COE EM 200-1-6-1997 CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) PROJECTS《危害性 毒性与放射性废物(HTRW)项目的化学质量保证》.pdf

《COE EM 200-1-6-1997 CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) PROJECTS《危害性 毒性与放射性废物(HTRW)项目的化学质量保证》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《COE EM 200-1-6-1997 CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) PROJECTS《危害性 毒性与放射性废物(HTRW)项目的化学质量保证》.pdf（93页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、CEMP-RT Engineer Manual 200- 1-6 Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Environmental Quality CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HAZARDOUS, TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) PROJECTS Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is u

2、nlimited. EM 200-1 -6 10 October 1997 Licensed by Information Handling ServicesUS Army Corps EM 200-1-6 10 October 1997 of Engineers ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HTRW PROJECTS This manual is approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. ENGINEER MANUAL Licensed by I

3、nformation Handling ServicesAVAILABILITY Copies of this and other U. S. Army Corps of Engineers publications are available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfiel, VA 22161. Phone (703)487-4650. For a list of all U. S. Army Corps of Engineers publications and th

4、eir moat recent publication ates, refer to mgineer Pamphlet 25-1-18 Index of PUblications, Forms and Reports. Licensed by Information Handling Services 3515789 0717024 757 W CEMP-RT Manual N0.200-1-6 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U. S. rmy Corps of Engineers Washington, D. C. 20314-1000 EM 200-1-6 10 Octob

5、er 97 Environmental Quality CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HAZARDOUS, TXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) PROJECTS 1. Purpose. This Engineer Manual (EM) provides specific guidance, procedures, criteria, and tools for chemical implementation of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) HTRW Quality Ass

6、urance (QA) Program. Chemical QA is required to ensure analytical data generated for all projects meet the criteria prescribed by the technical project planning (TPP) team. This EM is intended for use by USACE personnel as a critical companion document to ER 1110-1-263. 2. Applicability. This manual

7、 applies to all USACE commands having responsibility for HTRW projects. 3. References. References are provided in Appendix A. 4. Distribution Statement. Approved for public release, distribution unlimited. 5. Discussion. This manual provides guidance for implementation of analytical chemistry aspect

8、s of the USACE HTRW QA program. guidance on meeting the requirements of ER 1110-1-263 and ER 1180-1-6. Included are suggestions for establishment of quality control (QC) and QA protocols needed to ensure fulfillment of chemical quality requirements in support of project specific data quality objecti

9、ves (DQOS) . The manual provides detailed FOR THE COMMANDER: 3 Appendices App A - References App B - Acronyms App C - Definitions OTIS WILLIAMS Colonel Corps of Engineers Chief of Staff Printed on Recycled Paper Licensed by Information Handling Services3535789 0737025 b3 = Table of Contents CEMP-RT

10、Manual N0.200-1-6 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington ,D. C. 203 14-1000 EM 200-1-6 10 October 97 Environmental Quality CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR HAZARDOU s, TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WAST E(HTR W) PROJECTS Table of Contents Chapter 1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CHEMICA

11、L DATA QUALITY MANAGEMENT 1-1. Introductio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-.1 1-2. Goals of the CDQM Progra .m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.-I 1-3. Technical Project Plannin . .g . . .

12、. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.- 1 1-4. CDQM Activitie s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 1-5. Primary CDQM Activitie .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13、l-7 1-6. Use of QA Samples by Project Phas . . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-8 1-7. Omission of QA Sample .E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lr9 1-8. Fraud Deterrenc 1,lO 1-9. Trainin g.,. 1-10 1-10. Procedures for CDQM by P

14、roject Phas 1-10 1-1 1. Data Management and Archive Proces 1-15 PROCEDURES AND NOTIFICATION S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 .e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .e . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15、. . . . . . . . . . . .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 2 CHEMISTRY DATA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND DATA PACKAGE DELIVERABLES . 2-1 2- 1. Data Reporting Requirement . . .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2. Data Reporting Forma . i . . . .

