ASME STP-NU-059-2013 CORRECTIONS TO STAINLESS STEEL ALLOWABLE STRESSES《不锈钢用容许应力校正》.pdf

《ASME STP-NU-059-2013 CORRECTIONS TO STAINLESS STEEL ALLOWABLE STRESSES《不锈钢用容许应力校正》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASME STP-NU-059-2013 CORRECTIONS TO STAINLESS STEEL ALLOWABLE STRESSES《不锈钢用容许应力校正》.pdf（37页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、STP-NU-059CORRECTIONS TO STAINLESS STEEL ALLOWABLE STRESSESSTP-NU-059 CORRECTIONS TO STAINLESS STEEL ALLOWABLE STRESSES Prepared by: Joseph M. Turek, Robert W Swindeman, Fujio Abe, William ODonnell and Carl Spaeder Date of Issuance: June 10, 2013 This report was prepared as an account of work sponso

2、red by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the ASME Standards Technology, LLC (ASME ST-LLC). This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any w

3、arranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial pr

4、oduct, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or ref

5、lect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Neither ASME, ASME ST-LLC, the authors, nor others involved in the preparation or review of this report, nor any of their respective employees, members or persons acting on their behalf, make any warranty, express or implied, or assum

6、es any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by tra

7、de name, trademark, manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by ASME ST-LLC or others involved in the preparation or review of this report, or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors, contributors and reviewers o

8、f the report expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of ASME ST-LLC or others involved in the preparation or review of this report, or any agency thereof. ASME ST-LLC does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any items mentione

9、d in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a publication against liability for infringement of any applicable Letters Patent, nor assumes any such liability. Users of a publication are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the

10、risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility. Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as government or industry endorsement of this publication. ASME is the registered trademark of the American Soci

11、ety of Mechanical Engineers. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ASME Standards Technology, LLC Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 ISBN No. 978-0-7918-6896-6 Copyright 201

12、3 by ASME Standards Technology, LLC All Rights Reserved Corrections to Stainless Steel Allowable Stresses STP-NU-059 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword v Executive Summary vi 1 OBJECTIVE 1 1.1 Technical Approach 1 2 CURRENT RESTRICTIONS 2 3 RESULTS 3 3.1 Part 1 - Assess Available Data 3 3.2 Part 2 - Det

13、ermine Time and Temperature Limits 10 3.3 Part 3 - Draft Code Rules 10 3.4 Recommendations . 16 4 JUSTIFICATIONS 17 4.1 Carbon . 17 4.2 Nitrogen . 17 4.3 Silicon 17 4.4 Nickel 18 4.5 Chromium 18 4.6 Copper . 18 4.7 Molybdenum . 18 4.8 Sulfur and Phosphorous . 18 4.9 Nitride Formers . 19 4.10 Higher

14、Service Temperature Range . 19 4.11 Ferrite Number. 20 References 21 Appendix A 22 Appendix B. 24 Acknowledgments 27 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Chemical Composition of NIMS Heats Studies 4 Table 2 - Statistical Composition Results Showing the Average, Maximum, Minimum and Standard Deviations in Weight

15、 % for Select Residual Elements Present in the 340 Production Type 316 Heats 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - 105 Hour Creep Rupture Results for the Type 304H and 316H NIMS heats 5 Figure 2 - Variations in Creep Rupture Strength for the Type 304H and 316H NIMS heats at 1292oF (700oC) . 6 STP-NU-059 Cor

16、rections to Stainless Steel Allowable Stresses iv Figure 3 - Plot of Aluminum vs. Nitrogen Shows a Large Variation in the Aluminum for the Type 316H NIMS Heats . 7 Figure 4 - The Effect of Elevated Copper on the Rupture Life of Similar Type 316H Heats at 1292oF (700oC) that Exhibit an NAV of Approxi

17、mately 0.007wt% . 7 Figure 5 - The Available Nitrogen Concentration and Impurity Copper were Identified as Controlling Variables Responsible for the Observed Heat-to-heat Variation in Creep Performance for Type 316H . 8 Figure 6 - TEM Micrographs Showing AlN Precipitates Associated with Sigma () and

