ITU-R REPORT M 2050-2004 Test results illustrating the susceptibility of maritime radionavigation radars to emissions from digital communication and pulsed systems in the bands 2 9.pdf

《ITU-R REPORT M 2050-2004 Test results illustrating the susceptibility of maritime radionavigation radars to emissions from digital communication and pulsed systems in the bands 2 9.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R REPORT M 2050-2004 Test results illustrating the susceptibility of maritime radionavigation radars to emissions from digital communication and pulsed systems in the bands 2 9.pdf（18页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 Rep. ITU-R M.2050 1 REPORT ITU-R M.2050 Test results illustrating the susceptibility of maritime radionavigation radars to emissions from digital communication and pulsed systems in the bands 2 900-3 100 and 9 200-9 500 MHz (2004) 1 Introduction Tests have been performed to assess the effects that

2、emissions from digital communication systems have on three maritime radionavigation radars that operate with a primary allocation in the 2 900-3 100 MHz band and two radars that operate with primary allocation in the 9 200-9 500 MHz band. The radars were International Maritime Organization (IMO) SOL

3、AS1compulsory carriage category maritime radionavigation radars that employ scan rates, pulse widths, PRFs, IF bandwidth, noise figure, and antenna beamwidths typical of those identified in Recommendation ITU-R M.1313. These radars are representative of the types being used by the United States Coas

4、t Guard for shipboard navigation, by the commercial shipping industry, and recreational boaters as well. The radars operating in the 2 900-3 100 MHz band are identified as Radars A, B and C in this Report and the 9 200-9 500 MHz radars are identified as Radars D and E. Radars identified in Recommend

5、ation ITU-R M.1313 typically employ interference mitigation techniques/processing methods identified in Recommendation ITU-R M.1372 to allow them to operate in the presence of other radionavigation and radiolocation radars. Techniques of that kind are very effective in reducing or eliminating low du

6、ty-cycle asynchronous pulsed interference between radars. All of the radars that were tested have some type of interference rejection circuitry/processing, which by default was enabled. Recommendation ITU-R M.1461 contains protection criteria for radars operating in the radiodetermination service. T

7、hese tests investigated the effectiveness of each of the radars interference suppression circuitry/software to reduce or eliminate interference due to the emissions from a communication system employing a digital modulation scheme. Additional tests were also performed using low duty-cycle pulsed emi

8、ssions as an interference source. The tests were performed with the assistance of the radar manufactures and experienced mariners. Their guidance was used to properly set up and to operate the radars. The tests were performed with non-fluctuating targets generation which were inserted into the radar

9、 receivers. This Report describes the conduct of the findings to date. 2 Objectives The objectives of the testing were: to quantify the capability of each of the five maritime radionavigation radars interference-rejection processing to mitigate unwanted emissions from digital communication systems a

10、s a function of their power level; 1International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea. 2 Rep. ITU-R M.2050 to develop I/N protection criteria that would mitigate the unwanted digital communication systems emissions in maritime radionavigation radars; to observe and quantify the effectiveness of eac

11、h of the maritime radionavigation radars interference rejection techniques to reduce the number of false targets, radial streaks (strobes), and background noise or “speckle”. 3 Radars under test 3.1 Radar A Maritime radionavigation Radar A, which was introduced circa 2000 and is still being refined,

12、 is designed for commercial applications and is an IMO category radar that operates in the 2 900-3 100 MHz band. Nominal values for the principal parameters of this radar were obtained from regulatory type-approval documents, sales brochures and technical manuals. These are presented in Table 1. TAB

13、LE 1 Radar A transmitter and receiver parameters Parameter Value Frequency (MHz) 3 050 30 Pulse power (kW) 30 Range (nmi) (km) 0.375-1.5 0.7-2.8 3-6 5.6-11.1 12 22.2 24-96 44.5-177.8 Pulse width (s) 0.08 0.30 0.60 1.2 PRF (Hz) 2 200 1 028 600 IF bandwidth (MHz) 28 3 3 3 Spurious response rejection (

14、dB) 60 System noise figure (dB) 4 RF bandwidth (MHz) Unknown Antenna scan rate (rpm) 26 Antenna scan time (s) 2.31 Antenna horizontal beamwidth (degrees) 1.9 Antenna vertical beamwidth (degrees) 22 Polarization Horizontal The radar uses a multistage logarithmic IF amplifier/detector. This type of re

15、ceiver design is very common in marine radionavigation radars since they have to detect targets that have very small and large returns. A logarithmic amplifier increases the range of target returns that can be handled by the radar receiver without it becoming saturated. The noise figure of the radar

