[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷226及答案与解析.doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷226及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷226及答案与解析.doc(16页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷 226 及答案与解析Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points)0 Like the flu, a persons emotional state can be contagious. Watch someone cry, and youll likely feel sad; think about the elderly, and youll tend to walk
2、 slower. Now a study suggests that we can also catch someone elses irrational thought processes.Anyone whos lost money on a house in need of repair may have suc-cumbed to a classic economic fallacy known as “sunk costs.“ You make a bad investment in a home thats never going to sell for more than you
3、 put in to it, yet you want to justify your investment by continuing to throw money into renovations. One way to avoid this hole is to get advice from someone who has no self-interest in the project. But is the outsider still somehow susceptible to your mindset?To find out, social psychologist Adam
4、Galinsky of Northwestern University and colleagues asked college students to take over decision-making for a person they had never metand who they didnt know was fake. The volunteers were split into two groups: one that felt some connection with the decisionmaker and another that didnt.In one experi
5、ment, the volunteers watched the following scenario play out via text on a computer screen: the fake decision-maker tried to outbid another person for a prize of 356 points, which equaled $4.45 in real money. The decision-maker started out with 360 points, and every time the other bidder raised the
6、stakes by 40 points, the decision-maker followed suit. Volunteers were told that once the decision-maker bid over 356 points, he or she would begin to lose some of the $12 payment for participating in the study.When the decision-maker neared this threshold, the volunteers were asked to take over bid
7、ding. Objectively, the volunteers should have realized thatlike the person who makes a bad investment in a housethe decision-maker would keep throwing good money after bad. But the volunteers who felt identification with the fake player made almost 60% more bids and were more likely to lose money th
8、an those who didnt feel a connection.Galinsky believes that the results suggest that companies trying to reverse results of bad decisions should find true outsiders. He points to troubled automaker Ford as an example. Instead of hiring from withinas General Motors (GM) recently didFord made Alan Mul
9、ally from Boeing, an aerospace company, their chief executive officer. Many experts believe that Ford is now recovering quicker than GM. “Its true that insiders have more knowledge,“ Galinsky says. “But when you are already down the road of a failed course of action, you really need. a true outsider
10、.“1 According to a study, another persons irrational mindset is characterized as_.(A)emotional(B) infectious(C) justifiable(D)susceptible2 Its indicated in Paragraph 2 that a person who has made a bad investment is prone to_.(A)calculate the costs and profits before making a further step(B) persuade
11、 others to believe that he has made a wise decision(C) persist in putting more money into the project(D)consult with some investment experts for advice3 Which of the following is true of the experiment conducted by Galinsky?(A)The participating students turn out susceptible to the mindset of the dec
12、ision-maker.(B) The students were supposed to outbid another person for a prize of 356 points.(C) The volunteers each were paid 12 dollars for participating in the experiment.(D)The volunteers actually lost all their payment because they made worse investment.4 Galinskys experiment has found that _.
13、(A)there is no true outsider because they may catch irrational thought processes(B) most investors generally tend to throw good money after bad investment(C) people will become irrational after they have lost money in investment(D)some outsiders may still catch the irrational mindset of the decision
14、-makers5 In the last paragraph, Galinsky suggests that _.(A)a company should seek help from outsider to reverse the downfall(B) Ford out-performed General Motors in times of trouble(C) outsiders are better decision-makers than insiders to get a recovery(D)a company should use a true outsider to avoi
15、d sunk costs5 You are what you eat, or so the saying goes. But Richard Wrangham, of Harvard University, believes that this is true in a more profound sense than the one implied by the old proverb. It is not just you who are what you eat, but the entire human species. And with Homo sapiens, what make
16、s the species unique in Dr. Wranghams opinion is that its food is so often cooked.Cooking is a human universal. No society is without it. No one other than a few faddists tries to survive on raw food alone. And the consumption of a cooked meal in the evening, usually in the company of family and fri
17、ends, is normal in every known society. Moreover, without cooking, the human brain (which consumes 20-25% of the bodys energy) could not keep running. Dr. Wrangham thus believes that cooking and humanity have developed alongside. In fact, as he outlined to the American Association for the Advancemen
18、t of Science (AAAS), in Chicago, he thinks that cooking and other forms of preparing food are humanitys “killer application“: the evolutionary change that underpins all of the otherand subsequentchanges that have made people such unusual animals.Humans became human, as it were, with the emergence 1.
19、8 million years ago of a species called Homo erectus. This had a skeleton much like modern mansa big, brain-filled skull and a narrow pelvis and rib cage, which imply a small abdomen and thus a small gut. Hitherto, the explanation for this shift from the smaller skulls and wider pelvises of mans ape
20、like ancestors has been a shift from a vegetable-based diet to a meat-based one. Meat has more calories than plant matter, the theory went. A.smaller gut could therefore support a larger brain.Dr. Wrangham disagrees. When you do the sums, he argues, raw meat is still insufficient to bridge the gap.
21、He points out that even modern “raw foodists“, members of a town-dwelling, back-to-nature social movement, struggle to maintain their weightand they have access to animals and plants that have been bred for the table. Pre-agricultural man confined to raw food would have starved.Start cooking, howeve
22、r, and things change radically. Cooking alters food in three important ways. It breaks starch molecules into more digestible fragments. It “denatures“ protein molecules, so that their amino-acid chains unfold and digestive enzymes can attack them more easily. And heat physically softens food. That m
23、akes it easier to digest, so even though the stuff is no more calorific, the body uses fewer calories dealing with it.6 It can be inferred from the first paragraph that_.(A)what you eat exerts little impact on who you are(B) the food makes Homo sapiens different from others(C) Homo sapiens often coo
24、ked its food(D)Homo sapiens cook food in a unique way7 Dr. Wrangham holds the view that _.(A)cooking is a human universal without exception(B) the human brain could not work without food(C) eating cooked meat should be accompanied by family(D)humanity is a precondition for development of cooking8 It
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 阅读 模拟 226 答案 解析 DOC
