ITU-R S 1527-2001 Procedure for the identification of non-geostationary-satellite orbit satellites causing interference into an operating geostationary-satellite orbit earth statio.pdf

《ITU-R S 1527-2001 Procedure for the identification of non-geostationary-satellite orbit satellites causing interference into an operating geostationary-satellite orbit earth statio.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R S 1527-2001 Procedure for the identification of non-geostationary-satellite orbit satellites causing interference into an operating geostationary-satellite orbit earth statio.pdf（14页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 Rec. ITU-R S.1527 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1527 Procedure for the identification of non-geostationary-satellite orbit satellites causing interference into an operating geostationary-satellite orbit earth station (Question ITU-R 231/4) (2001) The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) that

2、the World Radiocommunication Conference (Istanbul, 2000) (WRC-2000) adopted a combination of single-entry validation, single-entry operational and, for certain antenna sizes single-entry additional operational downlink equivalent power-flux density (epfd) limits contained in Article 22 of the Radio

3、Regulations (RR), along with the aggregate limits in Resolution 76 (WRC-2000), which apply to non-geostationary-satellite orbit (non-GSO) fixed-satellite service (FSS) systems to protect GSO networks in parts of the frequency range 10.7-30 GHz; b) that Resolution 137 (WRC-2000) invites ITU-R to deve

4、lop, with the aim of completion by 2003, methodologies to assess the interference levels (through measurement for operational limits) that would be produced by a non-GSO FSS system in the frequency bands specified in Tables 22-4A, 22-4B and 22-4C which may be used by administrations to verify compli

5、ance of an individual non-GSO FSS system with the operational limits contained in Tables 22-4A, 22-4B and 22-4C. This necessitates identification of the system concerned; c) that Resolution 137 (WRC-2000) further recognizes that, taking into account RR Nos. 22.5H and 22.5I, it is important to discou

6、rage violations of the operational epfdlimits by a non-GSO FSS system, but that, if a violation occurs, it should be corrected in the most expeditious manner; d) that a procedure is needed to identify a non-GSO FSS satellite close to or within the main beam of an operational GSO earth station where

7、it may generate interference, noting a) that up-to-date ephemeris data for non-GSO constellations are required to conduct an accurate identification procedure; b) that ephemeris data may be usually publicly available; c) that a separate Recommendation is under development to enable the measurement o

8、f peak epfdlevels generated by the non-GSO satellite identified into the operational GSO earth station, recommends 1 that the methodology given in Annex 1 could be used to calculate the time that a non-GSO satellite would be close to or within the main beam of a GSO FSS earth station antenna and thu

9、s with the aid of the ephemeris data, to identify the non-GSO constellation causing interference; 2 Rec. ITU-R S.1527 2 that the non-GSO satellite system operator should provide assistance to the GSO FSS network operator to obtain the most current ephemeris data, if necessary to identify the source

10、of interference. ANNEX 1 1 Introduction This Annex provides a procedure which could be followed by a GSO earth station operator, to identify non-GSO systems causing sync-loss or severe degradation in operating GSO downlinks. This Annex is divided into three parts. The first part intends to show that

11、 through a simple observation of a signal interfering with a GSO earth station, it is possible to establish a list of the possible existing non-GSO constellations that may be responsible for interference. The second part provides a description of the test bench that can be used to identify a non-GSO

12、 constellation. Finally, the last part provides an example of use of this procedure for identification of the HIBLEO-4FL constellation. This procedure defines an essential step towards the measurement of the power flux-density (pfd) levels generated by a non-GSO constellation into a GSO earth statio

13、n in operation. 2 Pre-measurement analysis This part intends to show that through a simple observation of a signal interfering with a GSO earth station, it is possible to establish a list of the possible existing non-GSO constellations that may be responsible for interference. 2.1 Observation of the

14、 interference When receiving interference, a GSO FSS network operator first has to identify the source of interference and, most of all, has to determine whether the interference it receives is internal to its network or external. A non-GSO interfering system can be identified using some or all of t

15、he following set of elements: any repeatability of the interference and its associated period; the time duration of the interference; the frequency of the interference; a knowledge of the interference level (which causes synchronization loss, or a severe degradation of the GSO signal reception); the

16、 date and accurate time of appearance of the performance degradation; the characteristics of the interfering signal transmitted; spectrum analyser plots of the nominal and interference conditions, if any. Knowing these characteristics of the interfering signal, it is possible to draw up a list of th

