【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-32及答案解析.doc
《【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-32及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-32及答案解析.doc(15页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(一)-32 及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Reading Comprehensio(总题数:0,分数:0.00)三、Text 1(总题数:1,分数:20.00)A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention
2、to stay, and who would make some money and then go home. Between 1908 and 1915, about 7 million people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italian immigrants, for example, eventually returned to Italy for good. They even had an affectionate nickname, “uccelli di passaggio“
3、, birds of passage. Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or illegal, good or bad. We hail them as Americans in the making, or brand them as aliens to be kicked out. That framework has contributed mightily to our broken immigration system and
4、the long political paralysis over how to fix it. We don“t need more categories, but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond strict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. W
5、e might then begin to solve our immigration challenges. Crop pickers, violinists, construction workers, entrepreneurs, engineers, home health-care aides and physicists are among today“s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a global economy driven by the flow of work, money and ideas.
6、 They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them. They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another. With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease. We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a w
7、hile without committing themselves to staying forever. We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably. Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration battle. Looking beyond the
8、culture war logic of right or wrong means opening up the middle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes, including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.(分数:20.00)(1).“Birds of passage“ refers to those who(分
9、数:4.00)A.find permanent jobs overseas.B.leave their home countries for good.C.immigrate across the Atlantic.D.stay in a foreign country temporarily.(2).It is implied in Paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US(分数:4.00)A.needs new immigrant categories.B.has loosened control over immi
10、grants.C.should be adapted to meet challenges.D.has been fixed via political means.(3).According to the author, today“s birds of passage want(分数:4.00)A.financial incentives.B.a global recognition.C.opportunities to get regular jobs.D.the freedom to stay and leave.(4).The author suggests that the bir
11、ds of passage today should be treated(分数:4.00)A.as faithful partners.B.with legal tolerance.C.with economic favors.D.as mighty rivals.(5).The most appropriate title for this text would be(分数:4.00)A.Come and Go: Big MistakeB.Living and Thriving: Great RiskC.Legal or Illegal: Big MistakeD.With or with
12、out: Great Risk四、Text 2(总题数:1,分数:20.00)The US $ 3-million Fundamental Physics Prize is indeed an interesting experiment, as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted this year“s award in March. And it is far from the only one of its type. As a News Feature article in Nature discusses, a string of luc
13、rative awards for researchers have joined the Nobel Prizes in recent years. Many, like the Fundamental Physics Prize, are funded from the telephone-number-sized bank accounts of Internet entrepreneurs. These benefactors have succeeded in their chosen fields, they say, and they want to use their weal
14、th to draw attention to those who have succeeded in science. What“s not to like? Quite a lot, according to a handful of scientists quoted in the News Feature. You cannot buy class, as the old saying goes, and these upstart entrepreneurs cannot buy their prizes the prestige of the Nobels. The new awa
15、rds are an exercise in self-promotion for those behind them, say scientists. They could distort the achievement-based system of peer-review-led research. They could cement the status quo of peer-reviewed research. They do not fund peer-reviewed research. They perpetuate the myth of the lone genius.
16、The goals of the prize-givers seem as scattered as the criticism. Some want to shock, others to draw people into science, or to better reward those who have made their careers in research. As Nature has pointed out before, there are some legitimate concerns about how science prizesboth new and oldar
17、e distributed. The Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences, launched this year, takes an unrepresentative view of what the life sciences include. But the Nobel Foundation“s limit of three recipients per prize, each of whom must still be living, has long been outgrown by the collaborative nature of moder
18、n researchas will be demonstrated by the inevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discovery of the Higgs boson. The Nobels were, of course, themselves set up by a very rich individual who had decided what he wanted to do with his own money. Time, rather than intention, h
19、as given them legitimacy. As much as some scientists may complain about the new awards, two things seem clear. First, most researchers would accept such a prize if they were offered one. Second, it is surely a good thing that the money and attention come to science rather than go elsewhere. It is fa
20、ir to criticize and question the mechanismthat is the culture of research, after allbut it is the prize-givers“ money to do with as they please. It is wise to take such gifts with gratitude and grace.(分数:20.00)(1).The Fundamental Physics Prize is seen as(分数:4.00)A.a symbol of the entrepreneurs“ weal
21、th.B.a possible replacement of the Nobel Prizes.C.an example of bankers“ investments.D.a handsome reward for researchers.(2).The critics think that the new awards will most benefit(分数:4.00)A.the profit-oriented scientists.B.the founders of the new awards.C.the achievement-based system.D.peer-review-
22、led research.(3).The discovery of the Higgs boson is a typical case which involves(分数:4.00)A.controversies over the recipients“ status.B.the joint effort of modern researchers.C.legitimate concerns over the new prizes.D.the demonstration of research findings.(4).According to Paragraph 4, which of th
23、e following is true of the Nobels?(分数:4.00)A.Their endurance has done justice to them.B.Their legitimacy has long been in dispute.C.They are the most representative honor.D.History has never cast doubt on them.(5).The author believes that the new awards are(分数:4.00)A.acceptable despite the criticism
24、.B.harmful to the culture of research.C.subject to undesirable changes.D.unworthy of public attention.五、Text 3(总题数:1,分数:20.00)The mythology of a culture can provide some vital insights into the beliefs and values of that culture. By using fantastic and sometimes incredible stories to create an oral
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 32 答案 解析 DOC