16、 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3. Data Package Deliverable Time Schedul . . . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4. Sample Identification Tab1 . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z 1 2.-4 2-4 2-4 L

17、icensed by Information Handling Servicesm 3515789 O737026 52T EM 200-1-6 10 Oct 97 Chapter 3 DATAASSESSMEN . . 3-1 3-1. Data Assessmen . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3-2. Required Level of Data Assessmen . . . .t. . . . . . . . . . . .

18、 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3. Assessment of Definitive Dat . .a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 3-2 Chapter 4 CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4-1. Purpos . 4-1 4-2. Cover Memorandu m . . . . .

19、. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4-3. CoverPag . 4-1 4-4. Report Content .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 Chapter 5 CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT S . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20、 . . .5-1 5- 1. Introductio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2. Evaluation of Data Qualit . y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3. Documentation of Data Qualit . .y. . . . . . . . . .

21、. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-.1 . 5-1 . 5-1 Chapter 6 FIELD SAMPLING OVERSIGHT ON HAZARDOUS, TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE 6- 1.Introductio n 6.1 WASTE PROJECT S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 671 6-2. Field Audit Checkl

22、ist 6-3. Sources of Erro . s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 . 6-1 . J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4. Frequency and Duratio . n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

23、. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6. Documentatio .n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 6-5. Feedback and Corrective Actio . . .n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 6:2 Chapter 7 USACE CHEMIST TRAINING AND CE

24、RTIFICATIO N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7- 1. Introductio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3. Eligibilit y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25、 7-.1 7-.1 7-2. Objective s . 7-1 7-4. Certification Progra 7-5. Certification Categorie m. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7-1 7-6. Procedures for Certification and Recertification by Examinatio . . .

26、. . . . .n . . . . 7-2 7-7. Certification Maintenanc .7-3 7-8. Implementatio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:6 7-9. Administratio IL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:7 7-10. T

27、rainin g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7 . .e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Licensed by Information Handling Services 3535789 0737027 466 = EM 200-1-6 10 Oct 97 7-11. Prof

28、essional Development 7-7 7-12. Use of the Certification Designations . 7-8 7-13. Expiration or Revocation of Certification 7-8 , 111 Licensed by Information Handling ServicesTable EM 200-1-6 10 Oct 97 List of Tables Page 1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 CDQM Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29、 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-17 Sample Identification Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5 DataReview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5 Criteria for Comparing Field QC and QA Sample Data . . . . . . . . .

30、 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 . lll Licensed by Information Handling Services E 3535789 0737029 239 E EM 200-1-6 10 Oct 97 List of Figures Figure Page 1-1 6- 1 6-2 6-3 6-4 6-5 6-6 6-7 6-8 Laboratory Notification Information Checklist 1-16 Field Oversight Checklist . General Procedure . 6-3 Fi

31、eld Oversight Checklist . Groundwater Sampling 6-7 Field Oversight Checklist . Soil and Sediment Sampling . 6-10 Field Oversight Checklist . Surface Water Sampling 6-12 Field Oversight Checklist . Waste Sampling 6-14 Field Oversight Checklist . Storm Water Sampling . 6-15 Field Oversight Checklist .

32、 Air Sampling 6-17 Field Oversight Checklist . Potable Water Sampling 6-19 iv Licensed by Information Handling Services 3535789 0737030 T50 EM 200-1-6 10 Oct 97 Chapter 1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND NOTIFICATIONS 1-1. Introduction. Execution of the US

33、ACE Chemical Data Quality Management (CDQM) program for HTRW contamination requires the interface and coordination of several Corps personnel. Procedures and responsibilities for USACE staff performing government CDQM activities are defined and detailed in this Chapter. The USACE project manager (PM

34、) is responsible for initiating and coordinating the defined CDQM activities. 1-2, Goals of the CDOM Program. The goals of the USACE CDQM program are to: 1) generate data of acceptable quality for the intended use; 2) satis the needs of the customer and the regulators; 3) generate sufficient data of

