ITU-T X 488-1999 Message Handling Systems - EDI-MS Attributes PICS Proforma Series X Data Networks and Open System Communications Message Handling Systems《信息处理系统-IPM-MS属性PICS估价单 X系.pdf

《ITU-T X 488-1999 Message Handling Systems - EDI-MS Attributes PICS Proforma Series X Data Networks and Open System Communications Message Handling Systems《信息处理系统-IPM-MS属性PICS估价单 X系.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-T X 488-1999 Message Handling Systems - EDI-MS Attributes PICS Proforma Series X Data Networks and Open System Communications Message Handling Systems《信息处理系统-IPM-MS属性PICS估价单 X系.pdf（15页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 STD ITU-T RECMN 48b2591 Obb457L NTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU UN 27T ia ON X.488 (06/9 9) SERIES X: DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COM M U N I CATI O N S Message Handling Systems Message Handling Systems - EDI-MS attributes PICS proforma ITU-T R

2、ecommendation X.488 (Previously CCITT Recommendation) ITU-T X-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC DATA NI5TWORKS Services and facilties Interfaces Transmission, signalling and switching Network aspects Maintenance Administrative arrangements Model and notation

3、Service definitions Connection-mode protocol specifications Connectionless-mode protocol specifications PICS proformas Protocol Identification Security Protocols Layer Managed Objects Conformance testing General OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION INTERWORKING BETWEEN NETWORKS X.1-X. 19 X.20-X.49 X.50-X.89

4、 X.90-X.149 X.150-X. 179 X. 180-X. 199 X.200-X.209 X.210-X.219 X.220-X.229 X.230-X.239 X.240-X.259 X.260-X.269 X.270-X.279 X.280-X.289 X.290-X.299 X.300-X.349 Satellite data transmission systems X.350-X.399 DIRECTORY OS1 NETWORKING AND SYSTEM ASPECTS Networking Efficiency Quality of service Naming,

5、Addressing and Registration Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) Systems Management framework and architecture Management Communication Service and Protocol Structure of Management Information Management functions and ODMA functions OS1 MANAGEMENT SECURITY OS1 APPLICATIONS Commitment, Concurrency an

6、d Recovery Transaction processing Remote operations OPEN DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING X.500-X.599 X.600-X.629 X.630-X.639 X.640-X.649 X.650-X.679 X.680-X.699 X.700-X.709 X.710-X.719 X.720-X.729 X.730-X.799 X.800-X.849 , X.850-X.859 X.860-X.879 X.880-X.899 X.90CX.999 - _ For further details, please refer t

7、o iTU-T List of Recommendations. ITU-T RECOMMENDATION X.488 MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS - EDI-MS ATTRIBUTES PICS PROFORMA Summary This Recommendation provides the PICS profonna for access to a message store (EDI-MS) in an ED1 Messaging (EDIMG) environment using theP7 MS Access Protocol. Source ITU-T Re

8、commendation X.488 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 7 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 18th of June 1999. Recommendation X.488 (06/99) - 1 STD-ITU-T RECMN %.488-ENGL 1SSP 4-862531 Ob64574 T7 .I FOREWORD ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the

9、United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommuni- cations. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standar

10、dizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. 1 The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. The approval of Recommendations by

11、the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-Ts purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with IS0 and IEC. NOTE In this Recommendation the tem recognized operating

12、agency (ROA) includes any individual, company, corporation or governmental organization that operates a public correspondence service. The terms Administration, ROA and public correspondence are defined in the Constitution of the ITU (Geneva, 1992). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS The ITU draws attenti

13、on to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or othe

14、rs outside of the Recommendation development process. As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not repre

15、sent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. O ITU 1999 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission i

16、n writing from the ITU, except as noted in footnote 2 in Annex A. 11 Recommendation X.488 (06/99) CONTENTS Page 1 Scope 1 2 Normative references 1 2.1 Identical Recommendations I International Standards ,1 Paired Recommendations I International Standards equivalent in technical content . 1 3 Definit

17、ions 2 4 Abbreviations 2 2.2 5 Conformance 2 Annex A -PICS Proforma for EDI-MS attributes . 3 A.0 Instructions and identification . 3 Annex B - Amendments and comgenda . 8 Recommendation X.488 (06/99) . 111 Introduction This Recommendation is one in a set of Recommendations defining Message Handling

18、 in a distributed open system environment. Message Handling provides for the exchange of messages between users on a store-and-forward basis. A message submitted by one user (the originator) is transferred through the Message Transfer System (MTS) and delivered to one or more users (the recipients).

