[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷104(无答案).doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷104(无答案).doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷104(无答案).doc(25页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级模拟试卷 104(无答案)一、Part I Writing (30 minutes)1 1简要分析图表 2分析观众喜欢看体育节目的原因 Why Do the Viewers Like Watching Sport Programs?二、Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes)Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions att
2、ached to the passage. For questions 1-4, mark:Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.2 Cod in TroubleA. In 1992, the d
3、evastating collapse of the cod stocks off the east coast of Newfoundland forced the Canadian government to take drastic measures and close the fishery. Over 40,000 people lost their jobs, communities are still struggling to recover and the marine ecosystem is still in a state of collapse. The disint
4、egration of this vital fishery sounded a warning bell to governments around the world who were shocked that a relatively-sophisticated, scientifically-based fisheries management program, not unlike their own, could have gone so wrong. The Canadian government ignored warnings that their fleets were e
5、mploying destructive fishing practices and refused to significantly reduce quotas citing the loss of jobs as too great a concern.B. In the 1950s Canadian and US east coast waters provided an annual 100,000 tons in cod catches rising to 800,000 by 1970. This over fishing led to a catch of only 300,00
6、0 tons by 1975. Canada and the US reacted by passing legislation to extend their national jurisdictions over marine-living resources out to 200 nautical miles and catches naturally declined to 139,000 tons in 1980. However the Canadian fishing industry took over and restarted the over fishing and ca
7、tches rose again until, from 1985, it was the Canadians who were landing more than 250,000 tons of northern cod annually. This exploitation ravaged the stocks and by 1990 the catch was so low (29,000 tons) that in 1992 (121/2000 tons) Canada had to ban all fishing in east coast waters. In a fishery
8、that had for over a century yielded a quarter-million ton catches, there remained a biomass of less than 1700 tons and the Fisheries Department also predicted that, even with an immediate recovery, stocks need at least 15 years before they would be healthy enough to withstand previous levels of fish
9、ing.C. The devastating fishing came from massive investment poured into constructing huge “draggers“. Draggers haul enormous nets held open by a combination of huge steel plates and heavy chains and rollers that plough the ocean bottom. They drag up anything in the way, inflicting immense damage, de
10、stroying critical habitat and contributing to the destabilization of the northern cod ecosystem. The draggers targeted huge aggregations of cod while they were spawning, a time when the fish population is highly vulnerable to capture. Excessive trawling on spawning stocks became highly disruptive to
11、 the spawning process, and ecosystem. In addition, the trawling activity resulted in a physical dispersion of eggs leading to a higher fertilization failure. Physical and chemical damage to larvae caused by the trawling action also reduced their chances of survival. These draggers are now banned for
12、ever from Canadian waters.D. Canadian media often cite excessive fishing by overseas fleets, primarily driven by the Capitalist ethic, as the primary cause of the fishing out of the north Atlantic cod stocks. Many nations took fish off the coast of Newfoundland and all used deep-sea trawlers, and ma
13、ny often blatantly exceeded established catch quotas and treaty agreements. There can be little doubt that non-North-American-fishing was a contributing factor in the cod stock collapse, and that the capitalist dynamics that were at work in Canada were all too similar for the foreign vessels and com
14、panies. But all of the blame cannot be put there, no matter how easy it is to do, as it does not account for the management of the resources.E. Who was to blame? As the exploitation of the Newfoundland fishery was so predominantly guided by the government, we can argue that a fishery is not a privat
15、e area, as the fisher lacks management fights normally associated with property and common property. The state had appropriated the property, and made all of the management decisions. Fishermen get told who can fish, what they can fish, and essentially, what to do with the fish once it is caught. In
16、 this regard then, when a resource such as the Newfoundland fishery collapses, it is more a tragedy of government negligence than a tragedy of the general public.F. Following the 1992s ban on northern cod fishing and most other species, an estimated 30,000 people that had already lost their jobs aft
17、er the 1992 Northern Cod Moratorium took effect, were joined by an additional 12,000 fishermen and plant workers. With more than forty thousand people out of jobs, Newfoundland became an economic disaster area, as processing plants shut down, and vessels from the smallest dory to the monster dragger
18、s were made idle or sold overseas at bargain prices. Several hundred Newfoundland communities were devastated.G. Europeans need only look across the North Atlantic to see what could be in store for their cod fishery. In Canada they were too busy with making plans, setting expansive goals, and then a
19、llocating fish, and lots of it, instead of making sound business plans to match fishing with the limited availability of the resource. Cod populations in European waters are now so depleted that scientists have recently warned that “all fisheries in this area that target cod should be closed.“ The C
20、anadian calamity demonstrates that we now have the technological capability o find and annihilate every commercial fish stock, in any ocean and do irreparable damage to entire ecosystems in the process. In Canadas case, a two billion dollar recovery bill may only be a part of the total long-term cos
21、ts. The costs to individuals and desperate communities now deprived of meaningful and sustainable employment is staggering.2 According to the first paragraph,what was a major factor in the Newfoundland cod disaster?(A)The mass unemployment.(B) The collapse of marine ecosystem.(C) The cod collapse.(D
22、)The fleets destructive fishing practices.3 The Canadian government didnt want to reduce cod. catches pre-1992 because they were worried about _.(A)drastic measures(B) the ecological effects(C) the marine ecosystem(D)possible rising unemployment4 Which of the following graph most accurately describe
23、s Canadian cod catches from 1950 to 1992 _.(A)(B)(C)(D)5 Canada had to totally ban fishing in east coast waters in the year of _.(A)1975(B) 1980(C) 1990(D)19926 According to passage, which of the following is now true about the Newfoundland fisheries?(A)Normal fishing could start again in 2007.(B) C
24、atches of 2700 tons a year only are permitted.(C) Fishing with draggers will be allowed again in 2007.(D)No cod fishing is allowed but some other species can be caught.7 The massive investment put into the constructing huge draggers resulted in _.(A)more economic disaster areas in Newfoundland(B) th
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语六级 模拟 104 答案 DOC