16、 was measured and was found to be 5.3 dB, which was consistent with the nominal value of 4 dB. The 3 dB IF bandwidth is about 3 MHz for the range scale used for the tests. Using those parameters the noise power of the radar receiver is calculated to be about 104 dBm. Rep. ITU-R M.2050 3 Radar A has

17、extensive signal processing and target tracking capabilities, including an adaptive local constant-false-alarm-rate (CFAR) feature and a scan-to-scan correlation feature. The local CFAR (acting within a small fraction of one range sweep) is known as an ordered-statistic CFAR, which is a type that pe

18、rmits the desensitizing effect of interfering pulses to be lessened or avoided. This is done by discarding a selectable number of background signal samples that would otherwise be used in establishing the detection threshold. The process discards the samples having the greatest amplitude. As more sa

19、mples are discarded which contain the higher amplitude interfering pulses, the less influence they are likely to have on the sensitivity of valid target detection. Radar B can also perform a scan-to-scan correlation process that provides an additional means for discriminating between signals that ar

20、e present consistently, such as a valid target, and signals that appear at random times, such as asynchronous pulsed interference. 3.2 Radars B and D Radars B and D are maritime radionavigation IMO category type of radars produced by the same manufacturer and are designed for commercial applications

21、. Radar B operates in the 2 900-3 100 MHz band while Radar D operates in the 9 200-9 500 MHz band. Radars B and D locate their transmitter/receiver below deck and use waveguide to send/receive signals from the antenna. They use different antennas and receiver front-ends, but have a common display al

22、ong with common receiver elements including the interference rejection processing and IF circuitry. The radars use a multistage logarithmic IF amplifier and a separate video detector. Radars B and D also use pulse jitter. The transmitted pulse PRF can be jittered to prevent second time around echoes

23、 and also to reduce the interference from other transmitters in the vicinity. This function is automatically set in the transceiver and provides up to 25s jitter about the nominal value. Nominal values for the principal parameters of these radars were obtained from regulatory type-approval documents

24、, sales brochures and technical manuals. They are presented in Table 2. TABLE 2 Radars B and D transmitter and receiver parameters Parameter Value Frequency (MHz) 3 050 10 9 410 30 Pulse power (kW) 30 Range (nmi) 0.125-1.5 3-24 48 96 Pulse width (s) 0.070 0.175 0.85 1.0 PRF (Hz) 3 100 1 550 775 390

25、IF bandwidth (MHz) 22 22 6 6 Spurious response rejection (dB) Unknown System noise figure (dB) 5.5 RF bandwidth (MHz) Unknown Antenna scan rate (rpm) 24/48 Antenna horizontal beamwidth (degrees) 2.8 1.2 Antenna vertical beamwidth (degrees) 28 25 Polarization Horizontal 4 Rep. ITU-R M.2050 The values

26、 of pulse width and PRF in Table 2 are the default settings for that particular range. The operator can, for some ranges, select other pulse widths and PRFs that are under or over the default values. Pulse-to-pulse and scan-to-scan correlators are used by Radars B and D to mitigate interference whic

27、h may be caused from other radars operating nearby. For the pulse-to-pulse correlator, returns are compared on a pulse-to-pulse basis to reduce interference. A signal is only displayed if it is present on two consecutive pulses. This interference rejection function is most effective if the transceiv

28、er has been set to provide PRF jitter. For the scan-to-scan correlator, a target is only displayed if it is present on two consecutive scans. These radars do not have CFAR processing. A complete discussion of these radar interference mitigation techniques can be found in Recommendation ITU-R M.1372.

29、 3.3 Radars C and E Radars C and E are maritime radionavigation IMO category type of radars produced by the same manufacturer and are designed for commercial applications. Radar C operates in the 2 900-3 100 MHz band while Radar E operates in the 9 200-9 500 MHz band. Radars C and E are a topmast de

30、sign. The receiver/transmitter (R/T) is encapsulated in a metal housing located directly below the rotating antenna. The video from the R/T unit is sent to the ppi located below deck via cables. They use different antennas and receiver front-ends, but have a common display along with common receiver

31、 elements including the interference rejection processing and IF circuitry. Both of the radars use an eight-stage successive approximation logarithmic IF amplifier/detector. Nominal values for the principal parameters of these radars were obtained from regulatory type-approval documents, sales broch

32、ures and technical manuals. They are presented in Table 3. TABLE 3 Radars C and E transmitter and receiver parameters Parameter Value Frequency (MHz) 3 050 10 9 410 30 Pulse power (kW) 30 Range (nmi) 0.125-3 6-24 48-96 Pulse width (s) 0.050 0.25 0.80 PRF (Hz) 1 800 785 IF bandwidth (MHz) 20 20 3 Spu

