BS PD CEN TR 16041-2010 Bicycles — Replies to requests nfor interpretation of EN 14764《自行车 有关EN 14764标准说明请求的回复》.pdf
《BS PD CEN TR 16041-2010 Bicycles — Replies to requests nfor interpretation of EN 14764《自行车 有关EN 14764标准说明请求的回复》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《BS PD CEN TR 16041-2010 Bicycles — Replies to requests nfor interpretation of EN 14764《自行车 有关EN 14764标准说明请求的回复》.pdf(16页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、raising standards worldwide NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW BSI Standards Publication PD CEN/TR 16041:2010 Bicycles Replies to requests for interpretation of EN 14764PD CEN/TR 16041:2010 PUBLISHED DOCUMENT National foreword This Published Document is the UK imp
2、lementation of CEN/TR 16041:2010. The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical Committee GME/25, Cycles. A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained on request to its secretary. This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions
3、of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application. BSI 2010 ISBN 978 0 580 69602 2 ICS 43.150 Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from legal obligations. This Published Document was published under the authority of the Standards Policy and Strategy Committee on 3
4、1 October 2010. Amendments issued since publication Date Text affectedPD CEN/TR 16041:2010TECHNICAL REPORT RAPPORT TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHER BERICHT CEN/TR 16041 September 2010 ICS 43.150 English Version Bicycles - Replies to requests for interpretation of EN 14764 Bicyclettes - Rponses aux demandes din
5、terprtation sur lEN 14764 Fahrrder - Antworten auf Anfragen fr die Auslegung der EN 14764 This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 29 May 2010. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 333. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus
6、, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMI
7、T EUROPEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNG Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2010 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. CEN/TR 16041:2010: EPD CEN/TR 16041:2010 CEN/TR 16041:2010 (E) 2 Conte
8、nts Page Foreword 3 Introduction .4 1 Scope 6 2 Agreed interpretations and no action decisions 6 2.1 Clause 4.3.1 Security of screws (interpretation) 6 2.2 Clause 4.6.4 Brake-block security test (no action) .6 2.3 Clauses 4.6.8.5.3.6 and 4.6.8.5.3.7 III a) Dry and wet brake performance (no action).7
9、 2.4 Clause 4.7.2 Handlebar plugs (interpretation) 7 2.5 Clause 4.8.x Frame Fatigue test with horizontal forces (no action) 8 2.6 Clause 4.10.3.1 Requirement (no action) 8 2.7 Clauses 4.10.4.4 2) the rationale of the standard; 3) the history of the standard. b) A no action decision This is applicabl
10、e when it is agreed that the standard appropriately specifies how a cycle or a component shall be assessed. c) A proposal for an amendment of the standard This is applicable when it is agreed that the standard is deficient in some way. NOTE The interpretations and no-action decisions are published i
11、n this Technical Report, which will be updated on a regular basis. Proposals for amendments will be progressed as new work item proposals in accordance with CEN rules. Answers to requests for interpretations Since requests for interpretations are submitted through a CEN member body, it is assumed th
12、at the member body will keep itself informed about decisions concerning the request and its progress and will itself inform the originator of the request as appropriate. Disclaimer The interpretations have been derived by the Interpretation Panel Group. The information contained herein is for guidan
13、ce only and does not reflect the formal approval by CEN or CEN member bodies. It PD CEN/TR 16041:2010 CEN/TR 16041:2010 (E) 5 should be noted that the interpretations are neither part of any standard nor have been referenced in the Official Journal of the European Union. PD CEN/TR 16041:2010 CEN/TR
14、16041:2010 (E) 6 1 Scope The purpose of this Technical Report is to provide replies to requests for interpretations of EN 14764:2005, City and trekking bicycles Safety requirements and test methods. 2 Agreed interpretations and no action decisions 2.1 Clause 4.3.1 Security of screws (interpretation)
15、 Question According to the text, locking devices are required for the following: suspension system; generator attachment; brake-mechanism to frame, fork or handlebar; mud-guards to frame or fork; saddle to seat-pillar (except in EN 14765). The requirement does not apply to: handlebar to handlebar st
16、em; seat pillar to frame; luggage carrier to frame or fork. What is a locking device (thread locking compound)? Interpretation The locking devices mentioned as examples in the standard shall not be considered to be an exhaustive list. Also other means of locking devices can be acceptable provided th
17、at they do not unintentionally become unlocked. NOTE 1 Thread locking compound was discussed and considered as acceptable for locking of e.g. levers to handlebars. NOTE 2 This decision is also applicable to the corresponding clauses in the Technical Reports related to EN 14765, EN 14766 and EN 14781
18、. REQ 004-10-2007 (Sweden) 2.2 Clause 4.6.4 Brake-block security test (no action) Question During the test the wheel will lock and the tyre will slip on the surface. A brake that does not fulfil this requirement will not fulfil the ordinary brake-performance test. The test can be carried out as foll
19、ows PD CEN/TR 16041:2010 CEN/TR 16041:2010 (E) 7 apply the brakes according to the standard; rotate the wheel by hand forward and rearwards five times. Is the test meaningful? Should the testing procedure be revised? REQ 005-10-2007 (Sweden) Question Can brake pad security test be performed on a bra
20、ke test machine? Is it acceptable if the wheel skids? REQ 026-10-2007 (Germany), REQ 033-10-2007 (Germany) Reply The test mainly aims at checking if the brake-pad can be released when the bicycle is moved backwards with the brakes applied. This situation will not occur during the other brake tests.
21、The test shall remain. NOTE This decision is also applicable to the corresponding clauses in the Technical Reports related to EN 14765, EN 14766 and EN 14781. 2.3 Clauses 4.6.8.5.3.6 and 4.6.8.5.3.7 III a) Dry and wet brake performance (no action) Question What clamping force is required for machine
22、 testing? 4.6.8.5.3.6 says that sufficient force must be applied to prevent skidding. Then the test should stop if a lever force of 180 N is reached, or a braking force of 700 N but the test can be stopped if the wheel locks up (4.6.8.5.3.7 III a). Is there a difference in requirements between wet a
23、nd dry? It is often difficult to prevent wheel skidding at high lever forces during wet testing (requires a very large clamping force). Reply There is no limit to the force. It can be increased to prevent skidding. NOTE This decision is also applicable to the corresponding clauses in the Technical R
24、eports related to EN 14766 and EN 14781. REQ 032-10-2007 (Germany) 2.4 Clause 4.7.2 Handlebar plugs (interpretation) Question Handlebar grips are no problem to test. For plugs it is difficult to apply 70 N without coming into contact with the handlebar. Should it be permitted e.g. to drill a hole in
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
5000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- BSPDCENTR160412010BICYCLESREPLIESTOREQUESTSNFORINTERPRETATIONOFEN14764 自行车 有关 EN14764 标准 说明 请求 回复 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-397340.html