17、e non-GSO systems filed at ITU, whose signatures may possibly correspond to the one observed. Rec. ITU-R S.1527 3 2.2 Hypothesis on the possible interfering system In order to identify the non-GSO systems candidate to be responsible for the interference received by the GSO earth station, it is first

18、 necessary to draw up a complete list of the existing non-GSO systems operating in the band of concern for the GSO operator. Such a list can be set up using the radio-frequency data on file at ITU, which provides information on the non-GSO constellations of interest in the identification of the non-

19、GSO system, such as: period of the non-GSO constellation; the frequency range used by the constellation; the emission designators of the constellation (i.e. the bandwidth and frequency designators); the power levels expected on the ground, etc. Given this information and the limited number of in orb

20、it non-GSO systems that will eventually coexist, the list of candidate interferers will be relatively short. The peak of epfdgenerated by a non-GSO system can occur in two configurations: when a non-GSO satellite is in-line with a GSO pointing direction if the non-GSO satellite keeps transmitting th

21、rough its side lobes; when a satellite is about to switch off all its transmissions as it gets close to the GSO arc. In both cases, the peak of epfdcorresponds to clear geometrical configurations. Therefore, the second element that will help with the identification of a non-GSO system is the time co

22、incidence of an interference event with the particular geometrical situation of the non-GSO satellite with regard to the GSO network. To determine the location of a non-GSO satellite with respect to a GSO earth station at a particular time, reference ephemeris data along with orbit predicting softwa

23、re are required. Such orbit predicting software packages are widely available on the Internet, and provide information such as: the elevation and azimuth of the non-GSO satellites when passing through a GSO earth station main beam; whether satellites of a non-GSO constellation are visible from the l

24、ocation of a particular GSO earth station; the position of the satellites in the sky of the GSO earth station at the time of an interference problem. If non-GSO ephemeris data is not available from other sources then the non-GSO satellite system operator should provide assistance to the GSO FSS netw

25、ork operator to obtain the most current ephemeris data. One difficulty with the identification of a non-GSO satellite in the direction of the GSO satellite orbit is that the non-GSO signal is mixed with GSO satellite signals and therefore may not be readily identifiable. 2.3 Tests schedule The follo

26、wing section explains how to determine the pointing direction towards which the probability of having satellites of the non-GSO systems is high. 4 Rec. ITU-R S.1527 If up-to-date ephemeris data and associated orbit prediction software are available, it is possible to determine all satellite passes w

27、ithin X of an antenna azimuth and elevations, the name of the satellites, and the time and duration of each pass. Such information can be used to determine a (azimuth elevation) window of X on a side for which the probability of having satellite passes is maximum. This exercise will have to be done

28、for each candidate non-GSO system likely to cause interference. For the planned period of the test, the GSO operator should establish Table 1 for the selected azimuth: TABLE 1 Listing of the timetable for test schedule 3 Test bench presentation 3.1 Test bench set up The proposed test bench will obse

29、rve the pfd level received from non-GSO systems into the GSO earth station in the pointing direction with the greatest probability of appearance of their satellites with regard to the GSO earth station location (see 2.3). The test antenna that is used is separated from the GSO earth station antenna

30、and may be of small diameter: 1.2 m or 3 m. Indeed, the aim of the analysis is not to measure the interference level generated into the GSO earth station in operation, but rather to detect and observe signals coming from a particular non-GSO satellite, at the frequency at which interference has been

31、 detected in a GSO earth station. The test antenna is located close to the GSO earth station. The signal can also be observed in the telemetry bands. Indeed, most non-GSO FSS systems are not planning to serve all the areas in visibility of the satellite which means that the observed satellite may no

32、t be transmitting towards the measurement site. In order to make the first observation of the signal it is therefore necessary to validate the constellation parameters observing the telemetry bands. Candidate non-GSO systems Test antenna pointing direction Best probability (azimuth elevation)window

33、Satellite number pass Day of pass ( m:d:y)(1)Theoretical time pass ( h:m:s)(2)1 x y z ( m:d:y)x ( m:d:y)y ( m:d:y)z( h:m:s)x ( h:m:s)y ( h:m:s)z2 3 (1)( m:d:y): month, day, year. (2)( h:m:s): hour, minute, second, thousands of a second. Rec. ITU-R S.1527 5 The test bench proposed for identification