18、 Chi (x) Phases at the Grain Boundaries in Type 304H and 316H after Extended High Temperature Exposure 8 Figure 7 - Creep Rupture Data Showing the Available Nitrogen and Impurity Niobium Explain Heat-to-heat Variability in Creep Life of Type 304H SS . 9 Figure 8 - Creep Rupture Data Showing that at

19、Short Exposure Times, the Presence of Fine Niobium Carbides Improves Strength but the Benefit Disappears after Extended Exposure Times 9 Figure 9 - Illustration Explaining the Observed Heat-to-heat Variability in Creep Performance of Type 304H at Short and Long Exposure Times 10 Figure 10 - Ellingha

20、m Diagram Showing the Free Energy of Formation for Nitrides, with the Stable Nitrides of Concern in Steel Identified 12 Figure 11 - Plots of the Distribution of Residual Elements Found in the 340 Production Heats 13 Figure 12 - Bar Graph Showing the 340 Commercial Heats Exhibited Lower Aluminum than

21、 the NIMS Heats 14 Figure 13 - Bar Graph Showing the 340 Commercial Heats Were Low in Residual Titanium while the NIMS Heats Varied Considerably . 15 Figure 14 - Bar Graph Showing the 340 Commercial Heats Exhibited Higher Nitrogen than the NIMS Heatsz . 15 Figure 15 - Minimum Stress Determination fo

22、r Proposed Table X-1 Compliant NIMS Heats at 1337oF (725oC) . 16 Figure 16 - The Susceptibility of Austenitic Chromium-nickel Steels to Solidification Cracking as a Function of Schaeffler Creq/Nieq and Sulfur and Phosphorous Contents (from Kujampaa et al., 1980) 19 Corrections to Stainless Steel All

23、owable Stresses STP-NU-059 v FOREWORD This document is the result of work resulting from Cooperative Agreement DE-NE0000288 between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and ASME Standards Technology, LLC (ASME ST-LLC) for the Generation IV (Gen IV) Reactor Materials Project. The objective of the proj

24、ect is to provide technical information necessary to update and expand appropriate ASME materials, construction and design codes for application in future Gen IV nuclear reactor systems that operate at elevated temperatures. The scope of work is divided into specific areas that are tied to the Gener

25、ation IV Reactors Integrated Materials Technology Program Plan. This report is the result of work performed under Task 14 titled “Corrections to Stainless Steel Allowable Stresses.” ASME ST-LLC has introduced the results of the project into the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) volunte

26、er standards committees developing new code rules for Generation IV nuclear reactors. The project deliverables are expected to become vital references for the committees and serve as important technical bases for new rules. These new rules will be developed under ASMEs voluntary consensus process, w

27、hich requires balance of interest, openness, consensus and due process. Through the course of the project, ASME ST-LLC has involved key stakeholders from industry and government to help ensure that the technical direction of the research supports the anticipated codes and standards needs. This direc

28、ted approach and early stakeholder involvement is expected to result in consensus building that will ultimately expedite the standards development process as well as commercialization of the technology. ASME has been involved in nuclear codes and standards since 1956. The Society created Section III

29、 of the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, which addresses nuclear reactor technology, in 1963. ASME Standards promote safety, reliability and component interchangeability in mechanical systems. Established in 1880, ASME is a professional not-for-profit organization with more than 127,000 members prom

30、oting the art, science and practice of mechanical and multidisciplinary engineering and allied sciences. ASME develops codes and standards that enhance public safety, and provides lifelong learning and technical exchange opportunities benefiting the engineering and technology community. Visit www.as

31、me.org for more information. ASME ST-LLC is a not-for-profit Limited Liability Company, with ASME as the sole member, formed in 2004 to carry out work related to newly commercialized technology. The ASME ST-LLC mission includes meeting the needs of industry and government by providing new standards-

32、related products and services, which advance the application of emerging and newly commercialized science and technology and providing the research and technology development needed to establish and maintain the technical relevance of codes and standards. Visit www.stllc.asme.org for more informatio

33、n. STP-NU-059 Corrections to Stainless Steel Allowable Stresses vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The primary controlling variables for predictable 105 hour creep rupture properties in Type 304H and 316H stainless steel at elevated temperatures have been identified as nitrogen in interstitial solid solution (ava

