BS 4322-1968 Recommendations for buffering on hospital vehicles such as trolleys《医院用车辆(如手推车)减震器推荐标准》.pdf
《BS 4322-1968 Recommendations for buffering on hospital vehicles such as trolleys《医院用车辆(如手推车)减震器推荐标准》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《BS 4322-1968 Recommendations for buffering on hospital vehicles such as trolleys《医院用车辆(如手推车)减震器推荐标准》.pdf(8页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、BRITISH STANDARD BS 4322:1968 Recommendations for Buffering on hospital vehicles such as trolleysBS4322:1968 These Recommendations were published under the authority ofthe General Council on 25 July 1968 BSI 11-1999 The following BSI references relate to the work on these recommendations: Committee
2、reference M/26 Draft for comment 67/21936 ISBN 580 00221 7 Co-operating organizations The following Government departments and professional and industrial organizations were directly represented on the committee entrusted with the preparation of these recommendations: Association of Hospital Matrons
3、 British Cellular Rubber and Plastics Manufacturers Association British Latex Foam Manufacturers Association British Mechanical Rubber Manufacturers Association British Surgical Trades Association (Inc) Federation of British Rubber and Allied Manufacturers Institute of Purchasing and Supply King Edw
4、ards Hospital Fund for London Medical Superintendents Society Ministry of Health Ministry of Public Building and Works National Association of Hospital Supplies Officers Royal College of Nursing Royal College of Physicians, of London Teaching Hospitals Association Independent manufacturers Amendment
5、s issued since publication Amd. No. Date CommentsBS4322:1968 BSI 11-1999 i Contents Page Co-operating organizations Inside front cover Foreword ii 1 Scope 1 2 General considerations 1 3 Vehicle buffering 1 4 Wall protection 2 Figure 1 Examples of methods of buffering trolleys 2BS4322:1968 ii BSI 11-
6、1999 Foreword These recommendations make reference to the following British Standard: BS 2571, Flexible PVC compounds. However careful the staff of hospitals are in the handling of vehicles such as ward and operating theatre trolleys, stretcher trolleys and the like, incidents can, and will, happen
7、when the trolley is in collision with the walls or other parts of the building structure and usually some damage results, either to the structure, the vehicle, or both. The damage can be avoided to a large extent provided that(i) the need for care is continually impressed upon users,(ii) the bufferi
8、ng of mobile equipment is properly designed and(iii) where practicable, equipment is adequately protected. There should always be adequate space to allow full mobility to the vehicle. Care is all-important and good design, whereby projections, etc., are avoided and not merely covered up, is more imp
9、ortant than protection. The correct type and location of buffering on individual vehicles depends so much on their design that it is not a subject that can easily be dealt with in isolation. Clearly it cannot be advocated that trolleys should always have full buffering, because circumstances vary gr
10、eatly. In some existing hospitals, for example, expense has already been incurred on protection of the structure and additional expense on buffering would be wasteful. Therefore any approach to the problem of buffering must deal in general principles. In new buildings adequate buffering at a predete
11、rmined height can be incorporated in the structure to cope with most vehicles and it may even be such that buffering of the vehicle itself is rendered unnecessary, but in existing buildings there is frequently an almost impossible task involved. However, buffering of the vehicle does obviate the nee
12、d for varying heights of protection on the structure to suit different types of vehicle. The following recommendations are made to direct the thoughts of those responsible for coping with these problems towards the various aspects of the matter, with a view to assisting in the formulation of the bes
13、t solution to individual problems. The recommendations are mainly in respect of those items of equipment dealt with in British Standards. Recommendations on other equipment may be added later. In so far as the building structure is concerned, co-operation with the architect and designers, particular
14、ly with regard to details of doorways and corridor widths, is of great importance; the difference between just wide enough and ample width of entry cannot be too strongly emphasized in relation to damage to doors, their frames and walls. The general levelness of the floors can also help the smooth p
15、assage of a trolley along a corridor. Staircases should be bypassed by means of adjacent lifts with ample entry width and protection for the walls of the lift cage. A British Standard does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a contract. Users of British Standards are responsible f
16、or their correct application. Compliance with a British Standard does not of itself confer immunity from legal obligations. Summary of pages This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pagesi andii, pages1 and 2 and a back cover. This standard has been updated (see copyright date)
17、and may have had amendments incorporated. This will be indicated in the amendment table on the inside front cover.BS4322:1968 BSI 11-1999 1 1 Scope 1.1 The scope of these recommendations is confined to buffer-type protection principally relating to British Standard trolleys, but the suggested method
18、s might be adapted to suit other equipment used in hospitals. 1.2 The purpose of the buffering is to give, as far as possible, reasonable protection to the hospital building structure, other equipment and also to the vehicle itself. 1.3 For the purpose of considering buffering the equipment has been
19、 divided into three categories: 1) Fully mobile. This group includes patient trolleys, wheel chairs and similar vehicles moved between wards and other, departments. 2) Semi-mobile. Equipment which is normally wheeled about within a limited area, e.g.instrument trolleys. 3) Stationary. Equipment whic
20、h, whilst on wheels or castors, is not normally wheeled about but is moved for cleaning and repositioning. 1.4 In considering the above it is suggested that the three categories could be further sub-divided into “light” and “heavy” to suit the local conditions and it is readily appreciated that it i
21、s the latter equipment, particularly when fully loaded, which can cause the greater damage upon collision with the walls, doors or each other. 2 General considerations 2.1 One of the principal causes of damage to the building structure is the projections found on mobile equipment. The heavier the eq
22、uipment the greater the damage likely from such projections and therefore they should be avoided in designing. 2.2 The projecting parts are likely to be one or more of the following: castors, axle nuts, wheel brakes, sharp corners on shelves, projection of components attached to a trolley, e.g.a gas
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- BS43221968RECOMMENDATIONSFORBUFFERINGONHOSPITALVEHICLESSUCHASTROLLEYS 医院 车辆 手推车 减震器 推荐 标准 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-544306.html