34、of the non-GSO interference source is the following: 1527-01FIGURE 1Test bench proposed for identification of interference sourceNon-GSO satelliteTest antennaLNA DC block Spectrum analyserPrinterTest benchInterferedGSO earth stationAzimuth elevation windowTowardsGSO satelliteDC: direct currentLNA: l

35、ow noise amplifierThe required information on the test bench elements are given in Table 2. TABLE 2 In order to have accurate results it is necessary to calibrate the test reception chain as described in 3.2. Description Required characteristics Note Test antenna and feed Size Frequency range Antenn

36、a gain pattern Provided by the manufacturer LNA Frequency range Gain and noise temperature Measured by the manufacturer Coaxial cables Low loss cables Loss as a function of the frequency Measured during calibration tests (see 3.2) DC block Loss Measured Power supply Compatible with the LNA voltage S

37、pectrum analyser Low noise floor Frequency range compatible with tests Printer Compatible with spectrum analyser 6 Rec. ITU-R S.1527 3.2 Test bench calibration The test bench calibration consists of measuring the gain and loss of the whole reception chain as well as accurately pointing the test ante

38、nna towards the predicted azimuth and elevation of the non-GSO satellite. Indeed, it is important when calibrating the reception chain, that the carrier-to-noise ratio (C / N ) expected for the non-GSO characteristic signal, be high enough to be detected with the test set-up used. Too much loss in t

39、he reception chain may make it impossible for such a test to be successful. 4 Example: Identification procedure applied to HIBLEO-4FL To prove the feasibility of the technique, a practical test has been undertaken to detect non-GSO system signals from two separate locations: one near Washington DC,

40、in the United States of America, and another at Goonhilly earth station in the United Kingdom. The HIBLEO-4FL (Globalstar) system has been selected because: its orbital parameters for a 48-satellite constellation inclined at 52 at an altitude of 1 414 km are representative of proposed non-GSO system

41、s; it radiates to the ground a constant power telemetry (7 kHz bandwidth) that is function of the elevation; the transmissions are near 7 GHz using circular polarized single beam antenna, that are fully detectable with a linear polarized antenna; HIBLEO-4FL is the only user of the 7 GHz downlink ban

42、d, thus, there would be no confusion from signals from other satellite systems; the test equipment was commercially available for 7 GHz. These tests prove that it is possible: to determine a non-GSO constellation signature without implementing specific standardized signature signals; to detect satel

43、lites from a non-GSO system operating in low orbit with code division multiple access modulation; and to predict with a very good accuracy, the location of non-GSO satellites with regard to a GSO earth station location. It is important to note that the HIBLEO-4FL system is very close to a system lik

44、e F-SAT MULTI 1B in terms of orbital parameters and pfd on the ground. Table 3 provides the most important figures of both constellation orbital parameters and pfd levels. TABLE 3 F-SAT MULTI 1B HIBLEO-4FL Altitude (km) 1 469 1 414 Orbital type Circular Circular Inclination (degrees) 53 52 Frequency

45、 (GHz) 10.7-12.75 for the downlink Near 6.8 for telemetry pfd levels (dB(W/(m2 40 kHz) Around 145 pfdmin= 148 pfdmax= 135.8 Rec. ITU-R S.1527 7 The tests carried out in the United States of America and in the United Kingdom, for which a detailed description of the former is given in Appendix 1, prov

46、e that HIBLEO-4FL is detectable, identifiable and that the time of pass of a satellite into the main beam of the GSO earth station antenna, whichever pointing direction, can be predicted with about 3 s accuracy. 5 Conclusion It has been demonstrated in this Annex, that the identification of a non-GS

47、O constellation can be achieved, and at low cost. It is possible to predict the time pass of a non-GSO satellite close to or within the main beam of a GSO earth station, with an accuracy of about 3 s. A procedure as simple as the one presented here provides information that is essential for GSO oper

48、ators seeking to identify the non-GSO system responsible for the interference observed. APPENDIX 1 TO ANNEX 1 The test example provided in this Appendix is the one that has been performed in the United States of America. 1 Preparation of the tests 1.1 Information search on HIBLEO-4FL The preparation

49、 of the tests requires the gathering of as much information as possible on the HIBLEO-4FL constellation from the ITU filing (referred to as RES46/C/182). The following information on the non-GSO system is available from the filing: Constellation configuration HIBLEO-4FL is a non-GSO constellation of 48 satellites combined into eight planes of six satellites with a circular orbit at an altitude of 1 414 km and an inclination of 52. All 48 satellites were in orbit at the time of the tests. Frequency plan The fr