35、 known quality on the first attempt; and 4) provide an historical record for potential future use. When CDQM is used properly, the PM can readily measure the success of the team in meeting the project-specific DQOs. The USACE CDQM program consists of activities presented in ER 11 10-1-263, CDQM for

36、Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste Remedial Activities, Engineer Manual (EM) 200-1-1, Validation of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories, EM 200-1-2, Technical Project Planning Guidance for HTRW Data Quality Design, and EM 200-1-3, Requirements for the Preparation of Sampling and Analysis Plans (SAP

37、S). 1-3. Technical Project Plannins. Each district is responsible for assessment of chemical data quality, including determination of data useability and DQO attainment. The district project chemist is a critical team member for this effort, and must be involved in preparation and review of project

38、documents including scopes of work, SAPS, contract specifications, and final chemical data reports. The district project chemist must be involved at each step of an HTRW project, so that adequate data quality is maintained. The TPP process for design of DQOs is described in EM 200- 1-2. 1-4. CDOM Ac

39、tivities. All HTRW projects require a comprehensive and multifaceted approach to QC and QA in order to achieve and document attainment of appropriate quality for the intended data usage. The district project chemist is the focal point to ensure that chemical data meet DQOs for each HTRW project. The

40、 district project chemist has several techniques to monitor and ensure the quality of chemical data. The district project chemist in conjunction with other members of the TPP team determine the appropriate level of compliance monitoring as discussed in ER 11 10-1-263, Appendix A. This determination

41、should be based upon the intended use of the data and the degree of confidence needed in the quality of the data. Compliance monitog may consist of a combination of activities. Described below are twelve (12) activities that may be applied on a project-specific basis to assist in generating data of

42、known quality. The twelve CDQM activities, their relative cost, and typical use are summarized in Table 1-1. 1-1 Licensed by Information Handling Servicesm 3535789 0737033 997 m EM 200-1-6 10 Oct 97 a. Validation of Primary and QA Laboratories. In general, commercial and government laboratories that

43、 support the USACE HTRW program should obtain a USACE laboratory validation prior to field studies or sample analysis. The QA laboratory is defined as the Chemistry and Materials Quality Assurance Laboratory (CMQAL), located in Omaha, Nebraska or a subcontracted agent that is responsible for analysi

44、s of the project QA samples. For some data uses, other programs (i.e., State Fuel Storage Tank Program, MLA, Navy and Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP) Audits) can be utilized. Projects should not be implemented without utilization of information fiom some accreditation authority. Val

45、idation should be maintained throughout the duration of the project. The USACE laboratory validation program is project specific. The validation is a parameter, method, and matrix-specific approval. For each new contract or delivery order awarded during the validation period, a project-specific requ

46、est for validation should be sent to CENWO-HX-C (Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division, Missouri River Region, HTRW-Center of Expertise, Chemical Data Quality Management Branch) for verification of laboratory status regardless of their expiration date on the list of validated laboratories. The p

47、rimary objectives of the USACE laboratory validation program are to communicate to analytical service providers the USACE QC/QA requirements, ver the laboratories are performing specified analytical methods, and to ensure these laboratories meet the USACE requirements prior to sample analysis. Labor

48、atory validations are performed under the administration of the HTRW-CX applying guidance outlined in EM 200- 1 - 1. The USACE validation program is primarily based on SW-846 methods. The first step of the validation program is a paper review of the laboratorys capabilities to ensure that the propos

49、ed laboratory has the facility, equipment and personnel to meet the project required analyses. The laboratory must demonstrate capabilities by providing acceptable standard operating procedures (SOP) and successfully analyzing project required performance evaluation (PE) samples. The final step of the validation program is an on-site inspection of the laboratorys facility. Validation can be terminated at any step of the process due to inadequate laboratory documentation performance and/or execution. No notice or short notice on-site audits of facilities listed as