33、rious response rejection (dB) Unknown System noise figure (dB) 4 RF bandwidth (MHz) Unknown Antenna scan rate (rpm) 25/48 Antenna scan time (s) 2.31 Antenna horizontal beamwidth (degrees) 2.0 Antenna vertical beamwidth (degrees) 30 Polarization Horizontal Rep. ITU-R M.2050 5 The values of pulse widt

34、h and PRF in Table 3 are the default settings for that particular range. The operator can, for some ranges, select other pulse widths and PRFs that are under or over the default values. Radars C and E use pulse-to-pulse and scan-to-scan correlators to mitigate interference from other radars. A descr

35、iption of these techniques is provided in 3.2. These radars do not have CFAR processing. 3.4 Radar video displays Radar A, due to its enhanced signal processing capabilities, has the ability to display various types of targets in different combinations. The radar is able to display amorphous raw-vid

36、eo “blips” (known as the image display), synthetic targets that appear as an “o”, and/or tracked targets that appear as an “x”. The brightness of the video image targets corresponds to the level of the target return. Targets that have a brighter “blip” have a greater return echo. The synthetic targe

37、ts required about 2-3 dB of additional desired power compared to the raw-video targets to obtain the same probability of detection, Pd, when operating at minimum detectable signal (MDS) level but do not change their brightness in correspondence to the reflected signal strength. Radars B and D (from

38、the same manufacturer) use a colour CRT to display targets and radar information to the user such as PRF, pulsewidth, and range rings among other parameters. These radars do not show synthetic targets and only display raw-video “blips”. Likewise, Radars C and E (from another manufacturer) only displ

39、ay raw-video “blips”. However, the display used with radars C and E is monochromatic raster scan type. Besides targets, this display also indicates various radar parameters. Like Radar A, for these radars the raw-video “blip” is brighter for targets that have a greater return echo. 4 Unwanted signal

40、s Radar A was tested with a 2 Mbit/s quadrature phase shift keyed (QPSK) waveform as an interference source. Radars B and C were tested with 64 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), 16-QAM, code division multiple access2000 (cdma2000), and wideband CDMA (WCDMA) signals as interference sources. Rada

41、rs D and E were only tested with the cdma2000 and WCDMA signals. All interfering signals were on-tune with the radars. The QPSK signal injected into Radar A was continuous, occurring for a full 360. The unwanted CDMA signals that were injected into Radars B, C, D and E were gated to occur at the sam

42、e time of the target generation within the same azimuth. The gate time was equal to the length of time that a stationary interference source would be within the radars antenna 3 dB horizontal beamwidth as it rotates. The QAM signals were not gated. The measured emission spectrum of the continuous QP

43、SK signal is shown in Fig. 1. 6 Rep. ITU-R M.2050 FIGURE 1 Emission spectra of QPSK waveform Communication test sets were used to generate the DVB-T 16-QAM, DVB-T 64-QAM, cdma2000 and WCDMA signals. Spectrum shots of each of the unwanted signals are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The cdma2000 signal was fo

44、r the reverse link (mobile-to-base) standard according to the IS-95 format for cellular mobile telephones. The WCDMA signal was for the uplink standard according to the 3GPP 3.5 format. The 16 and 64 DVB-T QAM signals in Fig. 2 represent the type of modulation scheme that is used by digital cameras

45、for electronic news gathering (ENG OB) purposes. FIGURE 2 QAM signal used in ENG OB Rep. ITU-R M.2050 7 FIGURE 3 CDMA signals 5 Non-fluctuating target generation Ten simulated equally-spaced, equi-amplitude targets were generated along a radial using RF signal generators, arbitrary waveform generato

46、rs, and other miscellaneous RF equipment (combiners, cabling, attenuators, etc.) for each of the radars operating at a 3-nmi (5.6 km) range. The target generation system provided groups of RF pulses that were of the correct pulse width and timing such that when they injected into the radar receiver,

47、 the pulses appeared as ten individual targets on the radars ppi display. The ten targets were equally spaced along a radial that was 3-nmi long. The targets at each distance within that 3-nmi radial had the same signal power into the radar receiver. This simulates the targets having a larger RCS as

48、 the distance increases. The number of pulses that were used to generate each individual target was dependent upon the radars PRF, antenna rotation rate, and antenna horizontal beamwidth. The instrumentation used to generate the targets is shown in Fig. 4. The target generation system provides non-f

49、luctuating targets: at each distance the RCS is constant. 8 Rep. ITU-R M.2050 FIGURE 4 Target generator instrumentation The train of transmitter trigger pulses (A) was used to trigger the simulated-target generator. A free-running pulse generator was used to produce gate pulses (B) representing the amplitude modulating effect on target return due to the antenna beam. Those pulses gated the train of transmitter triggers in an AND gate circuit, producing bursts (C) of trigger pulses containing from 6 to 23 pulses each. Each trigger pulse was applied to an arbitrary