19、 The MTS comprises a number of Message Transfer Agents (MTAs), which transfer messages and deliver them to their recipients. To evaluate the capabilities of a particular implementation, it is necessary to have a statement of which capabilities and options have been implemented for a given OS1 protoc

20、ol. Such a statement is called a Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS). iv Recommendation X.488 (06/99) STDmITU-T RECMN X-4BB-ENGL 1999 W 4Bb2591 0hb4577 798 W Recommendation X.488 MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS - EDI-MS ATTRIBUTES PICS PROFORMA (Geneva, 1999) 1 Scope This Recommendation pr

21、ovides the Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma for the EDI-MS attributes specified in ITU-T Rec. X.413 I ISOAEC 10021-5 and ITU-T Rec. X.419 I ISOAEC 10021-6. The PICS proforma presents in tabular form the mandatory and optional EDI-specific attributes. This PICS proforma i

22、s based on the relevant guidance for PICS proformas given in ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7. 2 Normative references The following Recommendations and International Standards contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publ

23、ication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and Standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this Recommendation are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and Standards listed below. Members o

24、f IEC and IS0 maintain registers of currently valid International Standards. The Telecommunication Standardization Bureau of the ITU maintains a list of currently valid ITU-T Recommendations. I l I 1 2.1 Identical Recommendations 1 International Standards - ITU-T Recommendation X.402 (1997) I ISOAEC

25、 10021-2: 1999, Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS): Overall architecture. - ITU-T Recommendation X.413 (1998) I ISOIEC 10021-5:1999, Information technology - Message handling systems: Message store - Abstract service definition. - ITU-T Recommendation X.419 (1998) I ISO/IEC 1002

26、1-6: 1999, Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS): Protocol specijcations. 2.2 Paired Recommendations I International Standards equivalent in technical content - ITU-T Recommendation X.290 (1995), OS1 conformance testing methodology and framework for protocol Recornmendations for IT

27、U-T applications - General concepts. ISOAEC 9646- 1 : 1994, Information technology - pen Systems Interconnection - Conformance testing metho- dology and framework - Part I: General concepts. - ITU-T Recommendation X.296 (1993, OSI conformance testing methodology and framework for protocol Recommenda

28、tions for ITU-T applications - Implementation conformance statements. ISOAEC 9646-7: 1995, Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance testing metho- dology and framework - Part 7: Implementation Conformance Statements. Annex A in this Recommendation is technically aligned wi

29、th Annex A in ISOAEC ISP 12063-5, Information technology - International Standardized Profiles AMH3n - Message Handling Systems - ED1 Messaging - Part 5: AMH34 - EDIMG Requirements for Enhanced MS Access (P7). Recommendation X.488 (06/99) 1 3 Definitions Terms used in this Recommendation are defined

30、 in the referenced Recommendations I International Standards. 4 Abbreviations This Recommendation. uses the following abbreviations: ED1 ISP MHS MS MTA os1 PDU PICS UA 5 Electronic Data Interchange International Standardized Profile Message Handling Systems Message Store Message Transfer Agent Open

31、Systems Interconnection Protocol Data Unit Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement User Agent Conformance A conforming PICS proforma shall be technically equivalent to the text of the PICS proforma in this Recommendation and shall preserve the numbering and ordering of items in the PICS profor

32、ma in this Recommendation. A PICS which conforms to this Recommendation shall: a) b) c) describe an implementation which conforms to ITU-T Rec. X.413 I ISO/IEC 10021-5 and ITU-T Rec. X.419 I be a conforming PICS proforma, which has been completed in accordance with the instructions for completion gi