34、ilable nitrogen) and copper above 0.25 wt% 1. An expression was developed to account for the varying residual strong nitride forming elements in a heat, where targeted nitrogen additions can be made to ensure sufficient available nitrogen levels without complicating the material certification proces

35、s. Appendix A shows the current 2010 Subsection NH, Appendix X, Table X-1 restrictions for service up to 1100oF (595oC), with Appendix B presenting the new proposed restrictions in Table X-2 for long-term service at temperatures between 1100oF (595oC) and 1337oF (725oC). It is recommended that these

36、 proposed Table X-2 restrictions be mandatory for long term service at these temperatures to take advantage of the demonstrated creep performance improvements associated with these restrictions. A review of 340 recent Type 316 SS heat compositions identified residual titanium, aluminum, boron, niobi

37、um and vanadium at sufficient levels to impact the amount of available nitrogen necessary for optimum creep properties. These elements were targeted for restrictions in the proposed Table X-2 nitrogen calculation due to their presence as residuals in steel, their low free energy of nitride formation

38、 2 and the stability of these nitrides in steels at the anticipated service temperatures. Zirconium and tantalum were excluded from the calculation because they are typically present only at trace levels; however, these elements will be reported for future use and control if necessary. It is anticip

39、ated that the reporting of zirconium and tantalum could be eliminated if these elements continue to be at trace or less than minimum detection levels (MDL). It is proposed that the copper control be accomplished using a minimummaximum composition range, with a nominal composition typically found in

40、production heats. This approach of determining the residual nitride forming elements, and adjusting the nitrogen on a heat basis, has been reviewed by a major stainless steel producer and it has concurred that the proposed Table X-2 restrictions are acceptable for production quantities, and would no

41、t compromise the material certification process. This study examined 105 hour creep rupture data from the Japanese National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), and consisted of nine Type 304HTB and nine Type 316HTB heats that exhibited considerable scatter in creep results. The compositions of t

42、he NIMS heats indicate that they were likely produced to requirements similar to the conventional Type 304H (UNS# S30409) and Type 316H (UNS# S31609) requirements. Given that several of the NIMS heats did not meet the current Subsection NH, Appendix X, Table X-1 composition restrictions, they noneth

43、eless exhibited significantly reduced scatter in the creep results, and, in fact, were the best performers. These data indicate that a review of the applicability of the current Table X-1 restrictions is warranted given the strong correlations established between available nitrogen and creep propert

44、ies. The proposed Table X-2 is an attempt to further reduce scatter in creep data by using targeted restrictions mostly for copper and nitride forming species, as presented herein, to modify the conventional UNS alloy composition requirements for Type 304H and 316H SS. A potential economic benefit m

45、ay be realized by re-establishing the conventional H grade composition ranges for non-restricted species, by providing suppliers some leeway to achieve the desired creep rupture properties. After eliminating the Type 316H heats in the NIMS database that did not satisfy the proposed Table X-2 restric

46、tions, and then extrapolating the remaining compliant heat creep results to 1337oF (725oC), the data suggests that these compliant heats represent a minimum creep rupture strength of approximately 2553 psi (17.6 MPa) vs. the Section III, Division 1, Subsection NH allowable of 2321 psi (16 MPa) at 13

47、37oF (725oC). Given that only three relevant data points from the NIMS study satisfy the proposed Table X-2 restrictions, additional confidence in the 1337oF (725oC) upper temperature limit could be realized by including additional 105 hour creep rupture data from other sources. An additional benefi

48、t of evaluating additional Table X-2 compliant heat creep data may Corrections to Stainless Steel Allowable Stresses STP-NU-059 vii allow a more definitive upper service temperature limit that the NIMS data suggests may, in fact, be slightly above 1337oF (725oC). Regardless of whether the proposed T

49、able X-2 is adopted or not, it is recommended that additional available 105 hour plus creep rupture data be screened for compliance to the proposed Table X-2 restrictions, and the minimum stress to rupture be recalculated for comparison to the current Section III, Division I, Subsection NH allowables. This approach is expected to allow a more accurate determination of the acceptable upper service temperature limits for Type 304H and 316H materials, and improve the confidence for designers of high temperature components. Additional recommendations include considering if ongoing creep