【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-544及答案解析.doc
《【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-544及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-544及答案解析.doc(24页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(一)-544 及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Section Use of Eng(总题数:1,分数:10.00)Just because more men pursue careers in science and engineering does not mean they are actually better at math than women are. The 1 is that men think they are much better at math than they really are. Women, 2 , tend to accu
2、rately estimate their arithmetic prowess, says Shane Bench of Washington State University in the U. S., leader of a study in Springer“s journal Sex Roles . There is a 3 gap between the number of men and women who choose to study and follow careers in the so-called STEM 4 of science, technology, engi
3、neering and mathematics in the U. S. This is true 5 women outperform their male 6 on mathematical tests in elementary school. Bench“s study examined how people“s biases and 7 experiences about their mathematical abilities make them more or less 8 to consider pursuing math-related courses and careers
4、. Gender gaps in STEM fields are not necessarily the result of women“s 9 their abilities, but rather may be due to men“s overestimating their abilities, 10 Bench. His team also found that women who had more positive past experiences 11 mathematics tended to rate their numerical abilities higher than
5、 they really were. This 12 the value of positively reinforcing a woman“s knack for mathematics 13 at a young age. “Despite 14 that realism and objectivity are always best in 15 the self and making decisions, positive illusions about math abilities may be 16 to women pursuing math courses and careers
6、,“ says Bench. “Such positive illusions could 17 to protect women“s self-esteem 18 lower-than-desired performance, leading women to 19 to pursue courses in STEM fields and ultimately 20 their skills.“(分数:10.00)A.variationB.differenceC.distinctionD.alterationA.on the other handB.on the wholeC.more or
7、 lessD.once upon a timeA.seizableB.considerateC.worthwhileD.sizeableA.aspectsB.territoriesC.fieldsD.prospectsA.what ifB.even thoughC.no wonderD.if onlyA.rivalsB.partnersC.opponentsD.counterpartsA.previousB.indifferentC.frustratingD.painfulA.lovelyB.friendlyC.livelyD.likelyA.undertakingB.underestimat
8、ingC.understatingD.understandingA.contendsB.arguesC.explainsD.exclaimsA.withB.onC.atD.byA.overweightsB.overtakesC.highlightsD.hijacksA.speciallyB.especiallyC.essentiallyD.potentiallyA.situationsB.suggestionsC.assurancesD.assumptionsA.evaluatingB.gradingC.examiningD.rankingA.healthyB.wholesomeC.benef
9、icialD.nutritiousA.behaveB.simulateC.functionD.labourA.despiteB.saveC.exceptD.fromA.keepB.postponeC.sustainD.continueA.progressB.improveC.acquireD.change二、Section Reading Co(总题数:0,分数:0.00)三、Part A(总题数:0,分数:0.00)四、Text 1(总题数:1,分数:10.00)As you try to imagine yourself cruising along in the self-driving
10、 car of the future, you may think first of the technical challenges. But the more difficult challenges may have to do with ethics. Recent advances in artificial intelligence are enabling the creation of systems capable of independently pursuing goals in complex, real-world settingsoften among and ar
11、ound people. Serf-driving cars are merely the vanguard of an approaching fleet of equally autonomous devices. As these systems increasingly invade human domains, the need to control what they are permitted to do, and on whose behalf, will become more acute. Within the next few decades, our stores, s
12、treets and sidewalks will likely be crammed with robotic devices fetching and delivering goods of every variety. How do we ensure that they respect the unstated conventions that people unconsciously follow when navigating in crowds? A debate may erupt over whether we should share our turf with machi
13、nes or banish them to separate facilities. Will it be “Integrate Our Androids!“ or “Ban the Bots!“ And far more serious issues are on the horizon. Should it be permissible for an autonomous military robot to select its own targets? The current consensus in the international community is that such we
14、apons should be under “meaningful human control“ at all times, but even this seemingly sensible constraint is ethically muddled. The expanded use of such robots may reduce military and civilian casualties and avoid collateral damage. So how many people“s lives should be put at risk waiting for a hum
15、an to review a robot“s time-critical kill decision? Even if we can codify our principles and beliefs algorithmically, that won“t solve the problem. Simply programming intelligent systems to obey rules isn“t sufficient, because sometimes the right thing to do is to break those rules. Blindly obeying
16、a posted speed limit of 55 miles an hour may be quite dangerous, for instance, if traffic is averaging 75, and you wouldn“t want your self-driving car to strike a pedestrian rather than cross a double-yellow centerline. People naturally abide by social conventions that may be difficult for machines
17、to perceive, much less follow. Finding the right balance between our personal interests and the needs of othersor society in general-is a finely calibrated human instinct, driven by a sense of fairness, reciprocity and common interest. Today“s engineers, racing to bring these remarkable devices to m
18、arket, are ill-prepared to design social intelligence into a machine. Their real challenge is to create civilized robots for a human world.(分数:10.00)(1).Self-driving cars are an example of _.(分数:2.00)A.future civilized robotsB.intruders with technical challengesC.robotic devices with social intellig
19、enceD.smart devices actually challenging ethics(2).The robot“s controlled selection of its own targets is ethically confusing because _.(分数:2.00)A.the number of lives lost will be reduced when robots wait for a human“s reviewB.the human control over autonomous robots affect their working efficiencyC
20、.the duration for reviewing the kill decision will put many people in dangerD.the wider use of such weapons will cause more deaths(3).It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that _.(分数:2.00)A.it is impossible to let robots follow traffic rulesB.crossing a double-yellow centerline is passableC.it is out
21、of the question to codify human“s principles algorithmicallyD.breaking rules could be permissible in urgent cases(4).Which is true according to the last paragraph?(分数:2.00)A.Human instinct tends to chase after intelligent machines.B.Engineers are likely to provide machines with social intelligence.C
22、.Robots still have a long distance to go to own human“s social intelligence.D.Perceiving social conventions is as easy as following them.(5).What is the best title of this text?(分数:2.00)A.Artificial Intelligence In ReviewB.Can We Create an Ethical Robot?C.Real Challenges to HumanD.Which to Choose, F
23、ollow or Break?五、Text 2(总题数:1,分数:10.00)Marketplace or peer-to-peer (P2P) lending matches borrowers and lenders on low-cost online platforms. By skirting banks, P2P lending allows borrower and lender alike to achieve better rates of interest. Essentially, P2P lending is a way of capitalising on the n
24、etwork effect of social media and the volumes of data generated therein to allow cheaper access to capital. According to Liberum, P2P lending in the UK will grow at 98 percent year-on-year in 2015, with 3.5 billion presently lent out. Worldwide in 2015, it“s estimated that $ 77 billion will be lent
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 544 答案 解析 DOC