33、ven in Annex A,; include the information necessary to uniquely identify both the supplier and the implementation. ISO/IEC 10021-6; 2 Recornmendation X.4S8 (06199) STD-ITU-T RECMN X-488-ENGL 1999 I 48b2591 Obb4579 560 sl Annex A2 PICS Proforma for EDI-MS attributes (This annex forms an integral part

34、of this Recommendation) Contents of the PICS proforma Page A.0 Instructions and identification .3 A.O.l Instructions 3 A.0.2 Identification of PICS proforma corrigenda 4 A.0.3 Identification of the implementation . 5 A.1.12 EDI-specific attributes 6 NOTE -The numbering of subclauses and items in thi

35、s annex is identical to that in ISOIIEC ISP 12063-5, Information technology - International Standardized Profiles AMH3n -Message Handling Systems - ED1 Messaging - Part 5: AMH34 - EDIMG Require- ments for Enhanced Access (W). A.0 Instructions and identification A.O.l Instructions A.O.l.1 Purpose of

36、the proforma The purpose of the PICS proforma is to provide suppliers of implementations of the W protocol with a consistent means of stating which proforma has been implemented. The proforma is in the form of a questionnaire and consists of a set of items. An item is provided for each capability fo

37、r which an implementation choice is allowed. Items are also provided for mandatory capabilities for which no implementation choice is allowed. Each item includes an item number, an item description, a status value specifying the support requirement, and room for a support answer to be provided by th

38、e supplier. . A.0.1.2 Item numbering Each line in the PICS proforma which requires implementation detail to be entered is given a number in the first column. The item number column provides a means of uniquely referencing each possible answer within the PICS proforma. A.0.1.3 Base column In each tab

39、le, the “Base“ column reflects the level of support required for conformance to the base standard. The following classifications are used in this PICS to specify static conformance requirements - i.e. capability. NOTE -The Profile column is used for functional profiles and uses the same classificati

40、on. In the case of protocol elements, the classification is relative to that of the containing element, if any. Where the constituent elements of a non-primitive element are not individually specified, then each shall be considered to have the classification of that element. Where the range of value

41、s to be supported for an element is not specified, then all values defined in the MHS base standards shall be supported. mandatory support (m): The element or feature shall be fully supported. An implementation shall be able to generate the element, and/or receive the element and perform all associa

42、ted procedures (Le. implying the ability to handle both the syntax and the semantics of the element) as relevant, as specified in the MHS base standards. Where support for origination (generation) and reception are not distinguished, then both capabilities shall be assumed. Mandatory support of an M

43、S attribute for the MS requires that it is supported in the context of all applicable supported operation arguments and results. Mandatory support of an MS attribute by the MS-user requires that it is supported in the context of at least one supported operation argument and result. The way in which

44、attribute values are stored by an MS implementation, or used by a UA implementation, is otherwise a local matter. Copyright release for PICS proformas Users of this Recommendation may freely reproduce the PICS proforma in this annex so that it can be used for its intended purpose and may further pub

45、lish the completed PICS. Recommendation X.488 (06199) 3 optional support (o),: An implementation is not required to support the element or feature. If support is claimed, the element shall be treated as if it were specified as mandatory support. If support is not claimed, and the element is an argum

46、ent, then an implementation shall generate an appropriate error indication if the element is received. If support is not claimed, and the element is a result, then an implementation may ignore the element if it is received. If support of an operation as a responder is not claimed, then an appropriat

47、e error indication shall be generated (as a minimum, a ROSE reject shall be generated). conditional support (c): The element shall be supported under the conditions specified in this Recommendation. If these conditions are met, the element shall be treated as if it were specified as mandatory suppor

48、t. If these conditions are not met, the element shall be treated as if it were specified as optional support (unless otherwise stated). out of scope (i): The element is outside the scope of this Recommendation -Le. it will not be the subject of a conformance test. not applicable (-): The element is

49、not applicable in the particular context in which this classification is used. A.0.1.4 Support column The “Support“ column is provided for completion by the supplier of the implementation as follows: Y N - or blank The element or feature is fully supported (i.e. satisfying the requirements of the m profile support classification). The element or feature is not supported, further qualified to indicate the action taken on receipt of such an element as follows: ND - the element is discardedhgnored; NR - the PDU is rejected (with an appropriate error indication where