大学英语四级165及答案解析.doc
《大学英语四级165及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学英语四级165及答案解析.doc(26页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级 165及答案解析(总分:746.56,做题时间:130 分钟)一、Writing (30 minutes)(总题数:1,分数:30.00)1.For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a letter. You should write at least 120 words, and bas a your composition on the outline given below in Chinese: 假设你是即将参加一英语考试的学生,需要几本相关参考书,请写封信给一书店销售部,你的信应包括: 1. 详细说明你想买的
2、那本书的特点; 2. 咨询付款方式; 3. 确定送货时间及方式。 (分数:30.00)_二、Reading Comprehensio(总题数:1,分数:71.00)Bird Flu: Communicating the Risk The recommendations listed below are grounded in two convictions(信念): that motivating people to start taking bird flu seriously should be a top priority for government health department
3、s, and that risk communication principles provide the best guidance on how to do so. Start where your audience starts. Telling people who believe X that they ought to believe Y naturally provokes resistance. You cant ignore X and just say YY-Y-Y-Y. You cant simply tell people theyre wrong. Youve got
4、 to start where they are, with X, and empathically explain why X seems logical, why its widely believed, why you used to believe it too.and why, surprisingly, Y turns out to be closer to the truth. The biggest barrier to sounding the alarm about bird flu is that its flu usually seen as a ho-hum(漠不关心
5、的) disease. It would help if people stopped calling every minor respiratory infection “a touch of the flu“ but thats not going to happen. Empathy is the only answer. Instead of ignoring the fact that people think flu is minor, or berating people for thinking that flu is minor, acknowledge that even
6、some public health authorities use the term “flu“ in ways that minimize its seriousness. After making common cause with the public“we have all ignored influenza for too long“talk about how horrific the next flu pandemic(流行病) may be compared with the annual flu. Dont be afraid to frighten people. For
7、 most of the world right now, though, apathy(漠不关心) is the problemnot denial. We cant scare people enough about H5N1. WHO has been trying for over a year, with evermore-dramatic appeals to the media, the public, and Member States. Until a pandemic begins, theres little chance well scare people too mu
8、ch. Research evidence wont protect you from criticism, of course. Fear appeals often provoke angry pushback from people questioning your motives or your competence, accusing you of “crying wolf“ or provoking “warning fatigue“ or panicking the public. That happened after WHO Western Pacific Regional
9、Director Shigeru Omi said that, in a worst case, a bird flu pandemic could kill up to 100 million people (a well-justified estimate). Of course, there is a genuine downside to issuing warnings that turn out to be unnecessary. Although panic is unlikely and warning fatigue is temporary, there is some
10、 credibility loss, especially if the warnings were exaggerated or overconfident. But consider the alternative. Which is worse, being criticized for “unduly“ frightening people or being criticized for failing to warn people? Acknowledge uncertainty. When the first Thai bird flu outbreaks subsided(平息)
11、 in 2004, a senior public official said: “The first wave of bird flu outbreak has passed. but we dont know when the second wave will come, and we dont trust the situation. So the Public Health Ministry is being as careful as possible.“ This exemplifies two risk communication principles: acknowledge
12、uncertainty and dont overreassure. During Malaysias first outbreak, tests were pending regarding what strain of flu was killing the chickens. Senior veterinary official Hawaii Hussein said, “We know it is H5, but were hoping it wont be H5N1. “ This very brief comment not only acknowledges uncertaint
13、y; it also expresses wishes, another good crisis communication practice. Everyone shared Husseins hope, but feared the worst. Overconfident overreassurance (“the situation is under control, everything is going to be fine“) is terrible risk communication. Paradoxically, people usually find it alarmin
14、g. They sense its insincerity and become mistrustful even before they know the outcome. But overconfident warnings are also unwise. There is so much we dont know about H5N1. How many people will it infect? How quickly will it spread? How long will it last? How long will it take for an effective vacc
15、ine to be available? Which countries and which people in those countries will get the vaccine first? How well will health care systems cope? How well will national and international economies cope? And how well will civil society cope? Bird flu experts and risk communicators cannot answer these ques
16、tions. But we can and should raise them, acknowledging our uncertainty at every turn. Share dilemmas. Sharing dilemmas is a lot like acknowledging uncertainty. Not only are we unsure about what will happen; were also unsure about what to do. Everyone finds this hard to admit. But dilemma-sharing has
17、 huge advantages: - It humanizes the organization by letting the pain of difficult decisions show. - It gives people a chance to make suggestions and be part of the process. - It moderates the conflict between opposing recommendations. - It reduces the outrage if you turn out to be wrong. Dilemma-sh
18、aring does raise some anxiety at first, but it allies with the publics resourceful, mature side. This leads to better buy-in and better coping down the road. The most important bird flu dilemma at the moment is stockpiling(储备). If we stockpile H5 antigen(抗原) or an H5N1 vaccine (once it exists), that
19、 may save millions of lives if a pandemic materializes. But a vaccine is no magic solution. We probably cant make and distribute enough vaccine for most of the world. And what if there is no pandemic? Or what if the virus mutates(突变) or drifts a lot, and the vaccine proves minimally useful? Is this
20、really a good use of scarce health dollars, especially in developing countries? Maybe we should stockpile antiviral drugs. But theyre expensive, and who knows how well they will work against the actual pandemic strain that arises? The worst response to the stockpiling dilemma is also the most tempti
21、ng: Stockpile only a little vaccine and some antivirals and imply that you have enough. Some officials are already engaging in this kind of overreassurance. The risk communication answer: Share the dilemma and let the public help you decide. Give people things to do. One reason sometimes given for n
22、ot alarming the public is that theres nothing for people to do anyway. A Jan. 13, 2005 Wall Street Journal article quoted Canadian infectious disease expert Richard Schabas as saying: “Scaring people about avian influenza accomplishes nothing, because were not asking people to do anything about it.“
23、 But the error isnt scaring people. The error is failing to realize and say how much they can do to prepare. Helping resolve government policy dilemmas is just the beginning. Thailand, for example, has trained almost a million volunteers to reach out to every village in the country to inform people
24、about the risks and signs of bird flu and how to try to protect themselves and their flocks. Many companies, hospitals, schools, and local governments around the world are starting to plan for “business continuity“ in the event of a pandemic. Even cognitive and emotional rehearsal learning about H5N
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 英语四 165 答案 解析 DOC
