of this blessed plot to Blair but equally foolish to deny him any of it. In todays climate, however, this counts for naught compared with the blame that Blair attracts for ensnaring Britain in the fiasco of Iraq. As the Bush A
9、dministration careered from a war in Afghanistan to one in Iraq, with Blair always in support, it became fashionable to say the Prime Minister had become the Presidents poodle. This attack both misreads history and misunderstands Blair. Long before 9/11 shook up conventional thinking in foreig, n af
10、fairs, Blair had come by two beliefs he still holds: First, that it is wrong for the rest of the world to sit back and expect the U.S. to solve the really tough questions. Second, that some things a state does within its borders justify intervention even if they do not directly threaten another nati
11、ons interests. Blair understood that today any countrys problems could quickly spread. As he said in a speech in 2004, “Before Sept. 11, I was already reaching for a different philosophy in international relations from a traditional one that has held sway since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 namel
12、y, that a countrys internal affairs are for it and you dont interfere unless it threatens you, or breaches a treaty, or triggers an obligation of alliance.“ Blairs thinking crystallized during the Kosovo crisis in 1999. For Blair, the actions of Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic were so heinous that
13、 they demanded a response. There was nothing particularly artful about the way he put this. In an interview with Blair for a TV film on Kosovo after the war, I remember his justifying his policy as simply “the right thing to do.“ But Blair was nobodys poodle. He and Bill Clinton had a near falling-o
14、ut over the issue of ground troops. (Blair was prepared to contemplate a ground invasion of Kosovo, an idea that gave Clinton s team the vapors.) The success of Kosovo and that of Britains intervention to restore order in Sierra Leone a year lateremboldened Blair to think that in certain carefully d
15、elineated cases the use of force for humanitarian purposes might make sense. As far back as 1999, he had Iraq on his mind. In a speech in Chicago at the height of the Kosovo crisis, Blair explicitly linked Milosevic with Saddam Hussein: “two dangerous and ruthless men.“ In office, moreover, Blair ha
16、d become convinced of the dangers that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) posed. He didnt need 9/11 to think the world was a risky place. As a close colleague of Blairs said to me in 2003, just before the war in Iraq, “He is convinced that if we dont tackle weapons of mass destruction now, it is only
17、 a matter of time before they fall into the hands of rogue states or terrorists. If George Bush wasnt pressing for action on this, Blair would be pressing George Bush on it.“ To those who knew him, there was simply never any doubt that he would be with the U.S. as it responded to the attacks or that
18、 he would stay with the Bush Administration if it close to tackle the possibility that Iraq had WMD. The Prime Minister, of course, turned out to be disastrously wrong. By 2003, Iraq was already a ruined nation, long incapable of sustaining a sophisticated WMD program. And the Middle East turned out
19、 to be very different from the Balkans and West Africa. In a region where religious loyalties and fissures shape societies and where the armies of “the West“ summon ancient rivalries and bitter memories, it was native to expect that an occupation would quickly change a societys nature. “When we remo
20、ved the Taliban and Saddam Hussein,“ Blair told Congress in 2003, “this was not imperialism. For these oppressed people, it was their liberation.“ But we have learned the hard way that it is not for the West to say what is imperialism and what is liberation. When you invade someone elses country and
21、 turn his world upside down, good intentions are not enough. Yet that on its own is not a sufficient judgment on Tony Blair. He will forever be linked to George Bush, but in crucial ways they saw the world very differently. For Blair, armed intervention to remove the Taliban and Saddam was never the
22、 only way in which Islamic extremism had to be combated. Far more than Bush, he identified the need to settle the Israel-Palestine dispute “Here it is that the poison is incubated,“ he told Congress if radical Islam was to lose its appeal. In Britain, while maintaining a mailed fist against those su
23、spected of crimes, he tried to treat Islam with respect. He took the lead in ensuring that the rich nations kept their promises to aid Africa and lift millions from the poverty and despair that breed support for extremism. The questions Blair asked When should we meddle in another nations life? Why
24、should everything be left to the U.S.? What are the wellsprings of mutual cultural and religious respect? How can the West show its strength without using guns? will continue to be asked for a generation. We will miss him when hes gone. 1 Which of the following leads to Blairs failure in office? ( A
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 专业 英语 阅读 练习 29 答案 解析 DOC
